I think it's interesting that I've often read in The Red Pill that many feminists are not honest about their sexual strategies - because their theory doesn't match their practice. (Sexually speaking.)

Over in reddit's askfeminism someone asked the simple question "Can there be a positive feminist heterosexuality". (I'm not sure what that poster's alternative is, they didn't suggest one.)

I made this totally reasonable contribution. You will find what you might call "blue pill" thinking there, but I'm entitled to my own morality especially there.

Now, what is interesting is that that comment was removed, and I was also banned from reddit's askfeminists - though its sidebar explicitly allows such "critical" discussion (my comment wasn't critical.) I decided to ask reddit's feminism about it, and was summarily banned from there also without any reply.

Now, what I think is really interesting about that, is that a subreddit that said "This is a place to ask feminists your questions and to discuss the issues with feminists" decided to ban me for taking a quite fair side. I'd think as far as the content, the red pill would be far more likely to disagree with what I posted than that community.

So, here you have a very clear example of a "feminist" community who says "External articles can be a topic of discussion" and who says "all comments are open to challenge/debate, regardless of who initiates the challenge, or their ideological orientation".

As you can see, when it comes to actual sexual strategy, this is such a huge issue that it's cause for a ban from a community like that.

That is pretty unbelievable. I have huge problems with the red pill, because I don't agree that women are 'inferior', need to be referred to by derogatory names, can't participate equally in society, be knowledge workers, scientists, programmers, technicians, researchers, everything men can be, and I know from historical examples that some of the largest contributions have been made by women. So I personally am not going so far as exemplifying a male-dominated viewpoint, and I disagree with huge amounts of content.

But when it comes to who they have sex with, or whether that sex can be feminist, the very discussion is so threatening that it causes a ban from communities that are explicitly open to discussing those issues.

Of course, this is a problem. I'm not going to go around abusing my power, raping whoever I want, and so forth - even if in some evolutionary sense this could be a "successful" sexual strategy for some meaning of the term. But real feminists, who are supposed to be honest and filter some of the advice into some usable form, are not willing to honestly address those points. (They're not doing their jobs.)

So here you have an example of being banned from a feminist community for so much as mentioning the issue. Make no mistake: this is intellectually dishonest. It makes interfacing with feminists or upholding any feminist ideals extremely problematic.

In essence, as I have directly quoted from their own rules, they are hypocritical. For shits and giggles I read the sidebar rules here before posting. I come a lot closer to violating them here, but I am sure my post will still not be removed, because I don't think the red pill is full of hypocrites. I think even though it's easy to find reasons to remove my post, no one will do so.

Actually watch me say it in black and white (and I really think this): many posters in red pill are wrong, criminal people, many posters to red pill are literal rapists (actual rapists, commit actual rape by any standard of that term), follow wrong and incorrect ideology, and are just wrong in the actions they choose and the reasons they choose them. many people's advice and philosophy/attitudes here in the red pill should never be followed by anyone.

Even though I just said that, I think my post and example will still be approved. While, when I bent over backwards to be accommodating to feminists, and did not breathe a word of disagreement with it on any point, they felt the need to ban me for so much as mentioning the fact that most women don't actually want to physically escalate with guys and play that role.

It's hypocrisy in action.