TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Woman's rights advocate says she cares less about legal justice for rape than "community accountability" for the alleged rapist

thereturnofdoombot2

January 31, 2016
107 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2016/01/30/why-the-jian-ghomeshi-trial-may-change-nothing-for-sexual-assault-survivors.html
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Woman's rights advocate says she cares less about legal justice for rape than "community accountability" for the alleged rapist
Author

thereturnofdoombot2

Upvotes 107
Comments 24
Date January 31, 2016 7:27 AM UTC
(10 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/43i888/womans_rights_advocate_says_she_cares_less_about/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/womans-rights-advocate-says-she-cares-less-about.957307
https://theredarchive.com/post/957307
Red Pill terms in post
feminism
Top posts by thereturnofdoombot2

Woman gets rejected for a job because she wore a t-shirt and was late, complains that it's sexism

967 upvotes
April 17, 2015
/r/MensRights

Canada will not allow single men in as refugees under Trudeau's plan, Canada's feminist PM at work

263 upvotes
November 23, 2015
/r/MensRights

Judge throws out case of man suing a woman for tricking him into fatherhood

73 upvotes
January 17, 2016
/r/MensRights

Even 2nd wave feminists are sick of current feminists' refusal to believe that any false rape accusations could exist

65 upvotes
February 20, 2016
/r/MensRights

Two more accusers speak out about James Deen and get media coverage to try him in the court of public opinion

56 upvotes
December 3, 2015
/r/MensRights

Another porn star comes out to accuse James Deen of rape and of course this makes him guilty in the court of public opinion

55 upvotes
November 30, 2015
/r/MensRights

Feminist says women should not be told to report rape to the police because that is "carceral feminism"

52 upvotes
November 30, 2015
/r/MensRights

Ashley Madison hackers specifically target men, ignore sister site for women, call cheating men "dirtbags"

45 upvotes
August 19, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 38 points39 points40 points 10 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Of course. Who needs real justice when you can have vigilante mob justice?

[–]SimCity8000 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

what is real justice?

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 10 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

I'd say that real justice would be allowing a person accused of a crime to go through the justice system and have a verdict rendered after evidence was provided both for and against trying to prove their guilt.

Realistically it boils down to: if you commit a crime, you are punished appropriately for it. People getting up in arms to consider someone guilty for no reason other than "I said so" or "I feel so" is not fair to the accused and I do not consider that to be real justice.

[–]SimCity8000 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

this works only for crimes that leave evidence. what about the ones that don't? ghomeshi, the subject of the article above, is a perfect example of that.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

If you are raped, you can inform any authority (police, doctors, therapists, etc) and they would advise you to go to the hospital and get a rape kit done to collect physical evidence. If you wait 30 years without telling anyone, what do you expect to be done? I could just as easily claim that I was robbed 20 years ago but do I expect the police to be able to do their job decades later? No.

I believe that every citizen has a duty to report crimes against them as soon as humanly possible. If you do not report your rapist when there is somewhat a chance of building a case against them, you are partially responsible for future attacks because you did nothing.

[–]SimCity8000 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

What about sexual assault such as unwanted touching or fondling? What if the dude inserts his penis inside a woman and doesn't ejaculate? What if that rape kit sits, untested, in a police station? Or in Ghomeshi's case - what if he's kissing you and all of a sudden chokes or punches you or pulls your hair? Hard enough to be assault but not hard enough to leave a mark? There's no rape kit for that. Even if she reports right away, what evidence can police collect?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

These are very good questions and unfortunately if we want to have a justice system that minimizes punishing people for crimes they did not commit, it needs to presume innocence until the crime is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt. If you report a crime (in a timely manner) but there was not enough evidence to convict the person, at least you have done what you can as an individual. The people who are criminals and generally continue with that behavior so one day they will slip up and there will be evidence to convict them. Also keep in mind that even when charges are dropped or there is no conviction, those circumstances are weighed when regarding the history of the accused so simply reporting a crime does help.

[–]SimCity8000 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

To revisit your original question, I think we have established it's hard to apply "real justice" to sexual assault.

Knowing the justice system presumes innocence beyond a shadow of a doubt, we as a society can't expect victims of sexual assault to willingly succumb themselves to a lose-lose situation.

Women, just like anybody, are going to go down the path of least resistance. For most, that means saying nothing and suppressing a bad experience.

Today, when a couple dozen women (in the case of Jian Ghomeshi) or over 50 women (in the case of Bill Cosby) are realizing there are others like them, they are - with the help of a newly created support system - exploring other ways to receive some facsimile of justice.

Is this fair? No. Is it fair that the justice system in it's current state probably can't help them? No.

We live in a messy, unjust world.

I think this is what the voice in the submitted Toronto Star story is trying to say.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree with most of what you just said and at the end of the day, I am not an uncompassionate person. I want real victims to be able to get help when they report a crime and I want a competent and effective justice system. I want to see less false positives (men falsely accused of rape) but I also want to see less false negatives (women who were actually raped but not believed enough by police to begin an investigation, or where evidence which should be valid is inadmissible due to some stupid legal loophole).

How will these goals be achieved? I don't know exactly but I will support efforts made to work toward both of them.

[–]skee_ 19 points20 points21 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Wait a minute. When did we start calling them "woman's rights advocates"? They are feminists, and they are not pro-woman's rights, they are anti-men's rights. I support equal rights, but not female supremacy (including reversing due process), hence I am not a feminist.

Has the term "feminist" become so toxic that they're going to start calling themselves WRA's?

[–]WaitingToBeBanned 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Feminism has been trying to attach itself to other movements and groups for a while now.

[–]IVIaskerade 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Even when it doesn't make sense (atheism, seriously?)

[–]Ibex3D 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where better to find white knights?

[–]Wargame4life 19 points20 points21 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

ok fine, lets first lock her up for 30 years for being collectively responsible for the slave trade, and then after 30 years, another 30 for being responsible for all unjust foreign deaths as a result of american government action or policy.

lock the bitch up make her pay for these crimes as she shares and attribute of the offenders therefore by her own logic is suitable to be punished.

[–]girlwriteswhat 5 points6 points7 points 10 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

This is what "community accountability" looked like less than 100 years ago:

http://www.eachoneteachone.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/lynching-of-Thomas-Shipp-Abram-Smith-in-Indiana_1930--1024x544.jpg

So yes! Let's go there, fuck the courts and fuck due process of law.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

The link is no good on mobile. What is it?

[–]girlwriteswhat 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Black men hanging from a tree in a crowd of white men.

[–]RobDog101 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

*white men and women

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh. Well that sounds about right.

[–]5th_Law_of_Robotics 10 points11 points12 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

“I have no faith in the justice system. So for me, the focus is less on a criminal trial and more on community accountability.”

In Ghomeshi’s case, Lalonde says, it seems the court of public opinion will not be swayed by not-guilty verdicts – people are instead choosing to believe the many women who have come forward. Much of what he has been accused of is not even being addressed in the trial.

“You don’t have to be convicted of a crime for people to believe you are not worthy of a pedestal,” Lalonde says. “Justice for women doesn’t begin and end in a courtroom.”

How does this jive with their claim that false accusations are harmless if he isn't convicted because that stigma doesn't follow you around?

[–]NibblyPig 3 points4 points5 points 10 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It's really depressing to read this stuff about them complaining about women sometimes not being taken seriously due to consenting and regretting it later when it is entirely feminisms own doing. By failing to prosecute people that cry rape for regretting a sexual encounter, the behaviour is normalised.

Some people will be evil and use it to as a tool to ruin a man's life, yes, but that's not the main issue (surprisingly). Others will just think it's normal and cry rape instinctively because they have unhappy feelings about a sexual encounter. What rape actually is is being blurred so much that people without malicious intent will cry it because they've been convinced that's what you're supposed to do. If a woman feels bad about a sexual encounter it is not her fault! It's never her fault! Therefore must be rape.

Someone should make a feminist movement called the accountability movement, that teaches if you want to be a scientist or an engineer then you need to apply, and it's honourable; no-one is going to do it for you. If you have a shitty sexual encounter that was consensual, chalk it up to experience because shit happens. Take some responsibility for everything in your life and you and womenkind will be successful.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Exhibit A: Margaret Thatcher.

[–]bertreapot 4 points5 points6 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Feminist logic is confounding. They claim women don't come forward because they will be treated poorly by the system. So you have all these women claiming rape, yet they won't report it, just because they know they won't be treated well, yet in truth they have no idea how their treatment would be, because they don't bother reporting. Make sense?

Next is not trusting the criminal system when a report is made, because the man will most likely get off, because defense attorneys will look at the complainant's own behaviors to discredit her; and that it is a myth that sometimes women regret sex or are being vengeful. Well guess what, it is not a myth. Sometimes women do regret sex, sometimes they make up a rape to get back at an ex. What feminists have a problem with is the police or defense attorneys actually looking for evidence of this, and finding it. When you have dozens of text messages after the "rape" where the woman is telling the guy how much she loves him, and she only goes to the police after he spurns her advances, then yes, there is a very real chance that the rape was fabricated. Feminists just want all of us to ignore any evidence that might actually not be in the accuser's favor, because that is "victim blaming" somehow.

Lastly the article promotes mob justice. Even if you are cleared of the crime, the feminists don't have to believe it, and they will do what they can in the community to keep an accused man from rebuilding his life. Feminists forget the very real possibility that the accused man may actually be innocent, and when they insist on punishing innocent people, sane people rightly call them out as the irrational, vengeful harpies they truly are.

[–]ABC_Florida 1 point2 points3 points 10 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The trial, beginning Monday with unprecedented media and public attention, will offer an unusual opportunity to scrutinize a system in which sexual assault victims must effectively accept that they will be put on trial in a bid to hold their attacker accountable in a criminal court.

Welcome to the World, Alyshah Snowflake! Do you think there should be a hotline to report rape, and the police would haul the "guilty" directly to prison. And you could also text it? How long do you think due process would last? A year, maybe two? And what would follow? Mob justice. What is mob justice about? Mass of people. And? Physical strength. And who would prevail? The strong ones. You mean the demonized ones with toxic masculinity? Yes. You are a really clever little girl, who wants to build the female version of Afghanistan, that's an F, so sit down!

“Henein, out of any top criminal lawyer, is perhaps most likely to be able to craft a more creative approach to this. It will be interesting to see if she can draw a line between a rigorous defence and a misogynist defence.”

Let's pull the gender card at half distance! So, I assume any female prosecutor or female judge accusing or convicting a male for stealing/robbery/assault/murder isn't simply doing her job, but living her misandric fantasies.

“There has been progression and evolution in our thinking about sexual assault. But I have to say that people have been saying for 30 years that we are undergoing social revolution — or, now is the moment, this is the case that will shift public attitudes about sexual assault,” says UBC law professor Janine Benedet.

...

For example, Alberta judge Robin Camp faces an inquiry after being roundly criticized for his comments in a sexual assault case where he asked the complainant, for example: “Why couldn’t you just keep your knees together?”

The case of Cindy Gladue, an aboriginal sex worker who bled to death in a hotel bathtub in Edmonton after an encounter with an Ontario trucker — who was acquitted — is one extreme example.

Jane Doe, the woman whose rape case in 1986 and ensuing lawsuit led to changes in the way police approach sexual assault cases, swings between the cynical view that this trial won’t be any different from the hundreds of high-profile trials that have gone before and the hope that the public scrutiny it brings could prompt political action.

So they complain about the too little changes made in 30 years, but out of the three examples they choose to portray the problem, one is an idiot judge, one is someone getting away with it, and one from 30 years ago! I think it is a good thing, that they only could come up with one real recent issue. Maybe because there are fewer issues nowadays?

“You don’t have to be convicted of a crime for people to believe you are not worthy of a pedestal,” Lalonde says. “Justice for women doesn’t begin and end in a courtroom.”

Dear Julie Lalonde! If you are interested in how justice outside the courtroom works, please buy a ticket to Kabul! You will see how glorious your coveted justice works. Where the one not put on pedestal and had to defend herself with physical force against huge overpower. Where physical strength = being right. Where chai boys are raped on weekly bases by the police and by soldiers. You know, they have a huge advantage over girls. They won't get pregnant. Hope that would clear your vision about your dreams.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter