TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/seduction
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

      • Artful Prudence
      • A Voice for Men
      • Alpha Game
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Good Looking Loser
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • In Mala Fide
      • KillToParty
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Married Man Sex Life
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Power Moves
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • The Spearhead
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Is a caption really needed for something this disgusting?

EnigmaScientist

April 19, 2017
73 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://i.redd.it/51a4qlqgfksy.jpg
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Is a caption really needed for something this disgusting?
Author

EnigmaScientist

Upvotes 73
Comments 22
Date April 19, 2017 7:58 PM UTC
(9 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/66copu/is_a_caption_really_needed_for_something_this/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/is-a-caption-really-needed-for-something-this.925189
https://theredarchive.com/post/925189
Top posts by EnigmaScientist

These are the people who decide if you’re a “man.” Don’t listen to them. Go your own way.

450 upvotes
September 11, 2020
/r/MGTOW

Is a caption really needed for something this disgusting?

114 upvotes
July 4, 2017
/r/MensRights

Good thing you're a girl otherwise you could've been accused of rape. If you were a guy.... Well shit. Wonder what its like when women actually rape people now....

65 upvotes
July 15, 2017
/r/MensRights

Roasties will roast

6 upvotes
November 1, 2020
/r/MGTOW

Comments

[–]theothermod[M] [score hidden] 9 years ago stickied comment (0 children) | Copy Link

A descriptive title is needed so that readers know what your post is about.

[+]lobsTROLL points 9 years ago [recovered] (10 children) | Copy Link

Women never wanted equal rights, they want to be superior. To be able to get away with anything yet and make more money and basically be put before men.

[–]mwobuddy 3 points4 points5 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

We'd have to know the case facts. Was it a 17 year old, or a 3 year old? Big difference imo, and something which would weigh in the decisions of the jury or judge.

[+]lobsTROLL points 9 years ago [recovered] (4 children) | Copy Link

I always had this question in mind, why would you go to jail for watching child porn even though you're not 18,child pron could be two 17 year olds or a 17 year old and an 18 year old, matching completely with sexual consent laws.

[–]franklindeer 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If there were no harms to the production of child pornography it wouldn't be illegal. It doesn't matter how old you are when you're watching it, watching it still contributes to the exploitation of children which is largely why it's a crime in the first place (there are some exceptions).

A better example of what you're talking about are cases where there objectively was no exploitation or risk of exploitation at all. Like when teens are charged with possessing child pornography for having nudes of their girlfriend or even themselves on their phone. Unless there was some coercion involved in getting them, it's a completely victimless crime and dragging people through the system over it is doing far more harm than the act that it results from.

[–]CurtisAxelmania 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Consuming media for free does not support the industry producing the media.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Why wouldn't you go to jail for watching child porn as a teen? you're still violating the intent of the law, which is to prevent use and production of anything less than 17.

I'm perfectly fine with teens having to eat that particular bullet, as anyone 18+ has to as well.

[–]CurtisAxelmania 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

These dilemmas can be avoided by not criminalizing possession. The priority should be catching whoever is doing the stuff on the videos and making them stop. That is the only win of import. Letting cops pretend they are winning by arresting viewers just distracts from the core issue.

[+]Aprilisse points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

Taylor Lautner was 17 when they filmed Twilight, guess that means any woman or man who lusts after him in that is a paedo.

[–]mwobuddy 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Basically, according to feminist/sjw logic.

What was first? The chicken or the egg. In this case, it is quite clear the egg is first, if the egg is {claim} "anyone under 18 is a child". This claim was invoked in the late 1800-middle 1900 period, but had to go through a long transition period.

Arguments for this claim came, from one direction, from age of consent law, which itself was 13 but raised to 16-18 by women angry at males.

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/66itaz/nobody_20_year_old_actress_herizen_guardiola_is/dgivljv/

If you read the comments, people are saying she's a disgusting pedo, for being 20 and dating a 16 year old.

This is the zeitgeist of mores regarding what age means.

[+]OhOkThx points 9 years ago [recovered] (1 child) | Copy Link

They want all the perks but not any of the sacrifices

[–]lobsTROLL6 points 9 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

The lady looks like one of those loud mouthed fiminists that start recording videos while yelling at people.

[–]Kroxicon 2 points3 points4 points 9 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

http://www.ktuu.com/content/news/First-Alaska-woman-charged-with-possessing-child-pornography-gets-no-jail-time-397985081.html

[–]Kroxicon 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Source is always good.

[–]DaeusPater 10 points11 points12 points 9 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

The pedophile and her sister had been abused as children by their grandfather(he was recently released from prison). The defense used this argument to negotiate a lighter sentence(no sentence). Now, bear in mind that, numerous studies have shown that pedophiles/child porn distributors often have histories of child abuse themselves of both genders. But a man using that as defense would have never worked. This is pure systematic institutional discrimination. Pussypass.

A forensic analysis of the equipment resulted in Robinson being charged with 12 felony counts of distribution of child pornography and 18 counts of possession of child pornography.

But wait....

In October 2015, the defense and prosecution reached a plea deal in which Robinson agreed to plead guilty to a single count of indecent viewing of photography.

So, this judgement was for 1 count of possession/viewing child porn. So what happened to the other 12 felony counts of distribution of child pornography and 17 counts of possession of child pornography. The prosecution was obviously lenient on her. They should have shame on themselves. Pussypass again.

“Ms. Robinson wasn’t looking at these images for sexual gratification. It was more that she identified with the victims in the case,” her defense laywer..

No, I'm not buying it. She is using her female privilege to game the system. What an easy world for women to live; do the crime, but don't have to pay the price....ever.

[–]Kroxicon 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

No wait, please don't misunderstand. I'm not defending anything here, just pointing out a source is great to have instead of just a picture with a headline.

[–]DaeusPater 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I didn't misunderstand, sorry if it came out like that. I just commented on the information in the source you mentioned.

[–]Kroxicon 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah alright.

I'm quite horrified she got away with that.

[–]poorpersonality 1 point2 points3 points 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Something like 50 % of female criminals tell they have been abused. It's a common pussy pass strategy (because it works.).

[–]geniice 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

So, this judgement was for 1 count of possession/viewing child porn. So what happened to the other 12 felony counts of distribution of child pornography and 17 counts of possession of child pornography. The prosecution was obviously lenient on her. They should have shame on themselves. Pussypass again.

Nah check out the other alaskan cases. They really like their plea bargins up there even by US standards.

[–]MagicTampon 0 points1 point2 points 9 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

UiW:$d

[–]CurtisAxelmania -1 points0 points1 point 9 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am not disgusted. I do not think possession deserves jail time. At best some light community service which can be waved if the possessor aids authorities by telling them where they for it so they can move on to investigate higher up the ladder: distributors, then creators.

Purchasing it, on the other hand, should face stiffer penalties, since that may support its creation, but only if paying directly to a creator or a distributor who bought from one.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter