What?

alter_furz · 2025-03-18T15:10:40+00:00

women

are the primary victims

of war

because they cry in safety

away from the frontline

they cry in lifeboats

they cry in cities built by men

in buildings heated by men

in countries protected by men

they cry and their tears matter

more than mens lives

because dying for a woman

and a child

is a bare minimum

slash ass

Mister_3177 · 2025-03-18T15:01:48+00:00

i'd like to know they mean by "pay first"

AgeOfReasonEnds31120 · 2025-03-18T15:16:48+00:00

imagine thinking misandry is misogyny

Jack-The-Happy-Skull · 2025-03-18T17:14:39+00:00

I disagree with the whole women and children first; However I do believe that children should be first, children should be protected in every instance, they are the most vulnerable, and are the most precious ones in the universe.

But that’s just my opinion.

Disastrous_Average91 · 2025-03-18T14:48:44+00:00

They only thought it was bad because it puts women and children in the same category and protects them, not because it causes men to die and suffer

adeeb1234567 · 2025-03-18T14:44:53+00:00

These MFS try not to give feminists a bad name challenge: (IMPOSSIBLE) like as a feminist I am anti chivalry and it's glorious

Alex_Mercer_23 · 2025-03-18T20:16:27+00:00

This is called the benevolent sexism conjecture which is basically unfalsiable bullshit.

However it can be made unreasonable by providing an analogue.

Historically the reasoning that blacks could tolerate pain better was used to justify slavery on blacks but not on whites. Does this mean they were racist against whites and thought that whites were inferior which led to slavery of blacks? Clearly this sounds ridiculous.

Sick-of-you-tbh · 2025-03-18T18:10:58+00:00

This makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

UndefinedFemur · 2025-03-18T20:41:08+00:00

Well

that

went

off

the

rails

pretty

quickly.

DemoniteBL · 2025-03-18T20:19:51+00:00

The D in Farida D. stand for dumb.

rumpots420 · 2025-03-18T22:46:02+00:00

This isn't a poem

WaffleWafflington · 2025-03-19T03:24:27+00:00

Women and children have primarily been noncombatants throughout history, only in the last 150 years have women in the thick of the frontlines been changing steadily. This phrase is more or less another way to say civilians now, at least in the context of warfare. In the event of a natural disaster, I would imagine most fathers would want their kids and spouses out first.

PrimeWolf88 · 2025-03-19T10:11:07+00:00

Women: Strong when they want to argue, weak when they need benefits and special privileges - with all the responsibility of children added.

DarthDragon117 · 2025-03-20T05:03:16+00:00

Poem summary: she hates men, likely because of her dad.

eternal_kvitka1817 · 2025-03-19T10:42:26+00:00

As if feminazis don't use all the privileges of "the society created by men". Was titanic because if patriarchy?!

6_3times · 2025-03-19T07:41:13+00:00

they're right it should be children first only

Title	What?
Author	meeralakshmi
Upvotes	157
Comments	31
Date	March 18, 2025 2:04 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/EverydayMisandry
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1je5psw/what/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/what.1546934 https://theredarchive.com/post/1546934

Comments