TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

So apparently there's something wrong with me for caring about circumcision.

AlexReynard

December 16, 2017
29 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://imgur.com/gallery/wZn9SbT
Archived from /r/MensRights

r/MensRights is a community advocating for the social and legal equality of men and boys since 2008.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/MensRights archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title So apparently there's something wrong with me for caring about circumcision.
Author

AlexReynard

Upvotes 29
Comments 47
Date December 16, 2017 1:21 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7k453w/so_apparently_theres_something_wrong_with_me_for/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/so-apparently-theres-something-wrong-with-me-for.909299
https://theredarchive.com/post/909299
Top posts by AlexReynard

"What Will We Concede To Feminism": UPDATE

927 upvotes
July 3, 2013
/r/MensRights

A debate tactic I'm gettin' real sick of.

583 upvotes
June 7, 2014
/r/MensRights

Time magazine cares more about a fake women's crisis than a real one. Look what's front and center vs. what's shoved up in the corner.

205 upvotes
May 16, 2014
/r/MensRights

"Why does female-leaning fandom come in for such criticism?" I dunno. Why'd you delete my comments showing differently?

110 upvotes
November 5, 2013
/r/MensRights

I guess boys can literally just go to hell.

81 upvotes
August 3, 2017
/r/MensRights

What Will We Concede To Feminism?

79 upvotes
June 25, 2013
/r/MensRights

Why Zootopia Might Just Be The Opposite Of SJW Propaganda (SPOILERS AHOY)

45 upvotes
March 8, 2016
/r/MensRights

What's some of your best links/articles/images/videos for quickly disproving common misconceptions?

38 upvotes
April 21, 2013
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Guaranteed those comments are by defensive circumcised men. That's something all intactivists have to deal with. Try not to feel too discouraged.

[–]Late_For_Username -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

intactivists

How about you pick a less divisive and less cringe-worthy name for yourselves then?

Most of us who are circumcised don't feel like half-men.

[–]MenDeserveRights 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's a good name.

I was circumcised in infancy, I'm not happy about it, and I recognize that my penis isn't intact, that something is missing.

[–]Late_For_Username -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

And a lot of men, an overwhelming majority in fact, don't feel anything is missing.

I just mentioned in another post that I'm not really interested in how certain men feel about being circumcised, I'm interested in more objective concerns.

[–]MenDeserveRights 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

But it's objectively false to claim that something isn't missing.

The foreskin, which is part of the penis, is missing.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Case in point. I never picked the name.

[–]Late_For_Username -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Adopting the name is very close to picking the name.

[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Apparently you have a better one that hurts your feelings less?

[–]Late_For_Username 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

A name that doesn't make me cringe and allows me to take people with certain positions on male circumcision seriously.

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Like I said, I'm open to suggestions.

[–]Late_For_Username 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Anti-circumcision activists?

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Well that's adding five syllables and is still not adequate, if you want what they literally stand for. We would then have to say, 'anti - circumcision of minors without medical reason activists'. I get the feeling that you wouldn't 'take certain positions on male circumcision' seriously anyway, no matter what name we give the opposing side.

[–]Late_For_Username 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well that's adding five syllables

So?

I get the feeling that you wouldn't 'take certain positions on male circumcision' seriously anyway

What certain positions?

[–][deleted]1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

What certain positions?

anti - circumcision of minors without medical reason

[–]Late_For_Username1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I mainly have problems with men who view circumcision through a lens of their own hypersensitivity.

I'm not interested in whether someone feels "intact" or not, I'm more interested in other details, such as pain and risk to the infant.

[–][deleted]1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I mainly have problems with men who view circumcision through a lens of their own hypersensitivity.

Including the ones that see opposition to child circumcision as an affront to their manhood and family?

I'm not interest in whether someone feels "intact" or not, I'm more interested in other details, such as pain and risk to the infant.

Well if you have a name that conveys pain and risk to infant then go ahead and use it. The name is just convenient short hand, not meant to appeal to every person's particular interest (an impossibility).

[–]Late_For_Username1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Including the ones that see opposition to child circumcision as an affront to their manhood and family?

What?

Well if you have a name that conveys pain and risk to infant then go ahead and use it. The name is just convenient short hand, not meant to appeal to every person's particular interest (an impossibility).

People read a lot into names. "Intactivists" sounds like a bunch of guys who cry themselves to sleep over having some skin taken off their penises instead of being people who are concerned about all the issues regarding circumcision.

[–]zulu127 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

It really is amazing how people react good for you for posting it.

[–]AlexReynard[S] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I was unprepared for just how rotten they'd be. SMH.

[–]rodrigogirao 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Imgur's "community" is some serious cancer.

[–]bhavv 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It actually is ok ... If an adult male consents to having it done, or to treat phimosis.

Otherwise its not ok.

[–]mgm-survivor 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Even in that situation, there are better/lower-risk/faster-healing surgical alternatives such as a Z-plasty or preputioplasty where no skin is removed. Circumcision predates knowledge of volumetric solids and really should be done to no-one.

[–]AlexReynard[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Certainly, there are medical exceptions.

[–]TheGlassStone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (23 children) | Copy Link

What frustrates me about the whole circumcision debate is that women think they have a say in whether or not babies do or do not get circumcised. Shouldn’t it just be up to fathers? I’m not for or against, just asking a question.

[–]rodrigogirao 19 points20 points21 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn’t it just be up to fathers?

No, it should be up to no one except the owner of the penis.

[–]TheGlassStone 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

And that would be a man lol

[–]clockworkgirl21 14 points15 points16 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

If that man wants to make a decision about a penis it should be his own, not someone else's.

[–]TheGlassStone 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Agreed.

[–]rodrigogirao 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Indeed, a man: only an adult man, fully warned about the possible negative consequences, can decide about performing such a modification of his own body. Anything else is aggravated battery.

[–]Draggonzz 5 points6 points7 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn't be up to the parents at all.

[–]clockworkgirl21 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, it should be up to the child when they get older.

Neither parent should get to make that choice for someone else.

[–]AlexReynard[S] 10 points11 points12 points 8 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Shouldn’t it just be up to fathers?

Maybe not. It seems like most of the hostility I get is from cut guys who're so insecure they can't admit that anything bad happened to them, so they shoot the messenger. "There's nothing wrong with my dick! Stop thinking about it, you fag!!"

[–]TheGlassStone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

No hostility from me. I’m circumcised and I don’t even think about it. I don’t feel traumatized or lacking. But I can’t speak for anyone else who is.

My issue is with who gets to decide. We can agree that babies can’t decide, but why should the mother? In my experience, most people (except here) I’ve encountered who are against it are female, and I honestly don’t think it should be up to them at all.

[–]AlexReynard[S] 7 points8 points9 points 8 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

I don’t feel traumatized or lacking. But I can’t speak for anyone else who is.

It's hard to get people to understand that, nothing seems wrong because you have no basis for comparison. There's literally no way for you or me to know what natural sex feels like. It seems weird to me that guys wouldn't be irked by that.

We can agree that babies can’t decide, but why should the mother?

Ha ha, because women get 100% of rights to decide whether the kid lives or dies, so why not!? /s/

I’ve encountered who are against it are female, and I honestly don’t think it should be up to them at all.

I really don't know. I've talked to clueless women who think it "looks better". I've talked to women who are utterly horrified by it. I'd say that doctors should decide, but the American Academy Of Pediatrics is just fine with it.

Christ, I am still really bitter about those comments. I don't mind being ignored, but to be made fun of for caring about kids... Serious rage here.

[–]SoulofEquality 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

It's hard to get people to understand that, nothing seems wrong because you have no basis for comparison. There's literally no way for you or me to know what natural sex feels like. It seems weird to me that guys wouldn't be irked by that.

The way my fwb has explained it to me is that since he's already very sensitive and has no problem reaching orgasm or getting hard, there's "obviously" nothing wrong with losing some skin. He said he also knew a few guys in high school sports who would complain about needing to wash their foreskins after practice and they were somewhat jealous of the cut guys who could just rinse off with a few swipes. Because of this, he says he's happy his parents made the decision to get him circumcised when he was a baby and couldn't remember the pain of it like he could if he got it done as a teen or adult.

I've pointed out that if he grew up with a foreskin, then that's what his body would be used to sensitivity-wise, and that the dudes in the locker room may have just been voicing their frustration at being different in a way that would get them sympathy instead of shame. He still doesn't see any issue with it, which I think is weird. I know that if I found out the hood of my clit had been removed without my approval I'd be fucking pissed and be doing skin stretching exercises to try and get back to normal.

I just think it's as bad to cut boys as it is to cut girls. If they decide to get a circumcision or a labiaplasty (or whatever else people do nowadays) as an older teen or adult, then that's fine. It's their body to change as they want. But forcefully and painfully removing a child's physical autonomy is just too disturbing.

[–]AlexReynard[S] 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know that if I found out the hood of my clit had been removed without my approval I'd be fucking pissed and be doing skin stretching exercises to try and get back to normal.

Ah, but here's a terrifying thought: you probably wouldn't. Much as the attitude of cut-guys-in-denial frustrates me, I can't help but understand it. To accept that this was wrong, you have to accept that your family knowingly subjected you to ritual child abuse. Your family. It's easier for me, as I had an abusive childhood and a thought like that doesn't bother me. But you'd have to believe that your parents went along with a massive conspiracy that includes all the doctors in North America. For some people, that's too impossible to grasp. If everyone else says it's okay, it must be. Normal = good. It reminds me of people leaving orthodox religions, and being disowned by their entire community for it. For some, there's too much emotional anchoring to bear that.

I guess it's unlikely I'll ever change anyone's mind in the moment. But what I hope is that I can introduce a nagging, ugly little idea into their heads that will burrow in and not let go. The kind of idea it might take a year or so to realize, "Holy shit, that's TRUE."

[–]MenDeserveRights 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've never liked doctors/medicine, and disagree with my parents on most things, though I do get along with them, so I guess that makes it easier for me to accept that I was ritually abused than some other guys.

[–]SoulofEquality 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ah, but here's a terrifying thought: you probably wouldn't. Much as the attitude of cut-guys-in-denial frustrates me, I can't help but understand it. To accept that this was wrong, you have to accept that your family knowingly subjected you to ritual child abuse. Your family.

I agree, for those with otherwise normal childhoods with loving, caring parents who in every other aspect of your life want you to be healthy and successful...well. It must cause at least some cognitive dissonance. But I think one could take a look at the ritual of circumcision, how prolific it is here in the States, how rare it is to ever meet someone intact, how there's so much disinformation regarding the "dirtiness" of having a foreskin (which is fucking stupid, because little girls have to learn to clean the daily smegma from around our labia... there is absolutely no reason a little boy can't be taught to also, it's not rocket science) etc and understand that just because it's popular doesn't make it right. Your parents aren't Hitler Incarnate for getting you circumcised, they are sheep being lead around, nodding in agreement with the faulty ideas or religious superstitions we still have in society.

It's easier for me, as I had an abusive childhood and a thought like that doesn't bother me.

Same here. I had massive self-esteem issues even after leaving home at 17 due to religious/extreme tradcon brainwashing telling me my "role" as a female person who loves their personal freedom human who's "duty" is to be a wife and babymaker, not to mention the years of gaslighting and abuse by my stepfather ramping up these ideas. Thinking your parents or elders necessarily want what's best for you is an interesting idea, but not something either of us have experience with, it seems.

But you'd have to believe that your parents went along with a massive conspiracy that includes all the doctors in North America.

Even if I had a good childhood, I'd most likely still believe this. I'm into researching conspiracy theories, and unfortunately far too many are now unclassified and shown to be true. I'm not talking Roswell shit, I mean the actual experiments the US government ran on prisoners, the insane, parts of the black community, soldiers... it's fucking scary, knowing what was gotten away with. There's a reason I'm very much in favor of our right to bear arms, even though (or because?) I love my country.

If everyone else says it's okay, it must be. Normal = good.

This is the type of thinking that makes good people commit/allow bad acts. It creates a flawed moral compass based on what is common vs what is right. Popularity over empathy... never a good thing. It's why we have so much backlash as MRAs, people don't see anything wrong with gynocentrism so obviously something must be wrong with us.

It reminds me of people leaving orthodox religions, and being disowned by their entire community for it. For some, there's too much emotional anchoring to bear that.

I agree. I was a Roman Catholic, and now am an atheist. There's people I grew up with who truly believe I'm going to roast in hell for my "hatred" of god. Thankfully I don't care anymore...but that took a while as well. It does indeed sound the same with coming to terms with circumcision. You have to be willing to give a real, hard look at exactly what the point of the procedure is, why various doctors and the media and some religious leaders are so heavily invested in it. Who profits? Why do they profit? At what cost to you as an autonomous individual? What other prices have you passively paid without being told or really thinking about it? Or worse, people have forced you to? All questions one needs to consider nowadays, because in the fight for men's rights you can't afford to be blindfolded anymore.

I guess it's unlikely I'll ever change anyone's mind in the moment. But what I hope is that I can introduce a nagging, ugly little idea into their heads that will burrow in and not let go. The kind of idea it might take a year or so to realize, "Holy shit, that's TRUE."

As stomach churning as they are, videos and pictures of circumcisions will probably help in that. It is keep squirreled away under the guise of a quick, clean, relatively painless procedure taken care of in a sterile hospital room. Most parents will never hear the cries of their son as his sexual organs are sliced into, and will only have to be slightly careful when cleaning his penis in the following days. I'm convinced that the reason similar types of female circumcision is hated and despised as much as it is, is because it's typically done to adolescent girls who are able to tell of the pain and betrayal of having their most sensitive parts cut away. Obviously there are also worse forms done to some girls, where the entire outer clitoris and labia are removed so she cannot experience any sexual pleasure...but these are not as common as people in the West are lead to believe. Regardless, any kind of genital mutilation should be seen for the cruelty it is, no matter who it victimizes.

[–]TheGlassStone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

And I don’t hold it against you or anyone else who thinks it does harm children. I wouldn’t want you to violate your conscience just for the sake of some skin.

I feel the same way about abortion. I can’t stop it, but I think it’s morally wrong. Do I look down on people who get them? No, I don’t. I just wish there was better education about the matter without it being turned into a political shit storm.

[–]AlexReynard[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Not to preach too much, but if I may offer my reasoning for being pro-abortion?

Being unwanted, and poverty, both fuck children up. As in, future criminals kinda fucked-up. As a child of abuse, I struggle every day with the mental illness my childhood gave me, as the unwanted son of a sociopathic single mother. When she got pregnant again and later miscarried, I felt a sense of profound relief that that kid would never have to deal with her as a mother. I want every type of birth control, including abortion, subsidized for free by the government. Anytime someone thinks twice about having a kid, I want them to have a greased path to ending that kid's life before the suffering starts. And anyone thoughtless enough to use an abortion as birth control should never be a parent.

[–]TheGlassStone 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Absolutely, and those are great, valid points. My arguments against abortion is that I believe in the sanctity of life (I am against the death penalty as well), and entertaining even the possibility that fetuses are alive and do feel pain hopefully gives people pause about what an abortion actually is, and the psychological consequences some people go through of not knowing if what they did was humane or not.

Like I said, greater education could go a long way for both sides, not shouting or picketing or physically assaulting each other because we disagree.

[–]AlexReynard[S] 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

<nod> Between you and me it's a disagreement about inherent worth of life vs quality of life, and I can certainly respect that. I wish every conversation could be both sides explaining their own position to the point where, even if there's not agreement, both sides feel understood and understand the other's words too.

[–]TheGlassStone 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yes, agree 100%.

[–]iainmf 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Should be up to the child when they are old enough.

[–]jmg836 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Why should it be up to the fathers? My mother didn't want this to happen to me, but my father wouldn't drop the subject. I wish she hadn't been so weak.

[–]Late_For_Username 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

What frustrates me about the whole circumcision debate is that women think they have a say in whether or not babies do or do not get circumcised.

To be fair, women have a perspective on male genitalia that men don't seem to share.

I've overheard women say that uncircumsised penises are never as clean as circumcised penises.

That could be affecting their decisions when deciding whether or not to get their male children circumcised.

[–]MenDeserveRights 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

If a woman says that, I'd just respond with "any penis is cleaner than all the folds of your vagina"

I really have no tolerance for women who force their sons to get circumcised because of their own preferences.

Want to cut off someone's genital skin? Cut off your own.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter