TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Rational Male
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

The Empathy Gap in Tech: Interview with a Software Engineer | Is the gender gap in tech at least partly because people with Aspergers (5X more men than women) make very good software engineers?

EricAllonde

January 7, 2018
83 upvotes
/r/MensRights
http://quillette.com/2018/01/05/empathy-gap-tech-interview-software-engineer/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title The Empathy Gap in Tech: Interview with a Software Engineer | Is the gender gap in tech at least partly because people with Aspergers (5X more men than women) make very good software engineers?
Author

EricAllonde

Upvotes 83
Comments 34
Date January 7, 2018 10:22 AM UTC
(8 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/7opwsh/the_empathy_gap_in_tech_interview_with_a_software/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/the-empathy-gap-in-tech-interview-with-a-software.1180235
https://theredarchive.com/post/1180235
Top posts by EricAllonde

Kathy Griffin whines about her fee for hosting NYE telecast on CNN, tries to claim gender pay gap, is firmly slapped down.

26663 upvotes
January 1, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

I'm seeing more and more of this: feminists using "mansplaining" accusations to deal with being publicly proven wrong

11347 upvotes
September 7, 2017
/r/MensRights

Female BBC manager publicly declines promotion over pay inequality | After she threw a public tantrum, it's revealed that the male manager had several years more experience than her, justifying the difference in pay. The BBC is standing firm for once - good for them!

9152 upvotes
May 22, 2019
/r/PussyPassDenied

Who Would Win? Vidcon edition: answered

9072 upvotes
June 29, 2017
/r/PussyPassDenied

College tells construction crew to take down "Men Working" sign deemed 'sexist', even though it was accurate as the crew included zero women | Though women don't want to do dirty, manual labor jobs themselves, they still want to control how men do them

7812 upvotes
January 23, 2017
/r/MensRights

Looks like a great campaign to help tackle male suicide

7265 upvotes
April 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Imagine the outrage & hysteria if an article like this was written about women: "So thirsty I could drink the pool"

5808 upvotes
August 5, 2016
/r/MensRights

Woman divorced her husband and got $15m. He later listed his company on the stockmarket and earned $93m. You guessed it: she's now suing him for more money...

5662 upvotes
April 5, 2017
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]1up_for_life 48 points49 points50 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

After school robotics coach here. I get asked all the time how many girls are on my teams, nobody ever asks how many special needs students I have. The answer is seven, I have seven boys with special needs this year and nineteen students total. Some that aren't on the spectrum are pretty close.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 9 points10 points11 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Very interesting, thanks for that.

[–]BloodFartTheQueefer 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Who asks? Everyone?

[–]the_unseen_one 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've long been of the opinion that many autists are just low key idiot savants. A family I am close to has three children, all three of which are on the spectrum. The girl and youngest is the best off, and is only slightly weird. The second son is definitely out there, but he excels at math and programming. The third is the worst off and needs someone near him to keep him centered and focus or else he loses his way, but he has always been able to make photo realistic drawings without any training or real effort on his part. I think a lot of autists give up something to gain something in terms of brain function.

[–]BlindNowhereMan 31 points32 points33 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

this is a great article. This guy is high functioning autisic and is afraid of having that be uses against him as well as being a white male. He turn down and offer for Google because google sees autistic traits are brogrammer ones.. or sexist.

Also says this:

" He said that society increasingly sees groups instead of individuals, to the extent that group rights may supersede individual rights in all sorts of contexts, including politicised work environments. Because contemporary moral codes delineate women as vulnerable or marginalised, we stop seeing them as individuals with unique talents and idiosyncrasies, but as representatives of a victimised class. The reverse is true of men. Because women are now a victimised class, men are increasingly seen as victimisers, irrespective of their individual attributes or actions."

[–]putamanoutofaplane 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

The only fault I found is when she wrote:

Of course, women are sexually harassed in the tech industry just as they are harassed in every other industry in which they work

There are lots of industries where employees are mostly or altogether women, where there are no customers or customers are girls or women and where women don't usually get harassed. There are slao vast amounts of small businesses where women never get harassed.

She could also have added that men, too, get sexually harassed in many industries and particularly in female-dominated ones. But that is never brought up when or, rather, if somebody happens to discuss the under-representation of men. An additional problem for men is that they don't report the harassment as often as women

[–]-manatease 17 points18 points19 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It's just a necessary showing of loyalty to The Party, talking about male issues without such a reference would otherwise be pure misogyny.

[–]TestamentaryOtis1 point 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Haha, Qulilette is like Reason Magazine. Libertarians who want to be on good terms with mainstream liberals. They can't swerve too much from the righteous path. They have to acknowledge women's victimization, just to stay among the 'beautiful people'. Once you've acknowledged women's victimization and proven yourself to be one of the good guys, then you can voice your opinion.

[–]-manatease 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It is worryingly ironic how a group with neuro-atypical leanings can be targeted with what is tantamount to relentless bullying with such widespread acceptance. It's truly disturbing when you think of it in these terms. The hypocrisy involved when thinking of more PC-accepted, gender-neutral differences of ability is nothing short of disgusting.

[–]motorscuz 8 points9 points10 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well, if programmers play the disability card then maybe femnazis will leave them alone

[–]68696c6c 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I’m a programmer and there could be something to this. Female programmers are rare, I’ve only worked with two out of the dozens of people I’ve worked with. And guess what? They both had aspergers or autism. Lots of the men do too, or claim to. To be honest, it’s kind of a trendy thing for programmers to claim to be on the spectrum. But there’s no doubt in my mind the two women I’ve worked with have been on the spectrum. Both of them had/have obvious symptoms. It seems to help them get/enjoy the job more, but sometimes has created some difficulty for them when the job requires more social interaction

[–]YetAnotherCommenter 4 points5 points6 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

A good article, and its especially good to see more people are realizing there is a very large difference between aspie/nerdy types and the hypermacho types. The irony of the assault on Silicon Valley is that its being waged in the name of opposing traditional machoness, yet SV was built by people that weren't traditionally macho and were often bullied by the traditionally macho.

[–]nrkyrox 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We make good software engineers, but still can't get past the bitches in HR in the job application process because they're sick to death of working with geeky, socially-awkward aspies.

[–]azazelcrowley 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Diagnosing girls with Aspergers has a few stumbling blocks, as it doesn't present itself the same as it does in boys most often. It's possible there's more undetected girls with aspergers than boys, much like how depression expresses itself differently in men a lot of the time.

Doubtful that there's enough to close the gap, but i'd be cautious about a 5X result rather than something a bit lower.

[–]EricAllonde[S] 2 points3 points4 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Studies cite ratios between 4:1 and 15:1.

I don't have the expertise to make a judgement myself.

[–]autotldr 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the best tl;dr I could make, original reduced by 97%. (I'm a bot)


Last year I was working on an article about the tech industry when I decided to interview a software engineer who writes for Quillette under the pseudonym "Gideon Scopes".

Note, I'm not saying that all men differ from all women in the following ways or that these differences are "Just." I'm simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don't see equal representation of women in tech and leadership.

The third factor, Gideon said, was the empathy gap, where we tend to be more receptive to women's pain than men's.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Feedback | Top keywords: women#1 work#2 autism#3 industry#4 high#5

[–]FyrW -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago (17 children) | Copy Link

You know the gender gap in tech can simply be explained by differences in biology. No need to search for psycological disorders to put women in a good light for not choosing STEM.

Women are less genetically evolved than men and that's okay. Everyone are of equal worth. You can't fault them for being women. That's just how they were born.

[–]gjsmo 6 points7 points8 points 8 years ago (16 children) | Copy Link

Wow, that's ignorant. Read your own damn article:

Just because the Y chromosome, which determines gender, is evolving at a speedy rate it doesn't necessarily mean men themselves are more evolved.

[–]Burninglegion65 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (14 children) | Copy Link

Honestly, I think that is a poor statement to begin with. I fail to understand how rapidly evolving and not more evolved when the differences are 2% vs 30%. Im going on a limb here and guessing that this statement is probably a snippet from the interview which had more detail afterwards.

Edit: agreed though that the guy acting superior because of it is ignorant.

[–]gjsmo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

FWIW he's now tripled down on the ignorance. I'm not even trying here but... wow.

[–]FyrW -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

Just because you do not understand what you quoted does not mean that I'm ignorant. In fact if you did understand her quote, you'd understand that she confirms my comment.

[–]gjsmo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Would you care to explain yourself then? The burden of proof is on you to explain how that quote supports your statement "Women are less genetically evolved than men..." . That is an absolute statement, which means you must provide absolute proof.

[–]FyrW -3 points-2 points-1 points 8 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Would you care to explain yourself then?

If you'd been polite I might've but jerks like you that bully and shame others deserve zero respect.

Learn some manners & educate yourself, asshole.

[–]gjsmo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

/u/FyrW:

Learn some manners

Also /u/FyrW:

Yes you already managed to show how you're great at showcasing your lack of intelligence

keep jerking off to yourself about how smart you are xD

asshole

[–]FyrW 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

You show zero respect and are treated with none in return. Not everyone you encounter will submit to your abusive behaviour

[–]gjsmo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Buddy, you're the one being abusive here. Not only abusive towards women but abusive towards me, and for what? Because I said that your viewpoint was ignorant? If you're really so convinced of it you'd be able to argue for it but so far all you've done is hurl insults.

[–]FyrW0 points 8 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

Buddy, you're the one being abusive here.

Deflection. Typical manipulative behaviour.

Not only abusive towards women

Facts are not abusive.

but abusive towards me

Deflection.

Because I said that your viewpoint was ignorant?

Yes. There is no need to insult if you want a polite conversation. If you want insults, then that's a good way to start and that's what you got, you jerk.

If you're really so convinced of it you'd be able to argue for it but so far all you've done is hurl insults.

I am able to argue for it but I have no need to convince an arrogant insulting prick like yourself. Learn some manners and you might find that others are more mannered toward you.

Don't like insults? Then do not throw stones when you live in a glass house, asshole.

[–]fonduman 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

"Evolve" really just means "change". You can evolve to become more inferior than you were before. Of course, "inferior" is a bit of a subjective term when so loosely defined. Are ants inferior to humans? Well, they might be just as successful as a species, depending on how you look at it.

[–]FyrW -2 points-1 points0 points 8 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link

I am superior to /u/gjsmo that doesn't even understand what his quote means and based on his own lack of understanding calls me ignorant. He is a jerk

[–]gjsmo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

/r/iamverysmart

[–]FyrW -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yes you already managed to show how you're great at showcasing your lack of intelligence. Now you also managed to link to a circlejerk subreddit with an inferiority complex.
Another time don't call people ignorant if you do not even understand the article that you read. But keep jerking off to yourself about how smart you are xD

[–]gjsmo 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

/r/iamveryVERYsmart

[–]FyrW 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't respect people that insult me and you're as stupid as they come. Let me cut it out in paper for you:
Men genetically evolved more than women for the past 6 million years. Fact. And your quote doesn't dispute that even if you want it to. I can understand how an uneducated person would think your quote disputes that.

People that insult others and link to /r/iamverysmart instead of replying with logos should probably be ignored but you're great entertainment so might as well

[–]FyrW -1 points0 points1 point 8 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Ignorant?
I did read the article and not necessarily is what it says but our y-chromosome which is more evolved than the x-chromosome seems to suggest that this is the case.
When evidence change, my view will change but until then keep living in your fantasy world.
You call me ignorant because evidence doesn't support your wishful thinking.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter