~ archived since 2018 ~

Are there actual studies concerning this sub that are made in 2020's

puddingdesperation
December 9, 2022
1 upvotes
/r/AllPillDebate

most i see are +10 years old or 2010's at best.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/AllPillDebate.

/r/AllPillDebate archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Are there actual studies concerning this sub that are made in 2020's
Author puddingdesperation
Upvotes 1
Comments 10
Date December 9, 2022 2:48 PM UTC (3 months ago)
Subreddit /r/AllPillDebate
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/are-there-actual-studies-concerning-this-sub-that.1142321
https://theredarchive.com/post/1142321
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/zgz7o0/are_there_actual_studies_concerning_this_sub_that/
Top posts by puddingdesperation

one pill even chad can't escape: agepill

11 upvotes
December 9, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate

Why are guys on incels is or looksmaxx so mean to unnattractive women?

9 upvotes
December 4, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate

what do guys you know that could get girlfriends, or are ''chads'' like?

2 upvotes
December 9, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate

why are men not nichemaxxing?

2 upvotes
December 11, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate

not a pill discussion, but random something i found

2 upvotes
December 9, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate

80/20

2 upvotes
December 4, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate

chadcopers explain:

1 upvotes
December 4, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate

ı'm 50 kg and 161 cm, should i usamaxx to find simp provider bf?

0 upvotes
December 12, 2022
/r/AllPillDebate
Comments

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump 1 point2 points  (6 children) | Copy Link

Why does it even matter? Society doesn't change that fast. A study that's 10 years old is as valid today as it was then unless you can find a newer one that contradicts the old one.

This "that study is old" is a wussout tactic by people who have nothing else to counter with.

[–]puddingdesperation[S] 0 points1 point  (3 children) | Copy Link

It does change, there sure as hell weren't as many people whining about ''hypergamy'' in 2008. Technology does change society in a far faster rate than before.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump 0 points1 point  (2 children) | Copy Link

Whining? Well that shows your bias.

I'm gonna repeat - if you're going to challenge a study based on its age, then post a contradicting newer study. Show the change of which you speak. Otherwise there's no reason to take that challenge seriously.

[–]puddingdesperation[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

this is my complaint itself, there's no new study being made abıut a lot of data mde in 2000's.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

Why would they make new studies when nothing has changed? Humans will always be humans.

[–]Siukslinis_acc 0 points1 point  (1 child) | Copy Link

The COVID quarantine had a big influence and change to society (like a lot of places allowing you to work from home, restaurants and shops adapting to delivery, so you can do be a functional member of society without having to go outside your home). One of the more noticeable effects can be seen in children socialisation.

[–]RatDontPanicAverage Unfrustrated Chump 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

It didn't do much for men's and women's preferences. If it did then post the study that shows it. Otherwise "it's an old study" is an empty comeback.

Basically, show the contradicting study!

[–]RedditsOlderBrah -2 points-1 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes. You can actually go to Google scholar and restrict results to time periods.

They absolutely exist, but they constantly shit all over the echo chamber formed in subs like these so they have to removed from context or straight up lied about. Also, presenting better evidence to the contrary of these 'findings' will cause the incel to reject the academic findings because they are no longer convenient to the pity party making the whole endeavour pointless. Reactionary positions are fundamentally anti-science.

[–]AutoModerator[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

your post has been flaired as kokopost because you are /u/kokorwqac

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]FortniteAbobusWhitePill 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

r/BlackPillScience/

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter