~ archived since 2018 ~


November 2, 2022
post image

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill content, including various subreddits and blogs. This post has been archived from the subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry.

/r/EverydayMisandry archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

Post Information
Title Utopia
Author Entire_Friend_1056
Upvotes 86
Comments 18
Date November 2, 2022 10:12 AM UTC (4 months ago)
Subreddit /r/EverydayMisandry
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/utopia.1138435
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/yk18uk/utopia/

[–]TheLWMA 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m pretty sure if men vanished, then humanity would be screwed because… ya know, how would you sustain a population without breeding?

[–]ijustdontcare74 24 points25 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Nope. Without men to do the hard work, the human race dies out within a generation, probably a lot less.

[–]DouglasMilnes 39 points40 points  (4 children) | Copy Link

Women don't pass inequality legislation, men do. Women's voting record on laws for equality is worse than men's and feminists in particular regularly oppose equality measures.

In proportion to when women have been leaders of nations, those nations are more at war than when men lead nations, and female leaders are more inclined to start wars.

Communist countries kill off more of their own population than any other form of despotism. Sharing everything you have earned sounds great when you are a bottom feeder but not for anyone else.

Women are the majority of abusers of children. Statistically, the most dangerous place place for a child is inside its mother's womb. The next most dangerous is inside a single-mother home.

Women use more resources and consume more goods than men or children. Women spend around 70% of disposable (dual) income and are the least likely to choose a product in the shop by its environmental impact.

Utopia? The commies have been trying to sell us on that idea for a century and it has never worked.

I wish there was an island that all women who wanted to live without men could freely move to: it would be hell on earth but at least the rest of us, normal people, could live without the misandry.

[–]vaaralinen 14 points15 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

normal people, could live without the misandry.

I wish. A significant amount of men would support them and only start hating other men more lol

[–]devasiaachayan 14 points15 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Agreed with everything until you said Communism is when sharing

[–]DouglasMilnes 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah, that does depend on your definition of communism; another response was that there hasn't been a communist country! Each to their own..

[–]ThrowAway640KB 8 points9 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Communist countries kill off more of their own population

Correction: authoritarian, totalitarian, & fascist countries.

There have been very few implementations of communism that came anywhere close to the technical/structural definition of it. Top-down command-and-control (USSR, China, etc.) violates communism quite severely.

Most “communist” countries have been as close to actual communism as North Korea or East Germany (DDR) have been “democratic”. As in, not in the least, and not to any rational or reasonable definition that a mentally coherent person would use. These countries were communistic in name only, in reality they were oligopolies that served to keep an entrenched elite in power, just like any feudalistic monarchy.

Women are the majority of abusers of children.

Boys under the age of 15 have a greater chance of being raped by an adult woman, than women over 40 are at risk of being raped by an adult man.

Statistically, the most dangerous place place for a child is inside its mother's womb.

Up to 80% of all fertilized eggs fail to develop into a full-term baby by entirely biological reasons. In the complete absence of BC, most “abortions” (rejection of the implanted zygote) aren’t even noticed by the woman, as it happens within the first month and gets flushed via the menses.

If you want to point to the world’s most prolific abortionist, point at God.

The next most dangerous is inside a single-mother home.

This is 100% true, and is supported by CDC data and other widely-respected data sources.

[–]Sinistaire 9 points10 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny how misogynist utopias are built on slavery, but feminist utopias are built on genocide.

They're both horrible, but even the patriachy still sees women's lives as more valuable and less disposable than men's.

[–]mcdeadeddy1 12 points13 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Whoever wrote that has no idea what they’re talking about, they think it would be a utopia but in reality it would be the opposite

[–]YesAmAThrowaway 3 points4 points  (2 children) | Copy Link

Wasn't there some country's episode of some show where they put two groups on islands, divided by male or female, and they had to bring the men over to fix some stuff?

Might have been a hoax that just got thrown around, idk.

[–]Reasonable-Wealth647 1 point2 points  (1 child) | Copy Link

Australia? A Bear Grylls show. Yeah it was like night and day. The women were pretty useless in that situation.

[–]RatDontPanic 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

The guys didn't do too much better TBH. But we're not the ones talking about killing all women so there is that.

[–]vaaralinen 10 points11 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Children are raised by women, often single and with hatred for their fathers or/and all men, the vast majority of teachers and kindergarten staff are women (hell a man can be denied any work with children on the basis of being a man and, therefore, paedophile), as are the majority of judges and state workers and, as already mentioned, consumers (just imagine a man complaining that his wife didn't buy him a 5th mink coat, or gave a ring with a diamond too small). The society is mostly created by women (and men have not vanished, but where they've all gone to war it's uncommon to see a man). So we already live in a utopia where there are no wars or inequality, etc. etc., all children are safe from being murdered or molested by mothers or nannies that are later protected in court, and Earth is cherished and protected from those who make up 3/4 of consumers, right?

I wouldn't be surprised if the author was convinced that all women in power are trans women and this is the reason of all grief, though

[–]xsplizzle 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Is that wikipedia? feels like something you would find on wikipedia

[–]kiadragon 1 point2 points  (0 children) | Copy Link

Until the civilization collapsed because no one would do the hard physical work of maintaining the water, electric, sewage, and traffic structure.

They all die off from food shortages and cholera. They will have a TON of grief counselors and yoga instructors to help you process the end of civilization without feeling too bad though.

[–]HeatScissors003 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link


[–]politicsthrowaway230 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

People fantasise about this - but there are plenty of thoroughly evil female politicians - think people like Priti Patel and Thatcher. Plenty of white nationalists are married to women, plenty of women voted for Trump. Though it's awkward to point out, thinking that women are this significantly less capable of evil and unpleasantness is a form of benevolent misogyny.

[–]New-Ground9760 0 points1 point  (0 children) | Copy Link

This is one of the stupidest things I've ever read. Have they watched any of the reaction videos from when Roe v. Wade was overturned? Women seem pretty freaking upset when you tell them they can't kill their own children in the womb.

You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2023. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter