I am amazed at the people here who can't do anything other than talk about their own personal experiences. Many Blue Pillers' arguments boil down to

"I'm not like that"

"My friends aren't like that"

"The people I know arent like that"

If you cannot accept general statements about sexuality, mating, dating, men, women, and people, if you cannot accept generally true statements, then there's no way anyone can discuss anything and there's no way anything can truly be known.

Most people are coming here talking about things that are generally true. The few of you who try to extrapolate your own experience to the entire world.... I don't know what to tell you.

Look, people:

--looks and physical appearance are important, in fact they're paramount now, for men and for women

--women prefer men who are taller than they are

--looks>game>status>personality>money

--most men are not attractive; while most women are attractive enough

--most women can get sex anytime they want

--most men cannot get sex anytime they want

--most women cannot get commitment from the attractive men they want; so they have to settle for less attractive men who will commit

--when women are freed up to do so, they generally pursue a dual mating strategy of AFBB: Chasing the most attractive men for sex both for fun and enjoyment and in the longshot hopes of locking one of those men down for commitment; and then when it fails (as it does 90% of the time), settling for a much less attractive man in exchange for immediate all-in commitment of the man's resources BEFORE sex happens. Alpha fucks for as long as she can pull it off; beta bucks when it fails.

These things are generally true. If they were not generally true, there would be no "pills" and no need for any discussion of intersexual dynamics. There are things that can be known about sex and human sexual behavior. It's not complex, it's not unknowable, and it can be generalized about. If you can't accept that and speak in generalities about human sexual behavior, I don't know what you're doing here.

And why is it that some of you reject the anecdotal and lived experiences of the men who comment and post here? Are you truly unable to accept anything unless there's a "study" to support whatever proposition or assertion is being made? Are you unable to accept any statement unless there's a double blind random controlled peer reviewed study published in NEJM or JAMA about it? Is anecdotal evidence just useless to you unless you, personally, experienced it? Do you have to have a study tell you what basic observable reality is?

(Oh the irony - this from the same blue pillers who lectured us "well, can't you just look around and SEE what's going on? Can't you see who's getting laid and who's not? Can't you just figure it out? Do you have to have everything spelled out for you??" Now that we're coming to them and saying "yeah, we figured it out", they're saying "well, you can't say that unless you have a study or "science" to support it! You can't rely on your own eyes! You can't rely on your own lived experience! You can't rely on what other people have told you! You can't rely on what you've seen and what women are doing right in front of you! If it's not in a "study" or "science", it's not true!!" Sheesh.)