TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Condoms, vasectomies, the pull out method...Men should have the right to more birth control options. Donate to make vasalgel a reality.

NewChristianThrwwy

October 22, 2016
89 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.parsemusfoundation.org/projects/vasalgel/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Condoms, vasectomies, the pull out method...Men should have the right to more birth control options. Donate to make vasalgel a reality.
Author

NewChristianThrwwy

Upvotes 89
Comments 44
Date October 22, 2016 2:50 AM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/58r79d/condoms_vasectomies_the_pull_out_methodmen_should/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/condoms-vasectomies-the-pull-out-methodmen-should.939256
https://theredarchive.com/post/939256
Top posts by NewChristianThrwwy

How scientists are using a deadly poison to develop male birth control

16 upvotes
January 31, 2018
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]Pinuspalustris 9 points10 points11 points 9 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps I am ignorant of the situation, but surely something as good as this sounds should have no trouble getting funding, right? I could see millions of men getting something like this, why do they need to ask for donations online?

[+]-_-I-_-I-_- 9 years ago* [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

I know of no specific mens organisations with the funds capable of funding this, and no groups capable of funding this - nor current leftist feminist government - will fund something women are so vehemently against, and overwhelmingly women do not want men controlling their own reproduction. Current government, large organisations, and women want only women to control all reproduction. Even when all the testing is done, I do not believe that a leftist feminist government FDA will approve this to go to market. Perhaps if Donald Trump is elected President that may change.

[–]NewChristianThrwwy7 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I am a woman and I want men to have a more of a say in whether they want a child or not.

I think it's utterly stupid men only have 3 options for birth control and women have like a kazillion.

It's not fair.

And I am sick and tired of googling Male Birth Control every few months to see if there are any new methods...and all there are is studies and a distant dream.

This desperately needs funding. Men deserve more options.

Edit: Just put my money where my mouth is and donated $5 to this campaign. Anyone want to match me?

[–]AilieBain -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know I've stumbled onto, well, /this/ kind of sub but I find your comments entirely surprising, I've spoken about this with many woman I know and every single one of them, myself included, would be delighted to see this come onto the market. I myself have donated £5, not much but it's all I can spare right now! Don't be so cynical, women are far from against this and I am hopeful and looking forward to the day when unwanted pregnancies are a thing of the past :) (also can't help but laugh at the suggestion that America has a leftist government... I appreciate they're probably lefter than your point of view but still, definitely a right wing government as far as the rest of the world is concerned hahaha)

[+]-_-I-_-I-_- 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Go read the 10 Planks of Communism, then compare it to the US government.

[–]AilieBain 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I really can't tell if you're joking or not... Stunning

[–]NewChristianThrwwy14 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

They want to create a method that can be accessible price wise to all. Also pharmaceutical companies aren't interested in male bc because it would eat into their female bc lines. This is a nonprofit that is trying to go all Jonas Salk on this.

[–]SporkTornado 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

ObamaCare requires insurers to covers every single form of female birth control, except Abortion. Abortion is the only type of female birth control that obama care is not required to cover. or to quote directly from the obamacare website.

What Birth Control Is Covered?

According to HealthCare.Gov Food and Drug Administration-approved contraceptive methods prescribed by a woman’s doctor are covered. This generally includes:

-Barrier methods (used during intercourse), like diaphragms and sponges

-Hormonal methods, like birth control pills and vaginal rings

-Implanted devices, like intrauterine devices (IUDs)

-Emergency contraception, like Plan B® and ella®

-Sterilization procedures

-Patient education and counseling

Plans aren’t required to cover:

-Drugs to induce abortions

-Services related to a man’s reproductive capacity, like vasectomies

-http://obamacarefacts.com/obamacare-birth-control/

[–]glassuser 4 points5 points6 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like it's not compliant with equal protection.

[–]my_name_is_gato 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It is so cheap that it will be hard to make money on it. Even the reversal is inexpensive. Investors prefer to chase larger returns rather what produces the most social benefit.

[–]Pinuspalustris 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

How is it cheap? Especially from the beginning they can charge almost whatever they like for this. Though I can see how it would be less profitable than something like the pill that is taken daily.

[–]my_name_is_gato 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The gel itself is very inexpensive. It doesn't cost much more than the syringe to inject it. The reversal is very inexpensive also. I guess some company could try to buy the patent and then mark the prices sky high, but that isn't the mission of the current developers.

[–]Anaxagoras23 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

they can charge almost whatever they like for this

Until someone replicates it. It doesn't need to be an exact replica, simply something that functions identically would be enough - say a different substance to perform the same block and unblock. If you were a pharmaceutical company and were the first on the market with something like this yes, you would make bank at first... up until someone decided to slice off a piece of your pie. From there the profit would diminish quickly and eventually disappear. The cost of that brief window where you were the king would be losing out on the regular dependable (and now government guaranteed) profits from female birth control.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]vinkelvankel 7 points8 points9 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It's not exactly cheap and without risks. It's also permanent, so keeping it a secret can have consequences. Vasalgel allows you to be fertile when you want to.

[–]double-happiness 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

FWIW, they're free on the NHS, in the UK.

[–]vinkelvankel 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

Freezing your sperm is free?

[–]double-happiness 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, vasectomies I meant! Sorry if that was unclear.

[+][deleted] 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]vinkelvankel 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Good point, but Vasalgel would still be a superior solution if they manage to make it reversible and safe in humans. The way it is now, women can lie about being fertile and noone will ever know. Men can lie, but it won't end well if they do.

[–]NewChristianThrwwy0 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Everyone needs to have the tools to be able to make a decision in birth control.

[–]Mashiki 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well some of us have already been under the knife for testicular torsion and have no desire to repeat the experience.

[–]Devastration 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I would imagine a vasectomy to be a slightly different procedure from the one to revert torsion. What does the surgery for repairing TT entail?

[–]Mashiki 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Depends on how bad it is. If it's really bad it's basically the same thing as done under a vasectomy. Cutting open the scrotum. The full TT is cut open the scrotum and untwist the testicle, then permanent sutures to ensure it doesn't twist again. With luck and they get to it in under 6hrs the recovery rate is around 80-100% with no loss of the testicle. Then you have a secondary surgery usually within 2-4months to have the other side done and ensure that the initial suturing did the job and the other testicle didn't die. Both cases you're going under the knife, the difference between the two is TT is a medical emergency.

In the best case, it can be done with no surgery if it's only a partial twist and you're recovering the same day with little to no pain. The recovery also varies, I was bed ridden for two months and in a hell of a lot of pain. Which was basically the same thing that happened to my cousin for his vasectomy(around 5 years ago) and with my grandfather(~40ish years ago). In the best case for a vasectomy you're up and doing fine the same day. ~25 years later I still have pain from the surgery.

[–]chaircushion 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Unfortunately there is a 1-2% chance of developing chronic pain in your testis that will never go away if you get yourself fixed.

[–]feedmecarrots 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You would think there would be support from women for this. A lot of them don't take to well to hormonal birth control. I guess the opposition would come from women that want the option of having "Oopsie" pregnancies.

It is depressing that a forerunner of this has been in trials for fifteen years with no end in sight. Then, there is the man in Brazil who developed something effective from cottonseed in the seventies.

[+]NewChristianThrwwy 9 years ago* [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

I feel like a lot of women would support it. I mean I get a strong feeling if I brought it up with the women in my life they would be all for it. Maybe the issue just lacks visibility? Like it needs a public awareness campaign to build momentum behind it to bring it to fruition?

Edit: just asked my mom if she would support male birth control. She hesitated a bit before saying yes...and when questioned about her hesitation...cited concerns about safety.

I also got the feeling it was like a new/foreign idea to her. But she did say she supported it.

Edit2: posted this in /r/birthcontrol. Looks like there's a lot of women there. This thread made it to the top.

So I think there might be support from women as well.

[–]feedmecarrots 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Thanks for putting this out there. I had a feeling that there would be support from married women. I am certain the resistance is beneath consciousness. It would be instinctive to want to retain full reproductive control.

[–]rg57 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not only that, but ask your candidates whether they will amend Obamacare to explicitly require (rather than explicitly exclude) male contraception coverage.

No man should have to pay for a condom, particularly when the alternative could be 18 years of servitude.

[–]double-happiness 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I just had a vasectomy this summer, unfortunately my (now ex-) girlfriend, who already has two kids and claimed not to want more, took exception to it and promptly broke up with me! :(

Back to square one after a few happy months, it's too bad.

[–]NewChristianThrwwy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So sorry to hear that :(

[–]wateroclock 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why do my balls hurt when I read this?

[+]jimmywiddle -12 points-11 points-10 points 9 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

As I have said before no guy is going anywhere near this with a bargepole. Jabbing a needle into someones balls ? Yeah fuck off.

Turn it into a pill format and it might be doable.

[–]Missing_Links 5 points6 points7 points 9 years ago* (10 children) | Copy Link

I would take it.

If vasalgel works, it's a miracle drug. Non-hormonal, effective, quickly applicable birth control that can be reversed with a 5 minute procedure, both of which basically amount to a shot in a tender area. Also it only needs renewed every 3 years or so.

It would fulfill literally every single completely idealistic goal for a BC drug of any sort. Which is part of why I think it will fall short somewhere, since it really would be a miracle for any solution to a problem, especially a first solution, to be so good.

500k men annually get vasectomies in the US alone, a more uncomfortable procedure involving a knife rather than a needle, and it can't be reversed ever.

What are you smoking that you think literally hundereds of thousands of men wouldn't be lined up for this?

[–]hecter 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

You call it a miracle drug, but I feel like that's inaccurate. I wouldn't call it a drug as it's purely mechanical. It's more of an implant. That's what makes it so great.

I don't understand cowards like this dude over there. Who can't close their eyes and clench their teeth for two minutes because they don't want a needle near their balls? I'll happily take a few minutes of discomfort to enjoy complete control over my reproductive rights.

[–]Missing_Links 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I guess I was using drug in terms of a medical treatment to achieve an effect on the functioning of the body, but yes, it does have limited to minimal chemical interaction with the body and maybe drug is the wrong word.

The point still stands that if it is as effective as initial tests have shown, has few or no side effects, and is as easy to put in and take out as it is supposed to be, with no other side effects it would be a miracle solution to the problem it addresses. Medical solutions are never that effective and easy to use with no side effects. It would be a miracle.

But yeah, the person above is too squeamish about the idea of ball needles, even though that's not even accurate to the procedure.

[–]jimmywiddle 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

You are looking at this from the narrow lens of the US. The vast majority of men do not have vasectomies a very tiny percentage do.

So no it wouldn't be signifiant at all. And if you knew anything about the process the painful part is when they cut into the tubes going down to your testicles. This process would involve jabbing a needle into those tubes something that is going to hurt as well.

Tell me something how many women would be taking contraception if they had to have a needle jabbed into their ovaries in order to do it ? Very few, so why the fuck should men settle for some cheap shitty half measure that can't be taken via pill form ?

I'll answer that for you, they shouldn't. There are millions of dollars pushed into research for women's products to get them as good as possible yet we end up with this ?

Im sorry to unreasonably ask for the same level of care for men as women but you know I tend to believe men deserve the same.

As for calling me a coward, you can go fuck yourself. You know very well I am all for men having equal and fair reproductive rights its one area that men have been screwed over on since forever but some shitty half measure that involves this kind of process is not the answer.

[–]drpennypop 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I have an IUD, and part of the procedure involved an injection into my cervix (twice, since I got it replaced). Small price to pay for >99% assurance of no babby.

[–]hecter 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Right, a small percentage of people get vasectomies because it's largely a permanent procedure. As opposed to Vasalgel, which is designed from the ground up to be reversible. A vasectomy involves severing your vas defrens. Vasalgel involves blocking it off. It should be clear that the pain involved would be, at worst, comparable to a vasectomy. A procedure which is already considered to be fairly painless. The reality is likely to be less painful.

How many women would be taking contraception if they had a needle jammed into their ovaries? Well, probably not many. But it's not really comparable to what's going on here. A needle to the fallopian tubes would be more comparable, but neither are as accessible as my sack. Depo-Provera is fairly common, and it's a needle, as well as a contraceptive implant. Though both are hormonal.

And that's one of the major things you're missing out on. This is non-hormonal and long term. In my opinion, it's as good as it gets. You say it's a shitty half measure, I say it's the best possible solution. I honestly see zero downsides to it other than the fact that I have to spend thirty minutes in the doctors office once a decade. So I'm sorry, but if you find the idea of having a needle to be that close to your testicles to be THAT off putting, that's pretty cowardly.

[–]jimmywiddle -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

"How many women would be taking contraception if they had a needle jammed into their ovaries? Well, probably not many."

And I rest my case.

Keep working on it until you get to the same level of painless approach that women have. It doesn't have to be hormonal but something like a pill is the baseline we should be aiming for.

[+]NewChristianThrwwy 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

...I'm kind of confused because this method of bc has to do with the vas deferens which is equivalent to the fallopian tubes in women. Testes are equivalent to ovaries in women.

I feel like you're getting some human anatomy wrong in your posting. This method would not be injected into your testes.

[–]jimmywiddle -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

vas deferens which is equivalent to the fallopian tubes in women.

No, fallopian tubes are not carrying thousands of nerve endings. Vas deferens are, and thats a big difference.

[–]Missing_Links 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Tell me something how many women would be taking contraception if they had to have a needle jabbed into their ovaries in order to do it?

Women have several forms of contraceptive whose insertion methods basically require being fisted by the doctor. That's at least as bad as a shot, and literally millions of women everywhere in the western world get them every single year.

And if you knew anything about the process the painful part is when they cut into the tubes going down to your testicles...

Those are called the vasa. They collectively feed into the vas deferens. Being insulting doesn't make you right, but I suppose that's not a concern as being wrong seems to not be a problem for you.

Pain wise, vasectomies are usually done under local anesthetic. This means that there is no perception of pain for the patient other than the initial local injection. Sometimes this is even done with a spray so there is not even injection pain. You are not very well informed.

so why the fuck should men settle for some cheap shitty half measure that can't be taken via pill form?

You also seem to have absolutely no concept of what would be fair in a meaningful sense. "Fair" here can mean nothing other than "how well can you rely on this method as your only form of birth control."

The pill is maybe the least desirable form of female contraception. Or actually of any contraceptive since even condoms work better. Any contraceptive can be well measured according to the following, in order of importance:

1) How effective is it at its maximum efficacy?

2) How hard is it to achieve constant maximum efficacy?

3) Is it permanent?

4) What are the side effects of the birth control? Specifically, is it hormonal or not?

5) How bad are the application/removal proceedures.

You chose the only factor that is actually almost meaningless as the only thing you're considering. And it is because you are a coward afraid of a little pain, which only exists in your mind in the first place because local anesthetic is used anyway. Vasagel, if it delivers on its promises, scores the maximum possible in every one of these categories. It would be orders of magnitude better than any form of female birth control that has ever been available.

You really have no idea what the promised form of this birth control would mean for men and for the world in general and you are indeed a coward. Now, I am done with you.

[–]jimmywiddle -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women have several forms of contraceptive whose insertion methods basically require being fisted by the doctor. That's at least as bad as a shot

Considering women get fisted for sexual pleasure you are so far off on this one.

The fact that you are resorting to childish insults shows you have already lost this argument. No wonder you are desperately asking for donations when only people with your mentality are supporting the idea.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter