God agrees

M1GarandDad · 2019-10-31T14:15:28+00:00

inb4 Doobie: "Female genital mutilation is mutilation because there is the word 'mutilation' in it. Circumcision is not mutilation because there is not the word 'mutilation' in it. You are all bigots and perverts."

happyunicorn666 · 2019-10-31T14:26:23+00:00

It'S ParT oF CuLtURe, yOu BigOT!!!

2019-10-31T15:48:12+00:00

Thank you god, very cool

theskullcrusher8776 · 2019-10-31T14:19:58+00:00

There is nothing good with circumsition

Samantha_Cruz · 2019-10-31T14:46:23+00:00

not sure your can cite 'god agrees' since it's pretty clear in the bible that god loves little boys foreskins;

way back in Genesis God tries to kill Moses but Zipporah doesn't want Moses killed, so in Exodus 4 (verses 24 to 26)

24 And it came to pass by the way in the inn, that the Lord met him, and sought to kill him.

25 Then Zipporah took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me.

26 So he let him go: then she said, A bloody husband thou art, because of the circumcision.

So instead of murdering Moses she bribes god with the babies bloody foreskin and all is forgiven because god loves foreskins... especially bloody baby foreskins.

Circumcision however in the US is not religious in nature (although some people try to claim that it is). It was quite rare prior to around 1890 when the idea was popularized as a means to stop 'masturbation insanity' along with a wholesome diet of boring old corn flakes with no sugar.

There were some attempts to claim circumcision cured or prevented some diseases but these claims were based on some pretty dubious research that is largely discredited. It was mostly to stop the 'evil' of masturbation - there was also a push from the same people to remove the female clitoris for exactly the same reason but that never gained as much popularity.

DanteLivra · 2019-10-31T17:56:50+00:00

They hated jesus because he told them the truth.

UnexplainedShadowban · 2019-10-31T19:04:46+00:00

Oy vey, this is anti-semitic!

Gutotito · 2019-10-31T17:19:25+00:00

Not that I disagree, but... eh... isn't he the one who started all this shit?

Thatgirl318 · 2019-10-31T16:37:26+00:00

Sure they both could be considered mutiliation Female genital mutilation in on another level compared to circumcision.

At the lowest level, there’s the clitoridectomy. That’s the complete removal of the clitoris. It’s basically like cutting off the head of the penis (or even the whole thing) considering the number of nerve endings there are.

Then on the next level there’s the removal of the labia. This alone would be comparable to circumcision. Except in FGM it typically happens when their 10 (not a baby) and there’s no anathesia.

At the last level they sow skin over the vagina and the Urethera so she can’t have sex. Everything, period blood, urine, etc, comes out of a small slit at a bottom. On her wedding night, the husband literally has to cut her open so they can have sex. This can create severe medical problems (for obvious reasons).

In the end the closest comparison is removing the head of the penis then sowing the penis onto one of their legs.

RIPOldAccountF · 2019-10-31T17:23:16+00:00

Uhh it started cause of you though

Title	God agrees
Author	m0mmyneedsabeer
Upvotes	345
Comments	41
Date	October 31, 2019 2:09 PM UTC (6 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/dpo2ed/god_agrees/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/god-agrees.865865 https://theredarchive.com/post/865865

Comments