TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Justice for Men and Boys
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • Mensactivism
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

Programmer: "There is specialization in our species. It seems pretty clear that programming as it exists today is a mostly male thing." Commentors hamst. He backpeddles.

freewanderer

August 22, 2013
19 upvotes
/r/TheRedPill
Archived from /r/TheRedPill

r/TheRedPill is a subreddit for discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.

TheRedArchive is an archive of Red Pill subreddits and blogs. This page is our copy of the original post.

/r/TheRedPill archive

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Programmer: "There is specialization in our species. It seems pretty clear that programming as it exists today is a mostly male thing." Commentors hamst. He backpeddles.
Author

freewanderer

Upvotes 19
Comments 45
Date August 22, 2013 4:52 PM UTC
(12 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/TheRedPill
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1kvu17/programmer_there_is_specialization_in_our_species/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/TheRedPill/programmer-there-is-specialization-in-our-species.233319
https://theredarchive.com/post/233319
Red Pill terms in post
the red pill
Top posts by freewanderer

Guy makes a mild sexual joke while sitting in the audience at a programming conference, female "developer evangelist" nearby gets offended and raises a shitstorm, gets the guy - a father of three - fired

193 upvotes
March 20, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Women in Tech: "If more men learned to put away their privilege and have empathy for other people we wouldn’t have this problem!”

50 upvotes
May 29, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Guy dates fatass, feels guilty when he can't get it up for her, /r/fitness white knights are all up in arms

44 upvotes
March 20, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

[Video] Karen Straughan (GirlWritesWhat) Presentation at the 2013 NY Libertarian Convention [~1 hour]

43 upvotes
May 3, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Guy posts on TIL how the woman appearing in the iconic "We can do it!" WWII poster quit the job she couldn't do it. Epic hamstering in comments.

42 upvotes
June 14, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

[Video] Russell Brand, the alpha in the room, completely dominates the MSNBC morning show hosts (two women and a man)

29 upvotes
June 18, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

An incredible alpha widow story: woman falls in love with mentally handicapped bad boy, it lasts a few years and she never recovers.

23 upvotes
November 20, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Wasted chick gets into car of random guys and says (among other incoherent things) "take me to your house, take advantage of me" (at 1:56)

22 upvotes
July 27, 2013
/r/TheRedPill

Comments

[–]freewanderer[S] 21 points22 points23 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

I'm a co-founder of a successful tech startup. What the guy says in the article is pretty obvious to anyone who has spent any time in the industry (and can look at things without beta glasses), regardless of the NAWALT comments.

[–]3Ill_mumble_that 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago* (6 children) | Copy Link

Fuck man. Why did it have to be scripting.com. This guy is my favorite tech writer. These women are insane.

All he did was ask a rhetorical and very valid question and add in some commentary.

This witch:

I'm a female programmer and I'm going to be very blunt here:

Qualifier. Had to throw that in there.

you are displaying a worldview that's very gender-essentialist. Gender essentialism and sexism walk hand-in-hand.

Shame tactics. Indirectly saying "you're a sexist!" Ad hom.

Numerous studies have shown that there are very few differences between men's and women's brains that rise above the level of statistical noise.

False statements that aren't backed up by a single quoted source. Great.

A lot of women choose to leave programming, or choose to never learn, because the community shelters a lot of this gender-essentialist, scientifically invalid nonsense.

Blames men.

Then there is this guy who makes me want to give up on humanity. Fuck.

kevinmarks
I've worked with quite a few women programmers over the years, and it is the endless grinding misogyny that tends to make them give up.

[–]watersign -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

lol, i bet the real reason they give up is if they're half way decent looking, they get knocked up and their husband takes care of them. like most women

[–]vx6 4 points5 points6 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I think women in general suck in programming. If I take my example, the females in all my CS labs seemed to struggle the most. The thing they didn't understand is why they were struggling. It was because when they were out partying it up and riding alpha cock all weekend, I was sitting alone in my room writing code for "fun".

[–]3Ill_mumble_that 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

They think all they can be Marissa Meyer.

They can't. And Marissa Meyer lies to other women about how to be successful because she doesn't want the competition.

Source: http://ideas.time.com/2013/08/22/marissa-mayers-princess-problem/

I say that's a smart move.

But listen to the entitlement of this bitch who wrote the time.com article:

And her reticence is irksome. She is one of only 21 female CEOs in the Fortune 500. Doesn’t she owe it to us to tell us how she got there?

[–]vx6 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

strong entitlement there.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]vx6 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I can keep my views and you can keep yours.

[–]the_letter_P 16 points17 points18 points 12 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link

Its funny to read the logic of these people in the comments. It pretty much goes like this:

There are vastly more male programmers than females programmers, therefore there is "sexism" somewhere.

Then the next handful of people start arguing about where this sexism is. Is it the programmers themselves? No, its the corporate culture. Wait, No it isn't, its the media!. Hey wait a minute...

Its funny cause someone from each of those groups will chime in because they work in those areas and know for a fact there is no institutionalised sexism there (if anything its usually the opposite) and so pass the blame of "sexism" over to the next person in the line. Its like a bunch of kids chasing after an elusive boogeyman that no one can seem to objectively find. They're in a forest running in circles screaming because a squirrel ran up a tree and it set off a chain reaction of screaming and panic amongst them, cause they "heard a monster".

God help the man who dares to say "wait a minute...maybe there isn't a massive conspiracy of sexism in every aspect of programming. Maybe its something inherent in women and men at a biological level which makes them predisposed to particular fields of study/work". If anyone dare step out of the "Men and women are equal in all ways!" philosophy, they are likely to be hen-packed by the feminist vultures who are constantly flying in a circle overhead all internet discussion.

[–]Endorsed ContributorRedBigMan 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Just look at the prodominant gender of nurses, school teachers, daycare employees, human resources, public relations, social workers, etc... Most of those women are vastly overrepresented

Men are overrepresented in Firemen, Police, Paramedics, Military, Engineering, Construction, etc...Notice all these jobs require more muscles and more brains to pull off.

I guess the feminists cant grasp the concept that women and men have different abilities unless it's to lower the bar so that women can enter a profession (like Emergency Responders and the like)

[–]puck_mar1n 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

My favorite excuse is that there are few women in STEM fields because of the way female STEM students get treated by their male counterparts.

Let's think about that for a minute... Did you stop and think for a minute that maybe increasing the number of female STEM students might fix that problem?

[–]the_letter_P 17 points18 points19 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

The thing is, STEM female students are treated like royalty. There is so much pressure on universities to get women into "underrepresented" fields, that being a female gives you near automatic admittance to them. It is by far easier to get a qualification in a STEM field as a woman then a man. and companies will snap you right up just to show how "diverse" they are. Same is true with ethnic minorities.

I wouldn't be surprised if in a few years time when a female walks into a STEM lecture hall she has a red carpet and flower petals thrown in front of her to make her walk to her seat more pleasant. God forbid the petals are the wrong color though. That would be the STEM fields systematic oppression of her as a female.

As for men being underrepresented in loads of fields such as teaching and care work, etc? "LOL, WAT R U? a FAGG??22"

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]the_letter_P 10 points11 points12 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Believe me, the feminists will not be waving Margret back.

Slightly off topic, but Margret Thatcher is hilarious. She is like the embarrassing little secret that feminists never really want to talk about.

What I mean is, all we would ever hear about from feminists is how oppressive men are in the world and the old cliché "if women ruled the world there'd be no more wars". So low and behold a woman manages to fall into the highest seat of power in the land. And she also manages to hold it for over a decade.

Well given that men are naturally evil and oppressive, and women kinder and merciful, this should be the beginning of a new Utopian Britain, right? Nope. In fact, she turned out to be one of the most cut-throat leaders that Britain had seen for many decades. Women more nurturing? She cut the welfare state down to record low levels. More just? She systematically destroyed the unions and sent many thousands into poverty. Less warlike? She declared war for the first time since WW2 within her few years (Falkland's war). More social justice? She pretty much took all nationalised services except the NHS and turned them into private monopolies. Well at least if nothing else, she must have actively tried to help the rest of her sisterhood succeed, just like men apparently do with other men? Nope. She actively stated she did not want any other women in the cabinet and thought they weren't as intelligent as men.

So where the hell are the feminists now? Should the miners who were on strike and living in poverty have said to themselves "Gee, I am being oppressed and it is from this woman. Therefore there is a massive female conspiracy to keep men down. I will call it...THE MATRIARCHY!"? No they didn't. Because what feminists are too stupid to understand is that oppression is not a gender issue. It is a power issue. Those in power oppress those without it. Regardless of gender.

And now somewhat back on topic. Whenever feminists want to prove that some women can be good in STEM fields, they reference people like Marie Curie. I am not taking anything away from her. She was insanely talented. Yet, she did all this in a pre-feminist era. So which is it feminists? Either patriarchy is crushing all female STEM talents or women aren't naturally good at it. You can't pick and choose from both sides of the argument to try and win your case. Maybe...just maybe, women like Marie Curie got the recognition they did because they were actually talented in what they were doing. Imagine that...someone getting recognition for talent and not some silly social conspiracy. Crazy I know.

[–]jakethesnake76 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This reminds me of a story that Walter E. Williams tells of when he taught at George Mason University, Back in the 70's a student was arguing with him about a text in the economics class and how to interpret the courses teaching manual. Walter simply told the young man to read out loud the name of the author who of course was Walter Williams. Walter said that students view of him changed in the 90's he was thought to be teaching merely because of a quota. BTW Walter E. Williams is a black man and proud of his achievements as is Thomas Sowell .

[–]averageredditor123 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

There is so much pressure on universities to get women into "underrepresented" fields, that being a female gives you near automatic admittance to them.

So true. Years ago, I attended a visiting session for a very selective engineering school that I was applying to. Every single visitor there was male, and the female staff member leading the session practically begged us to encourage girls we know to apply to the school.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

The women who are in STEM fields are shit hot though, from what I've directly witnessed.

[–]DexterousRichard 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Dude. This is NOT true. Maybe you live in bizarro land, but at at least one top engineering school I have personal experience that they are mostly fat, ugly, and wear purple capes around on top of their backpacks. Not that the smartest guys are hot or anything. But the girls certainly aren't either.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Numerous studies have shown that there are very few differences between men's and women's brains that rise above the level of statistical noise.

I'd love to see the numerous studies that have come to this conclusion. That is such an absurd statement.

In those rare instances where some measurable difference exists, the standard deviation within a gender is near-universally (and I'm only saying "near" to avoid an absolute statement) larger than the difference in averages between the two genders.

This is completely meaningless.

Immediate familes are genetically more similar than non-families. But the standard deviation within a family is near-universally larger than the difference in averages between one family and another.

After reading the above paragraph, if you manage to draw the conclusion that familes aren't genetically similar, you're hopeless.

[–]atlascrowed 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you say "I think there's something about programming that makes women not want to do it" then you are displaying a worldview that's very gender-essentialist. Gender essentialism and sexism walk hand-in-hand.

Oh great, another bullshit term to throw at people who dare poke the feminism dragon. My favorite of these is "heteronormative". It's heteronormative to assume most couples are male and female. Well I think it's feminormative to assume most women are more capable than most men.

[–]Endorsed ContributorSarcasticus 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Heteronormative is a fancy academic word meaning, "Applicable to the majority of people."

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 6 points7 points8 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Pseudointellectual masturbation

[–]HarleyWalker 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Heteronormative, or in other words just normal.

[–]AnasRexGottfried 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The industry I work in is over 95% male and the only reason women are around at all is because they fill bullshit HR roles such as sexual assault coordinating liason.

With the exception of one archetype, the older motherly type, every woman at my work is a problem. I would bet that it's the same at every job, next time you're at work, look at where the root of the problems are coming from.

[–][deleted] 9 points10 points11 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Women don't want to be programmers because women have decided that nerds aren't cool. This is just another case of the female hivemind shooting itself in the dainty foot.

[–][deleted] 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Podrick4 points 12 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

It's a shame really, because struggling is just a part of learning. And when you overcome that struggle you come out a better person and feel good about yourself. Shame they don't see it that way.

[–]heisamanster 7 points8 points9 points 12 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I'm actually glad there is less women who are into programming, to be honest they are lazy. I've worked with several, they will code, but don't like to solve bugs. So they tend to use "puppy dog eyes" to these beta guys, and will gladly fix emm. Me on the other hand, I tell emm I don't got time, I'm tryna change the world.

[+]btvsrcks -11 points-10 points-9 points 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Um, I'm female and was a lead programmer for a very large company. If you have lazy programmers that is a problem with hiring, not the sex of the programmer.

I'd still be programming except I retired early.

[–]TRP VanguardVZPurp 16 points17 points18 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Not everything is about you

[–]Ragna_The_Blood_Edge 3 points4 points5 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

"Retired early"

Enough said

[–]btvsrcks -3 points-2 points-1 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm sorry, did me making a ton of money make me unqualified?

[–]DingFuckinDong 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Right off the bat, you're having trouble reading -- I didn't say "can't" I said "don't want to."

This is exactly the kind of condescension and mean-spirited attack that keeps women out of tech. You've got your answer and it is you.

WEEOOOWEEEOOOOO DAMAGE CONTROL AT 12:00

Only a woman could think that pointing out a mistake is a mean spirited attack.

[–]watersign 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I had an old friend who worked as a hotel front desk dude when we were younger. His manager was a woman who was married to some corporate manager guy and he told them they he doesn't hire women because all they do is cause fucking problems. My ideal work place has about 2-3 women max. I dont even like working with attractive women because they are fucking batshit insane/drama whores. Im a fucking pervert, dont get me wrong..i think about licking womens asses and titties all day but when it comes to work i dont have time to fuck around, nor do i have the tolerance for stupidity and elementary school games

[–]empyblessing 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Hey is programming still a good job? I've heard it went to shit since outsourcing.

[–]pjcelis 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

PHP spaghetti code written by some $5/hour code monkey isn't going to get you very far. If you can write modern code (MVC, design patterns, test driven development, etc) and think logically about business you will be very desirable as a developer.

Edit: If you want to see an example of how industrial strength code is being made, do www.railstutorial.org

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Does everyone forget that Ada Lovelace, a woman, was the first 'programmer'?

[–]zedmeyn 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

programming was a female dominated profession back in the punch card computer days if I'm not mistaken. At the time they didn't realize what additions like GUI's and programming languages would do for computing. When computing shifted towards progress and really began to evolve rapidly (last 35 years imo) is when men took over the industry by number.

[–]my_ns_account 2 points3 points4 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Programmers were always men. Women were just sofisticated secretaries doing repetitive work punching cards.

[–]Endorsed ContributorSarcasticus 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

That's debatable. I would argue Charles Babbage wrote the first computer program with his difference engine.

[–]autoNFA 0 points1 point2 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't think people are arguing that women can't possibly be talented programmers - just that the vast majority of talented programmers are men due to basic variance between the sexes and not prejudice/sexism.

[–]freewanderer[S] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

So, NAWALT?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Well, yea. Do I have to accept all TRP dogma to be on here?

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points1 point 12 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Don't present an exception as a rule and you wont get called out for doing it.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points3 points 12 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Where did I present anything as a rule?

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter