No, the Google manifesto isn’t sexist or anti-diversity. It’s science

tetsugakusei · 2017-08-16T10:47:19+00:00

As gender equity continues to improve in developing societies, we should expect to see this gender gap widen.

Read that twice. In Sweden, as women become wealthier, they are typically choosing female- typical occupations. In India, women cannot follow their desires, and instead work in IT for the money.

MaestroLogical · 2017-08-16T06:50:23+00:00

Usa today had an article proudly christening James Damore (google diversity memo) as being the new alt-right darling...

The ice has cracked. Hold an unpopular opinion and instantly get lumped in as a nazi. We're so fucked.

TheJazzProphet · 2017-08-16T05:46:07+00:00

Wow, did a woman really write that in the Canada Globe and Mail?

Aeponix · 2017-08-15T21:52:31+00:00

This is a great article, thanks for sharing!

More adjulation for science, please!

Awwtist · 2017-08-16T08:47:12+00:00

Facts don't matter when they go against the status quo.

2017-08-16T22:15:28+00:00

Newsflash: People are NOT equal. They never have been. Pretending people are equal creates this precise kind of schizoid dualism wherein we are told that the most important thing is someone exercise their right of choice but then complain when people do not chose as we wish.

mass_romantic_ · 2017-08-16T02:05:45+00:00

Why is this in men's rights? It's about gender distinction and segregation, when we yearn for equality.

Korleonis · 2017-08-16T03:32:59+00:00

I clicked this on to get a better look and the Asian women in the thumbnail. I was sadly disappointed.

Title	No, the Google manifesto isn’t sexist or anti-diversity. It’s science
Author	tonyespresso
Upvotes	365
Comments	19
Date	August 15, 2017 7:51 PM UTC (8 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/6twobg/no_the_google_manifesto_isnt_sexist_or/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/no-the-google-manifesto-isnt-sexist-or-anti.915823 https://theredarchive.com/post/915823

Comments