• Women only tournament are innately discriminatory towards men because it doubles their opportunity and having an upper hand is the only way women can still earn a living through chess while hundreds of men who outrank them but can not earn a living through chess with just open tournaments due to lack of an advantage that women feel entitled to.
  • Women have lower-standards in receiving "chess titles" allowing them to exaggerate their worth and earn even more money through coaching and gain more fame by advertising their gender over their skill. As if being a woman comes with inherent value?
  • There was a controversy over a man who called a blonde woman a "blonde woman" an example of men being treated like second class citizens not even allowed to address women without proper honors. On the other hand, people making fun of male chess players by pissing over the board, we have chess commenters making fun of the brutal assault of men(Mikhail Tal) in heinous ways!
  • This isn't a disadvantage but rather a lack of an advantage: Women chess players get more fame just because they're women! We're simultaneously required to view them as chess players in open tournaments or "women" chess players in women-only tournaments whenever it suits them! Judit Polgar screams "I'm a woman" in podcasts and interviews and the fact that she would've never gathered such fame if she was a man!
  • Women chess streamers in twitch(Botez) regularly break their terms of conditions; specifically of "mischaracterization" to gain more viewers and it's demotivating enough that they get viewers for being women but it's ridiculous that they can get even more from breaking rules.
  • There are soo many stories perpetuated by popular media about women bashing men in ways that a young boy listening to them might mistake it for female worship!