Generalazations?

Reddit1984Censorship · 2021-02-13T11:51:11+00:00

It is true not all women are bad but its just not worth the risk, the big difference is the unbalance of social power due to feminism including porpaganda and censorship, its practical and comon sense to behave as if all women are like that because theres no other way to protect ourselves unless you either blue pilled and pretend reality is not real or chose to play ''russian roulette'' risking screwing up your life.
In other words if feminism wasnt a thing i wouldnt be MGTOW.
Not all women are bad, but every single women posses the unfair feminist power to crush me at any time.

Analysis-is-Relative · 2021-02-13T11:53:59+00:00

I would suggest not arguing with people who cannot make objective observations of the current intersexual dynamics and come to understand that the vast majority of women, likely 99.9%, exhibit the same mating strategies and underpinning that; female nature.

If you have to argue with them though, they love to argue about how they feel more than facts and logic, and their teaching means you cannot invalidate someone feelings? I wouldn’t bother though.

MakeWomenGreatAgain · 2021-02-13T12:56:42+00:00

"Its not that every single western woman is evil, its that every single western woman can do evil, and when she does; she destroys men's lives, and there is absolutely nothing we can do about it"

So why even bother?

raddrickydronzy · 2021-02-13T14:23:05+00:00

Imagine you go to a restaurant and the waiter gives you ten plates of food and says 3 of them are poisoned. Will you test your luck? I will get out of that restaurant as fast as possible. That's MGTOW.

Talksaboutjobs · 2021-02-13T12:34:28+00:00

AWALT refers to women nature, period. But how is the female's morality built, and what encourages them to do or don't do things, what is their drive to act on that AWALT nature or to reproach that nature? Take a look at Kohlberg's theory of moral development and you will understand why women act the way they do in our times and why the AWALT is such a important premise, since their nature is the basis of the moral conflict.

Now, you could easily say that AMALT, yep, we too have our base nature and we too have to conflict or act with it. Now, again, take a look at the aforementioned theory of moral development and will understand why it's much more common for men to go against the herd mentality of their times.

So what we have here is that men are polygamous by nature, but we have been conditioned to control that nature in the name of civilization's development holding together the family nucleus. And women are hypergamous by nature but they were conditioned to suppress that nature BY THE HERD MENTALITY to make possible for civilizations to thrive and the family be protected. Now, what happened to that herd mentality when feminism became the overwhelming power to define women's morality?

irrelevantmoniker · 2021-02-13T13:04:51+00:00

Awalt for me isn't 'all women are evil' its 'society doesn't acknowledge the ability of women to do evil, gives them vast tools of evil and doesn't hold them accountable for their use' coupled with 'I am not nearly good enough at judging character to take that risk'

It's not 'all women are like that'

it's

'all women can be like that'

WeeklyGreen8522 · 2021-02-13T14:59:00+00:00

First of all, most women and a large chunk of men are not able to accept reality, they are not interested in knowledge, so even if you clearly explain it to them they will not listen nor understand. If someone is ready to learn the truth he'll come to you asking for it and he'll just listen, not argue. So don't bother arguing with people, they want to change you, not learn. Now, AWALT doesn't mean "All women are exactly the same", AWALT means all women are women. They are all different but they are still women, as tigers are tigers and lions lions. And women have evolved to optimize their offspring as men have evolved to optimize theirs, as chickens and cocks and all living things have done. So it happens that deception is one of the top traits that have been selected for in women, as it allows them to have their offspring taken care by males that aren't the biological fathers. (Resource extraction, dual mating, hypergamy, monkey branching, etc) So here is where I go back to the top of the message. Women are not interested in knowledge, they want to deceive you to get money/sex from you, depending on how they perceive you, so don't bother explaining.

ActOutside4853 · 2021-02-13T13:04:26+00:00

Generalizations were the very first thing Feminist started attacking in the 70's, the very first of the PC shit trips. Generalization has been a handy linguistic tool undoubtably for thousands of years, basically a description of "average" from the perspective of the speaker.

Having watched the modern Feminist movement since the 60's, I can say that the best counter is to ignore it, or point out that they generalize men constantly...

Also you might mention it as their first PC gripe, and that the men of that era, even husbands of feminists, rolled their eyes at all their dumb shit...

I know because I was there at the epicenter, and living in a comune etc.

Basically theyre dumb cunts with nasty attitides attempting to manipulate the planet, because they lost the genetic lottery, and were born toads on two legs...

Dont let them get away with it, just because a few million idiots believed what they blather.

Launch_Day_My_Dudes · 2021-02-13T14:43:33+00:00

The best counter argument is one the feminists invented themselves—the poison skittles argument. If one skittle in a bowl is laced with rat poison, would you eat any of them?

Similarly for AWALT. I personally don’t like to use that phrase because it sounds too much like feminists who generalize about men—‘not all men’ is, in fact, a valid point. But it’s enough to say that some fraction of women are like that, and I cut my losses by not playing Russian roulette for a booby prize.

skippydammit · 2021-02-13T12:36:42+00:00

[deleted]

Phantom_Spark · 2021-02-13T12:58:49+00:00

Best argument is to focus on the law. They can’t refute that

Sir_manalot · 2021-02-13T13:14:56+00:00

Would you agree with the statement “All humans have hands?”

Yes, you could technically argue that some people are born without hands, but would you change everything taught about human anatomy?

No, only an idiot would do that.

Awalt is the same. All women are hypergamous. Some have a stronger instinct for it, some it is barely there, some lost it due to trauma.

But all women are hypergamous.

ThrowawayGhostGuy1 · 2021-02-13T13:23:26+00:00

If they don’t want to be generalized then they shouldn’t have such generic minds.

Oh_no_I_was_banned-s · 2021-02-13T14:03:05+00:00

Yeah there are unicorns. Doesn't mean I need one.

silly_birb · 2021-02-13T14:03:35+00:00

Generalization is always wrong, by definition.

But women that say "not all men so not all women" are using the method of lying by omission.
Generalizing the evidence of 99% of women being promiscuous to 100% is a good generalization, meanwhile generalizing the 10% of good looking men to 100% of men as being promiscuous is a bad generalization.

The difference is in the chance of error, one is 1% the other 90%

SnooDrawings4726 · 2021-02-13T15:45:31+00:00

Yeah but the thing is, they do say all men are the same... they blame the bottom 80% of us for the actions of the top 20%...... not all women are the same, some are good... but do you really want to risk it, in the off chance that it works out?... the juice isn’t worth the squeeze

gantz_au · 2021-02-14T01:49:03+00:00

Women can and already do assume terrible things about men in general. If they want this mindset than they are welcome to it.

However, I too have the right not to participate in a society where that mindset from both women and other men is so prevalent.

So, unless society is willing to physically restrain me and make a slave out of me, I'm doing whatever the fuck I want to do with myself.

cryptotim70726 · 2021-02-13T14:22:49+00:00

Them: "NAWALT"

you: "Until they are."

f3wl · 2021-02-13T17:35:41+00:00

Emphasis on “like”. The question is to what degree. It’s like a rotten apple. How rotten is it? Could be fine. Could make you really sick. Best to just toss it out.

p3b234cw4z2 · 2021-02-13T19:40:07+00:00

Best counter argument is

"Find it out yourself."

Organic_Principle772 · 2021-02-13T19:47:23+00:00

Maybe not all women are like that, and maybe not all guns are loaded... But I'm going to act as if they are.

simplystimpy · 2021-02-13T21:55:45+00:00

What is best counter-argument against "NAWALT" or that we are generalizing?

Here are four counterpoints

1.) Men are not orchestrating mass-scale smear campaigns to cancel womens careers. #metoo exclusively targets men.

2.) Female victims are valued, male victims are ignored. Even if it's a male perpetrator assaulting a boy, the emotional energy is focused primarily on derision for the criminal, little sympathy goes to the male victim.

3.) Society does not recognize female pedophiles, which is a good thing for female schoolteachers, who account for over 80% of primary schoolteachers.

At best, female perpetrators have "inappropriate relationships" with their students. It promotes the false notion that female pedophiles are less harmful, or even beneficial, for children (he so wanted it!)

4.) Female needs are prioritized over men because, again, no one cares about male wellbeing. Only when a boy's mother says something will anyone care, because we are all programmed to appease mothers.

Essentially, society worships women, and largely disregards male plight. You are correct that not all women pretend to be victims, not all women are gold diggers, and not all women are pedophiles.

But there are little to no social consequences for women to be any of those things. This is because society worships women.

It would just be too much for society to accept how the world is far darker and more complicated than what we were all conditioned into believing.

exiledterror · 2021-02-14T12:31:26+00:00

Woman dont have a QR code on them to be scanned to know everything about them.And women tend to “adjust” them selfs if they meet a guy they are interested in(sex or/and resources). So if you are willing to take a risk - go for it, and i wish you the best of luck find ing the good one! P.S. theres a chance you will get destroyed by the wrong one

skippydammit · 2021-02-13T13:49:10+00:00

GeneralIzations....-:)

Title	Generalazations?
Author	swedishMGTOWboss
Upvotes	21
Comments	32
Date	February 13, 2021 11:46 AM UTC (5 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MGTOW
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MGTOW/comments/liz45f/generalazations/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MGTOW/generalazations.744586 https://theredarchive.com/post/744586

Comments