TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Once again, not “denied”, but just goes to show how sexist news providers are.

Shmack3d

December 26, 2019
2112 upvotes
/r/PussyPassDenied
https://i.redd.it/jx1h7k3fwx641.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Once again, not “denied”, but just goes to show how sexist news providers are.
Author

Shmack3d

Upvotes 2112
Comments 81
Date December 26, 2019 8:38 AM UTC
(6 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/PussyPassDenied
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/pussypassdenied/comments/eft3ak/once_again_not_denied_but_just_goes_to_show_how/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/PussyPassDenied/once-again-not-denied-but-just-goes-to-show-how.862263
https://theredarchive.com/post/862263
Red Pill terms in post
provider
Top posts by Shmack3d

Play on words

8882 upvotes
February 22, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

Not “denied”, but just goes to show how sexist news channels are.

384 upvotes
December 26, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

r/therewasanattempt to cry sexism

297 upvotes
January 23, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

The ultimate PPD, by a PO

12 upvotes
January 22, 2020
/r/PussyPassDenied

Comments

[–]eyenetics_ 273 points274 points275 points 6 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Double standards.

[–]Fsck_Reddit_Again 83 points84 points85 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Biased news to fool idiots.

[–]dingoperson2 39 points40 points41 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

The issue is that people here think that "standards" exist.

Standards imply a rule system or underlying principles that are sought consistently applied.

These people are psychopaths, and don't think that way. There is no standards. They have the infinite capacity to invent standards and justifications, but they don't feel any obligation to standards.

If they want to grasp a man's crotch they do it, unless a cost/benefit calculation tells them otherwise, and an hour later they can hold a speech about the horrors of sexual assault. Nothing is real in terms of rules or principles.

I recommend everyone here reading Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky for an insight into the psychopathic mind, and how they think. It's an eye-opener. Short book, online.

[–]some1arguewithme 11 points12 points13 points 6 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Standards imply a rule system or underlying principles that are sought consistently applied

What is women's liberation? Liberation from what? Well traditional gender roles. What is a role? It's a job that has to get done. So traditional gender roles can also be said as traditional gender responsibilities. Women have liberated themselves from all customs, codes, morals, traditions, rules, you name it. Now that women are liberated from all the traditional structures that guided their behavior, how do they determine what's right or wrong? What are the standards?

Let's look at the personality trait "agreeableness". Those people who are high in trait agreeableness conform to the greater culture more stridently than those low in trait agreeableness. When the greater culture is controlled by the media and the universities people who are high agreeableness conform to those lines of thinking.

Women are one standard deviation higher in trait agreeableness so they are easier to culturally brainwash via mass media. Women are also one standard deviation higher in trait neuroticism meaning they are more sensitive to negative emotion. This makes women more easy to culturally brainwash via social media. Social media runs on clicks and the way to get someone to click something is with rage bait. A title or a headline that causes someone to have an emotional reaction to it. Women are responsible for sharing something like 80% of all shares on social media therefore social media gurus aim their rage bait at women to encourage women to click and share. In this way pathological anti-male ideologies that play up to women's natural in-group preference for other women and out-group bias against men promulgate like a fire across the social media landscapes.

Same with pro immigrant Ideologies. Anything that makes the out group appear as an infantilized victim will play well to women whose maternal instincts tilt them towards "empathy" But also making them easily manipulated.

[–]Mild111 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Something Something History Never Something Something Well Behaved Women" -Every trashy feminist on the internet

[–]th_brown_bag 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Citation needed

[–]some1arguewithme 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

on which claim?

[–]th_brown_bag 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Literally every single one would be nice, since you appear to be asserting your opinions as fact; but this one in particular stood out given you seem to be implying you have actual figures to support this

Women are one standard deviation higher in trait agreeableness so they are easier to culturally brainwash via mass media.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Excellent analysis.

Since women are easy to convince, and most media and universities lean left, it's a no brainer to deduce why the feminist sjw stereotype is so spread in our society.

This also explain why feminine men are also so susceptible to be convinced by shitty leftist ideologies.

[–]some1arguewithme 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's worse than you think. There is a positive feedback loop here.

Every major world religion has serious prescriptions on women's behavior, why? Well, Women have different values drives ethics and psychology than men, let me explain.

Women self segregate themselves into feminine agreeableness bubbles. It's no wonder things like women's studies devolved into a positive feedback spiral of idiotic man hating ideology. What else could happen when you pack a class with overly agreeable females who aren't willing to rock the boat. High agreeableness people only like being around other high agreeableness people.

There is a race war going on right now. its not a race war between skin colors or anything like that; it's a race war between people who are high in trait agreeableness and people low in trait agreeableness. When i say agreeableness i'm talking about the personality trait from the five factor model or the HEXACO personality model. Agreeableness as a technical term with a definition. Agreeableness as a behavioral trait that is heritable.

What has happened is that these institutions have been selecting for people with high agreeableness, and people with high agreeableness self select into the institutions. This creates agreeableness bubbles. this is group think. Women's studies suffers from this bias more because women are one standard deviation higher in agreeableness than men. Women's studies classes filled with women who aren't willing to rock the boat, of course they're going to spiral into a positive reinforcement loop into insanity and ideology. no one is willing to stand up and point out how dumb this shit is. HIGH AGREEABLENESS.

Even worse is that this same pathological over selection for agreeableness has spread to almost every institution in our society. These agreeableness bubbles are an OBVIOUS side effect of empowering women who are one standard deviation higher in agreeableness than men. Here is a quote from Dr. Ed Dutton on how women change the institutions they colonize due to women having different values and predispositions than men.

"The universities used to be about nurturing genius. You'd get these, who is it that is geniuses, who is it that solves these amazing problems, people who have outlier high IQ plus moderately anti-social personality. People like James Watson, those people will tend to do what they do because they are highly intelligent so they can really conceive of these difficult problems. They're moderately low in conscientiousness so that means can sort of think outside the box so they're not bound by rules traditions or conformity. They're moderately low in agreeableness so they either don't care that they offend people or they're kinda autistic or a bit spergy and they couldn't conceive that they would offend people even if they didn't want to. New ideas will always offend so they don't care about that so they come up with brilliant ideas. Now women are the opposite of that. Women are the exact opposite of that, they are the opposite of genius. Well, A because women don't have outlier high IQ; the female IQ is bunched towards the mean. And B they tend to be higher in conscientiousness than men and higher in agreeableness than men, so you just DON'T GET many female geniuses. So when they take over university which is happening they will come across as the MUCH better candidate for the job than this kinda autistic wierdo who might if you leave him alone for ten years might come up with something brilliant. Who are you going to employ? Him or this girl who is positive, confident, outgoing... OBVIOUSLY you're going to employ her. So it changes the whole nature of academia. So academia doesn't become about the cut and thrust of debate and harsh disputation to get to the truth, it becomes about cooperating and being kind and creating a bureaucracy where you make incremental steps and publish every so often and this is A anathema to genius types and B very difficult for genius, because they are a bit autistic and will offend people so they get pushed out of uni. and this is happening. " because of women in university they have changed the WHOLE CULTURE of university to make it where TRUTH is plays second fiddle to Cooperating and everyone feeling good and happy and getting along. whereas truth is amoral of course and doesn't care..."

"Female empowerment will make you less harsh to outsiders, more cooperative to outsiders, it will take the institutions of society which have adapted to and elivated the (masculine) martial values which help us survive and it will make those more feminin and kind and loving, and therefor it wont prepare people for the battle that is group selection."

[–]some1arguewithme 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I've made this infographic that might help you understand how enfranchising a population one standard deviation higher in agreeableness and neuroticism will effect the politics of society.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Maps_of_Meaning/comments/e770sa/map_of_biology_and_culture/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

The Head Girl Syndrome - the opposite of creative genius

The ideal Head Girl is an all-rounder: performs extremely well in all school subjects and has a very high Grade Point Average. She is excellent at sports, Captaining all the major teams. She is also pretty, popular, sociable and well-behaved.

The Head Girl will probably be a big success in life, in whatever terms being a big success happens to be framed (she will gravitate towards such aspects of life) - so she might in some times and places make a Good Marriage and do a great job of raising a family; in another time and place she might go to a top-notch college and get a top-notch job - and pursue a glamorous and infertile lifestyle of 'serial monogamy'; with desirable mates.

But the Head Girl is not, cannot be, a creative genius.

Modern society is run by Head Girls, of both sexes, hence there is no place for the creative genius.

Modern Colleges aim at recruiting Head Girls, so do universities, so does science, so do the arts, so does the mass media, so does the legal profession, so does medicine, so does the military...

And in doing so, they filter-out and exclude creative genius.

The genius is pretty much everything the Head Girl is not. He is lop-sided in his abilities - truly excellent at some things or maybe just one thing, he is either hopeless or bored by many others. He won't work hard for long periods at things he does not want to do. He will not gravitate to the prestige areas of life, or cannot or will not do the networking necessary to get-on.

The Head Girl can never be a creative genius because she does what other people want by the standards they most value. She will worker harder and at a higher standard in doing whatever it is that social pressure tells her to do - and she will do this by whatever social standards prevail, only more thoroughly.

Meanwhile the creative genius will do what he does because he must.

The Head Girl will not ever want to alienate potentially powerful allies.

Meanwhile the creative genius is indifferent or hostile to the opinions of others so long as he knows he is right.

The Head Girl is great to have around, everybody thinks she is wonderful.

Meanwhile the creative genius is at best a person who divides opinion, strongly, in both directions - at worst often a signed-up member of the awkward squad.

The more selective the social system, the more it will tend to privilege the Head Girl and eliminate the creative genius.

Committees, peer review processes, voting - anything which requires interpersonal agreement and consensus - will favour the Head Girl and exclude the creative genius.

(Not least because committees are staffed by Head Girls, of BOTH SEXES, who naturally favour their own kind.)

We live in a Head Girl's world - which is also a world where creative genius is marginalized and disempowered to the point of near-complete invisibility.

just wanted to add that one of the defining factors of the west is that we don't just get rid of our geniuses. Most civilizations through history KILL their geniuses. The west, America in particular, has traditionally been just about the only place a genius could thrive. This is all going bye bye due to women's empowerment.

Women's empowerment is destroying our civilization. Most the problems we have stem from women's political enfranchisement. Women gravitate to external locus of control ideology, thinking they are NOT agents and nothing is their fault. This kind of mentality is diametrically opposed to a free and open society. Women vote their temperament and nature. Women's nature is to seek protection and provision. Women have turned the government into big Daddy. The strong independent woman is an illusion of the welfare state. Women have voted in a system where instead of one woman being dependent upon one man through voluntary marriage, all women are dependent on all men through forced taxation.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm really grateful for sharing all this info with me.

Let me share these two videos with you:

https://youtu.be/jQYFVw-s2t0

https://youtu.be/zJV3ionPkhQ

[–]some1arguewithme 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

thanks for sharing, i'll check them out ;)

[–]atryhardrooster1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Bro that’s like calling all high schoolers psychopaths. Being emotionally naive is not the same thing as using people’s emotions to give yourself some sort of control over them. I truly think you are Overestimating the general intelligence of people who write these articles.

[–]dingoperson2 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

if we presume that they were just emotionally immature and not psychopaths, then they were just emotionally immature and not psychopaths

No, most high schoolers wouldn't be retarded enough to do something like this, and would be able to see that this is wrong.

Moreover, if they were actually stupid and not evil, they would commit a whole bunch of mistakes. For example, although the article about men is based on a premise that it's perfectly normal to comment on people's bodies and genitals covered by tight swimwear, they don't declare that explicitly - because then the statement could be turned around to justify doing the same for women.

They just don't commit those mistakes. They are not stupid. They are psychopaths.

[–]ogrelin 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They done did theyselves

[–]RaptorX 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There should be a subreddit just for that

[–]hocrest 72 points73 points74 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Who in the hell considers Cosmo to be a "news provider"?

[–]mrbrianface 23 points24 points25 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

News is quite subjective these days. Just about every news company now presents opinion as fact and you have to figure out if it even happened

[–]DeBasha 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

My thoughts exactly

[–]PadaV4 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

as good as most MSM stuff these days.

[–]PioneerLeviticus 167 points168 points169 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

People who use effing are terrible people and need to grow a back bone. Just say fuck. People who get offended by swear words are morons

[–]redmaster_28273 47 points48 points49 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They would offend their only viewers though...

[–]PioneerLeviticus 16 points17 points18 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I see what you did there

[–]redmaster_28273 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thank you lol

[–]Riverjig 15 points16 points17 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I remember dating a chick in HS. I dropped her off one night and her Dad heard me use the word "hell" and forbid her to see me again. Lol. Needless to say, you can guess how her life went.

[–]haringtiti 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

did she go to hell?

[–]EduBA 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Maybe, but I'm glad to have learned a new word (not American nor resident here).

[–]PioneerLeviticus 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Me neither bud, I'm from the UK. People use it over here aswell though. I recommend not using it

[–]EduBA 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I recommend not using it

I agree.

[–][deleted] 43 points44 points45 points 6 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Comopolitan is just like Huffington post and buzzfeed nothing but a bunch of meth smoking feminists. Their articles are always shit. There's no exception.

[–]Reichbane 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

They aren't feminist though. Feminism recognizes that society treats men with a different set of horrid standards than women, and that men deserve to be free from their toxic macho expectations as well.

Groups like Cosmo and BuzzFeed that have double standards like this aren't practicing feminism, they're failing at practicing feminism.

[–]RedditsBreadNuts 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Enough with the "this isn't feminism argument" just accept that things change, could be for the worse or could be for the better, feminism changed for the worse.

[–]Reichbane -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you only look at the worst parts of a thing it's really easy to believe that. But actual progressive feminists believe, generally, along the lines of what I said in my comment. There are people who call themselves feminists (i.e. "RadFem" and Gender Critical people) that are just categorically doing it wrong.

​

Besides, if you don't engage with anything I said it's really easy to just dismiss my words.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It’s easy to believe because there’s overwhelming evidence it is true, while there’s precious little evidence that your ‘actual progressive feminists’ even exist, apart from you saying so.

This is called pissing on someone’s head and telling them it’s raining.

[–]Reichbane 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

*shrug* we're all going to find the evidence we want to find. You see precious little because your mind is made up about feminism. I find enough because mine is too. In the end it's just about who ends up taking a stance that hurts others the least (in my view, at least).

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well let’s just say all the misandrist not-really-a-feminist feminists tend to get opinion pieces regularly published at media outlets with national and international reach, while the true equality actual-feminist feminists, seem to get published nowhere.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Modern feminism is about hating white men. They seem to excel at this.

[–]Reichbane -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's not, but I can't imagine there's anything I can say to change your mind. I hope you're doing well and can grow past your disdain for equality, my dude.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hold on, your previous post above makes it clear how you define feminism. The guy you responded to has a different definition, which he just gave you, and to my mind us just as valid. You then berate him for not caring about ‘equality’? Seems to me he does care about equality, and its the misandrists at Buzzfeed and similar ‘feminist’ outlets who do not.

[–]Reichbane 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I gotta pick my battles, someone with a post history like his, and a comment like he made, I am not equipped to try to persuade. He wouldn't listen to anything I had to say anyway.

[–]blewpah -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it isn't. Your echo chamber strawman of it is.

[–]S0BEC 19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Cosmopolitan, Huffington Post and Buzzfeed, fucking cancer.

[–]Stabiel 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Fake news providers"

[–]Neehigh 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m sorry, but was anybody actually confused about whether Cosmopolitan was sexist? I thought that was standard knowledge.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

There are entire subs of circlejerking hypocrisy.

r/witchesvspatriarchy

r/twoxchromosomes

I dare any sane person to go in and have a conversation with anyone there. Its fucking hilariously challenging.

[–][deleted] 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Watch out errbody, T_D is leaking carcinogens again.

[–]foleyautist 14 points15 points16 points 6 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Women are pigs

[–]redmaster_28273 19 points20 points21 points 6 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

We're trying to show double standards here, if you stoop to their level we'll be portrayed as sexists

[–]foleyautist 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m fine

[–]USMC-KOS 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago* (9 children) | Copy Link

I get what you’re saying, but just subscribing to this subreddit will do that.

[+]mrbrianface -10 points-9 points-8 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

You’re*

[–]USMC-KOS 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Thank god you pointed that out. I had also neglected to place a period at the end of the sentence. Thank god you were watching!

[–]Flapappel -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, struck a nerve.

[–]USMC-KOS 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Is was triggered

[+]mrbrianface -6 points-5 points-4 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Trying to help you look credible. You’re* welcome.

[–]USMC-KOS 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Your pretty smart

[–]mrbrianface -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Your fragility saddens me, especially on a sub like this.

[–]Existenti4lism 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I love people photoshopping narrative.

[–]USMC-KOS 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m not offended, my insane mother would do the same thing. Thanks helpy helperton

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How is this pussypassdenied?

[–]Itsbilloreilly 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Its not. this sub is shit now

[–]nababaneabs 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn't this go in another sub then?

[–]RadcliffeMalice 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I looked up this double standard and found an article that says its fine to objectify men because it's "fun"

[–]big_red_160 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“This doesn’t belong here but ima put it anyways”

[–]Ipride362 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are those athletes from Bulgearia?

[–]IGotABananaForXmas 2 points3 points4 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is horrible but if it is not denied, don't put it on here!

[–]Moerdac 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Back to the kitchen.

[–]gertrude_is 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not denying it.

[–]bushman_za 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Someone should make a collage of 36 Olympic camel toes that deserves gold lol

[–]You-get-the-ankles 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This shouldn't be here.

Some guys are assholes, some girls are assholes. Yeah...we know.

[–]Treehut16 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That’s just how media is nowadays and its sad to see

[–]TNTorch 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What's particularly interesting is the "men are horrible" post came out 2 years earlier, so the magazine can't even double down and say "well yeah, but we've changed..."

[–]ThisAintItChieftain -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Doesn't belong in the sub. Just an opportunity to bitch and moan about mean women and "news" organizations like...Cosmo? Lol

[–]BiggusDickus-1 points 6 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Yea, this is double standard. But I don't even see why people care so much about "bulge" anyway. We would all be a lot better off if people quit making a big deal out of penis size.

[–]RodneyTheRedBulborb 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i agree with BiggusDickus

[–]throwaway-aa2 -3 points-2 points-1 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This sub has fully jumped shark. Not that I don't enjoy the content but people clearly want this to be more than PPD.

[–]Avante_grande -1 points0 points1 point 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Me after seeing this repost

My upvote: ahh shit here we go again

[–]Itsbilloreilly -4 points-3 points-2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

In what way, shape or form is this a denial?

[–]Nadrojer 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Read title

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter