I hate whenever it's brought up that female-on-male violence also exists just like the other way around when misandrists as usual will try to deflect and mitigate it and one way they tend to do so besides the usual (it doesn't happen as much, it's not on the same scale, men aren't afraid to be out at night, etc.) another that's noticable is when they bring up the argument that women on average tend to be physically weaker and don't do as much damage as men do and when men are violent it tends to be more severe, sometimes results in death, etc. So, somehow that makes female violence less severe and not as bad in these peoples' eyes? To me saying female violence is less severe and results in less damage or death is akin to saying being stabbed or slashed isn't as severe as being shot; it's still very dangerous and can still cause great harm or even death. It never ceases to amaze me the excuses misandrists always have up their sleeves to want to mitigate male violence victims and try to mitigate and sanitize female violence. In my book violence by both genders is equally bad and unacceptable, and a male victim of female violence should be helped as much as a female victim of male violence should. It shouldn't be a contest as to who's stronger, causes more damage and which happens to who more. But as usual, this just doesn't occur to them. Whether violence is male-on-female, female-on-male, or both harming someone of the same gender, it's a no-brainer it's all bad and should all be recognized and condemned equally. But misandrists aren't exactly known for using their brains.