It amazes me how Redditors can be completely aware of male behavior but then be confused/angry FDS exists. This comment makes it seem like women are one untouched penis away from living under a hostile terrorist regime and yet we’re the ones with the problem.

Sage_Planter · 2020-09-13T16:59:37+00:00

It also makes us sound like we're chomping at the bit to be in a polyamorous relationship. I'm not sure what the original post that OP is referring to.

FDS is against poly and open relationships. In 99.9% of cases, it's just an excuse to cheat or bring STDs into the relationship.

Maisiebr · 2020-09-13T17:14:37+00:00

[deleted]

reina_nova · 2020-09-13T17:09:32+00:00

Do these people ever leave their dark, stinky basements and, like, interact with real people in the real world? What’s up with this level of delusion and bitterness? He needs therapy.

__kamikaze__ · 2020-09-13T17:39:39+00:00

How is being a fuck doll a privilege? I don’t care to risk catching STDs, and ruin my body with the side effects of birth control and potential pregnancy just to fuck a “Chad”.

degnan1214 · 2020-09-13T18:06:19+00:00

I read that some societies didn't have a rape (or even prostitution) culture, I'm no expert ofc, but it is weird that men generalize our actual norms and act like it was always like this. I am even more confused about Christianity because lots of christians are huuuuuge hypocrites, and had a "side chick/mistress" culture for many centuries so IDK about that "analysis"(if I can even call that analysis lol) of his.

degnan1214 · 2020-09-13T20:02:42+00:00

I'm not in favor of polygamy or polyamory, and FDS certainly isn't advocating polygamy or non-monogamy.

The thing that most of us talk about is holding out for a good guy, a HVM, or if we end up single because the only options we see are low-value scrotes? Single life it is!

The scrotes and incels want to force us to settle for low-value men who put in little effort and will abuse us. In the "old days" before women could support themselves, vote, or own property, we could be "forced" to settle for some scrote just to have a roof over our heads.

Those days are over.

As I said in another post, Christian theology does support and encourage monogamy (but modern Christians are often hypocrites and lazy about taking it seriously). The Apostle Paul wrote this: “But I say to the unmarried and to the widows: it is good for them if they remain even as I am; but if they cannot exercise self-control, let them marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion” (I Corinthians 7:8, 9).

I interpret this to mean that anyone can opt for singleness if they feel they can, and one of the reasons for singleness would be that the choices for a mate are dismal. There should be no obligation to marry if one doesn't want to. And this may mean that some incels will go without a mate if enough women decide, "Nah." In past generations, it was difficult for a woman to survive if she didn't marry—even if she didn't want to marry, she'd have to. That's no longer the case. Sorry scrotes, we don't have to pair up with you if we don't want to. The Bible backs us up.

ethnicallyabiguous · 2020-09-13T18:20:55+00:00

He is referring to Jordan Peterson’s theory in why we should enforce monogamy among women.

Comments