Not always, but often and shockingly what I have found, ironically enough, the more masculine men, stereotypical jocks, or at least average "ball cap" types of men, contrary to what you think tend to be more empathetic and approachable to MRA and men's issues (involving parental rights, courts, etc.) but also social issues, and when it comes to preferential treatment of women or "disposibility" of men, they acknowledge these things exist even if they are Fundamentally Conservative and literally agree with it being how it should be, they are way more honest.

It is the less masculine men, IE. "soyboys", effete, nerdy sorts who seem seem to not empathize with men's issues AT ALL and quickest to make fun of you. You'd think logically, naturally, these type of men who don't fit the "gender roles" would be some of the biggest MRA type people bringing up social/legal inequality males face, but the inverse is true.

As an example, if you brought up the fact there is no fat acceptance movement for men and it's geared entirely towards body positivity for women, and said that in front of the former group of men, they will often laugh with you and makes jokes about it being true (even though they would think the fat acceptance would be ridiculous for men too). It's the later I mentioned that get weird about it, often very hostile or not acknowledging what you said at best.

With women on the other hand it actually sorta makes more sense in that women who nontraditional, tend to be more Feminist. There is something of a logic to it actually. It doesn't seem to work this way for men. If women behaved like men did the most non-traditional, non-feminine women would be the most pro-male and pro-masculine, and pro-traditional gender roles, etc.

I'm not even sure if I'm explaining my observations coherently but I have seen it well enough times to bring it up and this is the best way I can explain it. Does anybody know what I'm sorta talking about here?