Presented for your consideration and to spark a discussion. I'm not really sure where I stand on this. On the one hand it's discriminatory on the other there have been women only trips, women only workout areas, women only floors in hotels. women only carriages / rideshares, etc. If those are legal, this should be as well. Women can participate in other trips, which is usually the argument. Additionally, there is the issue of it being a church event. I give that a bit more latitude when it comes to sex based discrimination.
She's an adult. She could agree that only men can be priests for example. When it comes to children though, I tend to look at permanemce as the standard. Raise them in a religion because they can always opt outin the future as they reach adulthood. Ear piercing is problematic, but the holes will close by simply not putting an ear ring in for some time. Circumcisions are irreversable and even if reversable in future, will require surgery and probably would be similar rather than the same foreskin.
Anyway, what are yourthoughts?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2021/03/31/church-fishing-trip-sexual-misconduct/
[–]WingsofSky 24 points25 points26 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Da_Bagelz 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]OkraGarden 15 points16 points17 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]andejoh[S] 13 points14 points15 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]d_nijmegen 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]daisydias 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sandiboijamie 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]UnconventionalXY 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Ody_ssey 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lilkidyunginjr 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DraganTehPro 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Swingstar731 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link