Modern politics are largely about group interests. Men evolved to compete to the death, we compete as groups against other groups and as individuals against the members of our own group. As such, we are inherently disadvantaged in a battle of group interests.

As more and more men are living miserable, lonely lives barely worth the effort invested, our long term impact might depend on if we can unite behind shared goals.

For that, and this is the main point of this post, your other individual quirks are hinderances which are to be temporarily discarded if you want a chance at winning.

If you lean left or right politically and that prevents you from cooperation with your opposition, that is 50% of men you can no longer ally with.
Old or young.
Sub3 or Sub5 or just autistic.
High testosterone macho or effeminate twink.
Blue collar or White collar or NEET.
Race, class, looks, wealth, political orientation, interests, personality...
By the time you have removed all the men you can't personally stand, there no longer are enough individuals left to get up to relevant numbers.

I don't care if you hate each other or if you are gonna smash your heads in if you ever meet in person, but when it comes to anything that relates to male group interests, you can either start lowering your standarts for what kind of men you cooperate with or continue to get rolled in the political arena.

We are working around / against our own innate natural instincts when we try to collectivise. It's not gonna feel right and it's not supposed to. If you only follow your base instincts, it will never happen. Instead, it will require concious effort and a widely spread awareness for why it is necessary to group up amongst men. Awareness is spreading in tandem with our misery and isolation. But the effort will still need to be exerted by each men individually.

In a sense, I can understand male feminists that rat out their own sex in hope of a crumb of societal approval or female affection. They might simply have felt that their own interest group wasn't strong enough to protect them or offer them anything of interest, so they aimed to become part of a collective that could.

The first goal should be to have men's plight acknowledged by the wider public and to force them to accept that the root causes are innate to human/female nature and the modern dating market. Once our status as unfairly+innately disadvantaged is accepted by society at large, we become eligible for sympathy and also for societal support, whatever form that might take. Any attempt to make modernity a better place for men to live in will have to succeed as part of it, not outside of it. We need to change societies perception of what constitudes an acceptable reaction to our situation and this requires strenght in numbers.

So w/e you think of others on a personal level, each man and sympathetic woman is a potential political ally. Don't push them away because you can't control your emotions. Instead, welcome whomever offers to join the team the best you can, collect some convincing stats, calm yourselfs, then go out there and convert more people.