TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Trump to scrap "Violence Against Women" grants. He can't scrap "Violence Against Men" grants, because there aren't any.

Consilio_et_Animis

January 19, 2017
150 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://thehill.com/policy/finance/314991-trump-team-prepares-dramatic-cuts
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Trump to scrap "Violence Against Women" grants. He can't scrap "Violence Against Men" grants, because there aren't any.
Author

Consilio_et_Animis

Upvotes 150
Comments 65
Date January 19, 2017 9:15 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5ozeoh/trump_to_scrap_violence_against_women_grants_he/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/trump-to-scrap-violence-against-women-grants-he.933714
https://theredarchive.com/post/933714
Top posts by Consilio_et_Animis

Now women can use special apps to anonymously report “harassment” at work. Men won’t even know who their accuser is. Orwell would be proud.

2349 upvotes
February 7, 2020
/r/MensRights

Eton College SACKS English master for producing lecture for older students that questioned the 'current radical feminist orthodoxy'.

1743 upvotes
November 27, 2020
/r/MensRights

There are 4 times as many scholarships for females as there are for males.

1722 upvotes
February 28, 2016
/r/MensRights

Married father of two — a lawyer with a top London law firm — commits suicide after two women make allegations about his behaviour at the office party.

1573 upvotes
December 27, 2018
/r/MensRights

Asian women have now surpassed white men in weekly earnings in USA

1484 upvotes
December 25, 2020
/r/MensRights

Female Feminist Danish Health Minister says that Denmark will continue to circumcisie Danish boys. Previously she was "Minister for Children, Education & Equality". Male Genital Mutilation continues, with the direct collaboration of Feminists.

1319 upvotes
August 13, 2018
/r/MensRights

Huckabee to Washington Post: "Male lives matter". 94% of those killed by police are men.

1189 upvotes
July 11, 2016
/r/MensRights

Girl who cried UVa. gang rape pretended to be her rapist to win a boy, lawyers say. Hundreds of fantasy, fake texts. You couldn't make it up.

1184 upvotes
February 10, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]TedTheAtheist 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm all for scrapping that bullshit. We already have laws against violence.

[–]MattClark0995 25 points26 points27 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Education nominee who dares to mention due process for men accused and won't commit to continuing anti-male Title IX/OCR policy, DOJ nominee who is for the SAVE act (which turns rape allegations over to police instead of being run by kangaroo court) and Trump cutting some of those female only programs.

Feminists aren't going to like him. They'll get a taste of what we had to put up with for the past 8 years.

[–]Singulaire 18 points19 points20 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

past 8 years.

Ha, 8. The US has had laws on the books written by feminists for feminists since at least the 70s.

[–]MattClark0995 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

True, but it's been especially bad these past 8 years. We got something worse than VAWA and I didn't think that was possible.

[–]functionalsociopathy 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (54 children) | Copy Link

1 more day.

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (53 children) | Copy Link

I am hopeful but wary. Obama was supposed to be the messiah and he turned out worse than Bush

[–]TedTheAtheist 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (52 children) | Copy Link

Um, Obama was a lot better than Bush. Obama brought us Obamacare plus a billion other things. Sure, he could have done better, but fuck, Trump looks like he's gonna fuck up a lot of our shit.

[–]ClemsonPoker 22 points23 points24 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Things like the Dear Colleague letter which made college campuses hostile to men. Good riddance.

[+]TedTheAtheist -7 points-6 points-5 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Well, if he did anything like that, then yea... let's get rid of it.

[–]ClemsonPoker 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

If? I hardly see how you could have even a passing interest in the MRM and not know about that.

[–]TedTheAtheist -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

How do you figure?

[–]ClemsonPoker 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

All of the on-campus kangaroo court stories about sexual assault/rape trace back to that letter. It's been one of the biggest ongoing issues in the MRM (and even extends beyond the community thanks to the Rolling Stone and Mattress Girl incidents) for the last few years. I guess it's possible, it just doesn't seem plausible to me.

[–]TedTheAtheist 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I will look into it. My apologies for not knowing sooner. :)

[–]TedTheAtheist 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Do you have a link I can read that discusses the MRA and the letter together?

[–]ClemsonPoker 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A search of this board yields a lot of results:

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/search?q=dear+colleague&sort=top&restrict_sr=on

Here's the NCFM talking about what Trump might do to roll back the overstep: http://www.ncfmcarolinas.com/single-post/2016/11/26/Can-Trump-Undo-Obamas-Title-IX-Tyranny

And I don't know how popular this blog is, but it's another call to rescind the letter from an MRM source: http://mensrightsboard.blogspot.com/2012/06/rescind-dear-colleague-letter.html

[–]PowerWisdomCourage 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's no "if." Then there's shit like this: https://www.aei.org/publication/no-country-for-burly-men/

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Obamacare was shit, though. It didn't help enough people to be considered worthwhile by a broad enough portion of the public. It was mostly a giveaway toward women and old people, paid for by young men who just aren't doing well enough financially to justify it.

There's a reason why the 'typical citizen' in Obama's 2012 campaign commercials was always female--there was no way to claim that Obamacare covered even a tiny portion of what it covered unless the enrollee was a woman.

[–]TedTheAtheist 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But it did help a lot of people. It even keeps kids on until 26. Also, you can't drop someone due to known issues, unlike before.

To tell you the truth, I'd love for medicare to just include everyone. That would be best.

We need to tax corps more like they should, and the rich.

[+]-bach points 9 years ago [recovered] (11 children) | Copy Link

HE BROUGHT US OBAMACARE! Now the poor get free health insurance and the lower middle class get's fined for not being able to afford it.

[–]TedTheAtheist 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Everyone should get healthcare. It was supposed to extend medicare to all, but it kept getting watered down.

[+]-bach points 9 years ago [recovered] (9 children) | Copy Link

*Everyone should be able to afford healthcare.

Everyone agrees that the pre-existing condition clause and being able to stay on a parents insurance plan, is a good idea. Even Trump said so.

But Obamacare is hurting the Middle Class and Lower Middle Class. For a lot of people, they make too much to get Obamacare but make too little to afford health insurance,. So now they get fined for not affording it.

Yes Obamacare helped a lot of people, but it hurt A LOT as well.

[–]TedTheAtheist 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

*Everyone should be able to afford healthcare.

No, really, everyone should get healthcare. We should extend medicare and be done with it. Tax the corps like we should, and the rich more.

[+]-bach points 9 years ago [recovered] (7 children) | Copy Link

You really think it's as easy as giving everyone free health insurance? In a country with 320 million citizens.

Present a reasonable way of doing so.

Many doctors outright refuse to accept people with Obamacare. Even with Obamacare people had their premiums raised by 7%, and it's expected to be raised by another 20% this year.

[–]TedTheAtheist 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

You really think it's as easy as giving everyone free health insurance?

I didn't say free. We'd pay for it with taxes. We need to tax the places that aren't being taxed as much as they should. Many corps aren't even being taxed.

In a country with 320 million citizens.

We can do it.

Present a reasonable way of doing so.

See above. :)

Many doctors outright refuse to accept people with Obamacare. Even with Obamacare people had their premiums raised by 7%, and it's expected to be raised by another 20% this year.

Well, if we all have medicare we'll be fine.

[+]-bach points 9 years ago [recovered] (5 children) | Copy Link

Taxing more doesn't solve the issue of getting the 200+ million people currently with private insurance, on medicare.

You can't get a major capitalist country with 320 million people to have universal healthcare.

When politicians are receiving money from pharmaceutical companies, healthcare companies, top wall street investors, you won't get universal healthcare.

That's one of the major reasons Hillary Clinton was frowned upon, she's been paid so much by big companies and big people that you can barely believe a word she says.

And Trump is worth 3+ billion dollars, he appeared transparent because that we know of, he doesn't receive millions of dollars from big companies to have certain views.

[–]functionalsociopathy 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (25 children) | Copy Link

Can't tell if trolling or just really stupid.

[–]TedTheAtheist 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think you're trolling or stupid yet.

[–]cld8 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (18 children) | Copy Link

Some people care about other political issues besides gender. While there's no doubt that Obama did not serve men well in certain areas, that's not a reason to discount his other accomplishments. Let's try to keep this sub for open discussion rather than turning it into a Republican echo chamber.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Somehow, 'open discussion' means not calling liberals out on their bullshit. But I doubt you'd have any problem with a liberal pointing out the ways in which Republicans are shit.

Obamacare was a shit bill that didn't cover a damned thing, and which acted as a transfer of wealth from the poorest Americans (the young) to the wealthiest Americans (the elderly).

[–]cld8 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Somehow, 'open discussion' means not calling liberals out on their bullshit. But I doubt you'd have any problem with a liberal pointing out the ways in which Republicans are shit.

I have no problem with it either way, but unless it has to do with men's rights, take it elsewhere.

Obamacare was a shit bill that didn't cover a damned thing, and which acted as a transfer of wealth from the poorest Americans (the young) to the wealthiest Americans (the elderly).

r/ politics might be interested.

[–]pprstrt 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"I have no problem with it either way" my ass. You accuse him of trying to turn MensRights into a republican echo chamber and then when he calls out your bullshit you "go high". Man up, get off your high horse, and realize that people don't all hold your same opinion.

[–]functionalsociopathy 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

What accomplishments? Making health insurance costs skyrocket? Shooting race relations to hell and back? I honestly can't think of a single thing he has done that was beneficial to the American People.

[–]darkgatherer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Making health insurance costs skyrocket?

Do you even remember health care costs before Obamacare? There were rising much faster than they were after.

http://www.factcheck.org/2015/02/slower-premium-growth-under-obama/

I honestly can't think of a single thing he has done that was beneficial to the American People.

The people of the country seem to differ greatly with you considering Obama's 60% approval rating.

[–]functionalsociopathy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

For what people are now receiving the price of health insurance has gone up sharply. Just because most people that had family plans lost their insurance and had to replace it with individual plans doesn't mean the price went down. Ex: 1 plan covering 4 people at $200/wk causes a higher average premium than 4 plans each covering 1 person at $100/wk. The family plan would be considered twice as expensive if you look solely at average premiums, but the individual plans are twice as expensive when you look at what has to be paid in for the same coverage. Family plans pretty much went away completely and individual plans have been rising almost to the levels of the old family plans since competition pretty much went away.

As an anecdote, my insurance plan is basically unusable since it covers exactly fuck all and the deductible in well above $10,000, but that doesn't stop the premiums from going up every year. From what I've observed this is the same pretty much across the board for the middle class with the exception of the small percentage(and shrinking) of people that are still full-time employees at their companies.

[–]chocoboat -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Under Obama's term our country saved the American auto industry, killed Bin Laden, avoided financial disaster, saw stock values nearly triple, legalized gay marriage and weed, cut the yearly spending deficit from 1.3 trillion to 440 billion (still way too high, but it's a hell of a lot better than before). And even though Obamacare failed I appreciate that he took action and actually made something happen, we have to make changes in our health care system until we get it right.

Of course there are plenty of negatives too, you don't need to list those for me. Overall a mediocre president who couldn't find a way to get many of his goals accomplished.

But no way in hell is he comparable to Bush's term. The cost of the Iraq war is $2 trillion and counting, and 4486 American soldiers' lives. Tens of thousands of others are alive but fucked up physically or mentally and can't get much help from the VA. You do not invade a goddamn country unless you are absolutely sure it's necessary, and you for damn sure better have a plan on what to do once you've invaded.

Under his presidency the economy drove off a cliff and he was the most dangerous out of control spending president in the history of the world. He took the yearly deficit from $0 to $1.3 trillion, that is absolutely insane, a total disaster. He gave massive tax breaks to the rich and furthered income inequality and shrunk the middle class, and he blocked stem cell research for several years. He screwed up the response to Hurricane Katrina as well.

You want to tell me that some racist SJW whining and a failure to fix health care costs are as bad as all that? I don't think so.

[–]Sinsilenc 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most of the saving was layed in place before obama even reached office...

[–]functionalsociopathy 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The American Auto Industry was already on track to recover at the end of Bush's presidency. Bin Laden was already being hunted by most of the US Armed services and Intelligence services before Obama even got into office. Obama contributed nothing new to the manhunt for him. Obama didn't legalize weed, he just made it not a federal crime. The individual states still have to legalize it on their end for it to be legal in your area. Also, the Supreme Court made gay marriage a thing, not Obama. From the way it was handled it seems like it was just a power play on their part too since they circumvented the Legislative and Executive branches of government.

While stock prices don't actually translate into a better economy let's take a look. Here is what the Dow Jones has been over the past 10 years. If you go from the absolute lowest point it's just short of tripling. If you look at a general overview it's about an 28% increase, which really isn't that impressive when you take into consideration how much stock prices have been rising since the 80s. This also means very little to the middle and lower class since Actual wages have gone down under Obama, and he's done basically nothing to try and fix that problem. So for non-stock brokers and anyone not in the upper class the Obama administration has actually been a negative financially.

As someone that has always preferred Republican candidates over Democratic candidates I'll be the first to admit that Bush was a horrible president. He basically had no control over his administration, lied to the public constantly, and let the CIA get its foot back in the door of the shadow war industry. That being said, Obama was worse. There's no way of knowing if he's in control of his administration or is just a puppet because he tells the public exactly fuck all. The number of troops in the middle east went from 70,000ish to about "fuck if we know". You make it sound like Obama kept his promise of leaving the middle east. He did end the war he turned it up to 11. Between the drone strikes and the troop surges he's been the most warring president since Lincoln. And before you get on the high horse of "Well drones are much more precise than normal troops." No they aren't. Most of the time they're basically dropping a bomb from low orbit. The reason why the Bush administration didn't use more drone strikes is because of the collateral damage involved. They might not have cared much for the Iraqi people, but they at least tried to avoid getting civilians and children in the crossfire.

Bush did indeed double the national debt, and so did Obama. It went fro $6 Trillion to $10 Trillion under Bush to $19 trillion under Obama. He basically continued Bush's work of murdering the middle class through social means this time. 8 years of race and gender baiting as well as him fucking the middle class as hard as he could on insurance. It was almost like a tag team effort between him and Bush. Yes, the response to Katrina could have been better than the federal and state government arguing over who was handling it. Kind of like how Obama's handling of police shootings could have been better than complete radio silence.

Just because you hate Bush doesn't make him a worse president than Obama. Most of us don't like Bush, but Obama is without a doubt the worst president in US history. Bush really had no way of competing for that title once Obama started to double down on everything Bush did wrong and then throw feminist legislation on top of it.

[–]chocoboat -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I didn't say that Obama personally did all of these things alone. He did make the call to take out Bin Laden, which some presidents might not have made. He didn't personally change our laws, but his administration created an environment where it's politically acceptable to question and re-evaluate our positions on gay marriage and the useless war on drugs.

Stock prices certainly don't translate to a better economy, you're right about that without a doubt. Still, stocks doing well during his presidency is a nice stat for him to have.

Obama did not handle the Middle East well (oh look, ISIS exists now). But at least he got most of our troops out and scaled back the massive waste of money and lives over there. There's absolutely no way you can tell me this is worse than making the terrible decision to invade Iraq in the first place.

Same situation with the debt. Bush slammed on the gas pedal with spending, and raised our yearly deficit from $0 to $1.3 trillion. It scaled back during Obama's years, not quickly enough, but back to less insane levels at least. There's no way he could have turned around America's spending habits in a year or two, it takes gradual changes over time.

Both with the Iraq war and the debt, George Bush hopped in the driver's seat, aimed us towards a cliff and slammed the pedal to the metal, then Obama took over and hit the brakes. He didn't apply the brakes hard enough or skillfully avoid hitting bumps in the road, no doubt about that. But you should not blame the mess on the guy who's cleaning up poorly instead of the guy who actually created the mess.

Obama did nothing to help the middle class, continuing the tradition of all of these corporate-owned presidents of the past few decades. No better or worse than Bush there.

Everyone's views are different, I give Obama a C-, maybe you give him an F since you value certain issues differently from me. It only makes sense that people will view him differently. But the Bush administration is the biggest economic disaster since the Great Depression. His reckless spending was a huge threat to the continued safety and well-being of our country, and so was his moronic invasion of Iraq that did nothing but increase levels of Islamic terrorism facing us. Obama didn't create any messes on this massive scale.

[–]functionalsociopathy 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Obama didn't create any messes on this massive scale.

He left a massive power vacuum in the Middle East. We could have easily turned a few of those countries into US territories to avoid groups like ISIS from popping up. In my opinion, leaving those countries alone and letting the cavemen take over in absence of any legitimate leaders was as bad as going into the middle east without fully investigating in the first place.

On the debt. There's a difference between the deficit and the national debt, and there's a difference between those and GDP growth. The deficit compares the difference between how much we import vs how much we export. In that aspect Obama did outperform Bush. On the national debt though, Obama saw Bush's paltry 4 Trillion and raised it 9 Trillion in his term. Combine that with GDP growth under Obama being the worst since Hoover and I'd say it's a fairly safe assessment that as bad as Bush and Obama have been Obama was worse financially.

Obama didn't hit the brakes, he filled the car with explosives and kept it going steady towards that cliff. I'd give Bush an F, Obama would have an F with a note saying to see me after class. Comparatively I would have given Clinton a D, Bush Sr. a C-, Reagan an A-, and Jimmy Carter and F- and a phone call to his parents.

[–]cld8 -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Then you aren't thinking hard enough. Even without getting partisan, I could make a long list of things, but since this isn't a political sub I'll stop right here.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Obama was kind of a lackluster President who didn't accomplish much. Even if I didn't hate him for how he handled the economic 'recovery', I don't see how a case could be made that he managed much at all. Obamacare is a laughable program that costs too much and doesn't cover a damned thing--it's unpopular for very good reasons, not the least of which being that it simply didn't help enough people. He considered the TPP to be the primary purpose of his presidency, and the consensus on free trade just outright collapses during his presidency. The rest was mostly small-ball feminist bullshit.

[–]functionalsociopathy 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Translation: I can't think of anything, but trust me there's totally something somewhere that backs up my argument.

[–]cld8 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Post your question on one of the political subs, send me a link, and I'll be happy to discuss this with you further.

[–]functionalsociopathy 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This IS a political sub though. Mens rights, like any human rights movement, is political in nature.

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well Obama care was immensely beneficial for millions of poor men who previously were left to die of curable diseases. But that doesn't make up for his terrible choices.

Like supporting HRC over Sanders. Sanders could've fixed America. Made it great for the first time since FDR.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't think Obamacare is nearly as robust as some of Obama's supporters generally claim/

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Obama compromised too much and for no good reason without getting nothing in return from the republicans.

Thank the republicans for the failures of Obamacare. They killed it with a death of a thousand cuts. And I'm a Trump voter so no bias.

[–]functionalsociopathy 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

While Obamacare may have helped the most destitute Americans it hurt far more Americans that lost their insurance and raised insurance prices exponentially across the board. Also Sanders was more or less a deranged Marxist that would have torched what's left of our economy.

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well I guess we all have different opinions. Obviously I don't share yours at all.

The ironic thing is Sanders would've easily beaten Trump had HRC not squeezed him out. DNC did themselves in.

Oh well I voted for a wrecker (Trump). Just hope he wrecks.

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Trump is honestly sub 80 iq genuine retarded. I am hopeful that he breaks the system from being too retarded. That's what I'm hopeful for. That's why I voted for him.

The system is a problem and I don't believe it can be reformed. HRC would've continued and worsened the system. Trump is going to break it. Break America.

The outcome I hope for is the reformation of America post Trump.

Edit: Is it not enough that I voted trump, I have to believe in him as well?

[–]TedTheAtheist 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's what I'm hopeful for. That's why I voted for him.

I guess that's as good as any reason. :)

The system is a problem and I don't believe it can be reformed.

Sir, I'm seriously counting on AI in 30 years. We need them to save us from ourselves.

The outcome I hope for is the reformation of America post Trump.

I'll be looking for this. :)

[–]Dnile1000BC 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Wow, could we be witnesses the precipitation of real justice instead of social justice?

[–]TeaspoonOfSuperAids 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Probably not. Conservatives invented chivalry.

[–][deleted] 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

To be fair, some of the VAWA grants are aimed toward especially at risk children, not at women specifically. There are grants for minority kids in Indian bands, kids in a divorce situation, etc. So, there will be some collateral damage. I would prefer an introduction of a neutrality mandate more than I would cuts, to be honest.

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

At this point, I'm perfectly fine with throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

I'm sick of Democrats layering shit and half-way decent things so that we all have to eat shit to get something decent.

[–]Revoran 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Republicans do that just as much. It's called politics, unfortunately.

[–]contractor808 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like programs unrelated to violence against women. If they are effective, they can be reinstated elsewhere.

[–]DougDante 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

VAWA is the law, and I don't see much changing.

Oddly, if feds pull all grants, and states fund them locally, you'll see more discrimination against male victims rather than less. States like Pennsylvania and New Jersey have been shameless about illegal gender discrimination against male victims of domestic violence until the very recent past (thanks, I believe, in part due to our efforts to advocate on behalf of equal justice for those victims)

[–]contractor808 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Taking on a governor/local reps seems much more doable that pursuing action against the federal government.

[–]thrway_1000 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

https://archive.is/biV5X

[–]Rethgil 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hilarious. Yet strangely not mentioned in all the Liberal pro feminism bias reporting lately.

[–]Satansyngel 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wonderful

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do you really think that Trump will push back when so much of the electorate is female? I take that his views are old-school and in his life he must have met many women that were far from angels, but wonder whether he will apply the lessons.

[–]autotldr 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 86%. (I'm a bot)


Two members of Trump's transition team are discussing the cuts at the White House budget office: Russ Vought, a former aide to Vice President-elect Mike Pence and the former executive director of the RSC, and John Gray, who previously worked for Pence, Sen. Rand Paul and Speaker Paul Ryan when Ryan headed the House Budget Committee.

The preliminary proposals from the White House budget office will be shared with federal departments and agencies soon after Trump takes the oath of office Friday, and could provoke an angry backlash.

"The Trump Administration needs to reform and cut spending dramatically, and targeting waste like the National Endowment for the Arts and National Endowment for the Humanities would be a good first step in showing that the Trump Administration is serious about radically reforming the federal budget," said Brian Darling, a former aide to Paul and a former staffer at the Heritage Foundation.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top keywords: budget#1 Trump#2 office#3 cut#4 House#5

[–]dungone -4 points-3 points-2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Talk about finding a silver lining in a shit policy. He's going to use all those "spending cuts" to give tax breaks to greedy rich fucks and spend the rest of your tax money building a fucking wall and handing out kickbacks to cronies. There will be no savings to the average taxpayer. And many of the other things he wants to cut will hurt the economy and cost us far more money than it saves.

Besides, these savings are trumped up bs. Over 10 years? It will take a miracle for this guy to last 4 years in office. We'll see how long any of it really lasts. I don't believe it. Let me know when there's actually a bill to get rid of VAWA just on the principle of it, because it's a discriminatory, biased law.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter