TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Has Tinder really made the modern women this spoiled & entitled?

kluh100

November 3, 2016
18 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.bustle.com/articles/121866-i-swiped-right-on-everyone-on-tinder-for-a-day-and-heres-what-happened
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Has Tinder really made the modern women this spoiled & entitled?
Author

kluh100

Upvotes 18
Comments 59
Date November 3, 2016 9:14 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/5avqri/has_tinder_really_made_the_modern_women_this/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/has-tinder-really-made-the-modern-women-this.938341
https://theredarchive.com/post/938341
Top posts by kluh100

Millennial Entitlement in the workplace leading to a lot of false harassment claims about men?

51 upvotes
January 4, 2017
/r/MensRights

6 Reasons Men Can Literally Never Be Victims Of Sexism

44 upvotes
November 7, 2016
/r/MensRights

"Journalist" basically takes a big dump on all men sports...and its published without consequence.

8 upvotes
November 16, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]IoSonCalaf 17 points18 points19 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I think it's always been that way. Tinder just let it become a lot more obvious.

[–]fengpi 19 points20 points21 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

The author seems like someone who has become stupid-- yes stupid-- from being drunk on her own kind of privilege for much of her life. (And yes, I loathe using the word 'privilege').

She has no clue-- NO CLUE-- as to what it is to initiate a relationship. NONE. Zero. Nada. ничего. 沒甚麼. Bupkis. And when a dude has the temerity to write an (understandably) terse rejoinder borne of someone who is ironizing the fact of always being in the initiator role, she thinks it's some kind of ludicrous atrocity. Oh yes, for a Truly Honorable Man would in no way have less than 100% good-natured reactions to her own self-admittedly unserious behavior in which she jerks people around, not to mention any sexual thoughts whatsoever until after her saintly consent has been enthusiastically bestowed upon him with notarized forms, in triplicate.

Moron. Idiot. Her Highness Princess Clueless of the Duchy of Dumbfuckery. Her Holiness Lady-Pope of the Church of Skull-Fucking Imbeciles.

[–]galtthedestroyer 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You really have a way with words! (sincerely)

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]fengpi 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Then again, this writer could be suffering from the whole "if an attractive guy compliments me its charming, if an ugly guys does it he's creepy" paradox.

It's not really a paradox, is it? It is someone floundering under the weight of overabundance.

There is a stark difference between men's profiles and women's profiles on dating sites.

Men's profiles tend to be introductions with attempts to be interesting, funny and displays of value as well as what they bring to the table.

Women's profiles basically tend to be lists of demands which a would-be suitor must meet. What makes her deserving of a man who fulfilled that list of demands is, naturally, under-developed. In fact, she doesn't even need to spell anything correctly.

[–][deleted] 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't see the profiles of other women, but think on and off maybe I should.

Sure, I put that I want a serious relationship, but that's to avoid wasting both his and my time.

Are they really so bad overall?

[–]fengpi 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

They aren't 100% in the toilet (just as men's profiles are not all 100% thrilling with perfect spelling and grammar), but there really is a difference in tendencies between them, I would say. The different strategies borne of different ease (and different levels of what can only be called "entitlement") is obvious. And we get female geniuses like the above calling men entitled for actually trying to ironize a situation in which everything is lop-sided, for if she possesses mega-entitlement, men must possess ultra-mega-entitlement with spoiled-brattiness sauce on top rather than, say, frustration at needing to climb a mountain that she was born at the top of and is, in fact, rolling stones down upon the stupid creepy fucking losers below (they're probably rapists anyway) as a gleeful cutesie-pooh way to pass the time.

Yes, you may get the occasional "wanna fuck??" message from a moron, but you have not experienced the joy of spending a long time crafting personalized messages to a dozen women every week, trying to show a perfect balance of fun and exciting and attractive and intelligent, only to get no responses, save for a single "U SEEM COOL WHO R U? LOL" message from an account which gets deleted the next day. After 6-12 months of that, it might get a bit tiresome and you might even start complaining once in a while, even though that might be (gasp) unattractive behavior for a man to do. As if displaying attractive behavior without any complaining had worked like gangbusters in the previous 6-12 months. And lay on top of this the useless stupid "advice" for the peasants from Marie Antoinette about how to decorate layer-cakes with artistically-gilded chocolate ganache.

The fact of the matter is, honest women who have attempted to disguise themselves as men and attempted to take-up the male side of courtship end-up being flabbergasted and gobsmacked by how difficult it is (and this is an adventure that our intrepid writer above will most certainly never attempt). Yes, obese and ugly women might have a harder time, but I would argue that an unattractive woman has about as much difficulty as an attractive man does, while still not being expected to buy anything for men, have a decent car to drive the man-around in and make all the first moves.

The whole thing is a one-sided joke and I am very glad I don't have a need to be in that market.

[–]galtthedestroyer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

this. 1000 times this. Women have to be thin and pretty. Men have to be the all singing all dancing date paying monkeys. I'm not claiming either one is worse.

[–]fengpi 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Person A is starving from a lack of bread.

Person B has got way too much bread on their hands and is, frankly, sick of looking at bread, and would really prefer to enjoy a nice slice of apple pie instead.

Both of them have problems. Both are suffering. But who is worse-off? No one can tell.

[–]galtthedestroyer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Well that's almost the comparison from the article, and definitely not the one I made.

Women and men are in the same boat, well equivalent boats. Men's demands aren't written down because they are simple and well known: be sexy. Also they apply before any interaction. We rule out women by disregarding the ones that we don't want. Women have to rule out men after having been contacted. That can be just as tiresome as the mens' situation, but has a huge difference. The attention can overinflate her ego. It can make her think that's she's desirable enough for a better caliber of man than the ones who approach her.

So neither of them is starving. They both just find their selection of bread unsuitable. I didn't go into this much detail before because I'm getting tired of the flame wars that often start.

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Obviously, women do not get everything they want handed to them on a gold platter all of the time. I just find it very very difficult to relate to-- or sympathize with-- the flavor of complaints which emanate most frequently out of that sector.

[–]galtthedestroyer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ugh. Paying for dates is IMO the worst part about our side of things. A woman could literally line up free meals for most of her days just by flirting with strangers. Meanwhile for us dating is like bleeding money.

[–]Throwawayingaccount 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed. When comparing two problems, if one of them has a better result from ignoring the problem, than the other does in best case scenario, I'm disinclined to think they're equal.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's not really a paradox, is it? It is someone floundering under the weight of overabundance.

There is a stark difference between men's profiles and women's profiles on dating sites.

Men's profiles tend to be introductions with attempts to be interesting, funny and displays of value as well as what they bring to the table.

Women's profiles basically tend to be lists of demands which a would-be suitor must meet. What makes her deserving of a man who fulfilled that list of demands is, naturally, under-developed. In fact, she doesn't even need to spell anything correctly.

Please, please make a fake dating profile on a number of websites and put this in there.

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I would get blocked as a creep.

The creepy men are the ones who would dare to tell the truth, and the truth is something that Princess does not need in her life.

It would displease Her.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just make a dummy man account o sites and post that as your "about". Its time to start "displeasing" women with a highly accurate mirror.

[–]mwobuddy 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

in the time before Tinder, do we really think an average looking girl like this could be approached by 41 men in a single day. Ready to shower her with compliments and attention. She needs to quit being appalled by the "creepy" guys showering her with attention and be grateful that this is a power she now holds.

50-70 years ago, yes. And most of the time she'd "swipe left" then as well. Or she'd go in early on the first guy or two that approached her.

Now she swipes left because she KNOWs there's greener grass. Same way with all the divorce initiated by women.

Being attracted to women in today is creepy if you're not suitable. You must put on a show and dance like a good monkey with money in your bank account and a diploma or you're not worth her eggs.

Hyper-hypergamy.

As zoidberg would say: "grrahh?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Why_Must_I_Be_a_Crustacean_in_Love%3F

More advice: "having is not so pleasing a thing after all as wanting."

And if its work at all to have to hit on and be rejected by woman after woman, you have to eventually stop caring about their opinion. It might even make you "misogynist" because you'll stop being bothered by rejection and start viewing them as just obstacles, since they'll shoot you down 9/10 times and therefore you'll have to readjust your feelings and views on women.

[–]fengpi 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Hyper-hypergamy.

Oh no, it is men who are the entitled ones. Entitled to her time and attention. And that is the ultimate offense.

The fact that she feels entitled to the time and attention of 50 Prince Charmings with bulging wallets and high flying careers or (lacking that) inherited status which exists alongside a clearly-delineated mass of 1,000 drooling losers that she can laughingly kick in the balls is, of course, simply what she deserves by dint of being so brilliant, special and humble.

[–][deleted] 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

https://archive.is/IoG3D

The Science of Gawker's Nerd Baiting

About seven different people yesterday directed me to this Gizmodo article, in which a young woman, Alyssa Bereznak recounts a horror story she endured attempting to use OKCupid to find an online date. Fair enough, I thought, but this better be one hell of a story to warrant its own Gizmodo post.

She talks about the pains of being a woman on the site, plagued by horrific and crude messages from guys left and right (something many of my female friends can attest to), and finally she settles on a “normal” sounding suitor. Little did she know, this seemingly cool guy was in fact… A NERD!

Now, I’m not here to debate about just how shallow of a person Ms. Bereznak is, the internet has lambasted her plenty for this. The fact that people can be superficial or stuck in a high school mindset is not news, as it unfortunately happens every day...

Rather, I want to look at the fact that as of the time I’m writing this, that article has 529,280 views. For those of you lacking a frame of reference, that’s an astonishing number, especially for something a mere 12 short paragraphs long.

I think that Alyssa knew EXACTLY what she was doing when she wrote this post. It’s the tried and true practice of online nerd-baiting in order to get traffic, and this, perhaps more than any other example, shows just how well it works.

... Why does this happen? Why would a woman subject herself to be publicly dragged through the mud by the entire male population of the internet? It’s because the life of a freelancer is based around getting hits, as the more you get, the more you get paid. This is especially true with the notoriously sketchy Gawker pay model, and though I don’t know specific numbers, I can safely say that Alyssa is riding a wave of nerd tears all the way to the bank after this post.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Where are these crude messages? Most guys on dating sites are pretty nice and friendly. Where are these hordes of crude, sexist, misogynist men?

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Oh, on the Internet, fools and idiots can be counted-upon to pop-up with a certain regularly. And whatever atrocity they've messaged-- their vile vile deadly words of disrespect-- will then be held-up to the world with quaking outrage as proof that SO. MANY. MEN. are disgusting creepy brutes and that raep kulchir is more rampant than ever before and Seriously You Guys We Really Need To Have A Conversation About Toxic Masculinity In Which Men Hang Their Heads In Silent Shame While Being Screamed-At and the Internet really needs to be censored. The 99 respectful and boring messages will be consigned to the Memory Hole and swiftly incinerated for they are but worthless grains of nondescript sand on an infinitely dull beach.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

That's a tad dramatic.

Here I thought that blocking the assholes would work just as well (reporting profile pics of their dicks though--it's happened a couple times, and not cool. Having a dick, even a pretty one, is the bare minimum). Guess not.

Serious question though. I do feel bad not responding to messages of sweet and respectful men who I am not interested in for whatever reason. I usually just ignore them, but is it better to do that or respond with something and say it wouldn't work out?

And yes, sometimes you know in advance. That's what profiles help with.

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's a tad dramatic.

I tend to use hyperbole for comedic effect.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Oops I didn't edit fast enough. I'll repeat:

Serious question though. I do feel bad not responding to messages of sweet and respectful men who I am not interested in for whatever reason. I usually just ignore them, but is it better to do that or respond with something and say it wouldn't work out?

For some reason men tend to get emotionally open with me even without an intention on either side to date, so I have gotten some insight into their struggles. Obviously nowhere near guys themselves have. So they have told me about online dating experiences.

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I now see you had more to say.

I usually just ignore them, but is it better to do that or respond with something and say it wouldn't work out?

If I were in your situation, I guess I would probably end-up not responding while still possessing an awareness that being someone who never gets a response no matter what they say or do can get tiresome pretty darn quick and expecting them to be good-natured and happy about that every single time is unrealistic.

The fact that you wish to not be nasty in that kind of situation is praiseworthy, in my view.

[–]Throwawayingaccount 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Most guys on dating sites are pretty nice and friendly.

Yeah! Those are the crude, sexist men! The nice guys!

[–][deleted] 11 points12 points13 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Cattiness and the Unselected Man

I don’t understand why public trashing of unworthy men (or men who spurned them) is such an intense passion of young female blogresses; the orgasms of anger and seeking of support from the echo-chamber comments was/is the most pathetic element of whiny Ally McBeal-esque blogs like Lilly, DateMeDC and Diary of Why. My theory is that they were raised to think they would have it all, and commitment from worthy men is the final frontier they haven’t crossed, the one thing that no one can mandate they receive, that no Reviving Ophelia movement or special workplace initiative can give them. I’m loath to scapegoat feminism when Occam’s Razor gives us closer, simpler causes – our increasingly narcissistic, status-obssessed society, and Millenial helicopter parenting that sought to ensure nothing bad would ever happen to them.

In any case, the need to broadcast men’s unworthiness is a weird, vindictive part of the You Go Girl culture – the collective Princess Complex that demands men pedestalize them and grovel to their every whim. It’s not enough for a man to be politely rejected and sent on his way; you have to be humiliated, placed in the virtual stocks so that the world knows the insufferable wrong you’ve inflicted on her by not being good enough for her dreams.

Men who use apps are gross

Over at the Huffington Post, Maxwell Strachan criticizes an app that facilitates the amorous aspirations of “gross” men by automatically ‘liking’ (right swiping) every Tinder profile you come across.

Now why exactly this makes men “gross” in Maxwell’s mind is frankly unclear to me. What this app does — or what any man who ‘likes’ every Tinder profile does, as described in this description of the logic behind this approach in Buzzfeed — is to turn the tables a bit on the classic dating setup and allow the man to be picky. By liking everyone, he doesn’t waste time on evaluating the appeal of dozens or hundreds of women who have no interest in him.

Instead, women are somewhat unwittingly cast in the role of initiator, in that their ‘response’ to the man’s interest is really just a declaration of their own interest which the man in question may or may not reciprocate. Oh noes!!

Men who don’t defer to female privilege are so gross!

Social Media and Female Self-Esteem

Try to picture this life, except with the sex roles reversed. Every one of your trivial observations or random thoughts gets “upvoted”, literally and metaphorically, by throngs of admirers, mostly female but some male too. Your lauded accomplishments amount to sharing cute puppy pics. Say something stupid? No one will call you out on it. Make a lame joke? Everyone laughs uproariously. Post a drunken photo of yourself? Hundreds of chicks “like this” and cheer in unison, “you go, guy!”. Tell no one in particular that you are sad, and you’re having a bad day? Hundreds more line up to offer uplifting messages of support.

You get the idea. Now, what do you think experiencing life like that will do to your self-esteem? If you answered, “my self-esteem would fly through the roof”, you win. Again.

The notion that American women endure the travails of low self-esteem is unmitigated bullshit; mythmaking of the highest caliber. American women, and really most women in post-industrial countries on the downslope into cultural decay, have the opposite psychological condition: TOO MUCH self-esteem.

[–]kluh100[S] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Damn, enlightening!

[–]fengpi 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh and I LOOOVE this. Savor this nuclear-level idiocy:

but I think that men can get away with always swiping right because women are usually less prone to initiating conversation.

"Less-prone." She's absolutely right, "never" truly is "less-prone," much in the same way a ton of bricks is slightly heavier than a chicken feather. She is leaning correctly towards the point. Wildly, absurdly, laughably disproportionately clueless in her characterization, but generally leaning in the direction of the correct neighborhood.

They [men] accumulate a ton of matches, and then at their leisure, go back through them to get rid of those they aren't really into, and start conversations with those they like. When I swiped right on everyone, however, I immediately subjected myself to a high volume of messages I didn't really want to respond to in the first place, so I ended up getting overwhelmed really quickly.

Ohh right. So men accumulate a ton of matches and they can sort through them "at their leisure." Meanwhile, she is flooded with SO. MANY. MESSAGES, a veritable OCEAN. OF. LOSERS and golly gosh darn, no leisure for her! No way she can sort through those! She's got to scrape-away 99.999% of that worthless topsoil to find that rarest of diamonds: a Halfway Decent Man who not only respects her as his equal, but completely blows her away because he's so damn successful, high-status, suave and desirable, perhaps with a castle in northern Italy as a summer home. (She is humble and reasonable in her standards, after all.)

It's just overwhelming for her! She's like the poor, befuddled Soviet visitor walking-in to an American supermarket and gawking at the wall full of breakfast cereals! "How can you choose? How can you choose?" Golly, but surely men enjoy the best of both worlds-- a giant number of choices that they can pick and choose from at their leisure while exerting no effort whatsoever to actually connect to those choices! No hardship for them! No compromising! No hard work required! All they have to do is just swipe-right every single time, eliminate the ones they aren't into, and then start conversations with those remaining! For her? Wow, there's just So. Much. Work.

Relationships "just happen" for her, therefore they "just happen" for men, too! Those free drinks that appear in her hand at the bar? Men must be getting a bunch of free drinks, too! Except they've got it better. They always do, the lucky jerks.

She is the millionaire grousing about how the poor don't need to bother with the inconvenience of using the nearest ATM machine to get more money. She is the celebrity flying-in to the famine zone, hoagie in hand, talking with her mouth full to teach the unwashed emaciated people on how to grill Chilean sea-bass. She is Marie Antoinette expertly commenting on the French peasants' abundance of cake. The filthy shit-stained peons out in the turnip field are oppressing her and laughing all the way to the bank, the lucky bastards.

FFS, it's as if she's been overdosing on Dunning-Kruger Incoherence Pills her entire life!

[–]kluh100[S] 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

She also wasn't brave enough to allow comments on her article, but damn well linked to her relationship podcast.

[–]fengpi 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feel free to send her your love via LinkedIn. There, you can be amazed and astounded by other examples of her mighty brain's literary output.

[–]mwobuddy 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A lot of these creepy-seeming guys were just that, and wasted no time in messaging me things like "hey beautiful" or "ur too pretty to be on this app."

Compliments are creepy. The guys saying it must've been ugly.

[–]fengpi 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

HOW, exactly, a man ought to initiate with her is, naturally, a question she will NEVER be answering because, frankly, uncovering the key that unlocks her interest isn't her job and I doubt she herself even knows what it is.

Though, I'm sure she can come-up with a pretty good list of "400 don'ts" if you gave her 5 minutes.

How to initiate with her would take, perhaps, some kind of preternatural talent and she lacks even the most basic level of self-awareness. I doubt this chick has ever been seriously forced to think in her entire life.

I'm sure her dating advice would be simply "go-up and introduce yourself!" when she knows god-damn fucking well that such an act is functionally meaningless unless you are a publicly-known multimillionaire with a film-acting career. She's never pondered such questions so the answers will naturally come very very easily to her, perhaps with an expert level of ease.

[–]kluh100[S] 12 points13 points14 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It was hard to get through that article.

Average girl "does the unthinkable" swipes right on every guy she sees for 50 times. Gets 41 matches, gets a bunch guys messaging her nice things. She's becomes bitch to all of them.

Why?

Simply put, she believes she deserves better?

That article was some of the worst feminist thinking BS I've ever seen. It basically a girl bullying guys because she can.

Tinder in of itself is an amazing tool for women. At any given moment, with less than 5 minutes of work, they can have 40 or more guys lining up to give them attention, sex, money or anything else they need. Its like we as guys have literally handed them the world on a silver platter.

I can't even blame them for having bloated egos, I would too if I could simply hop on my phone and be able to have sex, get dinner, have my bills paid, or travel to any city in the world for free with minimal effort whenever I wanted!

[–]SurturOfMuspelheim 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I know she only gave two examples - https://lovelace-media.imgix.net/uploads/994/d7fdaa60-66dd-0133-0b8d-0e76e5725d9d.jpg?w=740&h=1314&fit=crop&crop=faces&auto=format&q=70 - but if half of them were like that I could understand. That was some cringey ass shit he said, especially since he said "women" instead of "woman"

[–]fengpi 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ZOMFG SHE WAS SO BRAVE FOR SWIPING THE OTHER WAY!

Its like we as guys have literally handed them the world on a silver platter.

It has always been that way. FFS.

What are you, simple?

[–]fengpi 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's not Tinder wot done it.

[–]Donaldtrumppo 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Wot mr. Skeltal?

[–]majortom22 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This was one giant humblebrag masquerading as an article...

What was she even trying to do again? Just...see to see?

Yeah. Humblebrag

[–]Lice138 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is horrible, some of this shit...

just knew that I couldn't handle getting into an argument with someone who genuinely believes he's entitled to a response from a woman online, so I just blocked him and moved on.

Yes bitch, when you "swipe right" you make an agreement that you two are mutually interested and want to get to know eachother better. This is along the same lines as me saying "I can't believe that women actually feel entitled to communication with men after sex"

A lot of guys who just weren't my type

A common misconception that mostly women make but its fair to say both sexes make. Lets say I really hate greasy food that is covered in cheese and tomato sauce and when asked what type of food I like, I always say pizza. That is about how stupid having a "type" is. Keep perusing relationships with the same type of person and you will keep getting the same results.

All i really got from this article was the fact that she is not as attractive as she thinks she is. In an attempt to show off how attractive she is all the proved was that she could only get all the guys that swipe right no matter what.

[–]theDodgerUk 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm on pof. I have given up on it. I get messages of women

The pictures of my self are doing tough mudders and dressed smart. Also picture of me years ago when I was FAT

THE women that contact me are very below my level, who are 250lbs + with 3 kids

Yes women think they deserve better than they do

[–]kluh100[S] 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Also, just realized that the thumbnail for the article is literally a picture of her profile pic :-/

[–]kutuup1989 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Everyone is shallow ultimately, save for a small number of people. It's just socially acceptable for women to be shallow, whereas men are expected to be thankful any woman shows an interest in them.

[–]kluh100[S] 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The comments in this post are incredibly insightful...just wanted to drop by and say that.

[–]galtthedestroyer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She's no more spoiled or entitled than any other woman in history. She's dealing with the same overabundance that women have always dealt with.

Also, even if she is spoiled or entitled, this post has nothing to do with mens rights.

[–]kluh100[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I think it does. It shows the men are discriminated against, and bullied, simply for showing attention to a woman. In this case one who clearly asked for it.

[–]galtthedestroyer 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But they weren't being discriminated against or bullied. It was nothing more than typical "dating game". That's like claiming that ruling out fat or ugly women is bullying. It's all just bitching about dating.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]kluh100[S] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Typical slightly overweight privileged girl who considers herself enough of an intellectual to be above such superficiality, but does everything possible in her pics to hide her body.

[–]majortom22 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This was one giant humblebrag masquerading as an article...

What was she even trying to do again? Just...see to see?

Yeah. Humblebrag

[–]Meyright -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago* (8 children) | Copy Link

STOP BEING SO SALTY

What is your problem? If you don't like her, don't match her. If you don't like Tinder don't use it. She can do whatever she wants, she is a free human being. She will get the receipt for her actions and attention seaking for sure anyway. So why do you care?

You're a man! You're able to work on yourself, get richer, pump the iron work on your social life to get ahead on the dating market. Women don't have that ability, they're only judged for their appearance, if they're ugly, they're fucked. If they're beautiful they've won. But most of them are somewhere in between. You can be almost anything, but you chose to be a whiner.

Edit: God forbit someone writes something encouraging. "Oh you think I'm responsible for my own happiness on the dating market? Screw you!" This is exactly the behaviour we're blaming feminists for having. Fuck that

[–]fengpi 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

She can do whatever she wants, she is a free human being.

And the same license to do "whatever" allows us to mock her for being a stupid moron. We are also free human beings, see, so that token works for us as well. Isn't that just dastardly?

[–]Meyright -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Of course you can do that, but this would be exactly the reason you're not one bit better then her.

[–]fengpi 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually, I'm arrogant enough to believe that I am a bit better than someone who writes pants-on-head-retarded stuff for a living.

I guess I'm just bad.

[–]bufedad 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Men have problems... Think about the womenz!

[–]Meyright 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Think about the womenz!

No, FUCK HER and her stupid opinion and "problems" and focus on bettering yourself if you're unsatisfied with your dating life. How can you twist my words into that?

[–]bufedad 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You're a man! You're able to work on yourself, get richer, pump the iron work on your social life to get ahead on the dating market. Women don't have that ability, they're only judged for their appearance, if they're ugly, they're fucked. If they're beautiful they've won. But most of them are somewhere in between. You can be almost anything, but you chose to be a whiner.

Yeah... how can I twist your words indeed.

[–]Meyright 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Yeah please tell me? Me telling you that you're awesome because you can work on yourself, which doesn't work the same way for women, and telling you that you just have to stop whining is somehow "think about the womenz"? You're making this up in your head, now go on and continue blaming women for your problems and see how that works out.

[–]bufedad 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah please tell me?

I just did.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter