Why mensrights must be socialist; "the greater the societal inequality and instability, the more the groups on top of society tend to support a hierarchy between groups, protecting their own privileged status.
Is this a joke? Feminism is inherently Marxist/socialist and has been since the mid-1800s if not before. That’s the entire idea—to pool resources so that women need not be tethered to a man (i.e. women deserve free birth control, abortions, healthcare, [college???], etc.).
The entire reason we are in this mess is because “common knowledge” isn’t actually truth, and it turns out that we have inherent biases that cause us to raise women above men, therefor in a socialist society women will be above men…which is almost exactly like what feminist liberalism is doing, is it not? Yes. When people go "I think it would be good to raise children androgynously, that sounds good, that feels right" without measuring reality, then you get this bullshit where boys are doormats and the women are complaining about where are the "real men." Because, at the end of the day, all that hand wringing meant nothing, nothing changed.
You used three disparate examples which all use different metrics which is an incredibly dishonest way to debate. Critiques can be found which show the kibbutz to be inherently feminist, and there is no dictum that states that a successful person in a capitalist society be a capitalist, nor that one on welfare be a socialist.
You seem to be confusing marxism/socialism with fuedalism.
What are you talking about? Are you in high school? Feudalism?
a remarkable idea. I am a Socialist, Smurov.”
“And what is a Socialist?” asked Smurov.
“That's when all are equal and all have property in common, there are no marriages, and every one has any religion and laws he likes best, and all the rest of it. You are not old enough to understand that yet. It's cold, though.”
[–]SantaOrange 11 points12 points13 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ProudandConservative 3 points4 points5 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]heimdahl81 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]omegaphallic 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]DavidByron2 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Mens-Advocate 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]aussietoads 4 points5 points6 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lrellok[S] 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]aussietoads 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lrellok[S] 1 point2 points3 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]aussietoads 2 points3 points4 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]galtthedestroyer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]William__F0ster 6 points7 points8 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lrellok[S] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]galtthedestroyer 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lrellok[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]dfhghdfhgfddgfh points [recovered] (20 children) | Copy Link
Is this a joke? Feminism is inherently Marxist/socialist and has been since the mid-1800s if not before. That’s the entire idea—to pool resources so that women need not be tethered to a man (i.e. women deserve free birth control, abortions, healthcare, [college???], etc.).
The entire reason we are in this mess is because “common knowledge” isn’t actually truth, and it turns out that we have inherent biases that cause us to raise women above men, therefor in a socialist society women will be above men…which is almost exactly like what feminist liberalism is doing, is it not? Yes. When people go "I think it would be good to raise children androgynously, that sounds good, that feels right" without measuring reality, then you get this bullshit where boys are doormats and the women are complaining about where are the "real men." Because, at the end of the day, all that hand wringing meant nothing, nothing changed.
[insert Tobias Funke]
“This time it will be different.”
[–]Lrellok[S] 1 point2 points3 points (19 children) | Copy Link
[–]SantaOrange 1 point2 points3 points (13 children) | Copy Link
[+]dfhghdfhgfddgfh points [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link
Incorrect. Feminist theories and ideas have exists since at least Lysistrata. Stop staring at your navel.
[–]SantaOrange 1 point2 points3 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]aussietoads 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SantaOrange 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]dfhghdfhgfddgfh points [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link
You used three disparate examples which all use different metrics which is an incredibly dishonest way to debate. Critiques can be found which show the kibbutz to be inherently feminist, and there is no dictum that states that a successful person in a capitalist society be a capitalist, nor that one on welfare be a socialist.
[–]SantaOrange 0 points1 point2 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[+]dfhghdfhgfddgfh points [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link
It is inherently socialist and has been tied to maxism since its advent.
[–]SantaOrange 0 points1 point2 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[+]dfhghdfhgfddgfh points [recovered] (3 children) | Copy Link
Any separation of feminism and socialism is academic in nature and not prone to playing out in reality.
[–]galtthedestroyer 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[+]dfhghdfhgfddgfh points [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link
What are you talking about? Are you in high school? Feudalism?
Fyodor Dostoyevsky
[–]Lrellok[S] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[+]dfhghdfhgfddgfh points [recovered] (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes, the piece is clearly satire about the pie-in-the-sky idealism of socialism in the face of raw human reality.
You're using "enquire" to sound smart. Stop being stupid.
By what metrics and vectors? How will this be done? What about other elements of humanity?
[–]Lrellok[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Lrellok[S] -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Satansyngel -2 points-1 points0 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Incident-Pit 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Satansyngel 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Moonvie 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link