TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Famous feminist troll, Jessica Valenti leaves social media.

TheHawk71

July 27, 2016
6 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/columnist-quits-social-media-threats-rape-5-year-old-article-1.2728374
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Famous feminist troll, Jessica Valenti leaves social media.
Author

TheHawk71

Upvotes 6
Comments 33
Date July 27, 2016 10:39 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4uxfe5/famous_feminist_troll_jessica_valenti_leaves/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/famous-feminist-troll-jessica-valenti-leaves.944822
https://theredarchive.com/post/944822
Red Pill terms in post
feminismfeminist
Top posts by TheHawk71

When men are raped in prison people make jokes. When a trans-woman was raped in prison it led to a six figure payout.

2303 upvotes
April 19, 2018
/r/MensRights

MRA attorney helping fathers get their drivers licenses back with due back child support

65 upvotes
August 22, 2019
/r/MensRights

Once again unequal punishment for a woman committing a horrible crime. No prison after leaving four children at home while she travelled to Europe.

63 upvotes
April 20, 2018
/r/MensRights

Another day another female teacher rapist!

27 upvotes
January 21, 2018
/r/MensRights

The Red Pill Movie will be in Fairfax, Virginia on November 1st if 90 tickets are sold. Let's do this!

22 upvotes
October 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Article admits the truth about a Title 9 offering special rights and privileges for women.

20 upvotes
May 14, 2019
/r/MensRights

Matt Damon wimps out after speaking the truth

19 upvotes
January 17, 2018
/r/MensRights

Red Pill Movie Fairfax 2 days left

16 upvotes
October 23, 2016
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]omegaphallic 13 points14 points15 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Threating childern is bottom of the barrell stuff.

[–]Leinadro 6 points7 points8 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah that shit isnt cool. Disagree with her material all you want but threats arent the way.

[–]Mens-Advocate 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Do we know there to have actually been a threat? Or do we just have Valenti's word for it?

[–]Lethn 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I try my best not to dismiss these sorts of people off handedly because of the things they say, but why is it we never see actual evidence of these rape and death threats they claim to receive constantly? To put it into perspective, on the other side of the fence, we have anti-feminists and other more moderate voices like Christina Hoff Sommers who do get threats and all kinds of nasty shit thrown at them by feminists and they can easily produce evidence even video evidence of SJWs sending them all kinds of shit so why the fuck can't these feminists?

I try to be empathetic, but thanks to these idiots, however I find it very difficult these days to even take their word for it that something may have at least 'happened'. I think if some cunt did target the child then of course that's disgusting but really? Law enforcement needs to 'get their shit together'?

It's funny how people on the other side of the whole identity politics argument have no problem receiving help from the police when it comes to this kind of thing yet feminists mysteriously never get anywhere going through the usual judicial process.

Valenti didn't disclose the nature of the threats, or whether they were linked to a specific article she had written

Yeah, that's the most telling part of this article and we all know that these people who claim they'll 'quit' social media are full of shit. She'll be back like before except she'll use different mediums to do it like the usual Guardian articles she writes with the comments pages disabled or heavily censored.

This screams to me of the Jess Phillips style of feminist hysteria where she either heavily exaggerates or outright fabricates what's happening to her and their media buddies just play along with it.

[–]Arby01 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, that's the most telling part of this article

No. You can't conclude that at this time. Presumably she has reported this to the police and provided all data. Posting any direct non-vague information at this time would interfere with the police investigation.

[–]Lethn 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Actually, not true, there's nothing wrong with posting the actual information in fact it helps the police not hinder them, while they don't post details of the invstigation itself. They regularly post about what happened and what area it was in and so on along with any details that might actually help the police find witnesses or information about what's happened.

To me, this is another case of feminists who don't act like victims who actually would act in such a situation. When people are confronted with this sort of thing, they want to get the bastard involved as soon as possible, they don't hide away and make wild claims the police aren't doing their jobs while keeping vital evidence hidden.

[–]Arby01 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They regularly post about what happened and what area it was in and so on along with any details that might actually help the police

Yes the police regularly post vague statements to convey what actually happened with particular details that they feel might help them. They don't encourage full disclosure of anything they don't pre-approve of because they think it might help them. In fact, they discourage disclosure of anything by anybody else.

You're trying very hard, but this 'evidence' that you are leaning on proves nothing at the moment.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

On the one hand, threatening to rape a five-year-old is scary stuff.

But on the other hand, she only said she got a threat and didn't show a screenshot of the threat to lend credibility to her claim. She's known for lying to the public.

[–]AntonioGatesMcFadden 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Screenshots mean nothing. I could make a screenshot of /u/Liv47 threatening to rape my granny in five seconds via Inspect Element.

Is it that hard to believe her on this one?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on your level of cynicism, I guess. I've heard too much lying lately. It's hard to tell what is real and what isn't, especially from media outlets.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

All this nonsense can be solved in a simple manner:

There are health & safety laws to protect consumers from potentially damaging products and services. Many of these laws are there to protect people from their own stupidity; and often such people are not the brightest of the bunch and are a bit thick. e.g.: "Drink is Hot" on coffee cups from McDonalds.

Clearly, a minority of people cannot handle social media, and need protecting. So enact a law that says that all social media platforms must have an option to register under your true name with a verified ID and address etc. You must scan your driver's license or passport, and upload a picture of yourself etc., plus proof of address. All this can be done automatically, just as when you join one of the new online banks.

Then any user must be given the option to only interact with other, registered and verified users. So you could only ever see such users posts, and only comment to other, registered users.

Twitter are now moving that way, with anyone able to apply for a blue check-mark, upon proof of ID etc. The vast, vast majority of registered users are unlikely to ever be that offensive, and if they are, they can easily be identified. Suddenly, you can make all your social interactions just like real life — from people you can see as real folks.

And anyone who wants to roll-around in the mud of the wild-west is also free to do so.

[–]maggotshavecoocoons2 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

I would have said the solution was not to threaten to rape 5 year olds.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis -3 points-2 points-1 points 9 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

But that's not a "solution", as some people will never stop being so abusive.

Go and have a look at your front door. It has a lock on it, yes? Same thing.

[–]maggotshavecoocoons2 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Clearly, a minority of people cannot handle social media, and need protecting.

yeah ok so start with fixing your shitty attitude where people threatening to rape your kid is something that a majority of people can "handle".

[–]Consilio_et_Animis -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Oh! OK, amazing... so your front door has no lock on it, because you can't "handle" people threatening to break in and rape your daughter.

Yeah - I don't understand that logic either LOL

[–]maggotshavecoocoons2 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The fuck are you even talking about?

Someone got threats about their kid being raped, you wrote some dumb arse shit about them needing to be coddled.

[–]Consilio_et_Animis 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The fuck are you even talking about?

Logic is not your strong point is it fish-face? 😘

[–]Arby01 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's a really good idea.

[–]fengpi 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In feminist parlance "I hope you die" is considered a "threat".

[–]lostapwbm 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well...bye.

[–]Pornography_saves_li 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Valenti is a man hating bitch, who gives a fuck?

Not me, thats for sure.

[–]aokusman 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sick individuals inhabit the internet. Doesn't change the fact that she is scum.

[–]ThePigmanAgain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good. Now, if only we can get her to leave the planet.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points0 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Can you be called empowered strong woman when words on a internet wall scare you? Maybe Americans have become too soft with creature comforts like the Internet. Maybe look out into the world to see some real scary shit.

[–]Mens-Advocate -5 points-4 points-3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

This woman does not deserve a daughter. So assuming no artificial insemination why did any man give her the privilege of sex?

[–]Ultramegasaurus 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

why did any man give her the privilege of sex?

Because men are way too thirsty. This whole feminist mess wouldn't exist, if men didn't unconditionally venerate women like they do

[–]Mens-Advocate 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exactly. About men's thirst, check out the Baumli/August essay on the desert-rain forest effect in gender relations.

[–]Mens-Advocate 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Haha. No woman has a right to sex, any more than any man. But the downvotes show MRAs just as p-ssywhipped as other men.

In fact no man should agree to sex with a man-hater, just as no black would agree to sex with a Klanner.

A few women have written in the Guardian and elsewhere that they threw mates out of bed for not supporting feminism. So men should throw man-haters out of bed too.

[–]Leinadro 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Haha. No woman has a right to sex, any more than any man. But the downvotes show MRAs just as p-ssywhipped as other men.

Of course no woman has a right to sex but the downvotes arent from pussywhipped mras they are from people who know that that has nothing to do with threatening violence against her daughter.

Look we recognize that feminists threaten people even is mainstream media doesnt. Lets not stoop to their level and act like threats against them are okay.

[–]Mens-Advocate 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Sorry, I disagree with your interpretation for several reasons.

  • I think feminists lie both outrightly and by distortion. True and direct threat is always subject to prosecution; the law can pierce the ISP veil. Thus, if not prosecuted, I assume her claim of threat to her daughter has a good chance of being an outright lie, or otherwise a distortion. True and clear threats are a criminal act she could take to the police.

  • It's likely male public figures, from Milo to O'Reilly to even Farrell, receive nasty comments. I wouldn't be surprised if the men receive nastier comments than the women. But Valenti certainly wouldn't much care about them.

  • Though the daughter is innocent, we should have about as much sympathy for Jessica Valenti herself as she has for us; that is, none. Sorry to seem callous, but being nice has never helped protect men from feminism. In fact, men being nice to feminists is an exercise in masochism and destruction of self-esteem, an accurate way to describe self-destructive white knighting. So, I'm indifferent to Valenti's problem.

  • My post had absolutely nothing to do with the issue of threats or lack thereof; it addressed the fact of an imbalance; men's issues often result in men being punished in their personal relationships, while rabid feminists still find men willing to befriend, make love to, and even support them. Fanatic feminists seem to have no problem getting everything they want, including men to marry them and father their children. Think of Helen Reddy, singing "I Am Woman", then demanding alimony. Or Valenti's hypocrisy, complaining when catcalled, and complaining when no longer catcalled. And men (and society) not only put up with this hypocrisy, but marry it!

  • In fact, Valenti is an extreme hypocrite.
    http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/top-10-feminist-failures-of-jessica-valenti-in-2014/

    Like many feminists, Valenti loves using intimate partner aggression, neglect, and family violence against her own loved ones.

  • As the founder of Feministing, Valenti has done particular harm to men.

  • MRA's in particular should be wary of the "for the children" pretext - the generic social pretext for making men into wage-slaves to women, for alimony, for alimony disguised as child support, for taking away men's homes and reproductive rights, etc.

  • The article itself is completely one-sided, claiming abuse directed particularly at women, and falsely stating Milo abusive, as if these were facts.

  • It's common to hear said a woman "gave" a man a beautiful child. Well, Valenti's child certainly received half her DNA from a father; her husband or other man "gave" her the other half of the child by making love to her, though she deserves no man's attention nor affection.

  • And it's commonly said a man who doesn't support the wife/child well enough doesn't deserve them. Mutatis mutandis, a man-hating woman like Valenti doesn't deserve either a male lover or the child he gave her.

If men boycotted feminists, feminism would disappear.

[–]Leinadro 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think feminists lie both outrightly and by distortion. True and direct threat is always subject to prosecution; the law can pierce the ISP veil. Thus, if not prosecuted, I assume her claim of threat to her daughter has a good chance of being an outright lie, or otherwise a distortion. True and clear threats are a criminal act she could take to the police.

Im willing to give the benefit of tje doubt and say "if its true its not right". Mind you that doesnt mean that her getting such attention means I suddenly jave sympathy for her.

It's likely male public figures, from Milo to O'Reilly to even Farrell, receive nasty comments. I wouldn't be surprised if the men receive nastier comments than the women. But Valenti certainly wouldn't much care about them.

True. But this is wear Ill take comfort in being a better person than her and her ilk.

Though the daughter is innocent, we should have about as much sympathy for Jessica Valenti herself as she has for us; that is, none. Sorry to seem callous, but being nice has never helped protect men from feminism. In fact, men being nice to feminists is an exercise in masochism and destruction of self-esteem, an accurate way to describe self-destructive white knighting. So, I'm indifferent to Valenti's problem.

True she is unsympathetic and a hypocrite. And frankly this is about her daughter, not her. Its not about being noce to feminists its about being against bad behavior. I dont think its a good idea to be okay with a behavior based on a political label.

[–]TheHawk71[S] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As many have pointed out she didn't really point to a specific threat. That doesn't mean that there weren't any but it does make one wonder if it's just more attention seeking b.s.

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Valenti is a fucking liar and a hate-monger. She can fuck herself.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter