Based Milo supports circumcision and defends it with a plea to female desire. Very disappointing.

PM_ME_FOR_SUPPORT · 2015-05-28T17:51:55+00:00

Why are we making choices about infants' future sex lives again?

Ultramegasaurus · 2015-05-28T18:02:54+00:00

Disgusting article.

Fhwqhgads · 2015-05-28T18:10:33+00:00

Milo is overrated.

Fhwqhgads · 2015-05-28T18:35:12+00:00

By his own admission, too much of a pussy to practise what he preaches. If the case for MGM is soo fucking rock solid and the idea so awesome, what are you waiting for Milo?

And I LOVE the excuse 'you don't remember the pain so everything is fine'. That's real ethical. This guy is one of the figureheads of an ethics movement?

Griever114 · 2015-05-28T19:13:05+00:00

What an asshole.

Cantioy87 · 2015-05-28T17:57:22+00:00

This article promotes a great deal of misinformation. It's troubling that the author sincerely promotes genital cutting as a cosmetic choice people should force on their children (the author conflates RIC with genital cutting as a consenting adult throughout).

From article:

"More to the point, I’m not sure it’s consistent with manosphere principles. If “game,” the system by which men on many of these forums say they live in order to attract more and better-looking women, consists of changing your body shape and changing your behaviour, why shouldn’t it include making the best of yourself through a tiny surgical procedure? You lift so your sexual market value goes up, right? You cut your hair for the same reason? Well, getting trimmed down there is just good game, bros."

People all have an opinion about their bodies. The intactivist point is each person should have a say about their body.

not_shadowbanned_yet · 2015-05-28T19:39:20+00:00

I'm finding it harder and harder to believe this dude is really a gay european.

ashlaaaaay · 2015-05-28T18:37:09+00:00

based

more like debased

ThePigmanAgain · 2015-05-28T21:03:13+00:00

It's Breitbart and it's pro-circumcision. Tell me again why i should bother reading this shit?

tygertiger · 2015-05-28T18:01:19+00:00

I'm not going to discredit and disavow the guy because I still think he has a lot of good things to say. He also has a right to his opinion and to express it. I will even acknowledge his acerbic wit in this article. He's a good writer and he's funny. He's done a lot for #GamerGate and fighting Feminism.

This, however, comes across as a screed on his own personal predilections and desires couched in the 'safer' argument of a plea to female desire. He obviously prefers cut penises in his partners but instead of coming out (pun unintended) with it (probably because this is Breitbart) he bases his argument on the foundation of what women want, instead of admitting it's what he wants.

Really very unconvincing, unoriginal, and unethical.

TL;DR: Don't have any heroes. They will always disappoint you.

NotYoursToCut · 2015-05-28T23:27:42+00:00

"It’s not as if women don’t go under the knife to please men."

^ They certainly don't as infants.

I'm just curious if the author would be OK with women having their labia snipped at birth to appease their future male partners. And we all know that women have even MORE folds down there and are MORE prone to infection.

TR6Cool · 2015-05-28T23:04:33+00:00

Thank God I live in Europe.

Only religious nuts circumcise their children here.

NotYoursToCut · 2015-05-28T23:31:19+00:00

"NO ONE WANTS TO LIVE IN A WORLD OF UNCIRCUMCISED PENISES"

Newsflash, Milo: we do. Now go fuck yourself.

xynomaster · 2015-05-28T17:59:03+00:00

breitbart

Does anyone take that site seriously?

caius_iulius_caesar · 2015-05-30T06:11:48+00:00

And you should do it to your newborn sons, too, as early into their lives as possible.

People like this want routine infant circumcision because they like looking at little boys' circumcised penises. It turns them on. (Otherwise they'd let the kid decide later.)

I just wish they'd be honest about it.

LOLer_coaster · 2015-06-02T13:46:15+00:00

Notice how he uses no actual evidence to back up his claims. He mentions penile cancer but says nothing about how likely circumcision to prevent that vs. the risk of complications from the surgery. HIV transmission is brought up, but nothing about simply using condoms is vastly more effective. He brings up the bogeyman of phimosis but makes no mention of how common it is in Europe where the vast majority of men aren't circumcised. These are the sorts of retarded arguments you'd expect to get from a 7th grader.

Title	Based Milo supports circumcision and defends it with a plea to female desire. Very disappointing.
Author	tygertiger
Upvotes	13
Comments	41
Date	May 28, 2015 5:47 PM UTC (11 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/37mb5n/based_milo_supports_circumcision_and_defends_it/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/based-milo-supports-circumcision-and-defends-it.979085 https://theredarchive.com/post/979085

Comments