~ archived since 2018 ~
Popular
Other
ThisIsTheEnd6
[removed]
[–]iainmf[M] [score hidden] 5 years ago stickied comment (3 children) | Copy Link
An excellent example of constructive criticism of the sub.
Good work.
[–]SoundSecret 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Hey this is really cool! Good on you
[–]maxlvb 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Did you forget the /s
Feminists and women need to stop holding men to standards they're personally unwilling to meet.
[–]SoundSecret 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
No, I’m also not sure of what that really means. My personal philosophy is that hatred on any sides is counterproductive, and we need to work together. Because if it’s only true equality that we seek, the only way to achieve that goal will be collectively working together. In that way, we are a team, we want to feel valued and heard, and to be satisfied with our treatment.
I don’t associate with any political party or group because of this. The polarization of our society has grown so extreme that we are beginning to fall apart again. So, in your view, that would probably be that feminists are beginning to oppress men.
My point is that saying hateful things spreads a hateful message, and that only adds to the metaphorical fire. It’s counterproductive, and really throws off my vibrational fields to be honest.
People walk away from online ‘fights’ with complete strangers with anger and disdain. It is rare that somebody’s mind is changed, we are all programmed to believe that what we think is what is right. But everyone thinks that, and there are a LOT of opinions out there.
And that’s my opinion, I know I’m not right nor wrong in that either. I just see you and everyone else as a fellow human being, walking along in our journeys together. So, yes, I will advocate for peace and kindness; empathy and open mindedness. Without those factors, I don’t believe that real or meaningful changes can be born.
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
I have no problem with the MGTOW crowd but I think the different spaces should be reserved for different conversations.
I mean, it's okay to have a problem with them. You can acknowledge the causes of their pain without condoning how they express it.
When fighting for human rights, you can't alienate huge portions of society with comments like these.
I agree. And just to be explicit, misogyny is also bad merely because it's bad, not just because it delegitimizes men's activism.
Some of those comments aren't okay, but I wouldn't agree that all them are examples of hating women. For example, the one about having sexual worth tied to your bank account is an issue of objectification, not a condemnation of women based on their gender. I wouldn't go into a woman's group and tell them that complaining about objectification is actually man-hating. It isn't. Subs like this are the perfect place to discuss societal issues faced by men.
I also think the quote about feminism is borderline but ultimately acceptable. It stops short of saying that women actually act that way. Feminism is one of the biggest obstacles in the way of equality for men - we need to be able to criticize it.
Also, most of reddit's feminist and "against hate" circles are ideological, extremely partisan, hypocritical, and often the very hate they preach against. I couldn't care less what they think of me or this sub.
I don't agree with your post 100%, but it's a substantive critique of this sub's culture and that's awesome. You might not realize how rare a post like this is. Most of the criticism we get from "anti-hate" groups is not made in the same good faith as yours. A lot of links on reddit (and even publications outside of reddit) are fond of taking things out of context in a way that you didn't. We can't kowtow to people who ultimately want to see us silenced, and have to resort to false citations just to make that argument.
Finally - and this goes back to my first point about MGTOW - when men express frustration with women, we as a society should have the same curiosity that we do when women say they're frustrated with men. Is it all women-hating, or are some examples actually cases of systemic sexism against men, playing out at the individual level?
[–]suzuki1369 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
They did cherry pick a little bit, but most of it wasn't. Granted, still a good post.
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
So you would rather they be silenced away to places and have them draw the hate instead? Look, I get your point. But real question: do you think it is in any way okay for people to be resented because they are curious whether or not something as integral to life as partnership, romance and love is being trivialized?
Because that's also what is happening to men right now. If anything, their continued silencing and shaming of the people questioning what is going on, is exactly what is fanning the flames and resulted in them coming here. Now you're basically telling them they should stay within their own containers because the issues concerning men that you feel most aligned with, are more important than theirs. Even if you send them away and they have their discussions there, they will still be berated, because they don't conform to the status quo.
There's a certain naivete and fear in your post here. As if it is this important to conform to the opinions of others. As if this has worked out so well in the past, and they didn't find ways to make jabs at MRA before. It's one thing to snuff out things you believe are misandrist through reason. It's another thing entirely to try and silence them away, which is in part what you are advocating now.
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
It's not 'issues that I feel most aligned with'. The subreddit is mens rights, not mens issues. I believe the intention is to achieve equality in areas that men are inequal in terms of rights and legal positioning.
I don't think dating is a right. I don't think anyone does.
I didn't choose myself which issues this sub should and shouldn't talk about. I think issues related to rights are what should be talked about because that's the name of the subreddit.
I am not silencing anyone. I'm saying the conversations on mens rights should be about men's rights. And issues in dating are not a mens rights issue. Mental health issue? Yes. Social issue? Yes. Problem that should be discussed? Yes. Just not a rights issue.
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
The issues surround dating largely stem from gender expectations and anti male bias, I see that as a social issue.
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 8 points9 points10 points 5 years ago* (4 children) | Copy Link
Your definition of "rights" be damned. Having kids or support for your kids wasn't a right until too long ago either. People had no trouble letting your kids starve to death in times of famine. What is and isn't a right changes with the times. Nor does someone opening their mouth about what is happening to dating infer that the solution is a "right to date". It could be as simple as having a critical look at the education system, or a restructure of what can and can't be monetized on, like Tinder's algorithm knowingly inflating expectations and standards of both men and women.
Psychologists show time after time, acceptance is important to fulfillment and lack of acceptance forms the gateway to further mental health and social issues. Surely, if the health of men is your priority as an MRA, you wouldn't come at me wielding as flimsy an argument as "dating is not a right", without realizing what issues you are condoning on the long term. Young men feeling lost, checking out of society and going rampant aren't things you will be able to continue to ignore once it reaches critical mass.
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
I have never suggested ignoring any issues men face. I'm suggesting having different conversations in different spaces depending on what they are.
Saying women today are boring and bring nothing to the table is quite simply, not a rights issue. It's a mens issue. I don't personally believe that but I'm open to discussing it. I just don't think we should discuss it in the same place we are advocating for equal rights in family court. Because I want as many people reading about equal rights in family court as possible and conversations about how women today aren't good enough will only deter people.
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
And then you get back to the point I mentioned before, which you have yet to answer and ties back to your opening statement. One of your main concerns seems strikingly like not wanting poor judgment from outsiders. Due to the nature of the subject, these people will always get poor judgment until society changes or conformists don't get clout for being conformists. Being critical is already condemned. You put them in their corners, they will still be unheard, but in some idealistic world, MRA would suddenly get massive respect for not bitching on women (cause that worked so well in the first 5 years).
Do you have any plans on getting these boys and men heard by society? Because it doesn't seem like you thought this through at all beyond "this is legal, this is not legal, we discuss only legal, everything else GTFO to your own corner".
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago* (1 child) | Copy Link
I am absolutely concerned with public opinion. I want the mens rights movement to be seen as a necessary and crucial step in the equal treatment of men in the countless areas they are not being treated fairly.
I think everyone agrees that men deserve equality. Everyone is on board with that statement. But as soon as this becomes a laundry list of things people don't like about women, the movement loses credibility in the eyes of most people. And that will inhibit progress.
So no, I don't have a plan to fix every male issue. I just want to gain support for mens rights without pushing people away so that the movement can start opening people's eyes to the injustices.
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Right.
that will inhibit progress.
Again, this is a very blunt statement which has yet to be proven. If you've looked at the history of men's rights at all, it has been shamed regardless whether it tried to be nice to women or not. MensLib can give you a good taste of what happens when you become so spineless, your public opinion is worth more than what you stand for.
I just want to gain support for mens rights without pushing people away so that the movement can start opening people's eyes to the injustices.
And you believe the support of the conformist is more important? That as long as you have a bunch of conformists, it nets out a profit compared to losing another guy you could've talked straight to a much more extreme movement like TRP? This behavior is exactly what will drive guys away from not only the movement, but also ever getting in the position where they could benefit from improved child custody rights, or other typical men's rights issues. They won't be there to scratch your back after you showed them the door.
But as soon as this becomes a laundry list of things people don't like about women
So tackle this. Set them straight. You don't have to swing the entire other way and go "yeah this ain't a MRA problem bye". Just tell them to chill or have them actually defend why, objectively, women are messing things up for men and disarm them. Don't opt to do the same shit that every feminist circle does with their blanket bans and whatever.
And for f's sake, ignore the drama and concern trolls. Why in blazes would you care about the opinions of such low lives.
[–]bufedad 20 points21 points22 points 5 years ago (11 children) | Copy Link
The first one talks about dating as a man. Don't really see that as women hating, especially since the majority of the sentiment is backed up by data.
The second one is a gender swap of a man hating post to show how ridiculous it is.
The third, again, talks about dating troubles men face.
None of these are women hating.
If we can't talk about issues men face here, then men cannot talk about the issues they face.
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link
Hating is a strong word. But commentary on issues with women today are not related to mens rights in my opinion. It's a mens issue that should be discussed. But not a right.
Mens rights should be about advocating for equality in areas rife with inequality. Discussing things we don't like about being men is important but comments like the ones posted will muddy the lines between conversations about rights versus issues.
As I said, we can make this a 'mens issues' group instead of a mens rights group. But it will make advocating for said rights much harder. Which is why I think separating the 2 will be better for men.
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 9 points10 points11 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
It seems like you think this sub is only to discuss literal rights. It isn't. It's a place to discuss men's issues in general, be it legal or social.
[–]bufedad 6 points7 points8 points 5 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link
Hating is a strong word. But commentary on issues with women today are not related to mens rights in my opinion
Oh yeah, commentary on man hating is not related to mens rights... got it
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link
Women being boring and selfish is not a comment on man hating. What are you talking about?
Commentary on man hating is far more relevant to mens issues as it is the reason for much of the inequality.
[–]bufedad 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
The third one parodying the men like virgins post was absolutely dealing with man hating.
The women tend to be boring and selfish is a discussion of mens issues dealing with women in the dating game.
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
I'm aware that it is a discussion of men's issues dealing with women in the dating game. And discussing mens issues is important. I just think mens issues and mens rights are 2 different conversations.
[–]bufedad 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
So, you think you can discuss mens rights without discussing the unrealistic expectations expected of men (the basis of the inequality) or the outright hate fueling new discrimination every day.
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link
Yes.
Do you think 'nobody (women) has a fucking personality. No passions or interests or skills' is discussing unrealistic expectations of men?
Is it discussing hatred of men?
Or is that comments just generalizations about women that will make people think Mens rights is just a code word for misogyny?
[–]bufedad 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Or is it just generalizations about women that will make people think Mens rights is just a code word for misogyny?
Cool troll bro.
[–]Unonium198YT -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
What OP is trying to say is posts that center solely around mere social issues for men(like dating) be separated from posts solely about men’s rights(legal situations).
They’re not trying to discourage discussion about the social issues of men, they are just seggusting moving posts not about men’s rights somewhere else.
[–]power_forward87 7 points8 points9 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
None of these are women-hating. First one goes over dating as a man...it's not Woman-hate as there is tons of stats and data to back that up
#2- I see more of a role reversal, which definitely highlights how utterly asinine the situation is.
#3- more about issues men face while trying to date
You raise a valid point, but yea there wasn't anything wrong with any of those posts.
[–]Walshy231231 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (9 children) | Copy Link
This is sort of the crux of men’s rights
The second you give in to hate out of frustration, you only serve as fodder for the stereotype of toxic masculinity.
Fighting hate with hate does nothing but create more hate and division. It does nothing constructive. It’s fine to vent your frustration, but when you start generalizing or accusing, it is no longer in good faith, for lack of a better description.
There is no equality or equity without women being capable and happy, just the same as for men. Fighting for one’s rights and happiness shouldn’t include tearing down others, except for rare cases of mutual exclusion (e.g. men not having naming rights to their children, in which case some control should be relinquished from the mother)
[–]SomethingRand00m998 -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Fighting hate with hate does nothing but create more hate and division. It does nothing constructive.
Except that's all feminist do and they've been far more sucessful then MRAs.
[–]Walshy231231 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Far more successful at what though? At what? Making men’s lives worse? Spreading hate and division?
Do you want to make women’s lives worse? Do you want to propagate hate and division?
[–]maxlvb -2 points-1 points0 points 5 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link
Okay, well as men here's what we struggle with.
Okay, but what about all these men's issues that aren't linked to women's issues?
Okay, here's this group we made. We're gonna assemble and talk about men's issues.
Feminists and women need to stop holding men to standards they're personally and collectively unwilling to meet.
[–]Walshy231231 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
That is far from what I said, and basically just a strawman
I advocate for men’s rights. I think we get shit on by courts and the media, and face numerous challenges that women don’t or don’t as much, from custody to suicide to crime. I absolutely believe men should have a better lot in life. That doesn’t mean that we should generalize women as evil.
That is the entirety of my meaning: that men often get shafted, but that doesn’t mean we should tear down women. Don’t try to change what I say or boil it down to something else, that’s it, that’s what I’m trying to say. Fight for your good treatment, but don’t be an ass.
[–]maxlvb -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
You're just 'white knighting' for women, and saying men should behave, and not 'rock the boat' in case it frightens the women...
That all you're doing, and lately there's been an increase of posts like yours, from what I suspect are closet feminists claiming to be MRA's.
If you get offended by MRA's here in this sub talking about all that is wrong with feminism, then you are part of the problem that makes such talk necessary...
Feminists, women, and their white knight defenders need to stop holding men to standards they're personally and collectively unwilling to meet.
[–]Walshy231231 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
That’s not what I’m doing
Rock the boat. Definitely rock the boat. Cause a commotion. But understand that there’s a difference between rocking the boat and throwing people out of it.
I think modern feminism is a cancer. When it was fighting for the women’s vote and the like, it was good, but now it’s just hating on men. Do you disagree?
Modern feminism is shit, but I won’t say the same about women as a whole. There are definitely shit women out there, but not all women are shit. Saying that’s true is the same as saying all men are abusive/sexist/etc. It’s the same bullshit they use.
Again: fight for your rights and your happiness, but don’t tear others down to achieve it. Rocking the boat doesn’t mean being an asshole
[–]maxlvb -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Yes, it is what you're doing.
I rest my case m'lord...
And what do you do to cure cancer. You use every means at your disposal to get rid of it, Including the 'hate feminism/feminists' methods you dont like, because it's rocking the boat and frightening the women... 🤣🤣🤣
So tell me why when there's talk of 'rape culture' that it's all about most men being potential rapists to most women who all get very upset whenever any man (not even an MRA) say Not All Men.
Why do most women, even those that say they're not feminists, claim this is just men trying to 'derail the conversation'?
Spare me your r/menslib preaching, and thinking you have some sort of right to tell anyone else how to behave here or anywhere else....
(again) If you get offended by MRA's here in this sub talking about all that is wrong with feminism, then you are part of the problem that makes such talk necessary...
Feminism: Equality, when convenient.
[–]Walshy231231 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
You’re digging way farther into this than you should
All I’m saying is don’t be an indiscriminate asshole. Not all women are evil
[–]maxlvb -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Unfortunately, although your comment was indeed clear, simple, and straightforward, there is some difficulty in justifiably assigning to it the fourth of the epithets you applied to the statement, inasmuch as the precise correlation between the information you communicated and the facts, insofar as they can be determined and demonstrated, is such as to cause epistemological problems of sufficient magnitude as to lay upon the logical and semantic resources of the English language a heavier burden than they can reasonably be expected to bear.
When you abuse those who have a different opinion to yours, you lose the argument.
[–]maxlvb 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Note: OP has a new 15 day old account...
[–]RockmanXX 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
And, he(she?)'s gone.
[–]SuperSupremeKai 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link
TBH, men's rights should also include how we are socially treated. But yeah, most of these comments and posts should be relegated to r/MGTOW or r/MGTOW2
But what is so wrong about stating the reasons as to WHY we are in this situation if it does affect us?
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 4 points5 points6 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
These are acceptable conversations. No argument there. But a lack of men's shelters, bias in the family courts, mass incarceration, lack of funding for male issues. None of these are affected by women not being very interesting or only dating 6 foot men.
Issues like social support, bias and incarceration are rights issues and should be engaged as such.
Dating issues are social issues and men have no right to women they feel are interesting or attractive. Which is why I don't feel the issue fits under the heading of men's rights.
So I'm not saying the conversation shouldn't be had. I'm saying having it here may impede progress and cause the movement to be dismissed as 'men that feel dating women and sex is a human right'
[–]SuperSupremeKai 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Agreed.
[–]SomethingRand00m998 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Except this standard isn't applied to Feminist.
Way worse stuff then this is said on FDS and Feminism every single day yet you whine about this stuff.
This is why so many of us don't care. Why is it okay for women to say #KillAllMen but if we're a bit blue about them, it's the greatest crime humanity has ever seen?
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
FDS is garbage. And those people can wallow all they want in that hate fest. I don't even read that garbage because there is too much of it that is just attacking men. And people won't read this sub either if people feel this sub is attacking women.
[–]sam_bam_danky_man47 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
What do you mean? Lots of people criticize feminist and FDS, most people tend to be against #killallmen, you are making a very large blanket statement that is at best partially true
[–]Adanu0 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
So dating is not part of men's rights now?
Stop the tone policing. We get it every week.
Are you asking if successfully dating is a right? Because it's not.
[–]Adanu0 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Nice try at twisting my words around to suit your confirmation bias.
I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and say you're NOT trolling. Are you saying that men do not deserve happiness?
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
No. I'm saying mens rights should be about mens rights. Not about listing what people don't like about women. Modern women not being good enough is not an issue related to human rights.
[–]Adanu0 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I'd argue it very much IS, by way of expectations and interests. There's plenty of social pressure by women via feminism to keep men oppressed. Ignoring that is ignoring mens rights.
[–]rabel111 1 point2 points3 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
This sub isn't here to care about women or their ability to be offended. Nor is it about recruiting women to a cause. There are hundreds of women's rights subs that talk about offended women.
This sub is for discussions about men and masculinity, and the experiences of men. That includes good and bad experiences in relationships or interactions with women, and a broad range of opinions which many will either disagree with, or relate to. Feminism is not a protected species, and given the sheer volume of feminist hate speech directed at men, feminist opposition to MRAs, feminist led denial of service for men, and aggressive feminist silencing of any acknowledgement of men's issues (i.e. IMD), criticism of feminist and feminism is common. This isn't unreasonable, or misogyny, unless you define criticism of feminism as misogyny.
Why are you trying to silence the views of some men because those views may offend some women? This isn't a popularity contest. It's a forum for men in world where there are very few forums that allow men to speak freely. Why are you trying to restrict men's expression of their experiences using the subjective perceptions of women as a measure of acceptable speech?
I agree that some of the views here I find offensive (possibly not the same ones you find offensive). But the men and women posting these views are not going to change their views by being silenced or deplatformed. That's more likely the reason for their views being so disengaged from main stream dialogues in the first place. If you silence them they do not disappear or go away. That's delusional totalitarian thinking. If you silencing them on one of the last surviving subs where they can still speak, you drive them further into the dark.
[–]d_nijmegen 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link
If they don't like the mgtow people, they should not destroy every place they come together. Ban their subs they go elsewhere, like here.
So basically mensrights should fight for mgtow to be among friends. That's the only way to distance ourselves from their ideas. Without denying them rights.
What MGTOW spaces have been destroyed? There are 2 subreddits called MGTOW and MGTOW2 and as far as I know they are still active.
[–]d_nijmegen 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Quarantined and therefore not good enough
I dont really understand what 'quarantined' means. Does it just mean there is a warning before you enter the subreddit? Because that doesn't prevent any dialogue or exchange of ideas among men. It just warns those entering that they may see things they don't like.
[–]d_nijmegen 3 points4 points5 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Are you a Harry Potter fan? It's like the spell that hides a house for anyone who doesn't know the exact location.
That's exactly what it does.
It's censorship and against free speech
[–]WingsofSky 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
I thought some women wanted the "total destruction of mankind"?
They treat us like "objects" to use for money, then toss us away.
Then you are crying about how upset we are?
[–]Intrepid_University6 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
By allowing women to live in our minds rent free we remove the focus from what we are here for.
It’s a waste of time and energy complaining about what someone else is doing. It makes no difference if they deserve it or not.
I also understand it’s easier said than done.
[–]RobDog101 -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
How long are we gonna pretend that we’ll get anywhere with good PR instead of by corroborating what all young men who aren’t willfully blind realize about their place in society vs women’s? Having empathy and sympathy for men doesn’t come naturally to most people. We need to make men better at acting in their own interest by making them fucking angry. And you know what? From what I’ve seen over just the past few years that’s working. Men of my generation and younger who do not even consider themselves part of the MRM are openly parroting what once were exclusively MRM talking points about everything from circumcision to the wage gap myth to male disposability and the absurdity of feminist dogma on patriarchy and male privilege. They no longer tolerate females talking out of school about masculinity and what makes a real man, how males are supposedly socialized vs how we should be, baselessly claiming sole authority on men’s “lived experience” to try to monopolize control of the gender narrative. Victories for the MRM will almost surely not come from getting more people to identify as MRAs by making such an identity as socially acceptable and palatable as feminism (it likely never will be), but from getting them to agree with everything MRAs have been saying for decades, without even realizing their ideas originated in places like this. Admitting to being an MRA will still be a terminable offense under the policies of all corporate giants for the foreseeable future. Don’t try to delude yourself into thinking that you can placate them by trying to purge any language that could be interpreted as “misogynistic” from our discourse; the mere fact of giving a shit about men is as “misogynistic” as anything you can say or do as far as the status quo is concerned.
[–]LGuappo -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link
Agree. I'm facing a situation where my SO (former SO) is doing some of the most legit unethical, detestable stuff that a woman can do in a breakup. Manipulation and lies, character assassination, on a level I never would have thought possible. It would be nice if there were someplace to get some good advice and support on all that without feeling like I'm expected to sign up for some moronic mgtow political agenda. Subscribed to this sub an hour ago and am sorta regretting it already.
[–]maxlvb 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
Let me get this right...
Your ex is treating you like S**T, and you come here complaining about and insulting this sub?
I'm call BS on this one...
[–]LGuappo -1 points0 points1 point 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Relax
[–]ObviousObservationz -4 points-3 points-2 points 5 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link
More advocates for mens rights would help men with inequality. If people had faith that the mens rights movement was about Injustice, people would be more open to hearing it.
But it seems the overwhelming opinion here is that insulting women comes hand in hand with mens rights which IS EXACTLY what feminists say about the mens rights movement.
It's odd to see a situation where feminists and MRAs agree but here we are.
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
Fuck off, troll.
[–]Broadside_Beers 5 points6 points7 points 5 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link
But it seems the overwhelming opinion here is that insulting women comes hand in hand with mens rights
Nope.
[–]rabel111 2 points3 points4 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
There seems to be a small but insidious movement to reframe r/MensRights as forum more like r/Menslib, a conformist sub that only talks about mens rights, issues and experiences in terms that are acceptable to women and compatable with feminist ideology (the sanitised dictionary version, not the #KILLALLMEN variety).
Given the r/Menslib sub already exists (and seems to be floundering, or at least extremely boring), I'm not sure what this would achieve or why anyone would suggest this path.
This forum is not based on appeasing feminism or recruiting women to a cause.The language complained of is only a small part of a larger useful dialogue. Any dialogue carries a range of opinions and values. Given there are entire subs of equivalent size entirely devoted to misandry and hate speech directed at men, a few ambiguous comments that might offend seems rather minor.
[–]AmongUs_SHITPOSTER 0 points1 point2 points 5 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link
i just want to support men's rights without all the misogyny attached to it, i'm not sure why such a preset is so hard to achieve
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.created by /u/dream-hunter
[–]iainmf[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]SoundSecret 6 points7 points8 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]maxlvb 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]SoundSecret 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 7 points8 points9 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]suzuki1369 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 9 points10 points11 points (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 2 points3 points4 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–][deleted] 6 points7 points8 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 8 points9 points10 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 4 points5 points6 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]NoMoreMisterMaybe 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bufedad 20 points21 points22 points (11 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] -2 points-1 points0 points (10 children) | Copy Link
[–]LettuceBeGrateful 9 points10 points11 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]bufedad 6 points7 points8 points (8 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] -1 points0 points1 point (7 children) | Copy Link
[–]bufedad 4 points5 points6 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 0 points1 point2 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]bufedad 5 points6 points7 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]bufedad 2 points3 points4 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Unonium198YT -1 points0 points1 point (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]power_forward87 7 points8 points9 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Walshy231231 4 points5 points6 points (9 children) | Copy Link
[–]SomethingRand00m998 -4 points-3 points-2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Walshy231231 4 points5 points6 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]maxlvb -2 points-1 points0 points (6 children) | Copy Link
[–]Walshy231231 -1 points0 points1 point (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]maxlvb -1 points0 points1 point (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]Walshy231231 -1 points0 points1 point (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]maxlvb -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]Walshy231231 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]maxlvb -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]maxlvb 3 points4 points5 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]RockmanXX 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuperSupremeKai 2 points3 points4 points (5 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 4 points5 points6 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]SuperSupremeKai 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]SomethingRand00m998 -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]sam_bam_danky_man47 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Adanu0 1 point2 points3 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]Adanu0 0 points1 point2 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]Adanu0 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]rabel111 1 point2 points3 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]d_nijmegen 2 points3 points4 points (4 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]d_nijmegen 3 points4 points5 points (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]ThisIsTheEnd6[S] 1 point2 points3 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]d_nijmegen 3 points4 points5 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]WingsofSky 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Intrepid_University6 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]RobDog101 -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]LGuappo -1 points0 points1 point (2 children) | Copy Link
[–]maxlvb 0 points1 point2 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]LGuappo -1 points0 points1 point (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]ObviousObservationz -4 points-3 points-2 points (3 children) | Copy Link
[–]JestyerAverageJoe 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]Broadside_Beers 5 points6 points7 points (1 child) | Copy Link
[–]rabel111 2 points3 points4 points (0 children) | Copy Link
[–]AmongUs_SHITPOSTER 0 points1 point2 points (0 children) | Copy Link