TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Tory MP tries and fails to block anti-domestic violence bill with 91-minute speech. The anti-domestic violence bill only assists female victims.

GregDraven

February 25, 2017
91 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/domestic-violence-istanbul-convention-bill-philip-davies-filibuster-parliament-snp-a7597686.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Tory MP tries and fails to block anti-domestic violence bill with 91-minute speech. The anti-domestic violence bill only assists female victims.
Author

GregDraven

Upvotes 91
Comments 24
Date February 25, 2017 9:08 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5w3aay/tory_mp_tries_and_fails_to_block_antidomestic/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/tory-mp-tries-and-fails-to-block-anti-domestic.931174
https://theredarchive.com/post/931174
Red Pill terms in post
domestic violence
Top posts by GregDraven

Father trying to take daughter having a tantrum home, is suspected of and reported as abducting the child. Police visit home to confirm he is the father. How many women do you see leading a child having a tantrum away. I guarantee it's never reported. This was reported because it was a man.

228 upvotes
November 6, 2018
/r/MensRights

So, no men died in the blaze? Or are the 22 men that died in not important enough to talk about?

171 upvotes
November 28, 2017
/r/MensRights

Found in a unisex toilet... Isn't women's poop sticky too?

95 upvotes
June 17, 2017
/r/MensRights

Baby circumcised without parental consent. Police deemed it not to be a criminal matter and social services were not interested. It took 4 years to get justice - BBC News

46 upvotes
June 29, 2017
/r/MensRights

Q raised by my wife in relation to female privelage.

36 upvotes
January 27, 2019
/r/MensRights

A request - please don't post links to the Daily Mail - find an alternative source.

0 upvotes
September 6, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 29 points30 points31 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The man tries hard, he's one of the few but growing number of voices pushing back against political feminism.

Those comments though, Brutus taking one for the team while wrecking faces.

[–]Lethn 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

Even on the fucking headlines they're trying to make it out he's against stopping domestic violence. People look at the headline, what the article says and then read the comments all slandering him and they just assume it's true because it's a 'news source'.

I think one of the best ways we can combat this kind of slander is simply making sure that there are alternative news sources out there that can put a stop to this nonsense like David Rubin and so on.

I actually have a rather sad prediction to make that I've been thinking more and more lately. Because most of my generation has effectively been indoctrinated into behaving this way towards any sort of opposition or debate, I do wonder if it's not going to take 10 - 20 years to fix all this because that's roughly the amount of time feminists and anti-capitalists spent utterly wrecking the education system in favour of this fanatical western-hating man-hating bullshit.

Alternatively, one of the more damaging things that can be done which feminists really hate is using their own tactics against them except of course they do actually hate men so all we need to do is make sure people know just what man-haters they are and put a stop to them. I remember when the whole "Women against feminism" thing started up and they absolutely lost their shit, it's just difficult getting people to even think about that sort of thing because of how fanatical they are.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Flipping the narrative doesn't work usually, they have the Women Are Wonderful effect which doesn't translate over. I have noticed some, minor traction being made, with every major publication putting out hit pieces there will be a few dissenters. The comments are telling too, with more support each time.

I've just about won over my wife, she was a hardcore feminist as of two years ago, I've won every argument and provided facts to every claim, she's already dropped her previous positions and doesn't consider herself a feminist anymore.

I think it's going to take someone with more gravitas than Mr. Davies or Milo (when he used to talk about MRA stuff) to get any real traction. Milo has his gay card but that's not worth much anymore, Davies gets attacked for his prior marriage and weaker stature. Sounds weird but I think a man who is jacked, well spoken, well dressed, disadvantaged, and intelligent is the only way to get past the 'sexist, homophobic, misogynist, etc etc' smokescreen we see from the regular detractors. Davies is laying some serious ground work, I just don't think he can compete against the media disinformation machine.

Kinda went off on a tangent but im on vacay and it's raining, so eff it.

[–]Dembara 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

To be fair, it is technically true. It's a lie by omission, not an outright lie. He is trying to stop a domestic abuse bill. They leave out the fact that the bill only protects a bit over half the victims while fully excluding the other gender.

[–]Lethn 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

If it were just them saying that Philip Davies had blocked the bill then that wouldn't be a problem, but they're all making it out he's some backwards evil racist and misogynist 'Tory' MP which is a blatant lie.

Like I said, they take bills like this, give them names like 'domestic violence' and then use that to shame anybody who tries to criticise it or vote against it. Hence my kicking puppies and toddlers analogy, that is literally what they're doing, they're running to the tops of the towers screaming about how he hates women because it's a domestic violence bill.

I guess for an American equivalent this is a bit like the patriot act, probably one of the most unpatriotic bills produced in recent history and they do that kind of thing to shame people away from voting against it. This was back then though when the christian right and republicans were more prevalent in politics.

I do wonder if frankly Philip Davies should get his own back and start introducing bills of a similar nature, but I wonder with the establishment stacked against him they'll just smack him down even though they're using the exact same tactics.

[–]Dembara 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yes, it is a blatant lie. It also is not false. I agree with you, I just want to make sure we are able to be consistently correct, otherwise people can just point out some small flaw to dismiss us off-hand.

[–]Lethn 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is false because the domestic violence bill that's been talked about here is actually the women's domestic violence bill, but they left that little bit out in order to shame more people into voting for it, so yeah, I'd say it's a flat out lie.

[–]ThirdTurnip 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In Australia our major right-wing (coalition) party pretty much disowns feminism. In every interview of one of their female members that I've seen, they always say they're not a feminist. Pro equality. Not feminist.

Feminists moan about our female Minister for Women not being a feminist.

Though that party was also primarily responsible for the rise and rise of white ribbon here. When they were in office once, the PM decided to go hard for the chick vote and throw tens of millions of dollars at advertising to stop domestic violence against women. But only women. Not men or kids.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Why are males deliberately being left out of it? What are the arguments or rationale?

[–]dontpet 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I've been challenging this issue in New Zealand for some time.

A recent review of our DV support services said that while men do experience DV overall they are less likely to be harmed by it. This is also the justification our ministry of health use for all women being screened for DV when in hospital care but men not.

A very weak argument that demonstrates how little advocacy men have for their care.

You can look at suicide stats and argue that it's only men should be receiving care and interventions due to the greater risk for them. Obviously a callous and unwise position.

It says on our government website that 43 percent of adult family violence deaths are male.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

demonstrates how little advocacy men have for their care.

Nothing new here, sadly, was just looking at Stefan's presentation on the truth about violence, even if he's only right about half of those figures it's looking very dark. (DV https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KgBVedec_0 and V https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw_UlUGoUV4) Is there any sub here on the figures he uses, I'm a little shocked/stunned by them to be honest?

[–]DevilishRogue 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

It was drafted by a female MP from Scotland to ratify the Istanbul Treaty which deals with such issues as FGM and abortion but not MGM or male reproductive rights. The language of the bill was deliberately gender specific to exclude men because the author and the Treaty drafters specifically wanted to exclude men from protection regarding genital mutilation and abortion.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Ok, so can I then file this under something like: Simply the case of a western government honouring an international treaty while at the same time, at any cost, avoiding conflict with religious organisations? And while I'm at it, in the 21 century no less?

[–]DevilishRogue 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well, no, not if you're being honest at least. This is more the case of knowingly and deliberately enshrining unequal protections for women and men and trans-individuals in legislation.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, this is where I'm lost, I simply can't grasp the idea that a western democracy, knowingly and intentionally, brutalize and demoralize half of their subjects. According to Dr. Jordan Peterson there are very little chances of a happy outcome, see history of the 20th century etc.

[–]DevilishRogue 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The Women Are Wonderful Effect in action.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is also lost on me, the end result of taking another round through the 20th century is not just bad for some groups of ppl, man, small wonder Dr. Jordan Peterson is getting a little nervous.

[–]rg57 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have so much respect for this man. At the moment, he is the only politician (on the globe) I have any regard for whatsoever.

[–]thrway_1000 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

http://archive.is/rKFnF

[–]MagicTampon 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Strong Phil Davies!

[–]Badgerz92 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This should still be seen as a win. Don't focus on the DV bill being passed, focus on the fact that an MP just spent 91 minutes defending equal rights for men before Parliament. It's only a matter of time before that spreads.

[–]TejrnarG 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree in principle, but when you look and listen to the cucks in the British parliament, it might still take a while until more hop on board. ; )

[–]jeff_the_nurse 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He's doing all that he can, and he deserves our applause. He also deserves our help.

[–]rg57 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was hoping this was a link to the 91-minute speech itself... does anyone have the video?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter