TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

New Washington Post poll seems to support the 1-in-5 statistic. Thoughts?

belflandluvr

June 21, 2015
4 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/local/2015/06/12/1-in-5-women-say-they-were-violated/?wpisrc=al_exclusive
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title New Washington Post poll seems to support the 1-in-5 statistic. Thoughts?
Author

belflandluvr

Upvotes 4
Comments 28
Date June 21, 2015 5:55 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3amhaq/new_washington_post_poll_seems_to_support_the/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/new-washington-post-poll-seems-to-support-the-1-in.977063
https://theredarchive.com/post/977063

Comments

[–]iainmf 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Twenty percent of young women who attended college during the past four years say they were sexually assaulted, according to a Washington Post-Kaiser Family Foundation poll.

This is false. The study never asked the women if they were assaulted. The study asked about unwanted sexual contact.

[–]Frittern 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

This sexual assault epidemic theme is certainly well funded. Money for timely surveys with consistent results, that costs "extra $." Give me funds and I can find or create for you a non scientific survey that gives you whatever numbers your looking for. It's all about framing questions and targeting the right population.

Their is money behind all this, real money, slushed through the muddy waters of think tanks and PR agencies. Manufactured consent is real. I'm thinking at least some of that money is from trial lawyer interests, title 9 is creating a fucking never ending gravy train of litigation.

Also where are the people that started this witch hunt hysteria working now. This is how corution in our political system works if you push the correct agenda while in government position you, your're spouse or family members are rewarded with lucrative employment positions, speaking gigs, pulp mill subsidizing publishing deals etc.. So who is writing the checks to the Dear Colleagues author and her cohorts?

I wish I had the time to follow the money on this one because something really stinks about how these is playing out. All the identity politics shit coming out and timed to come to a head during highly contested presidential election cycle.

I'm not a conspiracy fan but I am firm believer in the confluences of interest and a lot of them are coming together on this 1 in 5 thing. Real data real information seldom boils down easy to a easy to digest talking point like "one in five".

[–]belflandluvr[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Would you mind sending me some links about how people could be profiting off this?

[–]ZimbaZumba -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Would you mind sending me some links about how people could be profiting off this?

You are of course kidding.

[–]Kingpink2 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One would have to see the poll questions.

[–]ZimbaZumba 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This just one big pile of dog poo from start to finish. As mentioned above, this is Manufacturing of Consent in action. It illustrates in technicolor every point Chomsky makes.

[–]copsgonnacop 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Let's just look at the first two paragraphs of the article and take them at face value (so not even going into the phrasing of the questions in the survey and the author's interpretation of answers).

Twenty percent of young women who attended college during the past four years say [emphasis added] they were sexually assaulted.

A lot of women claim they were sexually assaulted. That doesn't mean it happened. For starters, any self-defined feminist is likely to answer a poll question affirmatively because they think that sexual assault is a problem and will want any survey to show that. Second, we're living in an environment where women - especially college women - think that everything is rape (if you're drunk it is rape; if you didn't continuously verbalize "yes" it is rape; if you regret giving consent it is rape, etc. etc. etc.) Third, in an anonymous survey, women are likely to use an incredibly broad definition of assault because it has become a status symbol - almost a right of passage - to declare yourself a sexual assault victim.

But the circle of victims on the nation’s campuses is probably even larger.

In other words, we took this survey and are going to report the results, but even we don't believe the results; so you probably shouldn't either.

Many others endured attempted attacks, the poll found, or suspect that someone violated them while they were unable to consent.

"I think I might have been raped"? Isn't that a virtually meaningless response?

Some say they were coerced into sex through verbal threats or promises.

So now "he said he'd love me forever if I had sex with him" is defined as sexual assault. Good grief.

[–]belflandluvr[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

People don't lie about being assaulted due to their ideology. It's ridiculous and even offensive to say that someone would lie about being assaulted because they're a feminist. And you can't say people are reporting just what they believe to be assault, since they were answering specific prompts in the survey, not just a yes or no question about being assaulted.

[–]piemanrises 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

but people may claim that something that is on the verge of things or in a grey area is assault/ rape if their ideology makes them more inclined to treat it as such.

the whole idea of those in the feminist community with a focus on "listen and believe" for example

[–]copsgonnacop 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

People don't lie about being assaulted due to their ideology. 

Can you get me a citation on that?

[–]belflandluvr[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I really think it's your responsibility to prove your allegation that all feminists will lie about being raped than it is mine to disprove it.

[–]ZimbaZumba 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You actually made a definitive statement in response. So where is your citation? Presumably you know of some study that demonstrates people don't lie about being assaulted due to their ideology. Please share.

[–]Jander97 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

People don't lie about being assaulted due to their ideology. It's ridiculous and even offensive to say that someone would lie about being assaulted because they're a feminist.

So women will lie to police and friends and family about rape to save face, or vengeance on an ex, or for an art project... but they won't lie on a survey about sexual assault based on idealogy?

I'm not going to say it influenced the survey results or anything, but don't act like it's not reasonable to question and could never happen.

[–]piemanrises 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

  1. i haven't seen the actual study so i cannot comment negatively or positively about its methodology re reading it. that said the fact they publish snippets of the results without a link to the data and the way it was gathered and sorted is highly suspect. a good survey is always put down on papaer and given in the form of a report including methodology, colection, and then the raw data.

given that they refused to present anything but what they chose to from the survey, its not exactly something i could trust, many people trusted previous surveys but once the methods and the standards of data collection were investigated the whole idea of the stats being in any way scientific just evaporated.

  1. it still deals with peoples feelings and opinions in an area of human life which already has a huge grey area in it, even if the survey was rigorous, people opinions will still cloud the facts when they are asked to give an opinion rather than a factual statement.

all in all, i have no reason to trust this any more than previous statements, but if the report and its methods were published i would have to revisit it.

[–]_visionary_ 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They huge flaw is that it states that if someone says they were raped, that they indeed, were.

We know now from experience of major media rape cases that that's an absurd leap.

[–]belflandluvr[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

For those downvoting: why? The 2007 study was flawed by a bad sample set, but this one has a random sample that seems far more representative.

[–]_visionary_ 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Because it's not simply about "random samples" that make these sorts of anonymous surveys problematic.

User copsgonnacop has a fantastic answer to your question -- not the least of which includes the fact that "claiming" that something happened most certainly doesn't mean it did, particularly in an era where the definition of rape and sexual assault are becoming more and more broad.

[–]xNOM 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

this one has a random sample that seems far more representative

It has a response rate of 8-10%. The ncvs has a response rate of 88% and a sample size orders of magnitude higher than this propaganda poll. The poll questions are also designed crappily. Especially the word "unwanted" which has little to do with the legal definition of consent. The 1 in 5 summary also no breakdown by crime. It is designed to inflate "rape" numbers. The poll is for political purposes only..

edit: added sample size info. See this discussion for a document summarizing all major us rape studies:

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/3aeqbr/national_research_council_panel_goes_over_ncvs/

[+][deleted] 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]thrway_1000 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

And here:

The Post’s New Poll on Campus ‘Sexual Assault’ Is Bogus

[–]belflandluvr[S] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

The author's only arguments are that unwanted sexual contact is (edit: can be) consensual and forced sexual touching isn't assault. Do you agree with these arguments?

[–]bertreapot 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"unwanted" is not the same thing as "non-consensual." This study also conflates drunken sex with incapacitated sex, which is the same problem with earlier studies. If the surveyors wanted honest results, they would use the legal definition of rape and sexual assault, not the over-expansive feminist version. Additionally they wouldn't use compound questions and other trickery that folds in regretted sex with rape.

[–]GenderNeutralLanguag 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

That's just it. Forced sexual touching IS Assault, but NOT rape.

1 in 5 college women will get grouped at a party. This is assault, this is sexual assault. Hell, I'm suprized that the number of women that get felt up at frat parties isn't higher. The problem is that the 1 in 5 "he grabbed her ass" is conflated with the 1 in 1000ish incidents of "he forced her to have sex"

[–]belflandluvr[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

That's what the statistic is, the proportion of women who are sexually assaulted. No one's saying that many are raped.

[–]GenderNeutralLanguag 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But all the activism and advocacy and rules and everything else is about rape. How many "He Grabbed her ass" stories have you seen in the news driving the hysteria supported by "1 in 5"

[–]belflandluvr[S] -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I personally haven't seen much about the new study in the news, but that's not really a criticism of the study itself.

[–]GenderNeutralLanguag 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If you understand what the study is actually looking at and what the study is really saying, then the study is accurate. It's not that the study is flawed, but it uses loaded language to enflame the rape hysteria.

What the study is truly saying is that 1 in 5 women will be in an uncomfortable sexual situation while in college. Phrased this way the reaction is "Yea, so young adults are still discovering their sexuality". Phrased as 1 in 5 women will be SEXUALLY ASSAULTED, you know like raped, while in college is all about fanning the flames of rape hysteria.

[–]ZimbaZumba 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It will soon enough morph into:- 1 in 5 raped and sexually assaulted, as we all well know.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter