https://np.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/4l4bjh/fat_acceptance_has_nothing_to_do_with_feminism/d3k92el

tl;dr someone in TrueOMC argued that most feminists hate fat acceptance and that [sic "feminism used to be about equality but then the crazies took over." I don't entirely disagree (a lot of feminist women I know are quite attractive) but I am trying to argued that the 'crazies' were there from the start, in the ivory towers of academia. That feminism and Marxism have intimate links originating in the Frankfurt school in the middle of last century, that Marxist and feminist beliefs in the Other tie into earlier scholars such Emmanuel Kant and Hegel, that Hegel's dialectical trinity promoted the idea of 'being rather than doing' as a rejection of capitalist modes of production, which (alongside the circular thinking of the dialectic) indirectly fuels a culture of victimhood and hypo-agency, demanding society adapts to us rather than the other way around…which leads to contemporary SJWs, everything-is-hate-speech, safe spaces and so on.

This answer is a little sloppy, can anyone with some good education in these issues help me tighten it up? It started well with some links to essays showing how the likes of Atwood, Dworkon and MacKinnon have been criticising objectification as part of their 'male gaze' theory since the 2nd wave. I found a good essay on how feminism exploited eating disorders to argue that it was primarily patriarchal media beauty standards causing them, as opposed to what we now know to be a but more complex (maladjusted/wounded development during childhood, need to assert control when feeling life is out of control etc.) Then I tried to argue some stuff about participation culture and links between feminism and attitudes to therapy within psychology,and it sort of went downhill into waffle from there. Any tips would be greatly appreciated as I don't want to look like an idiot or more importantly, misinform.

Thanks :)