TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Some points everyone is missing!

DJOCKERr

September 5, 2021
35 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://youtube.com/shorts/7d_Hvq3c-Zc?feature=share
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Some points everyone is missing!
Author

DJOCKERr

Upvotes 35
Comments 76
Date September 5, 2021 2:43 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/piebpw/some_points_everyone_is_missing/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/some-points-everyone-is-missing.1066766
https://theredarchive.com/post/1066766
Top posts by DJOCKERr

[PostRemoved] Females argue if men's have the right to decide an abortion.

106 upvotes
April 26, 2021
/r/MensRights

Guess some of them have a brain.

4 upvotes
April 26, 2021
/r/MensRights

Guy's we want some jobs equality too!

1 upvotes
September 14, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]63daddy 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (130 children) | Copy Link

So many great points in such a short video.

A very low proportion of very wealthy men doesn’t mean society is male dominated. Of course the woman doesn’t mention that women actually spend more money than men do, due to men subsidizing women. Why do feminists complain about women working and earning less, when the end up with more money to spend?

[–]qemist 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

because they always want to push men further down.

[–]TheStumblingWolf 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's called the Apex Fallacy.

[+]Nick10inch -29 points-28 points-27 points 4 years ago (127 children) | Copy Link

On a larger scale, society is dominated by men. Society has been made by men for men. Saying that society is male dominated doesn't just mean that every male oppresses women. It means that we live in a patriarchal system where women lose their reproductive rights because cis men have been socialised to think it's their business. Male dominated means that most politicians are male. Male dominated means that a woman has to work harder than a man to be at the same level as him and that men can make all the mistakes they want, while women can't- e.g- us presidential elections. Learn what we mean by male dominated and then talk.

[–]63daddy 24 points25 points26 points 4 years ago* (88 children) | Copy Link

But we don’t live in a patriarchy. Women have equal voting rights. There are more female voters than male. Women can and do run for public office. Politicians, the majority of which are male are not advantaging men, they are passing laws advantaging women. That’s not male domination and it’s not a patriarchy. The fact that a head of state is male doesn’t make that country a patriarchy, just as having a female head of state doesn’t mean a country is a matriarchy or dominated by women.

If you believe numbers equals domination, then we live in a female dominant society, because more than half the population is female. There are some areas we see more men, and some areas we see more women. The fact men and women don’t do everything in equal numbers doesn’t mean on sex is dominant.

Women don’t have to work harder to get to the same level. In fact we artificially advantage women under affirmative action and women owned business advantages. Stop making stuff up.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ten inch (I think that’s called “fantasy”) also forgets the many places (including US states) that have legalised abortion, up to the stage where it’s is at least debatable if it’s gone to far even if you support abortion. In my country, Victoria has abortion without medical issues (abortion on demand) to 6 months. Given children born 3 months premature can survive, I don’t think the “bunch of cells” argument applies by then. Yet a Government headed by a man passed that bill.

[+]Nick10inch -22 points-21 points-20 points 4 years ago (86 children) | Copy Link

Living in patriarchy isn't about voting rights. It's about everything I've said . The reason there are more women voters is just an example of how we live in a patriarchal society. More women vote because they have more to lose if a misogynistic political cabinet is choosen. Even tho women can and do run for public office they are more harshly judged and held to a higher standard than any male candidate or politician. As most politicians are male they literally passed a bill restricting women's autonomy rights in Texas. As most politicians are male, pedophilia and rape cases are rarely taken seriously and actually a good chunck of politicians are rapists. If a law is passed that seems to advantage women, it's just for protecting women. And most countries are headed by men and a mostly male dominated cabinet, which is again an example of a patriarchal society. Start reading books or something

[–]The_big_A666 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

In what world have noncing and rape not been taken seriously

[+]Nick10inch -8 points-7 points-6 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

In this world, all the time

[–]The_big_A666 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Again, no

[–]Nick10inch -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Just say you don't talk to women

[–]The_big_A666 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Ah here we are, to insults we go

[–]Nick10inch -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Is it an insult when it's the truth

[–]The_big_A6667 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Oh BoY hE’s GoT mE tHeRe. HoW aM I eVeR gOnNa CoMe BaCk FrOm ThIs

[–]Angryasfk1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Glad to know you can know everything about people you have never met!

Don’t assume a few feminists you hang out with speak for women as a whole. Mattress Girl pushed this whole “my rape wasn’t taken seriously”, but it seems fairly clear she “realised” she was raped more than 6 months later when she and her “rapist’s” ex had a “bitch session” about him. It was then they both “realised they were raped”. But he still had the texts and emails she’d sent after she was “raped”, which convincingly showed she didn’t see herself as being raped at the time. As given that, Columbia and the police didn’t take action for an at best dubious claim of being “raped” a year earlier. And she was then held up as the poster girl for “rape not being taken seriously”!

Perhaps you should look up the Mark Pearson case, and see what happens when feminist theories about how “rape should be taken seriously” actually work in the real world. I wonder how many feminist campaigners were upset there even had to be a trial in that case when it’s clear you must just believe women!

[–]Clemicus 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

As most politicians are male they literally passed a bill restricting women's autonomy rights in Texas.

That's called responsibility and, you completely missed out who voted for it and, the religious aspect, babe

[–]Bojack35 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (59 children) | Copy Link

The reason there are more women voters is just an example of how we live in a patriarchal society. More women vote because they have more to lose if a misogynistic political cabinet is choosen.

How can you actually believe that... Does more white people than black people voting mean we live in a black supremacist society as those white people have more to lose?

As most politicians are male they literally passed a bill restricting women's autonomy rights in Texas.

A bill that had more support from female than male voters and the introductory speech when being proposed was made by a female politician?

As most politicians are male, pedophilia and rape cases are rarely taken seriously and actually a good chunck of politicians are rapists

You live in cloud cuckoo land don't you? Pedophilia and rape are two of the heaviest punished crimes there are. There is no evidence for you saying a good chunk of politicians are rapists? I presume your logic is thinking most men are so they must be too.

If a law is passed that seems to advantage women, it's just for protecting women.

This is a bad thing for women?

I hope you are a troll because its that or severely deluded.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

He’s (the troll is using a male moniker) desperate and reaching. The truth is that feminists have framed abortion as a man vs woman issue. They do this so they don’t have to discuss the morality of the issue such as when a foetus becomes a child. This should be of paramount importance for supporters of legal abortion. Instead feminists just it as purely whatever the woman wants. And this begs the question, do they think women should be able to terminate babies after birth? If so, come out and say so. If not, does the baby become a person by taking a lungful of air? Many feminists seem to cling to this. Essentially the view is that if you can’t see the infant, the infant is just a “clutch of cells”. This may be valid at 8 weeks, but it’s stretching it at 5 to 6 months

[+]Nick10inch -7 points-6 points-5 points 4 years ago (57 children) | Copy Link

There are more white voters because of voter silencing, not because of any other reason

Women can have internalized misogyny and the bill was mostly supported by male politicians who shouldn't even have a voice in the matter

Pedophilia and rape are the most punished? Then why do most pedophiles and rapists don't even go to prison? Why did we have a pedophilic president and why do we now have a president that is a rapist? Why is one of the supreme court justices a rapist? Do you even see how stupid you are? And most men aren't rapist, but the majority do contribute in rape culture.

And law that are made to protect women are because of men and because we live in a patriarchy

[–]The_big_A666 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Mate, stop trying to do this. We have all heard your points before and they have been debunked countless times. Get over yourself

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

When? My points arent debunked when it's literally the living experience of women

[–]The_big_A666 7 points8 points9 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Again, it isnt

[–]Nick10inch -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

So you just admitted that you don't talk with women?

[–]The_big_A6663 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Dude, you aren’t doing anything here

[–]Angryasfk2 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Yep all women want to have totally unrestricted abortion laws; men imprisoned without trial if a woman says he raped her or otherwise wronged her, men be banned from all political office, and any woman who says otherwise has “internalised misogyny”. Check! Oh and if anyone doubts any of this, they just never speak to women!

I’ll give you this. At least you don’t give Biden a pass out of political partisanship (too many fall into this trap). But who is the paedophile President? I haven’t heard of that one? Also what’s you’re view of women getting court ordered child support from the underaged fathers of their children? Are they off the hook as they’re women?

[–]Bojack35 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (49 children) | Copy Link

There are more white voters because of voter silencing, not because of any other reason

There are more woman voters because of voter silencing not because of any other reason.

You see how absurd it is when you fit reality to your narrative rather than your narrative to reality.

The reason for both disparities has to do with issues like voter availability (not being stuck at work)' engagement (caring about voting)' social engagement (feeling 'part' of the political system) and so on. To simplify it to one issue is either foolish or deliberately misleading.

Women can have internalized misogyny and the bill was mostly supported by male politicians who shouldn't even have a voice in the matter

Yes anything women do which you dont agree with is really the fault of patriachy- how patronising is that?! Of course male politicians have a voice in any social issue - should we ban female politicians from having an input on male issues?

Then why do most pedophiles and rapists don't even go to prison?

Because they are hard to prove.

Why did we have a pedophilic president and why do we now have a president that is a rapist?

Proof?

most men aren't rapist, but the majority do contribute in rape culture.

Why? Child abuse is committed by women at the same proportion as sexual abuse is committed by men - do women contribute to child abuse culture? Or are you just seeking to demonise a whole demographic for the widely condemned actions of a minority within it.

And law that are made to protect women are because of men and because we live in a patriarchy

Why would you need to explain an illogical opinion when you can just blame the patriachy! Much easier.

[–]Nick10inch -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (47 children) | Copy Link

Look dude, if you don't want to research this things and see how it is then there is no reason to talk. White women can vote, they arent black, there are literally a multitude of examples how there is voter suppression in the black community.

And yes, it's internalized misogyny when a woman is going against their rights. oh and yes, women should not participate when talking about men's reproductive right as they don't have penises, the same way men don't have uteruses and should not be part of the conversation.

Nope, they don't go to prison because the system works for them. When the system is made of rapists, it's normal for rapists to not go to prison. They protect their own.

There is more than enough proof of trump being in connection with pedophiles and he has more than 40 rape accusations. That's enough proof.

We are talking about rape culture? This isn't the conversation we are having

How is it illogical?

[–]Bojack35 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (44 children) | Copy Link

If you can't see how it is demeaning to dismiss the actions of women as being down to internalised misogyny just because you disagree with them then I dont expect you to grasp how illogical everything else you are saying is. I get it the big bad patriachy is to blame for everything no need for any critical thinking.

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (43 children) | Copy Link

It's not about me disagreeing with women. It's about misogynistic women going against what's good for all women, what doesn't click here? And it's not just patriarchy to blame, we have classism, racism, homophobia and a lot of other systems.

[–]Bojack355 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Why would "misogynistic women going against what's good for all women" happen? The answer is either as I believe that people have a variety of beliefs experiences and self interests which cause them to act differently. Or as you believe that those women have been socially conditioned to harm other woman and themselves.

Which seems more likely?

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Black women are no more “suppressed” than black men when it comes to voting surely! You’re claim was about “patriarchy” not some race prejudice issue. It’s very feminist to try to throw issues of black people (or gay men) into the mix to try to make women’s problems seem worse by some non-existent association.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

So if a man “knocks a woman up” in some hookup, and doesn’t want to be a father, he shouldn’t be obliged to pay child support? There don’t seem to be many feminists who support that. Are you one? You call Biden a “rapist”, so I’m hopeful you do. I’ll applaud you for consistency at least.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Give him his due. Most feminists give both Biden and Clinton a pass on the “believe all women” line.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

You really are a dumbarse

I have no respect for Biden, but I didn’t think it’s been demonstrated that he’s rapist.

I assume you’re referring to Kavanagh. The man has been slimed, but even Blasé-Ford didn’t say she was raped. Supposedly she was “jumped on”. Even if true, that’s an indecent assault, not a rape! And the claims were exceptionally vague.

I’m sick of people like you claiming society has no say in abortion laws. Is this really different in essence claiming that domestic violence is solely a “domestic matter” and is of no business to anyone else? A baby is utterly dependent upon its mother, but do you propose legalising infanticide? The Texas laws are too restrictive. If you’re going to have legal abortion, a woman has to have enough time to realise she’s pregnant and then make a decision. But there should be a limit on it.

But here’s the point. Many, MANY women think abortion is morally wrong. My first serious gf did not join the feminist group at university because they told her it was a prerequisite that she support abortion! And she was not some “born again” religious type either. Women like her, (as well as “God botherers”) think abortion should be restricted if not stopped outright. And why wouldn’t they? Abortion is not just a question of “women’s rights”. It’s a question of when does someone become a person and deserve legal protection. This is an actual legal decision for society. And abortion DOES concern us all to that extent. It’s a cop out to pretend it doesn’t.

[–]travelingmarylander 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Go onto some femcel subreddit. Your hate isn't welcome here.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

They wouldn’t like “him” either. Male feminists, certainly ones as far gone as “he” is don’t grasp the fact the sort of women “he” thanks to ingratiate himself with will always see him as the enemy.

And if feminists were serious about fighting for abortion rights, they should promote it on its own merits, not some “shutdown” non-argument of “men telling women what to do with their own bodies”. As has been pointed out again and again and again, these same feminists are quite happy to force 18 years of labour out of men in child support for a kid, with no say so in whether they want to accept such a responsibility. Few feminists batt an eyelid over this. So I find it hard to give much credence to their position on “bodily autonomy” since they only say it when convenient! So I think a non-sectarian view is surely that abortion cannot be justified without serious medical grounds after a certain level of development. But this is not a feminist view apparently. All I see is “term creep”. They push the threshold later and later and later. I wonder if we’ll come to a time where they back women having children who can walk and talk legally “euthanised” as they’re an intolerable burden on the mother!

[–]63daddy 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

In a patriarchy only men are given a say in governance which they use to the benefit of males. We don’t have that. Women have an equal say, even slightly more. There is no political position from which women are excluded. Again, we pass laws advantaging women.

More men than women being elected into political positions doesn’t make a country a patriarchy.

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

First, living in a patriarchal society isn't only about your political disadvantages as it is also about social disadvantages which I have already named a few. And I already said how women are politically disadvantaged in my previous comment so I won't be repeating myself, you can just read that

[–]63daddy 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

But nick, we have passed dozens of laws advantaging women, not the other way around. Like the woman in the. Interview you are ignoring the multitude of facts that don’t suit your agenda.

Again, just because one demographic is more common in a field doesn’t mean they have domination over all other demographics. There are more women psychologists than male psychologists, it doesn’t mean female psychologists have domination over male psychologists.

If you are not going to accept what domination actually means, then there is no point discussing the issue.

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

Babe, again, laws that seem to advantage women are just to protect women from men, that's it, it's not an advantage, it's a protection. And an interesting fact is that a lot of fields that are male dominated is because men in that field don't let women in it- for example, a garbage company was sued because they wouldn't hire women. A lot of game companies have been sued for discrimination in their hirering protocols between men and women, there are a lot of examples of this. Learn what domination means and how it affects women and then we can talk

[–]63daddy 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Laws advantaging women are not the same as laws that protect against discrimination.

The equal pay act for example is a protection. Laws advantaging women owned businesses are not protectionist, as the name makes clear, they are about advantaging women.

Again, you are simply ignoring all the facts that don’t suit your agenda, as well as coming up with new definitions for words to suit your agenda.

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

The only laws that seem to advantage women are the ones that protect them from violence and discrimination.

And no, it's not about fitting my agenda, it's about the actual truth, not about whatever you are trying to tell

[–]63daddy5 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

No nick. The women owned business advantage program for example even admits it’s advantaging women right in the title. There are protectionist policies, but also many programs advantaging women. Denying it doesn’t make these laws magically gone.

I’m pro-choice but pro-life abortion laws are not about men oppressing women. Many women are pro-life. People who oppose abortion believe they are advocating for the life that has not yet been born. They are not trying to oppress women. It’s incredibly dishonest to say that’s what pro-life abortion laws are about.

[–]Angryasfk1 point 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

I agree with that 63daddy. It’s a feminist lie that anti-abortion is some sort of “oppression of women” by men. I wonder if they do this because they lack the courage of their convictions to argue the merits of abortion, or consider the moral issues as to when it should be allowed or restricted. It’s an easy out to say it’s “men telling women what to do with their bodies”, and it is not convincing to anyone who thinks about it for more than 5 minutes. Abortion laws affect everyone to at least some extent. And that’s because it defines when someone becomes living and worthy of protection. In Victoria, abortion on request is legal up to 6 months (due to the Government pandering to feminists). If a 5 month foetus isn’t a person and has no rights, why spend scarce public funds on incubators and care on such premature infants? And yet that State Government does, and is quite happy to call those who’d question such spending baby killers! Square that circle!!!!!

[–]NiceNob 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Start reading the right books or something

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Are you actually stupid or are you trolling? The majority of voters being women “prove” we live in a “patriarchy”? What’s your next claim? Contraception proves women are forced to be baby making machines? Women being the majority at university proves they’re discriminated against in admissions? Men being the majority of members of legislatures prove women hold all the power in politics? Women living longer than men (on average) proves women’s health concerns are neglected?

[–]The_big_A666 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

Women have more legal rights than men and people still see them as oppressed.

[–]Nick10inch -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Other way around babe

[–]The_big_A666 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (15 children) | Copy Link

Just… no

[–]Nick10inch -2 points-1 points0 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Idk, men have their bodily autonomy rights, women don't

[–]mikesteane 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Like men can be circumcised without their consent and women can't? Like women have choices after conception, men only have obligations? What are you talking about?

[–]The_big_A666 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

No we don’t

[–]The_big_A666 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Women can abort the child without the mans consent (other than in Texas), woman can keep the child gene if the man didn’t want it and force the man to pay child support

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Yes we do

[–]The_big_A666 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

In what nation do you reside

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

The us

[–]The_big_A6663 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Then you don’t

[–]travelingmarylander 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

What are you talking about? Women are just as anti-abortion as men are. Women can vote, and they vote for male politicians. Women get advantages and freebies at every point in their career.

We get that you hate some men, now stop taking it out on the rest of us.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]armaadi 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

I hate all men babe* not some.

There we go. Pure misandry drives this bigot.

[+][deleted] 4 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]armaadi 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (12 children) | Copy Link

mis·an·dry

/miˈsandrē/

noun

dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex).

"poorly disguised misandry"

You said you hate all men, that's misandry.

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link

Alright? I don't care? Misandry doesn't actually hold any power unlike misogyny

[–]armaadi 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

So your argument is that you are a bigot but it's OK because you think your bigotry isn't as bad as other bigotry?

[–]d3ch01 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There's no point in arguing with this person. They are clearly misinformed and ignorant

[–]Nick10inch 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

How am I a bigot? Men aren't an oppressed class? You can be only a bigot towards an oppressed class babe

[–][deleted]4 points 4 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You said you hate all men, that's sexist bigotry at minimum. It's actually misandry, but I steelmanned your argument about society being patriarchal.

But holy shit, you didn't know hating people based on their gender is bigotry? Lol.

You thought you were a good person? Hot damn son.

[–]mikesteane 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

they have to work harder to be at the same level as a mediocre man

Do you have evidence for this?

[–]adoctorswife 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actually, we live in a matriarchy not a patriarchy.

[–]Angryasfk 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

What “reproductive rights” do women lose? If you’re talking about abortion I would point out that at least half of the “right to life” types are WOMEN! Something that feminists are in complete denial about! It may be a good catch cry to claim “old men tell me what to do with my body”, but it means you have nothing to say to women who oppose abortion!

Feminists (you?) also are quite happy to hold a man responsible for child support for 18 years regardless of whether he is part of the child’s life, or actually wants a child. You want absolute choice her her, and none for him. That’s the feminist idea of “equality” apparently.

[+]Mursin -17 points-16 points-15 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'll prolly get downvoted like fuck for this, but fuck it. I hate Jordan Peterson. He misses the point she's trying to make entirely and strawmans the fuck out of her. The man's a genius in the psych sphere but tries to anti-Noam-Chomsky himself into being some great political mind and fails miserably.

He knows what she means. She's not saying Men don't have problems, at least not in the context of this very small information she's able to present in this video. She's saying that men D O tend to get the better end of the societal shaft, and I'm personally inclined to agree. Not that that doesn't come with its own price, but that we do tend to get the benefits more.

As for everything else he mentioned, yeah... that's the fun of it. We've made this mess for ourselves over the past centuries since the Renaissance. We've put our own expectations, mores, and norms on ourselves and now we're whinging and bitching about those things we put on ourselves when women try to point out that we've been in control in general.

[–]63daddy 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She says society is male dominated and gives a few cherry picked examples where men are ahead as “proof”. By pointing out so many examples where men are behind, he’s making it clear her examples are cherry picked.

Even if he didn’t have counter examples, her examples don’t prove men dominate. She is simply showing males on average work and earn more. Her argument that women do more “unpaid labor” is incredibly misleading, and even if true, doesn’t make society male dominated.

[–]travelingmarylander 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

lol, you didn't listen to him at all. Most men have a harder life than most women. That's his point.

[–]Doyle_Trekka 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

So we should blame men for being homeless? Blame homeless men, regular men, top 1% of men, renaissance men?

Lets just blame men for everything right?

[–]Ekas_Babbar 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

MeN aRe HoMeLeSs, WoMeN mOsT aFfEcTeD

[–]Svenskbtch -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I am certainly not missing them - in fact, they all seem pretty obvious to me (in contrast to his Jungian mysticism and occasional bouts of social conservatism where his lucidity is harder to find).

The real question is: why in the world is anyone missing them, let alone find them controversial? They do not even contradict, only add nuance to the strawman version of, feminists precepts.

Even more fascinating is how this guy became such a hero and anti-hero in the first place. He is clearly uncomfortable in the limelight, speaks logically but monotonously and starkingly devoid of charm, and has never behaved discourteously - nor has any of the 100s of journalists digging around come up with anything even remotely bigoted he once said.

Even more striking is that the controversy is around issues going from concentric circles around the issue of mandating pronouns by force of law against which he took a principled liberal stance. That was then associated with his ventures into pop psychology, to which supposedly basement dwelling incels who manage to be pitiful and privileged at the same time, were drawn - though I could never figure out how JPs advice could be harmful to them, or anyone for that matter - it is all common sense about taking responsibility and knowing what you want.

But the loopy side of JP was left pretty much unscathed. Not only is he one of few adherents to Jungian mysticism, in many ways further out there than Freud: he also touts the Bible as a source of moral authority through allegory (without explaining, of course, why it should be so moral to offer your wife and daughters into sexual slavery to honor a guest, to take but one, comparatively mild instance from the Tora). His analyis of Theory and postmodern philosphy is particularly rickety - surely, he would see that the likes of Marcuso and Foucault would be vehemently opposed to the recent trends leading to, say, cancel culture and its ilk. In fact Foucault would see the use of the threat of an accusation of racism as exactly the kind of hidden, illegitimate us of power of definition that makes up most power actually exerted. In his essay, replace the power to decide who is mentally ill with the power to decide who is a bigot throughout, and his number one essay was pretty much about cancel culture.

So his wholesale dismissal is not only wrong, but a start and inexplicable contrast to the logic, precision, and nuance he brings to the fore in other areas.

Of course, that, too makes him fascinating.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter