TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Check Your Privilege, Liberal Women

Samurai007_

March 23, 2015
22 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://www.theblaze.com/contributions/check-your-privilege-liberal-women/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Check Your Privilege, Liberal Women
Author

Samurai007_

Upvotes 22
Comments 47
Date March 23, 2015 4:41 PM UTC
(11 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/300zz5/check_your_privilege_liberal_women/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/check-your-privilege-liberal-women.985107
https://theredarchive.com/post/985107
Top posts by Samurai007_

She Was Caught on Camera Beating Him with a Metal Pole, but He’s the One in Jail after Cops ‘Refused to Look at the Video’

675 upvotes
August 30, 2014
/r/MensRights

50% of married women have a "back-up husband".

141 upvotes
October 2, 2014
/r/MensRights

Men Are Losers, Says New Feminist Campaign

98 upvotes
March 7, 2015
/r/MensRights

MRA's are banned from Posthuman Studio's forum

88 upvotes
June 27, 2014
/r/MensRights

Welcome to Modern Britain Where Sexism is a Greater Crime Than Violent Jihadism

72 upvotes
June 18, 2015
/r/MensRights

CSPAN Q&A w/ George Will, he refuses to back down and instead attacks his critics!

42 upvotes
June 21, 2014
/r/MensRights

Grateful Mom Posts Photo of ‘Stranger’ Playing With Her Adopted Special-Needs Son at Texas Rodeo

41 upvotes
June 18, 2015
/r/MensRights

Rise of the Cultural Libertarians

38 upvotes
August 24, 2015
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]bertreapot 5 points6 points7 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i'd substitute "liberal" for those who buy into identity politics, and the author has the story right. most liberals do buy into identity politics, but for those who don't (I know MRAs are from all over the political spectrum) his critique doesn't apply.

i do like his point that it's pretty crazy to say the president of the united states has no power, nor does oprah, apparently, because of their color. i often compare park avenue housewives with working class white men. according to identity politics, a billionaire woman who never has to work has less power than a white male plumber. clearly that's not true.

[–]solaria_mra 11 points12 points13 points 11 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

As a far-left progressive, I would like to submit my objection to the idea that Azealia Banks is somehow a representative of 'progressives' or even 'liberal women'.

But yes, a lot of what the author writes is decently spot-on, particularly the gender stuff.

[–]Mitthrawnuruodo1337 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I didn't get the impression that he was saying that all liberals are like that, he was just adding that as a category which helps prevent criticism. I think he would contend that is, say Alveda King says something on the verge of crazy and pro-life, there is a pretty significant backlash despite the fact that she is also a black woman. I don't know how true that is or if it is just ideological bias, but from this side of the aisle it sure looks to be a part of it.

[–]eletheros -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

As a far-left progressive, I would like to submit my objection to the idea that Azealia Banks is somehow a representative of 'progressives' or even 'liberal women'.

Far left progressives - and the further left, the more common - regularly excuse both racism and sexism with tired nonsense about how such things against whites and men don't really count.

So your objection really isn't at all meaningful.

[–]solaria_mra 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Lets take a piece of logic all MRAs should be familiar with.....

"'Most people with overt power are men' does not equal 'men, as a class, have most of the power'"

.....and apply it to the current discussion:

"'People who spout insane SJW bullshit are mostly far-left' does not equal 'far-leftists, as a unified ideology, spout insane SJW bullshit.'"

[–]eletheros -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

"'People who spout insane SJW bullshit are mostly far-left' does not equal 'far-leftists, as a unified ideology, spout insane SJW bullshit.'"

The prevalence of SJW bullshit approaches unity as you move further left.

[–]solaria_mra 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

Of course the further you move left the more this is going to be the case. And the further you move right, the more you find racist, paranoid, civil war re-enacting, flat-earthers living in cabins in the middle of the woods with their 25 children all named "Ezekiel" who think that outer space is just a theory. Generally speaking, I try to not judge an ideology by the extreme fringes.

[–]eletheros -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And the further you move right, the more you find racist, paranoid, civil war re-enacting, flat-earthers living in cabins in the middle of the woods with their 25 children all named "Ezekiel" who think that outer space is just a theory

Perhaps in the US, although I'd still argue it. Cruz is damn far right, with a law degree from Harvard.

The thing about the left wing crazies is they're international. They exhibit the same symptoms of white hate, male hate, rich hate, and just generally loving and embracing hate worldwide.

[–]solaria_mra 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I don't consider myself knowledgable enough about non-US politics to comment.....

.....but I am going to take it as an article of of faith that you're referring to ACTUAL white-hate, male-hate, etc, that's displayed by a tiny, insignificant fraction of a fraction of a percent of liberals, rather than taking perfectly reasonable positions and deliberately mis-representing them as white-hate, rich-hate, etc, as conservatives are wont to do.

[–]eletheros -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

but I am going to take it as an article of of faith that you're referring to ACTUAL white-hate, male-hate

Actual white hate male hate etc that's expressed by a HUGE percentage of leftists, who pretend it's not bigotry by rolling some pathetic story about power.

[–]solaria_mra 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ok.

[–]Tzo73 10 points11 points12 points 11 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

Incoming smug liberal comment:

I'm politically and socially a liberal. I really want these conservative papers to stop painting everyone who disagrees with them 'a liberal'. So infuriating. Agreed with everything the dude said and he wouldn't STFU about liberals. This guy doesn't know conservatism from liberalism but he sure knows a lot about tribalism. He also has a point.

[–]CrimsonTideCosby 12 points13 points14 points 11 years ago (22 children) | Copy Link

We all are mature enough to realize where all this "check your privilege" and victim/identity politics nonsense is coming from and it's not conservatives.

[–]solaria_mra 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago* (17 children) | Copy Link

That's absolutely true, but if you go into a conservative space and say something along the lines of, oh I don't know, "America isn't a Christian nation" or "companies shouldn't be allowed to hide taxable income in the Bahamas", a lot of the reactions you're going to get are going to pretty strongly resemble a slightly different flavor of SJW blather.

Is there really much of a difference between "your non-inclusive, heteronormative language is extremely offensive to queer women of color" and "your secular humanism is extremely offensive to men and women of faith"?

I just find that a lot of the fundamental principles informing the behaviors that I object to as a men's rights advocate tend to be pretty darned apolitical.

[–]eletheros 4 points5 points6 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

That's absolutely true, but if you go into a conservative space and say something along the lines of, oh I don't know, "America isn't a Christian nation" or "companies shouldn't be allowed to hide taxable income in the Bahamas",

As someone who has lived in the SFBay Area, California and now lives in a red state stronghold I can state with total confidence that the average red staters care a lot less about me being an atheist than the average bay area person cares about my long list of anti-left crimes, like being male.

[–]solaria_mra 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I'm also from the SFBay Area and now live in a red state. I can also say that people here cared a LOT more about my ex-girlfriend's blackness than people in Cali ever cared about my white, hetero maleness.

;)

[–]eletheros 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not white, although not black, and experienced no such caring.

[–]librtee_com 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is simply much, much more venom coming from the left today than the right.

[–]CrimsonTideCosby 3 points4 points5 points 11 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

a lot of the reactions you're going to get are going to pretty strongly resemble different flavors of SJW blather.

I'm gonna need an example because I'm simply not familiar with this type of reaction. I figure if you said, "companies shouldn't be allowed to hide taxable income in the Bahamas." The response you would most likely get is something like, "people shouldn't feel like they have to hide their taxable income in the Bahamas." What they wouldn't do is take to twitter and try to ruin your life through threats, baseless accusations, boycotts, public shaming, etc.

a lot of the fundamental principles informing the behaviors that I object to as a men's rights advocate tend to be pretty darned apolitical.

I kind of get what you're saying here because I believe most of the fundamental principles informing the behaviors you and I object to are most certainly selfishly motivated. But the ideology that allows for these people to operate in a self-serving manner is that of the liberal left. For example, women pushing for subsidized birth control or Hispanics pushing for open boarders.

[–]solaria_mra 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

I'm at work right now so I'm gonna need a rain check in terms of links to specific examples (although if you wanted to look into Don Wildmon and the American Family Association, that would be a good place to start in terms of the right's "that hurtz my feelerz!! Ban it!!" Tendacies), but I will say that Twitter is stil a mostly-young people phenomenon, so insane Twitter campaigns are going to be a staple of people who are very idealistic and irrational (who are usually liberal-leaning). Conservatives usually take to Fox News for their organized tar-and-boycott campaigns, and have a stronger vaneer of respectability.

[–]CrimsonTideCosby 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Conservatives usually take to Fox News for their organized tar-and-boycott campaigns, and have a stronger vaneer of respectability.

I would argue they have a stronger vaneer of respectability because they will boycott things like Piss-Christ on religious grounds while tumblr "activists" will boycott video games because there is not enough diversity in them or somebody had the audacity to discuss their views on so called rape culture.

I'll look up Don Wildmon though. But at the very least conservatives can somewhat justify their position on religious grounds where liberals are just belly-aching because they feel bad that day/week.

[–]solaria_mra 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

So if Anita Sarkeesian came out and said "Bayonetta is an affront to God Almighty", while Jesse Helms said "Boycott the New York Museum of Modern Art because showing a man submerged in urine is sexist", the former would gain some legitimacy in your eyes, and the latter would lose some?

Whether its because Jesus or because The Patriarchy, it's all the same: "my offended-ness trumps your right to freedom of expression."

[–]CrimsonTideCosby 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I agree.

[–]Samurai007_[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago* (7 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever actually tried going to a conservative forum and seeing the reaction, or are you guessing what it might be? From my experience, posting dissenting opinions on a far-left forum will eventually get you banned and your posts deleted (how long that takes and how much abuse is hurled your way before it happens varies, but it always happens sooner or later), while posting dissenting ideas on conservative forums tends to result in debate that stays (for the most part) at the level of civility you set. People are almost never banned, and they tend to respond with facts and discussion.

PS: I'm agnostic myself but I'd argue America was at least built with Judeo-Christian values, and I'm opposed to forcing companies to have to hide things overseas because of the massive taxes and regulations in the US. If we had easy to understand corporate taxes with few or no loopholes that was competitive with most other nations, there be no reason to hide money overseas. Create incentives and remove disincentives and the money will stay here.

[–]Peter_Principle_ 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Have you ever actually tried going to a conservative forum and seeing the reaction, or are you guessing what it might be?

I have. It wasn't that different, in my experience.

[–]Hatcher 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Normally, I'd agree with you. I'm a little l libertarian, and still read RedState some. I've had a registered account on RedState for many years, but mostly lurked. A couple of months ago, I commented on a net neutrality front page post. It didn't agree with the poster, so he banned me and removed my comment.

I assure you, conservative blogs/sites can be just as closed minded as any other.

[–]Samurai007_[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've never posted at Redstate, so I can't comment on that one. Having been banned from multiple left-wing sites and never from any right-wing site, despite disagreeing with conservatives on several hot-button issues like abortion and being agnostic, I'm going by my own experience and based on the ideology.

[–]solaria_mra 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

I actually haven't tried that on conservative forums, I was referring more to the IRL lines of reasoning involved.

"Liberals want to take 'under god' out of the pledge of allegiance for no other reason than they hate Christians"

.....is fundamentally the same as.....

"MRAs want to give men accused of rape basic legal protections for no other reason than they hate women".

"We can't have gay marriage because that would make Jesus cry"

.....is fundamentally the same as.....

"We can't have a fair family court system because that would make Margaret Sanger's distilled spirit cry".

"Liberals want to tax the rich not because it makes the most sense, but because they want to punish people for their success"

.....is fundamentally the same as.....

"MRAs want to end women-only scholarships not because they're no longer necessary but because they want to hold women down".

I just see it all as being enforced by the same "special snowflake", "I'm personally offended or impacted negatively in some way, therefore you're obligated to change your behavior to accomadate" mentality.

[–]Samurai007_[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

But those are not actual quotes from conservatives (AFAIK), and sound more like what leftists THINK conservatives believe rather than what actual conservatives believe, in the same way that what MRAs actually believe and are fighting for is not what our opponents say we believe or want.

[–]solaria_mra 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

I may have caracaturized the positions, but I think that the way I've presented the conservative arguments is fair.

The conservative basis for opposing gay marriage is usually something like "my church will be forced to recognize unions it finds un-biblical" or "it will undermine a sacred tradition" or something like that. "It will make Jesus cry" is a pretty fair characterization from a satire point of view.

(If you don't feel my assessment of real conservative arguments against gay marriage is accurate, feel free to give me ones you find more acceptable)

Feminists accuse MRAs of wanting to legalize rape and domestic violence against women. That's an insane characterization no matter how you rationalize it.

[–]Samurai007_[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not religious myself, but I've found opposition to gay marriage comes down to 3 main points:

1) It changes the accepted definition, which is to them a holy sacrament, to a new definition that is expressly forbidden and deemed sinful. That change also sets the precedent for further changes, such as polygamy. (If the "man & woman" part of the definition can be altered, it won't be long until the "2 people" part is changed too, and possibly other parts. Considering the family unit is the basic building block of society and we are already seeing drastic declines in marriage, watering down the definition until its a meaningless grouping of 2 or more people of any combination of genders is driving a stake through the heart of the institution's solemnity and sacredness.

2) It might well open them to lawsuits. We have seen freedom of religion under attack in this country and others for decades. From tearing crosses off war memorials to stigmatizing the pledge of allegiance for containing "under God" to lawsuits against bakeries, photographers, wedding venues, and Hobby Lobby, the opponents of religion are growing bolder all the time. Considering how willing people are to repeal or make exceptions for parts of the Bill of Rights they don't like, and the fact that churches are tax-free institutions which gives the govt leverage over them to make changes or else repeal that status, they are right to be concerned. In Canada, judges have already ruled certain passages from the Bible to be "hate speech" and it can be prosecuted if spoken or written in public.

3) Now, the first 2 reasons above can be cause for alarm whether you are a believer or not. This last one requires certain beliefs though, and it is that God may punish the entire country if the sinning becomes too great, like Sodom and Gomorrah.

So, when you said "my church will be forced to recognize unions it finds un-biblical" or "it will undermine a sacred tradition", those are summaries of the first 2 reasons above, while "It will make Jesus cry" is a satirical version of #3. Individuals may believe in some, none, or all those reasons (personally, I think #1 and 2 are valid social and real-world concerns but #3 is far-fetched because I don't believe in a god, so it irked me a bit to see what I feel are real, valid concerns trivialized as "Jesus will cry", which is a satirization of a completely different concern, one that is not commonly shared by all people opposed to gay marriage).

[–]evil-doer -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Its not coming from liberals either. Politics is not a black and white liberal vs conservative. Theres so much more to it.

Democrats for instance are centrist, at best. Hillary and Obama both plot as slightly right leaning in fact, tho quite authoritarian. This seems to be the trend. These people are centrist authoritarians.

I myself am quite a bit further left than most liberals, but because Im very firmly down in the libertarian side of things, I STRONGLY disagree with all of this bullshit. Calling feminists and SJWs far left is inaccurate IMO. They are all over the left right spectrum (I agree left most of the time), but the only certainty is authoritarian.

[–]CrimsonTideCosby 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

the only certainty is authoritarian.

Absolutely true.

My thing is, it used to be conservatives on their moral high horse telling everyone what they can and cannot say etc when the "Religious Right" was big, but now it's self-described liberal progressives. That's all I'm really trying to say.

[–]evil-doer 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Ya, I agree they say they are liberal and progressive, but they literally are not by any definitions! The only thing they are progressing towards is a totalitarian society.

[–]CrimsonTideCosby 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]Lrellok 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

as an anarchist socialist, i would have replied with a picture of a nice erect cis hetro white male genitalia and gone back to working on things that matter.

[–]MattClark0995 -4 points-3 points-2 points 11 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Uh oh you submitted a conservative link on the liberal infested shithole known as Reddit.

Be prepared for incoming smug liberal comments.

[–]solaria_mra 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Somehow I think that the men's rights subreddit is probably safe for moderately right-of-center ideas.

Just sayin'...... Hahahaha

[–]kizzan 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

From talking to many mras, my guys is that many are not liberal.

Edit: my *guess is that...

[–]Samurai007_[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Many are not, but there are some liberals here who, while they've been burned by the feminist ideology in the courts, child custody, divorce, maybe jobs and promotions, etc and have thus seen through it and now are opposed to feminism, they still subscribe to the rest of the liberal ideology. In fact, I'd bet there are still some here who plan to vote for Hillary if she is the Dem candidate, no matter how bad she'll be for men's rights, because they like some of her other positions. I think some of this is due to misinformation (put out by the left) about what conservatives believe in, and why. Maybe Matt Clark and I and some other conservatives here should do an AMA to dispel some of the myths about conservatives so that, even if they remain liberals in all but men's rights, they won't feel so terrible about possibly associating with folks like us (y'know, all us conservatives supposedly want the Earth to burn up, have polluted air and water like some Captain Planet villain, want kids to starve and people to be homeless, want to give tons more money to rich people, want to control women's bodies, etc, etc... none of that is true)

[–]kizzan 2 points3 points4 points 11 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I would imagine there are some liberal mras, but this place is definately not the liberal infested place that /u/MattClark0995 described.

[–]Samurai007_[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This place isn't, but he said Reddit in general is.

[–]kizzan 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Good point. Although I didn't know that reddit was liberal land.

[–]librtee_com 0 points1 point2 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

it's actually roughly half and half, at least here

[–]Samurai007_[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've been proudly out as a conservative online for 17 years, on far, FAR nastier forums than this (Reddit is actually tame by comparison). I was openly liberal before that in my university classes, frequently debating leftist professors and challenging their opinions. It doesn't phase me anymore.

[–]PurpleViolettron -1 points0 points1 point 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That guy is too grating on my brain to read. I'm socially liberal, fiscally/monetarily pretty conservative-leaning moderate.

[–]chavelah -2 points-1 points0 points 11 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Social Media War XVIII: The Hoodrat v. The Homophobe

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter