Two examples of realistic false accusations by women against men.

What curdles my blood is how detailed the fantasies are, how compelling the tears are, how believable the lies are:

  • Charlie Rogers fabricates a story of a hate crime committed by three men:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hom-VLfDv4U

  • Two women fabricate a story of a hate crime:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HprkRRG1_Dg

In both cases, the lies were exposed because of arrogance. The women had too much faith in their gender-impunity and left incriminating physical evidence.

How many others did NOT leave a trail of e-mails and receipts and DNA? How many innocent incarcerated men cry in anguish for justice that will never come?

What scares me is that "presumption of innocence" no longer applies to men who are accused by women. Women know this. Some women are starting to use false allegations for strategic reasons (divorce, custody, revenge, politics, or to take control of a business).

How can a man defend himself? Has legal one-party audio recording become an MRM issue? If not, then what other defence is there for men who face strategic false accusations by women?