HYPOTHETICAL

Two consenting adults share an interaction. As a byproduct of this interaction, one of the adults is empowered with a choice. A choice, that if made, will irrevocably change the rest of both their lives.

Or not.

The other adult?

Has no say in the choice at all.

Objectively, is this hypothetical situation reasonable?

If you think this is reasonable, switch roles. What is unreasonable? If you think it is not reasonable, what is reasonable?

Try and view this with as much objectivity, in context to reasonableness, as possible. As reasonableness, and objectivity are key parameters to defining what is just.

Have at it.