TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Mr_KenSpeckle Archive

View 7 posts and 412 comments by Mr_KenSpeckle on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I'm usually not one to complain about woke this and woke that, but Australia (where the article that you cite comes from) on the subject of gender is a particularly egregious case of jumping the shark. In Australia, there is literally both a Parliamentary Secretary for Men's Behaviour Change and a Minister for Men and Boys. One might think that the focus of a "Minister for Men and Boys" would be to promote the welfare of men and boys. One would be wrong. It is to reeducate men in "new masculinit…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:45 PM
2

Haven't you ever just wanted to fuck? What's up with you spamming all the comments, insisting that everybody is insecure?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/26 10:04 PM
1

I didn't say anything about being fake. I talked about becoming better.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/26 08:03 PM
1

Red Pill already covers this well. Women want men who "just get it." But what about the men who did not "just get it"? What are they to do? Such men have no choice but to either LEARN to "just get it" or to wallow in loserdom for eternity. But women are turned off by men who have to learn to just get it. The idea of men learning Game repulses most women. Funny, women don't have this reaction to men learning any other skill: driving a car, playing a piano, learning Spanish, public speaking, etc. …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 07:25 PM
1

Most of the time when I have heard the term emotional labor used, it's women being neurotic about some shit that doesn't matter and then being upset that the men in their lives are not equally fixated on whatever it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 05:43 PM
2

Become above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 06:20 AM
–

It's not women's job to tell men how to be attractive to women. That's your bros' job.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 06:14 AM
–

Well, to be fair, it sometimes doesn't end well for women when they straight up tell a guy that they are rejecting him because he's ugly.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/25 06:12 AM
–

When men become truly Red Pilled, they take off the mask, not the other way around.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:18 AM
–

Pretty much anything claiming to be Red Pill that has first come out after the 2010’s isn’t really Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/25 07:14 AM
2

The point is not that men should be dicks. The dichotomy is not nice versus dick. The dichotomy is weak versus strong. However, men are taught as boys that if you are just nice, you'll get your just reward. That's a lie that is very deliberately encouraged.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 08:23 AM
3

You are not speaking for men. You are speaking for your white-knighting self.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 08:19 AM
5

I can kill spiders too, and get things from the high shelf!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/25 07:47 AM
2

Red pill is fundamentally about seeing the world as it is, not as you wish it was and not as some so-called authority told you it is, even if it is uncomfortable. That’s why it is called Red Pill. That’s why that symbolism was lifted from “The Matrix”. To see the world as it really is, pay attention to what people do, not what they say. That alone will get you 90% to wherever you’re going. This forum began with a focus on male sexual strategy. Over time, guys found that the same things they help…
/r/TheRedPill14/01/25 05:41 PM
1

Luck favors the prepared. If many things in life are out of your control, all the more reason to master those things you can control. Be observant of what situations are likely to be luckier, put yourself in as many of those situations as possible, and then be prepared to receive the luck when it happens. You must also recognize the luck as it is happening and not fuck it up. As long as bad luck doesn’t kill you, good luck and bad luck tend to even out over the long run.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 04:29 PM
1

Dude, if you go to a fundamentalist church, you’re going to find the most porn-addicted men of all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 04:11 PM
4

Women can convince themselves that they want to. And then those same women can convince themselves that they never wanted to, when the tide turns. I think Harvey Weinstein is fascinating from a Red Pill perspective in a way that hasn't really been adequately explored. Yeah, he was a fat fuck with some beta tendencies, but he made himself into a situational alpha, which is what we all say guys should do if they aren't born with Chad genes. Then it all turned. Right-leaning people demonized him an…
/r/TheRedPill17/12/24 12:07 AM
1

That literally makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 04:52 AM
1

First off, Trump has spoken in favor of a federal abortion ban as well as (sometimes) speaking against it. He habitually talks out of both sides of his mouth. Second, Trump will go along with what his right wing allies want because they will cover for him while he crimes as president, in exchange for giving them what they want. At no point in his life has Trump not crimed to the fullest extent possible to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:27 AM
3

There's only one bullet in this six shooter. What's the big deal?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:24 AM
1

Trump has also spoken in favor of a federal abortion ban. In typical Trump fashion, he takes both sides of virtually every issue so that he can later claim to have been the right side of the issue, depending on what his later needs are.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:22 AM
1

Hitler wasn't Hitler at first. He had to become Hitler. Just because Trump hasn't yet done the things that he has talked about does not mean there is no problem. If he does a fraction of the egregious things that he has talked about, it will be appalling. It is weird how Trump apologists/supporters always claim that he doesn't actually mean the things he says. For what other public figure do his or her supporters defend by saying they don't actually mean the things they say? When someone tells y…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:19 AM
0

And I would add to the OP, don't be needlessly argumentative. Let small things slide.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/11/24 12:01 AM
1

“This dude is living the life redpillers say they want to have.”. ?!?!?!? So many of you have no idea what Red Pill is. It has become a rorschach test onto which everyone projects their own baggage.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 02:37 PM
1

“A long-term relationship is the ultimate goal, right?” Not necessarily.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 02:33 PM
1

Maybe you settled, and then declared victory.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/24 02:31 PM
1

Whether or not you are religious does not affect the validity of your arguments. Your general metaphysical doubt that nothing is really knowable is not an argument for an affirmative claim that you are, in fact, advancing, even if you don’t actually believe the argument you are advancing.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 01:49 AM
1

You don’t seem to understand how empiricism works. You’re a broken record.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 01:40 AM
4

“I've begun worshipping the sun for a number of reasons. First of all, unlike some other gods I could mention, I can see the sun. It's there for me every day.” -George Carlin I have empirical evidence that a great many things exist because, among other things, I can see them. In contrast, having lived a long life, I have never seen any empirical evidence that god exists, contrary to expectation if god did in fact exist. Of course, using the scientific method, if new evidence becomes available to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 01:35 AM
2

The burden of proof regarding the truthfulness of a claim lies with the one who makes the claim. Also Christopher Hitchens. You are implicitly making the claim that god exists, yet you have provided no evidence. Also Hitchens: extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 01:26 AM
3

Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.” -Christopher Hitchens
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 01:22 AM
1

Just as men don’t get to dictate to women what women find attractive, so too women do not get to dictate to men what men find attractive. “Should” has nothing to do with it. Also it is not about catering to a man’s ego and it is not about women being obligated to nurse a man’s insecurities. Women who raise the issue of men’s insecurities are often engaging in projection. The fact is most men are not attracted to masculine traits in women. No, you don’t have to change for men. But you are not ent…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/24 12:49 AM
0

Luck, by definition, is out of your control, so there isn’t a lot of point in focusing on it. It makes it all the more important to focus on what you can control. Among the things you can control is to put yourself in as many situations to be lucky as possible. You also want to equip yourself with the tools to capitalize on luck when it happens. The harder you work, the luckier you’ll get. Also, luck comes in two forms: bad luck and good luck. As long as bad luck doesn't kill you, bad luck and g…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 04:51 PM
3

So don’t ask.
/r/ExRedPill10/09/24 05:45 AM
1

Even Red Pill guys acknowledge that not all women hit the wall at the same time. They acknowledge that women who take care of themselves can stay attractive well into their 30’s, if not longer. If this is something that concerns you, then prioritize the kinds of things that would promote your self-care. Exercise, stretching, minimal drinking, no smoking, balanced diet, prioritizing good sleep. Stress is a silent killer and ager so think about what you could do to minimize that. Probably at the t…
/r/ExRedPill10/09/24 05:36 AM
5

Older women “really know what they like “, which is another way of saying there’s a lot of shit that they’ve decided they don’t do.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/24 05:23 AM
0

It’s funny. I was just reading a Pook post from the year 2000 in which he was saying that when a woman shows interest in a guy, many times a guy makes the mistake of thinking he is “in” with her and he is too “emotionally easy” in his response, which can turn the girl off. So much of this stuff has already been covered, but a lot of guys today are dismissive of the work that has already been done by the guys who came before them. The last 5 years or so in the Manosphere have been shit, but if th…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 05:05 AM
-1

I’m starting to get so sick of the loser mentality. And not just the loser mentality, but also the fact that these guys just love to marinate in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 04:49 AM
1

Talking about "hacking the system" is the magical thinking straw man that I mentioned. A guy doesn't need magical thinking. He doesn't need to "hack" shit. Being aware and doing the work will get you better results. No, it will not guarantee that you always get 100% of what you want, but that's a bogus standard for a guy to make his life decisions on. Whether you get a woman to be loyal to you or whether she cheats has relatively little to do with "leagues." You could be in the same "league" as …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/24 01:26 AM
2

Of course people can improve. It's ridiculous to say otherwise. That doesn't mean a guy will have a problem-free life where he always gets 100% of what he wants, but he can improve and get better results. Demanding magical results is a straw man argument. Men may not always get what they want, but that doesn't mean men have to simp. Have some fucking dignity. To the extent that society may sometimes attribute higher value to women, that's just because a lot of guys don't realize their own value …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 11:09 PM
6

You have a superficial, if any, understanding of Red Pill. A bedrock principle of Red Pill has always been that if you want better, then it is up to you to improve yourself because nobody gives a fuck above you and nobody is going to come to save you. When we speak of the Red Pill as being bitter, uncomfortable truths, this is what we are talking about, among other things. When we speak of hypergamy, it isn't to complain or blame others, it is simply to describe the nature of the situation. As f…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 05:02 AM
-4

Any guy that is average is within striking distance of being above-average. Some guys drew the short straw in life and have no real hope of becoming above-average, but any guy who is truly average has no excuse not to become above average.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 04:37 AM
1

The thread also is not about men who hate women. YOU injected that into the conversation. The thread is about men who are unable to secure romantic relationships with women, not about hate.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/24 04:06 AM
1

Scientists hooked both men and women up to machines to measure to what degree their stated sexual preferences lined up with their measured physical sexual responses. Women were all over the map. Men’s physical responses aligned nearly totally with their stated preferences. That was true both for straight men and gay men. Straight men responded to heterosexual porn but did not respond to gay porn. Gay men responded to gay porn but didn’t respond to straight porn. When straight men say they don’t …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/24 03:53 PM
2

In that segment, he was talking specifically about dealing with male sexlessness rather than male loneliness. In either case, straight males cuddling with their straight male friends is not the answer. It’s just not. If it works for you and your female friends, good for you. It doesn’t work for straight males. Saying this is really a way for Trevor to avoid the hard issue while pretending to be bold and brave. Male sexlessness is a tough problem to solve in a society with free choice, so people …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 07:18 AM
0

You still have to be her best option in that moment. You still have to recognize the opportunity. You still need to seize the opportunity. You still need to escalate the situation in the direction you want. You still need to not say or do anything to fuck it up. There are all kinds of behavioral variables still in play.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 03:34 PM
2

I couldn’t find the full segment where he said it. Although you don’t hear him say the part I was talking about in the following video clip because it is edited, this is a part of the segment where he said it. You can tell from his demeanor that he’s not joking. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6M0kMJQRwz0&pp=ygUfIk5vYWggdHJldm9yIiAibWFsZSBsb25lbGluZXNzIg%3D%3D
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:47 PM
2

Yeah, but he wasn’t joking.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 02:41 PM
2

Southern Poverty Law Center is not a credible source.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 08:55 AM
2

The quality of Rollo's material has suffered massively since he switched from blog to YouTube in order to chase fame and SuperChats.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 08:47 AM
5

Trevor Noah, whose takes I usually like, did a segment in which he suggested that the cure for male loneliness was for straight men to cuddle with their straight male friends. I shit you not. Most people were telling him how "brave" he was for saying this.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/24 08:20 AM
1

The wall doesn’t mean that aging women get zero attention necessarily; the wall is a relative shift in negotiating power between the sexes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 03:30 PM
1

When you troll-post, it would be more effective if you weren’t so obvious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/24 07:26 AM
2

Your so-called authentic self is just your comfort zone. If what you have been doing has not worked, then your authentic self is not good enough. You have to change if you want to reach your goal. Then you have to either alter your goal or you have to change yourself, even if it impinges on what you perceive to be your "authentic self." The number one question is not what feels authentic, but rather what works. Only then can you make an informed decision about perhaps choosing not to do certain …
/r/TheRedPill29/08/24 09:14 PM
1

The manosphere teaches how to tell the difference between a shit test and rejection. But some guys don't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/24 08:02 AM
2

Rollo called leagues a buffer. In other words, something guys use as an excuse for inaction. His essay was encouraging guys not to be dissuaded by the concept that a woman is out of your league. (That was more than a dozen years ago--I wonder if he would still feel the same given the "globalized SMV" that has emerged.) Telling your friend to be realistic is the opposite of what Rollo was saying. I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying it's different from what "the godfather" said.
/r/ExRedPill21/08/24 05:08 PM
2

The sphere was more organic back in the day. It makes sense to me that some of the guys who put a lot of time into this would want to try to get paid for their time. But just because they're selling doesn't mean I need to buy. When Rollo was blog-based, I could read a new article by Rollo in 5 minutes. If it's a good article, that's a high value to time expenditure ratio and even if it's not that great of an article, you haven't lost much. Now he does fucking 4 hour videos. I understand why--it …
/r/TheRedPill20/08/24 10:32 PM
-1

You say that like it's a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/24 03:17 PM
31

Push/pull. Engage them, but tease them. But don't be all negative. Mix in some compliments, but not about the things that girls are usually complimented about. Don't tell her she's hot. Tell her that she's interesting, or quirky. When you compliment her, don't make a big deal about it, like you're expecting a reaction. It should seem offhand. Tell her you're not too sure about her. Later tell her that you think she might be alright. Etc. Caveat: everything in the preceding paragraph should be a …
/r/TheRedPill13/08/24 04:07 AM
1

Dude doesn't understand Red Pill at all. The Red Pill is a bitter pill because it teaches that nobody gives a fuck about you, other than maybe your mom and dad if you're lucky, and if you want better it's up to you to raise your game. Dude has it completely bass-ackwards.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 06:09 AM
0

Sounds like you never understood Red Pill.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 06:04 AM
5

Women will agree with just about anything as long as you frame it as women being superior to men, or women being oppressed by men. If you say women are more emotional than men, most women will object. If you say that women are better at getting in touch with their emotions then men, they will heartily agree. If you say that women lose SMV. after a certain age, most will vociferously argue against it, but if you say that men are dogs because they would rather try to get with young women than be “…
/r/TheRedPill26/06/24 06:59 AM
1

Your true self and your purpose are not hiding out there somewhere, waiting to be found by you through introspection. Your true self and your purpose are forged by you through ACTION. Certainly, consider your proclivities and current abilities, but then see where those intersect with the realities of the world and the market. Given these three factors, do the highest impact activity available to you at that time. You don’t have to have it all figured out to start. Just start. From there, just ta…
/r/TheRedPill12/06/24 06:24 PM
1

Agreed, but not every guy can get a hotter chick. But you might not need to. If you know what the particular insecurities are of the type of girl you want, you can stoke competition anxiety by dating someone who represents what they lack or feel they lack. For example, even a lot of fairly hot Asian women still have a complex about blonde women. You could flex with a blonde 6 and give an Asian 7 competition anxiety.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/24 07:52 AM
3

"Excuse me. Would you happen to have two nipples for a dime?" P.S.: No such thing as a pickup line that works every time.
/r/seduction27/03/24 11:25 PM
2

Red Pill is supposed to be about dealing with the world as it really is, even if it is sometimes uncomfortable, instead of hiding behind fairy tales, the feel-good stories handed down by so-called authorities. Religion is the ultimate blue pill. Instead of wrestling with sometimes difficult questions, you indulge in delusions of supposed truths provided by imaginary beings.
/r/TheRedPill29/02/24 10:59 PM
7

Models literally has tips about picking up chicks in bars. It's true that Manson puts a lot of emphasis on self-improvement and lifestyle, but the balance of your comment is reflective of a creeping prudish moralism that is invading this place. There is nothing lesser about picking up chicks in bars, and Models literally gives tips on doing it.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/24 11:57 PM
3

Take what works from any form of Game. If you can make yourself into a natural, then great. But it's still helpful to have some canned material at your disposal to get you past a sticking point now and then. And then segue back into a more natural approach. One thing that a lot of guys don't seem to appreciate when they talk about Game used to be performative and then it evolved into a purportedly superior natural style of Game, is that often all that has happened is that guys have internalized …
/r/TheRedPill13/02/24 11:50 PM
4

The throwaway user name was the first clue that this guy (or woman) was not necessarily aligned with the views of the forum.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/24 11:36 PM
2

Negging, as it is frequently misinterpreted, is dumb. Negging is not insulting. Negging should be a playful demonstration that you are unafraid of tension and conflict with her. You are unafraid of her judgment of you. And, yes, you are unafraid to judge her. Negging does not need to be dishonest. Negging has bad PR because the term "negging" sounds, well, negative. And some of the examples some people have offered are cringy. But just because some people do it badly does not mean that the theor…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/24 11:33 PM
1

You seem to have no idea whatsoever what Red Pill means.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/24 06:09 PM
2

You don't need any special game for MILFs. Gaming MILFs is gaming on easy mode.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/24 12:55 AM
3

Amen! There is nothing more Blue Pill than religion. It is the absolute antithesis of Red Pill.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/24 05:27 AM
1

I loathe Trump. There is almost nothing good about him. I will say this: the mofo never gives up. It's his Superpower. Too bad he can't use his Superpower for good instead of evil.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/24 05:26 AM
6

Dude has no clue what Red Pill means.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/24 05:23 AM
2

I don't think it. I know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 08:48 AM
2

past performance is not indicative of future results.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 08:47 AM
3

If we are all going to be honest, there's is only one crime where it is suggested that someone simply should be believed without any questions being asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 08:42 AM
1

I can't remember where I heard this, so I can't give attribution, but some woman in the media said the following: 1) the victim/accuser should be believed by her family and friends, absent some red flag; 2) the accused should be believed by his family and friends, absent some red flag. (if the share the same family or friends, then that gets tricky.) 3) for professionals, it depends on their roles. Rape crisis counselors should begin with belief. Investigators should be respectful and take the c…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 08:36 AM
1

Men highly value very physically attractive women. Very physically attractive women have a lot of options and can get away with more bullshit. Add in the fact that most women love drama, and many, not all, very physically attractive women take advantage of this fact by acting out simply because they can get away with it. Men are not attracted to bitches. Sometimes men tolerate bitchiness in women that they are already attracted to for other reasons. In my entire life, I have never met a man that…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/24 08:10 AM
2

This invisible man in the sky will not save us.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/23 01:53 AM
5

This forum is the bastard step-child of Red Pill. If you want Red Pill, you won’t find it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 06:05 AM
–

What a f*cking word salad.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/23 05:59 AM
2

The fact that you’re doing better is probably a function of you figuring out aspects of the game that you didn’t get before. Ideally by sharing notes online, young guys could figure out those life lessons more quickly instead of having to reinvent the wheel for themselves. Unfortunately among all of the gems, there is a lot of bad advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:49 PM
6

I’ve been saying for years that Red Pill has some good advice, but that this thing about you have to be older before you can have success with women is just idiotic. Some guys will come right out and say it. Some guys just imply it. Some guys who say it or imply it, when directly challenged on it, will say “Oh no, of course you should still be shooting your shot with women as you are improving”, but that’s not really what they spend 99% of their time talking about. There are exceptions, but as a…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:40 PM
2

Many men are too logically analytical (at least, what they THINK is logical). Logic is a lady-boner-killer. Women are about feelz. Everything you wrote is just mental masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 10:29 PM
–

The term "the Manosphere" has been used to lump together a lot of disparate forums with disparate points of view. There is nothing stopping anyone from talking about suicide rates, if that's what they want to talk about; and in fact that is a common topic of discussion. That doesn't mean that's the only thing that we are or should be allowed to talk about. Here, though, the reference to suicide rates seems to be mentioned as a way to trivialize and delegitimatize by comparison talking about stra…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 01:20 AM
–

The idea that gender is a thing separate and apart from biological sex is a social construct, and a very recent one at that. When someone pontificates on the subject of "gender" as if they are stating facts, they are simply regurgitating concepts invented in "gender studies" departments in the last few decades to advance a particular political argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/23 12:12 AM
1

In other words, you first made up your mind that red pill guys are bad! bad! bad! And then you worked backwards from there to define them as such to fit your preconception.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 08:52 PM
1

The irreducible core tenet of red pill is to deal with the world as it really is. It does not inherently have anything to do wealth or status. A man could live life completely eschewing material things and still be red pilled, as long as it was sincere and not just a cope. There is no shortage of "successful" men in this world who are trapped living a life that is a lie. That's not to say the grown man living with his parents and making $15 an hour isn't a loser.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 08:40 PM
1

It just depends on whether you are calibrated to the girl, the moment and the venue. Guys who think that cold approach or any other PUA technique is like a magic incantation that women are powerless to resist will be disappointed. Game, properly understood, is simply psychological observations surrounding attraction that are then broken down into actionable steps. Cold approach is simply talking to someone you don’t already have a connection with because you might be interested. For a lot of peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/23 07:26 PM
–

Young men are not preoccupied with a fear of being old and alone any more than they are focused on how best to maximize medicare benefits. Young men are preoccupied with getting pussy in the here and now. Young men who can't get laid feel helpless and hopeless in the face of women who are in their primes, in terms of physical beauty. When they rant about women becoming old and alone, they are simply trying to target what they believe to be women's weak spot, just trying to shake up the status qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 07:45 PM
2

There is a Red Pill saying that "the hesitation is the message." Women who are interested in you will find a way. If she is turning you down without proposing an alternative, it's an L. Why force her to be brutal with you? It's not her job, she may be concerned for her own safety, plus she quite possibly doesn't even know why: she just knows she isn't feeling it. She has already given you honest feedback by turning you down. From there, it's on you. From there, the feedback you need is from guys…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 07:21 PM
1

Not every man is a murderer, but any man could be. They usually don't come with labels on their foreheads. That's why women might be less than candid. It works the other way around too. The manosphere describes man-hating, monkey branch-swinging, gold-digging, me-too'ing, divorce-r*ping women, which some folks mock as the figment of weak men's imagination. Most guys who aren't heavily invested in white knight game realize that those women really are out there and that they aren't always obvious …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 06:45 PM
3

When a woman is with megachad, we all understand why she is with him. When an attractive woman is with some loser asshole who doesn't "deserve" her, this can be discombobulating for a guy. But while anger may be understandable, it is useless. In reality, observing this is a tremendous opportunity for a guy. When you see a guy with a woman who he doesn't "deserve", what you are actually seeing is Game at work. Instead of getting angry, you should observe and deconstruct what this undeserving guy …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 02:53 AM
34

The headline broke today that Jordan Van der Sloot finally confessed to murdering Natalee Holloway. He confessed that she rejected his sexual advances so he bashed her head in with a cinder block. Maybe that's why women sometimes aren't completely honest with men about exactly what they think of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/23 02:24 AM
2

Co-Ed interactive night classes: dancing, improv, winetasting, cooking, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 07:05 AM
2

Why do people who have given up come onto these forums to talk about the fact that they have given up. These forums are about solutions, at least they used to be.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 06:27 AM
1

Neil Strauss wrote “The Truth” largely because PUA had played itself out as a viable brand (which is a separate question from the validity of the underlying ideas) and Neil wanted reentry into polite society. And what better way to sell books than a “redemption” story. I mean, just look at your reaction lapping it up. Did you know that after he wrote “The Truth” Strauss continued to hawk his PUA products on his website?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 06:22 AM
2

I have seen many articles by women saying pretty much what the OP describes. Some of you will say link to it but I didn’t know it was going to be on the test so I’m afraid I didn’t compile a bibliography. If anyone is interested, he or she will have to act as their own reference librarian. But to jumpstart your research, pretty much any article of the “We asked 15 women about their threesomes” variety will have at least one say “I did it when I was young and crazy. Now I’m in a relationship and …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 06:08 AM
2

I have seen many articles by women saying pretty much what the OP describes. You’ll say link to it but I didn’t know it was going to be on the test so I’m afraid I didn’t compile a bibliography. If anyone is interested, he or she will have to act as their own reference library. But to jumpstart your research, pretty much any article of the “We asked 15 women about their threesomes” variety will have at least one say “I did it when I was young and crazy. Now I’m in a relationship and I would neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/23 05:26 AM
1

Saying that echo chambers run on confirmation bias is true but that is not an observation that supports that black pill is going mainstream. That is an observation that people stuck in an echo chamber THINK that their view is gaining ground in the wider society.
/r/AllPillDebate26/09/23 02:55 PM
1

No. Just the men that hang out in these kinds of spaces.
/r/AllPillDebate26/09/23 04:47 AM
0

Red Pillers and incels are not the same. In fact, they are opposites. Incels think everything is hopeless. Red Pillers, rightly or wrongly, think that they have discovered the cheat code.
/r/ExRedPill26/09/23 01:23 AM
2

Women promote ugly women as sex symbols because it makes themselves look better by comparison. Also, once an actress has some success there is a whole contingent of people with a vested interest in promoting the idea that she’s a sex symbol. The actress herself of course. Her agent and support staff. The producer of whatever movie or show she’s in. The leading man she appears with. It can be a bit of an eye-roller but it doesn’t really affect you if your focus is in the right place. Just because…
/r/AllPillDebate25/09/23 03:45 PM
-1

So many of you guys are depressed for reasons that you heard somewhere on the internet and then got repeated over and over and over and over and over and over again, and you just accept it as true because everyone on the internet says so. Has it ever occurred to you that someone is f*cking with you? What if you just turned off those voices?
/r/AllPillDebate25/09/23 05:49 AM
0

Women haven’t done anything against you. If you believe that height is destiny, then you must believe the evo psych theories. If you believe evo psych then women are just following nature. They are no more to blame for preferring tall men than you are to blame for liking big tits. But the truth is men that are less than optimum from an evo psych perspective can still have success by focusing on what they do have instead of fixating on what they don’t have.
/r/AllPillDebate24/09/23 06:09 PM
-1

A half inch of height is not destiny. Ok, we’ve narrowed down that your problem is mental. I’m not a mental health expert. Maybe you need to seek one out. But in the meantime, here are some things to do: (1) never again blame your height. That’s bullshit. (2) focus on developing positive mental frames. Nobody, not even Chad, has a problem-free life (3) develop plans for dealing with your down times. You probably know what kinds of things get you depressed and how that manifests. Develop a plan d…
/r/AllPillDebate24/09/23 04:58 PM
2

The point of Red Pill was never to sit around and consume content all day. The ideas are as relevant as they ever were. Go out there and try to put the shit into action. Try, fail some, try again. The top guys, by definition, have the most opportunities but this idea that only the top 5%, or whatever the number dr jure is, can get girls is bullshit. Everyday when I go out and about, I see normal looking guys paired off with girls. The war that you all are fighting is in your head.
/r/AllPillDebate24/09/23 05:47 AM
7

If you are 5’10”, then height is not your problem. That’s well more than enough for success with women. I know because I am 5’10” too and I’ve been with a fair number of women. And it could have been more if I hadn’t been such an dumbass when I was younger. But you learn things as you go through life and things improve. And while it’s nice to daydream about harems of women, the truth is you only need one if you get a good one. You are lucky that you are above average height for men, because heig…
/r/AllPillDebate24/09/23 05:33 AM
3

We live in the real world. Women are going to interact with men. As long as she isn't spending an inordinate amount of time with some guy or giving that guy an inordinate amount of attention, don't screw up a good thing over dogma. The Red Pill and Manosphere guys give some good advice. They also get some things wrong. This idea that women in relationships are not allowed to interact with other men is just stupid, plain and simple. If it really bothers you that much, get some friend to use his s…
/r/TheRedPill22/09/23 05:10 PM
2

I think Jada must have some hellacious kompromat on Will. There is no other explanation for him putting up with all of her shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 04:39 PM
2

I had a roommate when I was younger who was handsome, blonde hair, blue eyes, chiseled jaw, chiseled body. One of our other roommates used to call him Hitler's wet dream. The guy was just too nice of a guy. Couldn't make it man to woman or escalate worth a shit. The other roommates and I quietly speculated that he was secretly gay. But he eventually married and had 5 kids. Another guy I knew was an exchange student from Sweden. About 6'3", looked like a young Fabio. He was a world-traveler and s…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:56 AM
5

"I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." Groucho Marx.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/23 12:34 AM
1

Trying to reverse engineer the answer to this question is what pickup artistry is all about. It’s not about fuzzy hats or pickup lines. Okay, that guy over there looks like a Greek god, so I get that. But there’s no way in hell this dude over here should be getting tail and yet he’s rolling in it. So you try to decode what is this dude is doing that the rest of us are not doing. The answer to that question is too long for one Reddit comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/09/23 04:22 AM
2

Turn off your devices. Go do something in the sunshine. Seriously.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/23 12:26 AM
0

Nothing is more blue pill than believing in god.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/23 07:56 AM
1

Leaving aside the morality/ethics of lying, which some other commenters are focused on, you say you are from a town small enough that most people your age know each other. Although properly executed lying can work in the right situation, it is highly probable in your environment that you are going to be exposed and the damage to your perceived value will be substantial. As a pragmatic matter, you would be better served devoting your energies to developing new prospects.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/23 05:07 PM
2

Red Pill is about seeing the unvarnished truth of how the world really is, not about how you wish it was and not how some so-called authority said it was. Right and wrong has nothing to do with it. Being a good man has nothing to do with it. Armed with such knowledge, you can then make informed and effective decisions about how to use this knowledge to live the kind of life you want. You can choose to be a good man instead of being being duped or manipulated into being a "good man"; but Red Pill…
/r/TheRedPill12/07/23 02:58 AM
0

If it works 90% or 50% or 30%, then it works. And yes, if it works only 10%, then it works. Most success in life is achieved at the margins. A 10% edge is a great advantage in a situation that hangs in the balance and could go either way. When there are so many things that you can't control, it makes it all the more important to execute on the things you can control. You say training improves some salesmen but some just aren't cut out for it. You just prove my point. Just because somebody, say, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 11:49 PM
–

Funny how it's "just common sense" and yet the powers that be frantically try to ban any red pill leader that gains any traction. Why are the powers that be trying to ban "common sense"?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:44 PM
1

You are the one who brought up 100%, as if that were the dividing line between legitimate and bogus. .0000000001 percent is just a made up number and is ridiculous. Do you think it is impossible for a salesman to become more effective through sales training and practice? Do you think it is impossible for a public speaker to become more persuasive through training and practice? Of course these things are not impossible. So why would it impossible to become more effective at connecting romanticall…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/23 07:33 PM
1

How would you respond if a four year old called you a poopyhead?
/r/TheRedPill05/07/23 09:47 PM
0

Talking about whether it works 100% is a straw man argument. I don’t think I’ve ever heard any PUA proponent claim that it works 100% of the time. How many things in life work 100% of the time? You might be able to think of one or two such things, but not too damn many. Insinuating that something is illegitimate because it doesn’t work 100% of the time is a disingenuous argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/23 03:36 AM
1

This is just “just be yourself” in different words. Which is fine for those for whom “just being yourself” was already working. For those for whom “just be yourself” hasn’t worked, they need some more actionable, more specific advice. Approaching someone at night in a club is usually very different from approaching someone as they go about their life during the day. The differences may seem so obvious to you that they don’t even seem worth mentioning. For other guys, these differences might not …
/r/TheRedPill16/06/23 03:49 AM
1

Your post presumes that it is per se wrong to have more than one woman at a time. It also presumes that to have more than one woman at a time is undisciplined. Even asking the question "why can't you apply the discipline you have in the gym or business to your relationships with women?" presumes that having only one woman is per se right and having more than one woman is per se wrong. It's not inherently wrong. If you think it is, then you go be that guy. Having watched Justin's content, I don't…
/r/ExRedPill25/05/23 06:31 PM
–

The fact that the authorities seized his assets has nothing to do with whether hustler's university is or is not legit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 04:27 AM
1

Accepting on faith your quoted statistics, a third of young men are involuntarily celibate, not incels. Being involuntarily celibate is sometimes a person's present circumstances, but it is not who they are. Being an incel is a self-selected identity; it is who they have decided they are.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/23 04:12 AM
1

When people talk about what Red Pill is, you kind of have to define what point in time you are talking about, because it is a changing thing. It wasn't always pro-trad marriage, but it has certainly trended that way. In the beginning, it was much more of an exercise in trying to discuss the unvarnished truth of the current sexual marketplace in an amoral and apolitical way. As the community gained traction, you had a lot of different factions with different agendas all trying to co-opt it for th…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 03:03 PM
1

For those keeping score at home, Extra-Confection, who has been on Reddit for about 100 days and is totally the expert on Red Pill, began by saying PUA is not Red Pill. When I pointed out that Red Pill directly grew out of PUA, Extra-Confection responded of course it did. I also had pointed out that many of the ideas that Red Pill continues to espouse originally came from PUA, Extra-Confection had no answer for that. Then Extra-Confection again said that PUA is not Red Pill, thus making the stat…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 02:45 PM
1

You keep moving the goalposts. First you call PUA sexual assault. By the end, you are implying that a woman who was persuaded to have sex, but just wasn't enthusiastic enough is the same as sexual assault. This trivializes sexual assault and infantilizes women. You are suggesting that even when a woman says yes, men of honor have to second-guess the yes because you can't trust women to know their own minds. It is female privilege to think that romantic connections just fall from the sky fully fo…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/23 02:27 PM
2

You are rabidly against PUA, spending your days posting rants on Reddit against it. And you subscribe to several PUA subs including four private subs. Nothing desparate or creepy about that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 11:43 PM
6

This.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 10:51 PM
3

Game is not the same as manipulation and lying. Game is just being observant of psychology, particularly as it relates to women's attraction cues, and then breaking those observations down into actionable steps to improve your odds with women, sometimes if only a little (the margin between success and failure is often small). Then you can improve upon those action items through study and practice. You do not have only one authentic self. You have many different authentic selves which you deploy …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 10:49 PM
3

First off, Solid Guitar did not say anything promoting lying, pretending, manipulating or put downs, so your response is a non-sequitur. Effective Game is not inherently about any of these things. Second, who says the men want long term relationships or marriage? Maybe he just wants casual sex. There's nothing wrong with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 10:21 PM
1

Well, if you say so, then it must be true. You've been reading up on it for, what, 100 days or so now. And you've repeated it like 20 times in the comments and we all know that that makes it 20 times truer.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 09:42 PM
0

If a blockbuster movie seen by millions of people is supposedly "about" something for almost two decades without anybody realizing it, is it really about that thing? You want so badly for Red Pill guys to be embarrassed about it that you are trying to imagine it into existence. I find it hilarious that people like you always feel the need to comment that two "women" wrote the movie.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 09:40 PM
0

But we aren't talking about sexual assault. We are talking about persuading women to agree to something. If someone is just going to knock women over the head and drag them back to the cave, no techniques are required. If you have brothers, fathers or sons, I hope no one ever accuses them of sexual assault just for making concerted efforts to become more effective persuaders.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 09:26 PM
1

RP may be more than that, but no one was talking about men not putting women's interests ahead of their own before Red Pill normalized the idea. It is only common sense in retrospect.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:33 PM
2

First off, incels are not TRPers. Incels are the opposite of TRPers. Incels believe it is all hopeless whereas Red Pillers, rightly or wrongly, believe they have figured out the cheat code with women. But Red Pillers might be able to moderate incels if given a chance. When Reddit quarantined the TRP forum for perceived extremism, the forum only got more extreme. When they make it more cumbersome to engage the site, the less doctrinaire folks are less likely to jump through the hoops to participa…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:28 PM
1

The movie was made by two men who later decided to "transition". They only claimed much later that the movie was about transitioning and there isn't nothing in the plot line that is inherently about transitioning.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 10:10 PM
0

PUAs use tricks techniques to manipulate persuade women to have sex without consent to consent to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 10:00 PM
1

The question of what is Red Pill is actually two different questions. One question is what IS Red Pill? As in, what do a preponderance of the people who identify as Red Pill ACTUALLY say and espouse on the various Red Pill forums? This is not a static answer. Things ebb and flow, and evolve and devolve over time. Factions try to push and pull it in this direction or that direction. In terms of what is actually said, the Red Pill of today is not the same as the Red Pill of 2013 or 2015 or 2018. T…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 09:41 PM
1

Red Pill literally grew out of PUA. Many of Red Pill's continuing core concepts originated in the PUA community. It is true that over time, an offshoot that identified as Red Pill came to reject the idea of PUA (even as they continued to espouse ideas that they, perhaps unknowingly, inherited from PUA). There continue to be a lot of solid Red Pill guys that continue to recognize the validity and importance of Game.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 09:00 PM
2

If TRP got you to the place where you could take it or leave it with women, then TRP did its job for you. That is not a failure of TRP, it is a success. Maybe other guys are at a different place in the process and still need to learn to navigate women to get the next level.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/23 02:57 PM
1

Game is simply a set of techniques based upon psychological observations to increase your odds with women. There is nothing inherently unethical about it. The attempted moral shaming of guys for using techniques to increase their odds of getting laid is what is really blue pill and gynocentric.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/23 02:49 PM
3

The core principles are universal. How someone chooses to apply them is up to each man.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/23 07:48 AM
3

Nothing that you describe here is being fake. Arguably, from a certain perspective, any time you are trying to improve, you are being fake. However, allowing that idea to restrict your improvement is a recipe for failure. If there is a technique to which nearly all women favorably respond, how can we call that immoral? Their favorable reaction says that it is what they want. The universality of their response (or nearly so) says that this action and reaction is a law of nature. It is not good or…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/23 07:44 AM
22

My LTR, who is very good at picking up other languages, shared an astute observation with me: she said you can learn how to speak someone else's language by noticing the mistakes they make speaking your language. For example, in Spanish, instead of saying a clove of garlic, they say a tooth of garlic. If a Spanish speaker said that in English, it sounds weird, but if you're alert, you just learned a new idiom in Spanish. This is great advice for language learning but the more I thought about it,…
/r/TheRedPill08/02/23 07:26 AM
1

But if there was a men's only space, how would we know what we're allowed to say?
/r/MensRights08/02/23 06:51 AM
-2

There are a lot of comments by Tate that I disagree with. That said, some of his motivational videos are pretty awesome. Focus on the messages that ring true to you and separate them from the man. Take what's good; leave what's bad.
/r/ExRedPill08/02/23 06:45 AM
2

I think you have one key piece backwards. Red Pill used to be easy to find and access. You could just sign on without any special tricks. Sometimes a red pill link would even be auto-suggested or a redditor would refer someone to red pill without getting insta-banned. If you googled red pill it would be the top result or near top result. As a result, there was a wider audience providing input on the forum and it had a moderating influence on the content. Then red pill got quarantined. If I googl…
/r/ExRedPill08/02/23 06:26 AM
2

The Wall does not necessarily mean that post-Wall women are incapable of getting sex. The Wall is a shift in RELATIVE negotiating power between the sexes, increasing over time. Where once a woman had a throng of orbiters to meet her arbitrary and capricious whims, later the throng dwindles to a handful whom she must meet half way. Eventually most, but not all, are ignored entirely.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/22 08:17 AM
1

If there are many things in this world over which you have no control, it makes it that much more important to execute on those things over which you do have some control. For the most part, success and failure are determined at the margins. You don’t have to go from 0 to 100 to turn failure into success. Usually, you just have to nudge the needle a little.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/22 06:01 PM
11

Women give out pussy like bankers give out loans. First, you have to prove that you don’t really need it. Then you can have as much as you want.
/r/TheRedPill13/11/22 05:56 PM
3

It’s not that high value men never face adversity with (some) women. It’s that they don’t let it ruin their day or their life because they have an abundance mindset.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/22 05:27 PM
7

The problem with many guys is that they are always risking too much or too little. Either they take no action out of fear or they get grabby and make proclamations of love that seem to come out of the blue. We use the word escalation so much that maybe we come to forget what it means: gradually but steadily increasing. Some old school guys explained it this way: suppose you are a businessman and the success of your business critically depends on a reliable supply of widgets from your vendor. An …
/r/TheRedPill08/11/22 05:22 PM
2

Blue Pill is believing in Disney fairytale endings. Blue Pill is thinking that the good guy always wins in the end if he just stays true to what is “right”. Blue Pill is believing that women will recognize and reward your self-sacrifice on their behalf. Blue Pill is dispensing dating advice to “just be yourself.”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:30 AM
2

If I burn my hand on the stove, am I a hypocrite for saying “hey man, don’t touch the stove. It’s hot.” ? P.S. I don’t particularly care for Jordan Peterson. He sometimes makes a good point, but a lot of the time, I can’t tell what the f*ck he’s carrying on about. But that’s different than saying that someone who has experienced a setback in life is foreclosed from ever providing moral guidance.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 08:48 PM
0

Dude, if you want women to take you seriously as a man, maybe you should stop using words like "ciswomen". There is already a perfectly good word for that--the word is "women." Massive beta red flag.
/r/AllPillDebate11/08/22 01:13 AM
1

If you want to have sex with them, comfort is exactly wrong. Comfort is anti-seductive. Comfort is a dime a dozen. First, you need to elicit something at the intersection of intrigue and scarcity. They have to wonder if they can have you and you have to seem like you’re actually worth having. You need only just enough comfort so they don’t think you’re going to murder them.
/r/seduction09/08/22 07:24 AM
17

Good game shouldn’t look like game. If you look like what you’re doing is volume cold approaching, then it will not be helpful for her to see you engaging with other women. But if you look like you’re having multiple successful normal interactions with other women, then it could be good preselection. Just because you got a number doesn’t necessarily mean it was a good interaction from a preselection standpoint. Depends on your vibe.
/r/seduction09/08/22 07:01 AM
3

A couple of things: One, she could feel insecure because you aren't making a move so she isn't sure you like her and doesn't want to embarrass herself by showing interest that she thinks is unreciprocated. Women think the hints they drop are more obvious than they actually are. Two, women are much more about the feelings of the moment. If a guy likes a girl today, he'll like her tomorrow, barring some extenuating intervening circumstance. With women, for whatever reason, there are windows of opp…
/r/seduction04/08/22 01:03 AM
2

Try street fairs if there are any in your area. Outdoor music festivals. And bars are always a classic. Like pubs and watering holes. This are good for a relaxed indirect approach. But if it is a smaller venue, you're going to have to run smaller volume per venue.
/r/seduction04/08/22 12:36 AM
1

It's about getting laid, and I might add, there's nothing wrong that. For f*ck sake, what is wrong with some of these guys? There is an epidemic of moralizing lately.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/22 11:39 PM
1

I'm not saying guys should say these things. But Red Pill has nothing to do with right or wrong. Red Pill is about what is. Red Pill is about finding reality, even when it is uncomfortable. The proper question from a Red Pill perspective is do these lines work or not. Even if the lines work, you can still choose not to use them. That's a separate question.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/22 11:30 PM
1

This day-to-day fickleness is nothing new. Women have been doing that for decades, probably forever. For men, if I’m interested today then I’m interested tomorrow. With women, it’s about the moment, and it’s highly perishable.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 03:45 AM
9

Like trying to eat a banana in peace.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/07/22 03:15 AM
1

There’s been a rash of “people“ talking up John Anthony lately while he is a blatantly obvious loser. I swear it must be John Anthony himself using multiple accounts to try to promote himself.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/22 06:02 AM
1

These other guys who are replying are focusing on building value and there is nothing wrong with that necessarily. You need to achieve a certain minimum threshold of value before women will be receptive to you and the specific suggestions they have will help. My concern with the increasing semi-puritanical anti-game, “just be good enough“ sentiment that is creeping into these spaces is that it is taking the manosphere back to square one. We’ve already been there, people. It’s not enough to just …
/r/seduction24/07/22 06:23 AM
1

In terms of western countries, you can still cold approach. You just have to dial down the intensity. A lot of people think cold approach means you have to be really overt and intense and go for the same day lay, but that’s not the case. Just strike up a conversation on topics that are suited to that community and just keep it going.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 07:54 AM
11

Like the other guy said, AWALT refers to innate tendencies, not necessarily their actions in any given situation. And to be more precise, All women are like that sometimes, some women are like that all of the time and most women are like that most of the time, enough women are like that enough of the time, that it is a high percentage bet to at least be on guard for it. But AWALTSSWALTAOTTAMWALTMOTTEWALTEOTT is too cumbersome, so AWALT.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/22 07:03 PM
12

The problem is not necessarily so much that the man feels emasculated by a woman earning more. The problem often is that as she begins to earn more than him, the woman begins to look at her man differently (less favorably) and she acts differently towards him. In my admittedly anecdotal sample, women earning more than their men bothers the women more than the men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/22 05:26 PM
1

My LTR tried to use this one on me. I replied "Real men don't care what real men do." That left her speechless (for a while).
/r/TheRedPill30/06/22 05:20 PM
0

It's interesting to me that men who are not masculine in the traditional sense, and their female allies, still compete for the label of "masculine" to be applied to such men. If traditionally masculine traits are unimportant, as they often claim, you would expect them to say "I'm not masculine and there's nothing wrong with that." Instead, they very much want the label of being masculine. But they want to turn the definition of masculine on its head so that, in many cases, it means the opposite …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 09:46 PM
1

"Toxic masculinity" is not a thing. It is a phrase of manipulation invented to shame and control men. It has a one-size fits all meaning for whatever women and white knights need it to mean to serve their own purposes in any particular moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 09:32 PM
1

The content of his first book (and more) is available for free on his blog. The fact that some guys choose to buy it and have it all bound in one volume is more a matter of their own personal convenience. Everyone's ideas are open to criticism but just continually bitching that he got paid for the book he wrote is pretty weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 09:06 PM
3

At its most fundamental, Red Pill means seeing the world as it really is and not how you might wish it was. While there might not be anything wrong with a man being kind, caring, intelligent, thoughtful, strong, persistent, etc., saying that that is what Red Pill is kind of is contrary to the whole point. You are engaging in an exercise of projecting onto Red Pill how you think the world should be rather than how it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 08:54 PM
2

There is a ton that could be said about disqualifying and push/pull but to keep it simple, don't be afraid to express a view contrary to the woman's view every now and then. Too many guys are obsequious in the mistaken belief that constant agreement will attract women. If you focus on genuine disagreements, then you don't necessarily need rehearsed lines. Just remember it's not about having a heated logical debate that you are trying to win. Keep it kind of light-hearted.
/r/seduction29/06/22 08:18 PM
3

Some guys do just get it. But focusing on that misses an important nuance of the original point. Vas puts it in quotes because it really means that women want someone who seems like they just get it, even if they didn't originally just get it. What is "it"? "It" is a series of attraction cues that correlate to reproductive fitness that have become hardwired into women by evolution over eons. For the most part, women don't sit around and consciously think about this shit. They feel it viscerally.…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 06:56 PM
1

If financial abortions ever actually become a thing, the responsibility still will not fall on individual women. The financial responsibility will be transferred from individual men to society as a whole. In some ways, it might actually work out better for women because they wouldn’t have to worry about any given man being a “deadbeat”. Women would be able to focus solely on alpha fux with beta bux already being taken care of for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:10 PM
11

My buddy who slays would say basically this and add a little faux shudder as if the thought of sex with her repulsed him.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/22 06:34 PM
18

Never change yourself for a woman. But you have got to change yourself for women, if you are interested in having relationships with women and what you are currently doing is not working. As Chris Rock said "the audience is never wrong." If they didn't laugh at the joke, it wasn't funny. Don't put too much emphasis on any particular woman's opinion, but if women as a whole don't respond to you the way you would like, then the "real" you isn't good enough. You have to change, yes, for women, assu…
/r/TheRedPill20/06/22 10:49 PM
2

Yeah, that’s why the Red Pill forum has been quarantined, and why it doesn’t appear in Google search results when I literally have searched “reddit Red Pill”, and why I have to jump through hoops just to get to the site and when I do get there, I have to click on a button that I still want to go there even though I have been warned that it has “shocking” and “offensive” content. Because it is just “common sense” that everybody else except the Red Pillers already knew. That’s why.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 02:27 AM
5

Although you shouldn’t sacrifice your career or fitness for women (and you don’t need to) the advice to ignore women for 5 years is horrible advice. Just about the worst possible advice. You need to get started solving your problem NOW. Red Pill has some invaluable insights. But this idea that women in their 20’s don’t want men in their 20’s is just plain silly. And it’s dangerous because it may lull you into not taking necessary action. Nothing magical happens to you when you get older that mak…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/22 03:12 AM
1

Cultivate other options. Live your best life. Stop chasing her. If you happen to see her, you can still say hi, politely but in a slightly bored way. She has to re-engage with you. If she doesn’t, there’s your answer. If she does re-engage, no more declarations of love. Give her 2/3 of whatever she gives you. When you finally “ask her out” you don’t ask her out. You offer her an opportunity. ”I’m going to be going to X, if you want to join.” Don’t try to take it from platonic to man to woman wit…
/r/seduction08/06/22 06:44 AM
18

“Women are just constantly patting themselves on the back about how difficult their lives are, and nobody corrects them because they want to fuck them.” -Bill Burr.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 06:41 AM
3

Calmly point out to such people that their insults reaffirm traditional gender roles. They claim to fight against gender roles and that all of these new forms of "masculinity" are equal to, nay!, superior to traditional masculinity. Yet when they want to try to cut a man down, what do they say?: You are an incel (translation: real men fuck lots of women); You are weak/fragile (translation: real men are strong); You've got a little dick (translation: real men have big dicks/real men are defined b…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/22 07:41 AM
2

There are different components of value: looks, Game, social standing and financial resources are all components of value. I didn’t really try to break that down because it would have made the post too long. You have to show a woman some kind of value to interest her. I agree that you shouldn’t lead with money.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/22 08:52 PM
2

I think you and I have a completely different conception of Game. It’s not just for ONS. Arguably it’s even more important for LTRs. This idea that Game doesn’t work on or isn’t necessary for Good Women… oh geez, here we go again. Right back to square one.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/22 10:08 PM
1

You should definitely think for yourself. Don't accept anything uncritically. At its root, the focus should be on what works and what does not work. Value judgments that Game is "misogynistic" or "manipulative" are silly. Critics frequently say Game doesn't work and in the next breath say it's manipulative. But it can't be manipulative if it doesn't work. If it does work, how can it be misogynistic? Women are telling you what they want, but not with their words which can be insincere or lacking …
/r/TheRedPill29/04/22 07:08 PM
1

You're a young guy and still have lots of time. If you're still in high school, you may be stuck right now with a social circle not of your choosing. As you move forward in life, you'll be able to choose your own social circle(s). Some girls may limit themselves to white guys but there are girls who are open to black guys and there are some that even prefer black guys. Keep doing the work to improve/maintain your value and your time will come. For most guys, it's a numbers game. Life isn't fair …
/r/seduction28/04/22 11:29 PM
1

Have you heard the saying "Follow the signal, not the noise"? All of those messages are the noise, not the signal. You don't really want those messages. You want what you think those messages represent. What do those messages represent? Choice. Options. How do you develop choice and options? You don't do it the same way that women do it because men and women are not the same. Most of the things you have set out in your post will get you off to a good start of maximizing your potential, but be ca…
/r/seduction28/04/22 11:12 PM
13

Don't overshare: You seem to have intuitively identified one thing yourself: don't overshare. You have to share some, but don't vomit everything out at once. It dissipates the mystery and tension. It deprives her of the pleasure of discovering you. Spilling your guts right away implies that you are low value because it's like no one will bother to ask if you don't put it out there. If she asks what you do, you could say with a smile you're in the witness protection program, and that's on a need …
/r/seduction28/04/22 10:46 PM
1

I could be misconstruing you but you seem to be suggesting that men who seek to bang a lot of women do so because they are insecure and once they are no longer insecure, they see the error of their ways and then start interacting with women in a more mature and authentic manner. If that is what you are suggesting, I reject the premise. If a guy wants to settle down fine. But there is nothing wrong with a guy wanting to bang a lot of women. I'm sure that banging a lot of women helps most guys con…
/r/seduction28/04/22 10:06 PM
2

First off, you're overanalyzing. Relax. There is no one right answer. Music? Sometimes. Not necessarily all of the time. You should have some available for when you want/need it. You can choose the music to set the mood or you can use the choice of music as a conversation topic. Snacks? You should have something available, but you don't need to stock things you really don't want in your place. Seating. She can sit at whatever distance she is comfortable. Don't force it. If she sits first, you ca…
/r/seduction21/04/22 05:06 PM
12

Red Pills aren’t incels. Red Pills are the opposite of incels. Incels think everything is hopeless. Red Pills think, rightly or wrongly, that they have found the cheat code. Red Pillers detest incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:30 AM
10

Negotiated attraction has its place, but it is most definitely very much the consolation prize. Young men should do everything in their power to avoid it. Strive for genuine desire. Enjoying genuine desire as opposed to transactional sex is very much an apples to oranges comparison. But if we are keeping it real, for some men, transactional sex is the only shot they are going to have. If it comes to that, it is better than nothing but do not go gently into that good night.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 04:05 AM
1

This is a terrible post. After all of this time, have we learned nothing?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/22 05:46 AM
2

Congratulate yourself. You did what you were supposed to do. You took your shot. You can’t control everything. You can only control your own actions. When you did what you were supposed to do, that’s a W.
/r/seduction19/04/22 05:40 AM
4

You can escalate physically without making it sexual (at first). A handshake that lingers just a moment “too long”. A high five . A touch on the arm to emphasize a point in the story you’re telling her. Lean in close to her ear to tell her a “secret.” The fact that she’s with a friend needn’t be a problem. You can leverage the friend to tease her. Ask the friend “so is she a troublemaker?” Or “So is she a goody-two shoes?” as the case may be. Disagree with her. It doesn’t mean you have to be an …
/r/seduction19/04/22 05:33 AM
14

There is a middle ground between complete gullibility on the one hand and complete cynicism on the other hand. Yeah, the world often isn’t fair. Deal with it. Get over it. Don’t let it curdle you.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/22 07:47 PM
7

Three guys I knew come to mind who could get women almost at will. Although none of them are slouches in the career or looks departments, none of them would blow you away in those departments. For each of them, their biggest advantage was being charismatic in interpersonal interactions. Two of the three had good long runs of pumping and dumping. One of them was mostly a serial monogamist but some of those monogamist relationships were REALLY short. All of them eventually settled down, at least f…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 06:25 PM
2

Suppose the women on here admitted to you that they aren’t held accountable for anything, that they have inflated egos and insane standards and that they enjoy limitless privilege. Then what? Everybody wants some and they are using whatever they have at their disposal to strike the best deal that they can, as they see it. That’s all it is. The world will not change to suit you. You have to figure out how the basket of skills, attributes and advantages that you have, or that you can develop, can …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 05:43 PM
1

The attraction game is about influencing other people, not controlling them. You influence them by understanding what THEY are looking for and then controlling yourself to be able to provide it. Sometimes, of course, in a given situation, you will conclude that you are not willing to do what it takes because the cost/benefit is not favorable. That’s fine if it is a conscious choice and not the result of laziness.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 05:25 PM
10

Hitch was a cuck too. The movie started off promising but then Hollywood did what Hollywood does.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/22 02:56 PM
5

Don’t ask for anything; offer opportunities. “I’m going to [go to] __, if you want to join.” By never asking a question, you never give her the chance to say no to you. You dangle the bait and if she’s in to you, she’ll nibble. If she doesn’t, it’s easy to play off like it never happened. If she mentions she likes margaritas, then you say “well if you like margaritas, then there’s a place I go to you have to try.” Or wine. Or sushi. Or “I should show you ___ sometime.”
/r/seduction31/03/22 12:15 AM
3

There’s nothing wrong with cold approach but if you’re struggling, maybe don’t begin there. To start, try talking with people who are paid to talk to you anyway: cashiers, waitresses, salespeople, etc. I’m not talking about sexually harassing them on the job. Just strike up a conversation with the goal of learning one personal thing about them beyond what’s necessary for the transaction. Then a second personal thing about them. Gradually expand your comfort zone. At first, you aren’t necessarily…
/r/seduction30/03/22 11:40 PM
2

First off, women are attracted to excellence in men. So even if they aren’t interested in the thing itself, some will be more attracted to you due to a display of competence. Second, a well chosen hobby can, in fact, make you more interesting to her. Third, a hobby that you are very interested in will provide you with diversion so that you are not just seating around obsessing about women all the time, being needy. Neediness REPELS women. You shouldn’t choose a hobby only because you think it wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 06:23 AM
3

I don’t think it was staged but it was performative. Will was performing for Jada. That’s why it felt so weirdly emotionally uncalibrated.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 06:06 AM
2

Nobody deserves respect. Respect is earned.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 11:15 PM
3

Millions?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 11:06 PM
3

"Why is it so hard to believe that someone might have a non-traditional relationship and love their partner?" I'm not speaking about every relationship but as far as why I don't believe these two had an open relationship, Exhibit A is the look on Will Smith's face during the red table talk. That is the face of a man who is not okay with the situation (although he never finds his nuts enough to do anything about it). He calls their relationship open after the fact in a feeble attempt to save face…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 11:03 PM
8

She's certainly abusive of him from a certain perspective. But at the end of the day, it's his responsibility. Even before this, I seriously thought she must have photos of him with naked little boys or something. I have no inside information, but why would he put up with her unless she has insane kompromat on him?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 10:52 PM
44

Nah, that slap dried them up. He jumped through hoops like a good little circus seal. He laughed at first, looked over and saw she was upset and then performed for her approval. Check out the video in freeze frame right after he slapped Rock and was turning to return to his seat. He's smiling and he's looking over to Jada to see if she approves. Some women may speak out in favor of him because they love it when men dutifully provide service to them (funny how so-called "toxic masculinity" is ok …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 10:30 PM
0

There's no such thing as toxic masculinity. Will Smith is just a person wh is screwed up and he fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 10:22 PM
1

The OP fundamentally misunderstands shit tests. An insult because you are a low value man that a woman is not interested in is not the same thing as a shit test. Women insult men they are not interested in. A woman will shit test men because she might be interested, but she wants to check if you can hold your own. The two can sometimes look similar, but the difference is that a woman who insults you because she is not interested (1) will often break off contact as quickly as possible (2) will no…
/r/TheRedPill24/03/22 05:33 PM
5

It's a shit test. What do we do about shit tests, gentlemen? Ignore it; Agree and amplify; or Turn it back on them. Whichever option you choose , don't get all serious about it. You're not trying to "win" an argument. Keep it light. It's not a question of admitting or denying red pill. You don't have to directly respond to what they ask or say. You aren't their circus monkey. Respond indirectly, if at all. Then move on to a different topic. If they try to drag you back to the topic of Red Pill, …
/r/TheRedPill24/03/22 05:12 PM
1

Or, you could approach whoever the f*ck you want, do it in a DGAF way, and realize when you don’t win them all that the rejection probably isn’t personal and even when it sometimes is personal , so what? You could realize that there is a massive middle ground between living like a eunuch who is petrified to approach versus jumping in with two feet and no calibration, wearing your heart on your sleeve. You could engage, but with a little push/pull — you, know, the old school stuff. The post is so…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 07:22 AM
1

When someone tells someone to just be yourself, they are really saying that they have no worthwhile advice to contribute. They are trying to wrap their lack of useful advice in the disguise of common sense. First off, if what you have been doing is not working, try something else. Second, there is nothing phony about trying to improve yourself, as long as you are really doing the work and not just blowing smoke. Third, it is a fallacy to believe that the best product always sells the best. The e…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 08:00 AM
2

If women aged 18 to 25 cannot be trusted to select their own sexual partners of an older age because their brains have not sufficiently developed, then can they be trusted to select ANY of their sexual partners? If they lack the mental capacity to meaningfully consent to sex with an older man, should they be allowed to choose to have sex with men 18 to 25? I mean, after all, their brains are not sufficiently developed. They either have the ability to consent or they don’t. Shouldn’t we protect t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/01/22 07:30 AM
3

It’s not the red pill you are disliking; it is the misapplication of the red pill. Two different guys talk about the red pill and they are talking about two different things, apples and oranges. One guy looks around, sees that the comfortable illusions that he was fed are lies and all he sees is a dystopian hellscape. Another guy looks around after realizing he’s been previously fed bad information and thinks, wow, the world is now mine for the taking now that I know what the score is. It doesn’…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/22 08:18 PM
5

You literally haven’t made any points to be rebutted. You just prattle about cucks & Hegel. Stoics say see the world as it is and take action where you can. You interpret that as live in a world of illusion and don’t bother trying. I’m not sure how anyone can “rebut” anything to your satisfaction when you don’t even seem to know what basic words mean. Look, I get it. You’re schtick is to be provocative and contrarian. You confuse that with being profound.
/r/TheRedPill07/01/22 06:04 AM
1

None of which I said. Keep knocking down those straw men, big boy.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/22 09:45 PM
2

I don’t believe in Golden Ages and there is nothing in Stoicism that espouses Golden Ages. It’s just: look at the world as it really is and deal with it accordingly. Have some other guys on the internet sometime tried to apply stoicism in a flawed way? Maybe. Not my problem. Just saying “Hegel, Hegel, Hegel” isn’t an argument.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/22 06:20 PM
2

This sub has no answers to your question.
/r/ExRedPill06/01/22 06:16 AM
3

Stoicism is not passive. It is action oriented. Stoicism encourages you to fix what can be fixed, control what can be controlled. Of course, some things you will have no control over no matter what you do. Suggesting that Stoics retreat into a world of illusion gets it bass-ackwards.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/22 05:01 AM
1

It’s hilarious that I’m getting downvoted when my comment consists mostly of questions and I never mentioned either party by name. I guess you guys don’t like that little voice inside your heads that knows the real answers to the questions.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/22 09:01 AM
1

Wrong assumption. Not a communist. Funny how you express admiration for Putin but I’m the communist.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/22 08:57 AM
1

Maybe the “winners” got there by leeching off the “losers.” Maybe the game isn’t over but continues indefinitely. Maybe the “losers” are simply doing the rational thing and joining forces against a stronger opponent to execute their next move. If the game goes on indefinitely, how can we really say who the winners are and who the losers are? It’s just a snapshot in time. If being strong is virtuous, then isn’t it a good thing, definitionally, if these “communists” and “leeches” are able to vanqu…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/22 08:18 AM
1

There is nothing inherently right wing about TRP, although a lot of folks seem to want to make it that way. Many people on the left have drifted further left and now babble about there’s no such thing as gender or there’s 22 genders. They’re not sure which. Many people on the right are needlessly politicizing basic health information about which conservatives a decade ago would not have batters an eye. Similarly, lots of people on the right pretend to believe that Trump supporters didn’t really …
/r/TheRedPill03/01/22 07:55 AM
-1

Let’s see. Which party has been consistently pro-corporation? Which party has been anti-corporate regulation, including defending corporations’ ability to grow into near monopolies? You can find examples on both sides of the aisle to be sure, but which party has been consistently more pro-Wall Street at the expense of Main Street? Which party has made “free market capitalism…bs” central to its messaging for at least the last 40 years? Which party has been most protective of corporate profits? Th…
/r/TheRedPill03/01/22 06:55 AM
3

It is not “semantics“ to expect words to be used according to their proper meaning. If the idea that you are trying to communicate is not Marxism, then don’t use the word Marxism. Use the words that you actually mean. It would seem that the word Marxism is used even though that is not what is meant in an effort to invoke an emotional reaction from the readership. Ironic given the lip service often paid here to being logical rather than emotional. Keep Red Pill apolitical.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/21 12:39 AM
–

A lot of men who don’t have abundance are resentful that most young women have sex available on tap 24/7. That’s true, but what those men fail to understand is that the kind of sex available to women 24/7 is not necessarily the kind of sex those women want to have. Those women have the kind of sex men want to have available to them 24/7. But getting the invested sex from Chad is hard for most women. We all see the world through the prism of our own problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 06:04 PM
–

BlackGriffin is right. The Wall describes a shift in relative negotiating power. Capricious demands that women once could make and get easily met are no longer so easily met for many women. Many women who were once out of reach for the average guy are suddenly more available. Of course, there are outliers: exceptionally attractive women will continue to have options. Below average men or 80% men with unrealistic expectations will continue to struggle. Although I think the concept is generally va…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/12/21 05:54 PM
3

He’s mostly wrong. It’s easy to get laid. Some guys in the sphere seem to think that these philosophies can allow adherents to run harems of 9s and 10s. For that to happen on a regular basis if at all, you would have to be fairly elite.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 03:36 PM
5

Supposedly Red Pill men who want to return society to the 1950’s or to any other Golden Age are not really Red Pill. After all, the whole initial point of Red Pill is to see the world for what it really is and deal with it accordingly. It is oxymoronic to try to turn the Red Pill into a project to return the world to a Disney-perfect past.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 03:32 PM
1

While being better is, by definition, always better, every day when I walk out of my house I see normal men paired up with women everywhere I look. I think it’s great to encourage men to improve themselves because it will improve their options in all aspects of their lives, but I think lots of people get carried away with this stuff. This idea that you have to be elite or you don’t stand a chance puts guys in a negative headspace and then many don’t even try. As you consume all of this various a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 08:10 AM
0

Plating and pumping and dumping are not synonymous. You can maintain a plate over the longer haul. Also, a plate is not necessarily even someone you’re sleeping with. It could be an option you have lined up that you could sleep with if you chose. It is the option that provides the abundance mindset.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 07:56 AM
1

Sounds like you have some misinformed notions about what Red Pill is. Red Pill is about seeing the world as it really is and using that knowledge to live life on your own terms instead of someone else’s terms being imposed on you. There’s nothing in it that is inherently about being an asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 07:52 AM
2

The Islamic Golden Age is greatly overblown. People act like knowledge was lost in the West when in fact it was preserved in the Byzantine Empire which lasted until 1453, by which time the Italian Renaissance was already underway. Many of the scholars in Islamic societies were foreigners who were traveling scholars, the expats of the day. Many were not Muslim. And of those that were Muslim, they were often very impious and were considered bad Muslims.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/21 07:22 AM
3

Your fallacy is thinking it is a binary, mutually exclusive choice. It’s not. I’m not arguing don’t pursue financial success. I am arguing against those who say to pursue financial success to the exclusion of success with women because that will magically solve your women problems a decade or two down the road. It won’t. If a guy follows that path, he’ll just end up a tool in every sense of the word. Women will fleece you and leave you and they may let you stick your peter in them once in a whil…
/r/TheRedPill25/06/21 10:25 PM
10

You should go out on some missions to intentionally blow up some approaches. You can’t lose if you’re intentionally trying to blow it up. If you lose, you win and if you win you win. For the autists out there, this is a SHORT TERM exercise. And try this in a venue away from your usual social circle.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/21 06:03 PM
2

The idea that men should wait until their 30's or 40's to hit on women in their 20's is idiotic. It's an example of what Rollo calls a "buffer." It's a cope. An excuse. A way of kicking the can down the road so that you can avoid possible failure. Although some older men do well, men's SMV does not go up magically just because they get older. To the extent it does go up, it goes up because those men have cultivated value and certain skill sets. Part of that skill set is learning how to interact …
/r/TheRedPill25/06/21 12:16 AM
2

Or possibility #3: there was nothing wrong with those guys but she has an active hamster and a keen need for drama. That's possibly the most dangerous scenario.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 11:12 PM
1

"gendered" isn't a real word.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 11:04 PM
6

Notice that it's only "emotional abuse" when they don't like what you say or do. It's not emotional abuse when you don't like what they say or do. In the latter case, they talk about their "rights" and "independence." And you become "fragile" if you don't like something they do. It's partly because they can't admit being wrong. It's also partly because they love drama. It's emotionally juicy for women to feel like they've been wronged. Don't take what they say too seriously. Be your own center a…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 11:03 PM
1

“Women are surrounded by this tornado of misinformation and nobody corrects them because they want to fuck them.” -Bill Burr.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 08:04 AM
3

Women need to put their pussies where their mouths are...So to speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 06:54 AM
9

You are mistaking after the fact analysis for the sake of discussion here for in the moment deliberation.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/06/21 02:37 AM
4

This.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/06/21 02:33 AM
33

Go (re)read Married Man Sex Life Primer from the sidebar. He spends a shit-ton of time talking about various behaviors and how women react to them. Look, I get it. You don’t want to make a woman’s reaction the center of your universe. But pretending like it is completely irrelevant is just silly.
/r/MarriedRedPill12/06/21 12:20 AM
24

It is intended as an example of a practical application of theories discussed on MARRIED Red Pill. It’s kind of hard to discuss strategies for applying Red Pill within marriage without discussing wives and how they react.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/06/21 10:03 PM
20

Is that what I said? Is that what you took from it? I think that interpretation says more about you than it says about the situation in the post.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/06/21 09:56 PM
15

It’s more than just STFU. You have to lead. You have to stoke her imagination. “Get back to work you fucking monkey, because she's not going to be impressed for long”. Well, like I said, that was a few years ago, so I understand the ongoing dynamics. There’s no such thing as permanent success. And like I said, no one thing is going to transform the situation. It is the accumulation of behaviors.
/r/MarriedRedPill11/06/21 09:42 PM
5

“Power imbalance” is one of those words or phrases that makes my bullshit detector blare.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 08:30 PM
1

Society shames men’s desires when those desires don’t serve the larger society’s purposes. Even your post is too apologetic in that you try to offer a justification for why you want what you want. No justification is required. In every jurisdiction in the United States, 18 year old women are allowed to make their own decisions about their sexual conduct. Those who seek to interfere with the free exercise of sexual choices of women 18-25 years old are impinging on the agency of these consenting a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/21 06:35 PM
3

The world is not fair. The issue is not what is fair but rather what is effective. Deal with the world as it really is, not as you wish it was. Isn’t that the whole original point of Red Pill? What you do depends on what outcomes you’re seeking. Yes, you’re free to let it rip and spew whatever unfiltered thoughts come into your head, but don’t be surprised or offended if things don’t work out as you would have liked. OP can pat himself on the back about how direct and assertive he was if it make…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 04:09 PM
7

Stoic Challenge reading notes, Part 2: BUILDING RESILIENCE: Resilience is acquired. Some are incapacitated by life’s setbacks. Others quickly bounce back—or never get upset to begin with. Why? Some say people are born with it. But if resilience were hereditary, you would expect it to be passed down, but history provides ample examples that is not the case. Consider the London Blitz. Hitler anticipated crushing morale. But just the opposite happened. People took to heart the advice to “Keep calm …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/21 10:01 PM
10

My reading notes (Part 1) (mostly) from "The Stoic Challenge: A Philosopher's Guide to Becoming Tougher, Calmer, and More Resilient" by William B. Irvine: USE STOIC TEST STRATEGY: See setbacks as tests contrived by the Stoic gods to test your resilience & resourcefulness (& allow you to improve). The Stoic gods devise these tests not to make our days harder but to make them better. We should be thankful for being tested in this manner. The Stoic Test strategy short-circuits the subconscious mind…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/21 09:58 PM
5

The Stoic Challenge: A Philosopher's Guide to Becoming Tougher, Calmer, and More Resilient by William B. Irvine
/r/TheRedPill23/04/21 09:40 PM
0

Kay uses the phrase “Red Pill” only twice in the book and one of those times is at the end of a chapter summarizing what was discussed. Substantively, he used it only once as follows: "Take the blue pill – Continue your belief that simply being married will make everything work out for the best and that divorce is something that happens to other people. Take the red pill - If you’re ready to know the truth about modern marriage, read on. However, understand that you can never go back to not know…
/r/ExRedPill23/04/21 04:17 PM
1

?!? Athol Kay is pretty tame stuff. Is it simply trying to help men in ways that haven’t been approved by The Orthodoxy that you are objecting to?
/r/ExRedPill22/04/21 04:15 PM
1

What’s wrong with Todd V?
/r/ExRedPill22/04/21 04:06 PM
2

Well, I wasn’t talking about music, but, yeah, it happens all of the time that the music powers that be anoint this artist instead of that artist and people consume it because influencers of various sorts tell them they are supposed to. People listen to bad music. People watch bad movies. People wear ugly clothes. Not all of it is bad, of course, but it absolutely happens all of the time. Why do you think there are ad campaigns and promotional pushes? If talent always trumps connections, why do …
/r/TheRedPill15/03/21 02:14 AM
2

Actually, connections are even more important if you aren’t great at what you do. Believing that people reap benefits according to their merit is known as the Just World Fallacy. I’m not saying don’t cultivate your talent, but it’s naive to believe that average people with great connections cannot thrive.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/21 08:03 PM
1

And connections can be made. Sure, it might be easier (at first) to be born with connections but even that can be overcome. Want to be in show business? Move to L.A. Want to rub shoulders with finance gurus. Get to Wall Street. Politics? D.C. And if you are from the middle of nowhere, every state has U.S. Representatives and Senators who want to help constituents or at least pretend to care. They might not go out on a limb for you but if one of their lowly staffers can make a phone call that wil…
/r/TheRedPill12/03/21 06:19 AM
3

According to Stanford MBA professor Jeffrey Pfeffer in his book “Power: Why Some People Have It and How to Get It”, intelligence is correlated to success only up to a point and at higher IQ levels is actually NEGATIVELY correlated to success. According to Pfeffer, one of the most important factors in success is making key relationships work and overly intelligent people are often piss poor at this. I don’t have the footnote handy but it is a heavily footnoted book, if anyone cares to investigate…
/r/TheRedPill03/03/21 04:08 PM
1

The essence of Red Pill is to deal with hard truths rather than comfortable illusions. Pretending en masse that something is true not because you believe it is true but rather because it is useful to existing social structures to pretend that it is true seems pretty blue pill to me.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/21 03:56 PM
5

Further to this point, read “The Start-Up of You” by Reid Hoffman. While I recommend the whole book, Chapter 4 “It Takes a Network “ is particularly useful on this point. Also read “Never Eat Alone” by Keith Ferrazi. While he can be a tad smarmy sometimes, he clearly knows how to connect. It’s packed with actionable ideas.
/r/TheRedPill03/03/21 03:33 PM
1

For the same reason that a magician does not talk about the secret to his trick while he's doing the trick (or even after, for that matter) or a salesman does not narrate to the customer during the sale which sales technique he is using and why. Talking about the process changes the process. As TRP says, deeds not words. As for a woman saying that she would not date a TRP man, watch what women do, not what they say. If her assertion is genuinely true, then she shouldn't need to be told that a ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/21 08:05 PM
3

I couldn’t give less of a damn about the doomers. My message is targeted to guys who are fairly new, still are willing to try but may be confused by the mixed messages they receive in the sphere.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/21 10:35 PM
2

I’m pro-everything you suggest, but to succeed at playing any game, you first need to understand the rules of the game you are playing.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/21 04:33 PM
6

"You must be new" Funny. I'm just talking about Game as a tool. What you do with it is up to you. If some guy wants to pick up a gutter girl at closing time, I won't judge. Personally, that's not my thing. There's a reason that I talked about Game rather than PUA. I see Game as a set of techniques, a set of tools. I see PUA more as a lifestyle choice that uses Game and focuses on volume. But volume is not the only way to go about using Game. I am wholly onboard with guys pursuing the maximum pos…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/21 05:52 AM
4

Nobody that I know of has ever said that looks don't matter at all. However, as a man, unlike women, you have the advantage that unless you are a total and complete goblin, your looks do not determine your destiny. From what I can see, it is highly unlikely that your looks are your biggest problem. Your biggest problem is your attitude. Your second biggest problem is that you apparently spend much of your time in doomsday echo chambers. Get off of the forums. Go out, get some sun immediately and…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/21 04:57 AM
1

Read my original post. Yes, there is a minimum level of value required. But you don't have to be a "Chad". You know, this whole thing about 2's and 6's and 9's -- there is no such thing in real life. It is just a convenient way of illustrating some concepts. You may think you are a 2 but you are actually a 3 and some girl who doesn't know any better might think you are a 4 and because you are acting like a man and running some game, you'll look even a little better in her eyes. Maybe you'll bang…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/21 04:18 AM
8

One of the most common misconceptions that I see about Game is that Game is about pretending to be something that you are not. If you think this, then you have a fundamental misunderstanding about what Game is and it is no wonder that you have not had success with it. Everybody has multiple facets to themselves. We bring different ones out at different times, depending on context. Each one of these multiple facets is genuine. We even have parts of ourselves that are completely genuine but which …
/r/TheRedPill29/01/21 03:55 AM
1

Being physically and mentally fit, confident, successful, and having an abundance mindset is attractive While there's nothing wrong with being fit, confident, etc., that is not the essence of red pill. The essence of red pill is to see the world and deal with the world as it really is, not as you wish it was and not as some so-called authority tells you it is. It is to deal with hard truths rather than comfortable illusions. A man that does this is red pilled even if he never touches a single we…
/r/askTRP28/01/21 09:11 AM
0

I don’t need a counter-argument because my original statement stands untouched. Unlike you, I’m not interested in engaging in mental masturbation. You chastise others for engaging in mental masturbation and not being action oriented and yet it’s interesting how you responded to my prior comment within minutes of it being made. What does that say about who sits around mentally masturbating on the internet? Look at your post and comment history—what does that say about who sits around for years on…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/21 06:48 AM
1

Man blathering on about Hegel accuses others of mental masturbation.
/r/TheRedPill06/01/21 10:50 PM
1

Stoicism is not just some mental masturbation. Stoics believe in focusing on taking action on those things over which you actually have some control. So, on the contrary, Stoicism is imminently practical.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/20 04:53 AM
1

Pickup is such a rorschach test. It says more about the guys talking about it than it says about pickup. Critics of pickup have these caricatured ideas about what it is--they set up the straw man just so they can knock it down and feel better about themselves. Then they say "all you really need is..." and half of the time they then proceed to describe game, or some aspect of it, but somehow they feel more comfortable about it by not calling it game or pickup. Maybe it's because of all of the soc…
/r/TheRedPill16/12/20 12:41 AM
7

You might want to consider a hiatus from the internet and reddit. Go outside. Get some air and sun.
/r/TheRedPill16/12/20 12:01 AM
1

Maybe. Or maybe you never really understood the advice you received in the first place. Maybe you executed it badly. You admit that you walked around acting like a douchebag for a year. Being strong and assertive don't require you to act like a douchebag, but if you think that they do, maybe that was the problem.
/r/ExRedPill02/12/20 08:13 PM
3

sadly getting laid is what many guys here prioritize Not sadly. That is what the sub has been about from the beginning. It so happens that improving other areas of your life can help you get laid more, so the discussions often go off in those directions too, but it has always been about getting laid. I'm not saying that getting laid is the be-all and end-all in life. But don't go to a seafood restaurant and then complain about what's on the menu because you aren't in the mood for fish. There's t…
/r/askTRP02/12/20 08:02 PM
1

Maybe the problem was you.
/r/ExRedPill30/11/20 05:17 PM
4

When a woman hesitates with you, the hesitation IS the message. You don’t necessarily need to kick her to the curb and you don’t need to make some big scene or make some big declaration, but: You shouldn’t put all of your eggs in one basket, especially if she isn’t reciprocating (i.e., you should spin plates); and To the extent you continue to engage with her, give her 2/3 of whatever she’s giving you. As long as it’s low-maintenance and you aren’t foregoing other opportunities for her, nothing …
/r/askTRP26/11/20 08:35 AM
1

Cocky could mean she sees the guy as fake and she is not attracted. Or it could mean that she sees the guy as confident and she is attracted but she's shit-testing by calling him "cocky." The way to tell the difference is whether she disengages or whether she is still hanging around, engaging.
/r/askTRP19/10/20 09:46 PM
1

The great strength of TRP is that it is unfiltered. So many subs want to play like my nanny and protect me from myself. So many of those other subs never say anything of value because everyone is petrified of offending someone and so they spend inordinate time virtue-signaling. For example, I like stoicism in general but the stoicism subreddit can be pretty self-righteous and insufferable. Sometimes you be willing to venture outside your comfort zone to achieve the life that you want for yoursel…
/r/ExRedPill19/10/20 08:10 PM
2

TRP is not one monolithic thing. There are many factions with various agendas engaged in a tug of war to define what it is. The "real" TRP (as I see it) has been invaluable. But I recognize that there is a lot of garbage on there too. For a long time, I have tried to nudge things in the direction I think they should go. But in the end, it is more important for me to carry out the core ideas that I found attractive than it is to adopt a label or to convince someone else what that label should mea…
/r/ExRedPill13/10/20 05:21 PM
3

Forget labels. Consider everything. Keep a critical mind. Use the good. Leave the bad. Everyone is fallible. Don't spend too much time online. Get out into the sunshine. Enjoy the moment.
/r/ExRedPill13/10/20 05:06 PM
3

I actually find Red Pill much more tolerant of opposing viewpoints than most subreddits. Most subreddits will insta-ban you for straying from the orthodoxy. Here, they generally let you say it but, the thing is, you are going to get an unfiltered response. It is a curious characterization to complain that things are "not open for discussion" simply because you don't like the reaction that you receive.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/20 05:47 PM
3

Game is a tool. Game is simply making astute psychological observations about humans in general and women in particular and then breaking those observations down into actionable steps in order to improve your romantic odds with women. Game is not a panacea. Game is as unethical or shallow or manipulative (or not) as the person employing it. Game critics like to point to people who are doing it badly and say "See, game/PUA is [fill in the descriptor of choice]." That's like saying because some pe…
/r/ExRedPill15/09/20 07:21 PM
1

I think lifting is emphasized because it is one of the single best ways to improve yourself in a multitude of ways. Lifting/improving yourself is something you have control over. Fixing women or society is not something you have control over, except maybe indirectly as a result of fixing yourself. This creeping tradcon moralism on the sub is just thinly disguised blue pill think.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/20 08:06 PM
2

The key word is "byproduct". "Byproduct - a secondary and sometimes unexpected or unintended result." Merriam-Webster. Your post advocates making it an explicit, primary goal of the sub.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/20 05:24 PM
3

Don't forget the red pill basics. It's not about fixing your woman or fixing society--it's about fixing yourself. To argue this site should be about fixing women is to turn its purpose on its head.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/20 05:24 AM
1

In an LTR, even with your best efforts, she’s going to see enough of your flaws anyway. No need to add to it with some misguided notion that a total emotional reveal is going to help the situation. Most guys these days overshare. Strive not to show weakness; you’ll still screw up often enough that she’ll get to see your human side.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/20 07:58 AM
3

A. She’s a comedienne. B. Even assuming she’s serious, why are we taking relationship advice from women, again?
/r/TheRedPill24/08/20 07:43 AM
2

a 6 when she talks I don't know--how would you rate nails on a chalkboard on a scale of 1 to 10?
/r/TheRedPill11/08/20 05:28 PM
3

Everybody is taking it as a given that she dumped him. If he dumped her, you know she would race to her publicist to be the first one to put out a statement, so she could save face. If she dumped him, she shouldn't be so angry. At least, not yet.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/20 04:55 PM
1

I may have given you the wrong impression with my initial comment. It is not like I was a know-nothing dumbass passing myself off as a somebody when I was actually a fraud. I did develop some actual knowledge. I successfully gained entry into this world and was treated as a peer by people who mattered within the industry. People are not alpha in isolation; people are alpha only in a social context. Yes, "fake" being an alpha until you become an alpha. "Act like a king to be treated like one." 34…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/20 08:19 AM
1

From a certain perspective, anyone who is trying to improve arguably is being phony. They are trying to “be someone they are not.” The difference, I think, comes down to whether you are actually doing the work. A man who says this is who I am and these are my standards is being authentic if he is doing everything within his power to be that man and meet those standards, even if he hasn’t fully achieved it yet. The phony is the man who holds himself out to the world as being a certain way while n…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/20 07:09 PM
2

I wasn’t trying to become a sommelier or professional taster. I was focused on the business end of things. And I never made any claims to expertise, and yet people projected expertise upon me. It isn’t that hard to be perceived as an expert (or an alpha) and it becomes self-reinforcing. It is true that the details differ in becoming a wine expert (or other kind of expert) vs. becoming alpha with women. But the general dynamic is the same. You start by doing the work and over time others will com…
/r/TheRedPill02/08/20 06:37 PM
2

And to think, you are in the honeymoon phase of the relationship right now!
/r/TheRedPill29/07/20 10:08 PM
1

When you act a certain way, people tend to treat you as if you are the way you act. At least, if they don't already have a history with you that colors their view. People use mental shortcuts because otherwise there would simply be an overwhelming number of conscious decisions to make everyday. Plus, most people are preoccupied thinking about themselves and simply don't have that much spare bandwidth to be thinking about you or me. So for the most part, they believe what we tell them or show the…
/r/TheRedPill29/07/20 09:32 PM
1

The internal conflict is feedback. Rather than see the internal conflict as a problem, see it as an opportunity. Your subconscious is sending you a message of what you need to work on. It's your new to do list. Embrace that feeling as a call to action.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/20 08:51 PM
1

Guys who bad-mouth game as merely tricks never truly understood game in the first place. They seem think to think it is just about a guy in a fuzzy hat doing magic tricks.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/20 05:45 AM
1

It doesn't stop being miserable when you fail to accept it either. So what are you going to do?
/r/TheRedPill12/07/20 09:06 PM
2

I see from one of your other posts that you are 22 years old. Based on that fact, there are probably some things that you know more about than me. The effect of aging on women's attraction to men is not one of those subjects. My comment acknowledges that some older men do well with younger women. But trust me, age alone is not the explanation. The explanation is value in all of its forms, but value does not automatically come with age. My original point was that if someone sacrifices all interac…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/20 12:51 AM
1

"Tricks" is one of those subjective, judgmental bullshit words that certain guys use to soothe the cognitive dissonance they experience when the reality of the world doesn't match their expectations. Whatever value judgment you might otherwise want to pass about OP's post, there are no "tricks" that he is advocating. He is basically saying women will fuck you if you just get out of your own way and pull the trigger.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/20 10:08 PM
1

It's a good point to the extent that you question whether these goals are actually your goals or goals that you have unconsciously allowed society to impose on you. It is also good to check in with yourself every so often and ask yourself whether your goals are still relevant to you. People change over time and their goals may need to change. However, I would caution against accepting complacency as a way of life. Excellence is a muscle that will atrophy if not used. You theorize that you can si…
/r/TheRedPill06/07/20 09:19 PM
0

Says the guy who keeps responding within minutes of my comments. "Two accounts": I have no idea what you are talking about. I'm going to leave you now. It seems like it's your nap time.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 01:18 AM
0

Can't see anywhere in my post or comments any hint of 1, 2 or 3 You are oozing it. I believe you when you say you can't see it.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 01:00 AM
1

I think you have a very misguided idea of what is (or usually should be) involved in an approach. Integrate your approaches into the natural flow of your life. It takes only a few extra seconds (if any) to chat up the barista or the woman ahead of you in line at the grocery store. If you try to chat up the woman on the subway train, well, you are both stuck there anyway until the next stop. If you go to the art exhibit, or whatever your thing is, it is natural to speak with that hot single woman…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 12:54 AM
0

Cold approach doesn't mean: 1. you have to literally approach every woman you see regardless of attraction; 2. you have to go out every day and every night; 3. you have to act like a retard.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 12:29 AM
1

It is a false choice to argue that you either build value or you approach. You can do both.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 12:27 AM
1

Game exists. Game is basically sales training and your dick is the product. Do you doubt that it is possible for a salesman to improve through training? Granted, there are some prospects that aren't going to buy no matter what you do but that doesn't mean all sales training is bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/20 12:21 AM
5

This post simultaneously chastises those who seek meaning (by purported incorrect means) in today’s world yet wrings its hands about the lack of meaning in modern life. It implies, while stopping short of actually saying it, that we would be better off following “god” for utilitarian purposes even if we actually secretly know it’s bullshit. Seeking to soothe ourselves with comfortable answers seems pretty blue pill to me. I find it liberating that there is no god and no greater meaning. It means…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/20 03:55 PM
46

Kids, do NOT wait until your 40’s to “chase pussy.” To be sure, never sacrifice your own best interests for tail but by all means, play the Game, the sooner the better. You can do both. It’s a false choice to say you can only do one or the other. From a certain perspective, you should never “chase” pussy. But that is true at any age whether you are in your 20’s or 40’s or any other age. There is nothing magical that happens when you get older. Yes, some older men do very well but it is not a fun…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/20 07:36 PM
29

Your moments of weakness, your moments when you are just not feeling it, are actually your moments of greatest opportunity. These moments-not the good moments-are the moments of decision that determine your destiny. Train yourself that when you feel this way you take action, even if just a little. You don’t have to hit a home run- just swing the bat. Your feeling of weakness or frustration ARE your trigger to action.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/20 06:11 PM
3

The original "Millionaire Next Door" is good for general wealth-building advice. There were some sequels that were not as good. Regarding Wall Street, "One Up on Wall Street" by Peter Lynch would be good. Its examples are dated but the principles are still sound. Watch Warren Buffett interviews on YouTube. And read his mentor's book "The Intelligent Investor." "Creating and Growing Real Estate Wealth" by William J. Poorvu is a good, non-scammy book on real estate investing.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/20 08:00 PM
8

Or at least self-determination is one of the right's talking points. They are the first in line with their hands out whenever the shit hits the fan. As far as blaming others rather than taking responsibility for your own actions and inactions, we could talk all day about the Excuse-maker in Chief. But the quality of Red Pill always suffers when it devolves into partisan politicals. But I like the original post.
/r/TheRedPill04/05/20 03:53 PM
2

Use what makes sense; skip what doesn't make sense. Focus on becoming better.
/r/ExRedPill27/04/20 10:13 PM
0

Grow a pair. Stop apologizing or explaining or asking permission. She has to meet you half way and if she doesn't, well, there's your answer.
/r/ExRedPill27/04/20 09:57 PM
1

Ok, that’s one brief click-baity pitch. Are you telling me that if I listened or read the stuff of this guy (who I have never heard of), nowhere does he ever say that sometimes you might get rejected?
/r/ExRedPill02/01/20 11:50 PM
1

I think AWALT is a useful shorthand but not to be taken literally. When I think of it, I think “Some women are like that all the time, all women are like that some of the time, enough women are like that enough of the time” that it is useful to keep in mind. But SWALTATTAWALTSOTTEWALTEOTT can be kind of cumbersome.
/r/ExRedPill02/01/20 10:56 PM
1

I don’t know of any PUA guru that claims their methods have a 100% success rate. Oh sure, in the title of the video or post they might be a bit click-baity. That’s no different than 90% of the rest of the internet. But in the body of their content they always make disclaimers. It's not a binary choice where you have to bat 1.000 or else it’s bullshit. The real point of it is to simply improve your odds by making incremental improvements.
/r/ExRedPill02/01/20 10:39 PM
2

I feel like Peterson is spot on about 50% of the time, wrong about 30% of the time and 20% of the time I can’t understand what the fuck he’s saying.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/19 05:36 AM
1

There isn’t any one magical thing that is going to transform the situation. It is the accumulation of correct approaches over time that produces results. So it is not just words, but also body language, demonstrated value (career, money, possessions, ability to hold court), looks including fitness, wardrobe, etc., recognizing what is and is not an opportunity on any given occasion. That might be a downer that you seemingly have to manage so many factors, but the flip side of there not being any …
/r/askTRP12/12/19 09:09 PM
1

Women will go with the highest value male who is AVAILABLE when she’s ready to fuck. Value is important but simply being in the right place at the right time, being alert for the opportunity and just not screwing it up is often a big factor too.
/r/askTRP12/12/19 01:39 AM
1

Actually Red Pill doesn’t say that. That’s more of an incel attitude. Red Pill doesn’t deny it’s a factor but Red Pill is first and foremost about owning your shit. If you aren’t doing all that you can do in the looks department, then step it up. But once you’ve maximized your results, own that too. Accept it and move on. You should be working on other areas of your life too: status, game etc.
/r/askTRP12/12/19 01:33 AM
1

There are nearly infinite ways you can build value with words. One of the easiest to implement is to make declarative statements instead of asking questions: “I’m feeling like Mexican tonight” instead of “So what should we eat tonight?” Instead of asking a woman out, offer opportunities: “I’m going to the exhibit at the museum if you’d like to join.” This simple change in language creates a subtle but powerful shift in perception: you are the leader and she chooses to follow (or not) instead of …
/r/askTRP12/12/19 01:24 AM
1

MGTOW without the woman-hating is basically stoicism. Try searching for some stoicism forums.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/12/19 07:30 AM
1

Is it a scam to think that a salesman might improve his numbers by attending a sales training class? Is it bullshit to think that a public speaker can become more persuasive by getting some tips and practicing them? PUA is no different. Some people have a vested interest in bad-mouthing PUA and so they set up these straw-man arguments about what PUA is just so they can knock them down. Women don’t want genuine PUA knowledge to spread because it adversely affects the balance of power in relations…
/r/MGTOW06/12/19 08:03 AM
3

Fuck church and keep Red Pill apolitical.
/r/TheRedPill06/12/19 06:46 AM
10

I’m not sure what you think red pill is. You’re not interested in putting in any work to improve. You don’t need red pill if your plan is to just pay for sex. You could save yourself a lot of time by not reading this forum and everybody else would benefit by you not diluting the content here.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/19 04:30 AM
1

Yes, it happens, if you keep on top of your shit. I think some of the posts on TRP can mislead guys into thinking that such success is just the automatic result of growing older. It’s not. You can be an ordinary dude in your 20’s and get some decent tail. As the years go by, you have to be increasingly extraordinary to get decent tail. Most guys fall off. Another way that I think some of the posts are misleading is that they often are comparing apples to oranges without being clear about it. As …
/r/askTRP15/10/19 05:43 AM
3

It’s probably a good idea to take with a grain of salt what macho celebrities say about how early they get up. For some reason they like to get into dick measuring contests about how little they sleep.
/r/MarriedRedPill14/10/19 06:41 AM
12

Why aren’t you attracted to land whales with really great personalities?
/r/askTRP14/10/19 06:24 AM
1

Let’s not get carried away there, Spanky.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 07:24 AM
2

Mr. Bastard?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/19 07:09 AM
5

God is the ultimate blue pill Oneitis. Looking for someone outside of ourselves to tell us what we should do and give our lives meaning. RP is supposed to be about opening your eyes and seeing the unvarnished truth even if it is a bitter pill. It is about setting aside childish feel-good stories we were told when we were young and naive— that if we just don’t question things and we follow this set of rules that we were handed, then we were assured everything would be ok. We say women are the emo…
/r/TheRedPill23/09/19 04:57 AM
2

You should have several irons in the fire at any time so that you are not sitting around waiting on a response from any one person. If one person ignores you, you simply turn your attention to someone else. Don't give any recognition to them ignoring you. In most situations, there is someone with a vested interest in the thing being a success, whether it is a party, networking event, charity benefit, group chat, etc. Those people will usually be more responsive and you can use them as a life-lin…
/r/askTRP26/07/19 08:17 PM
1

Just game her without outcome dependence. Cocky/funny, push/pull. A mix of hot and cold. A light sprinkling of double entendres. 789+8 DGAF is crucial. Keep cultivating other options and make sure she knows you are cultivating other options. It sounds like she is still open to sleeping with you but hasn't completely made up her mind. She is testing to see if you're worthy, whether this seeming increased SMV is real or just a new facade. If/when this happens, shit is going to go down fast. When t…
/r/askTRP09/04/19 04:42 PM
5

Because if they gave you advice that was doable then you would realize, when it didn’t work, that the problem lies with them. By giving you advice that isn’t really doable, you think the problem is you. Go to bed about 10 to 10:30. Get up 6 to 6: 30, depending on what you’ve got going that day. You can stay up a little and sleep in a little on the weekend. Done.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/19 04:37 PM
6

However, if those opposing nuclear powers are well-equipped and well-manned with conventional forces, then they could take conventional military action and exploit our conventional unreadiness and then the question would be are we going to be the assholes to escalate with nukes over, say, the Baltic states or Taiwan? Even with nukes, conventional forces are not obsolete.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/19 10:46 PM
1

Do we still believe in phlogiston theory? Do you doubt the existence of oxygen? The advancement of those lines of thought are attributable to science. Your examples do not refute science but rather demonstrate the value of science. Science doesn’t mean being omniscient or infallible. It means following a RATIONAL PROCESS that will guide you ever closer to the right answers. The alternative that you propose is never mind whether the holy books are right, at least the answers (supposedly) never ch…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/19 07:50 AM
1

Yeah, you can make shit up with a Holy Book. That's why every religion splinters into countless sects. And that's not even counting that the Holy Book is pulled out of their asses to begin with. Even when you objectively demonstrate something with science, some naysayers may refuse to believe it. Refusing to believe something doesn't refute it. Also, the fact that there are still things we don't know and are open to debate does not mean that the process of science is invalid.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/19 05:51 PM
1

Because they are lemmings. Look at the bright side. The fact that they’ve marked themselves makes for easier sorting.
/r/askTRP09/01/19 10:56 PM
5

So you're broke, she can get better looking guys than you, the sex is good, she's submissive, but you're upset that she won't confess to AWALT? Yeah, right. This is yet another example of why you should not talk about Red Pill with women. And don't look for trouble where there is none.
/r/askTRP09/01/19 04:36 PM
2

Imagine you went to a car dealership because you were interested in buying a car. When you got there, the salesman doesn’t show you how great the car is and how buying this car can benefit your life. Instead, the salesman begins describing all the sales techniques he was taught in his sales training class--how he was told he should go about overcoming any hesitancy by potential buyers. Instead of using the techniques, he's telling the techniques. What effect do you think this verbal diarrhea wou…
/r/askTRP08/01/19 08:38 AM
1

Too much work?!? A google search is 5 minutes tops. Swinging by a bar is something a guy would do anyway. Not exactly tedious. Of course, if he already knows a good spot, that's cool too.
/r/askTRP06/01/19 09:09 AM
1

Whatever her favorite cocktail is, find out a place that makes the best version of it. Go to that bar and scope out the territory. Bonus points if you befriend the bartender. Next time you get her into a conversation and you gently steer it toward drinks, tell her "I know a place where they make a killer __. I've got to have you try it." Don't "ask her out." If she is receptive to it, say "when are you free?" Don't mention that you researched it because of her. Ideally, she won't know that you i…
/r/askTRP05/01/19 01:34 AM
1

Frame and dominance don't have anything to do with who has more raw intelligence. One year into marriage, it's not surprising you aren't experiencing any blatant issues. It creeps up on you over time if you don't take care of business. (Her moving up the MBA ranks will exacerbate this-you need to have some value-building stuff of your own going on to offset this or this will bite you 5 or 10 years down the road.) It is easier to maintain frame than it is to regain frame, so stay on top of it. BT…
/r/askTRP05/01/19 12:53 AM
1

There are windows of opportunity. Windows of opportunity for DTF/ONS are more fickle and fleeting than windows of opportunity for relationships. You don't explicitly say, but imply that you are maybe interested in a relationship with this woman. Sounds like she was maybe just thinking about a ONS and now the moment has passed for her.
/r/askTRP04/01/19 07:36 PM
7

Oh, good grief! We’re talking about whether cold approach is or is not too risky because feminists would be offended about being approached on the street. All that will happen is you will get turned down. If they are offended by the mere fact that you approached, then they weren’t going to sleep with you anyway. No harm. The theoretical risk that some woman is going to falsely accuse you of rape because she secretly hates men exists no matter what approach technique you use. Just screen her and …
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 10:15 AM
3

You do have an opinion. You repeatedly refer to “false” or “baseless” allegations. If you’re going to post stuff on here, have the sack to own it.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 09:47 AM
3

What risk? Literally nothing will happen to you if you get shot down. Besides, they are doing you a favor by self-selecting out.
/r/TheRedPill30/12/18 08:52 AM
5

There are many different styles of PUA. Some styles collect and organize astute observations of human psychology into actionable steps you can take to improve your odds with women. Some styles are just snake-oil being sold by snake oil salesmen. Likewise, some practitioners are competent; some practitioners are incompetent, even if their underlying ideas are valid. I feel like those who bad-mouth the entirety of PUA are selectively focusing only on the obnoxious forms and/or the incompetent prac…
/r/TheRedPill28/12/18 09:02 AM
1

You shouldn’t tell her for the same reason a magician doesn’t show the audience how he is doing his trick. The audience that would have been amazed by the trick will be bored, and evenly mildly contemptuous, when they have already been shown how it works.
/r/askMRP28/12/18 08:32 AM
1

If your approach works for you and others, great. I’m not going to try to change your mind. But what works for me is slightly different. I don’t tell myself I’m the greatest in the world. I think I would feel like I was full of shit. But neither do I beat up on myself. I tell myself that everyday is mine to win or lose. It’s all up to me. And if I do the things I need to do, then much more often than not, I’m going to win. And if I don’t do the things I need to do, I’ll probably lose and, yeah, …
/r/askTRP13/12/18 08:46 PM
2

You calibrate based on her actions towards you. You don’t want to get way out in the lead with the attention you give. But if she is giving you positive attention and you are interested in her, you should definitely give her some positive attention back. That’s how you “train” her how to behave. Conventional RP wisdom says you give her 2/3 of whatever she gives you.
/r/askTRP10/12/18 03:41 AM
1

Negative emotions will inevitably come around. The key is what you do with them. I try to condition myself so that the negative emotion is a trigger to action. "Oh, I'm feeling that again. Time to ... [get to the gym] [buckle down at work] [turn off the computer and get outside]" Big action is great but take small action, if that is all you can muster on a given occasion.
/r/askTRP04/12/18 08:19 PM
1

For the most part, no. But they can often tell when there is something wrong and if you don’t fill in the blanks, their imagination will. That can cause a lot of unnecessary strife. So I might say: “I got some shit on my mind. It’s not you.” Blame it on work if need be. But never lay the details on them. That will usually suffice because as long as it’s not them , they don’t care.
/r/askTRP04/12/18 04:59 AM
2

If he’s threatened by your self-improvement, then keep self-improving.
/r/askTRP04/12/18 04:46 AM
1

I can’t tell your age. You need a new environment for a clean start as soon as you are able. In the meantime, you are only responsible for what you do. You aren’t responsible for how fucked up your family is. I know it is hard but try to transmute their negativity into fuel for your own resolve and resilience. Train yourself so that every time they do something fucked up, it trips a switch in your brain that says: “That’s not me. I’m better than that.” You keep doing the right things for yoursel…
/r/askTRP04/12/18 04:35 AM
2

If you are in a university or corporate environment, figure out which professor/executive in your department is the most politically astute and suck up to him (without going overboard). You can figure out who is most important by the size and quality of their offices, the size of their staff, how many committees he is on, the importance of those committees, the budgets for their departments or committees. Who controls the money? Who has the power to hire and fire? Who gets quoted in the press? I…
/r/askTRP04/12/18 04:19 AM
10

My view on life purpose is set forth well in “The Startup of You” by Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn. Your purpose is not something you find. It is something you build by trying things, learning things and sometimes failing at things. The book talks about ABZ planning. A is your ultimate fantasy of what you would like to do. B is what you are doing today. Z is what you’ll fall back on if it all goes to hell. Knowing that Z is always there gives you the confidence to take some chances. With…
/r/askTRP04/12/18 03:55 AM
5

Too many shots not taken. When I did take shots, did it in a way that gave away my power. Believed what women said instead of noticing and believing what they did. Mistakenly believed that “merit” would prevail in the end. There is no such thing. There are only results. In business, underestimated the value of relationships versus hard work.
/r/askTRP04/12/18 03:32 AM
2

Psst... If I’m not mistaken, BirdManBrrrr is hinting that in the event of divorce, you may find your investment property has more expenses than you had anticipated which would lower its value in a divorce settlement.
/r/askMRP02/12/18 06:32 PM
2

You are using a computer to post this comment on the internet. Electrical signals are being shot through cables, sometimes through the sky bouncing off satellites. To power your phone or computer, and all of the servers that make up the internet, electricity is being generated at a power plant. You probably have traveled by car or bus, and plane. You most likely have gas or electric heat, and hot running water available to you in your residence. Your chances of living to the age you are right no…
/r/TheRedPill24/11/18 06:16 PM
2

Wow! That’s a pretty compelling rebuttal. You’ve totally won me over. I wasn’t persuaded at first but the way you added “-ism” on to the end of “science” made it all click. Those three little letters made me see that science actually means the exact opposite of what it seemingly means. No need to delve into what the individual steps in the scientific process are and analyze whether each step does or does not make rational sense, and to state reasons why. Even after you added “-ism”, I still was …
/r/TheRedPill24/11/18 05:58 PM
2

I guess we managed to miss everything you said because you didn’t say anything. Just a fucking word salad. Again: how is a system premised on questioning everything and insisting on evidence supposedly more susceptible to being controlled? Saying something over and over again doesn’t make it any truer.
/r/TheRedPill23/11/18 08:15 AM
3

Such a society [that believes in science] would be very easy to control As opposed to what? A society that believes in a set of rules on stone tablets given to a man who may or may not have actually existed by an invisible man in the sky?
/r/TheRedPill20/11/18 08:40 PM
2

Asserting that science is just another religion is whataboutism, which is a techniquie to dodge the substance of the issue. Religion and science are polar opposites. Religion is sacrosanct belief based on a lack of evidence. Science is tentative belief based upon evidence. The process of science constantly tests its beliefs against the evidence and is prepared to change them based upon new evidence. Nothing is sacrosanct. That is not to say that science is never wrong, but it is a self-correctin…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/18 08:28 PM
1

Why all this god talk on RP? I thought RP was supposed to be about opening your eyes and seeing the unvarnished truth even if it is a bitter pill. I thought it was about setting aside childish feel-good stories we were told when we were young and naive— that if we just don’t question things and we follow this set of rules that we were handed, then we were assured everything would be ok. God is the ultimate blue pill Oneitis. Looking for someone outside of ourselves to tell us what we should do a…
/r/TheRedPill20/11/18 07:55 AM
1

Lots of people say that men age like wine. And there’s a little bit of truth to that. A man that ages well has powerful SMV. But what many people fail to realize is that the vast majority of wine is drunk young because most wine lacks the characteristics for aging well. Yes, some older men do phenomenally well. I know this to be true because I know some such men. But these men have skills and savior faire, and are exceptional. Their SMV is not simply a function of being older. The truth is, all …
/r/askTRP13/11/18 04:31 AM
1

Point of clarification: you are using your ID to buy booze for them for which they have provided the cash. You are not footing their booze bill for them. By not making it transactional, I meant don’t go around tooting your own horn about how cool you are for buying for them, and don’t be proactively offering. Once word gets out, they’ll find you as long as you’re not creepy. Always better if they come to you asking for a favor than you proactively offering, which cheapens its value. Any time you…
/r/askTRP09/11/18 09:38 PM
1

For the most part, you don’t focus on your age and you just blend in. If they don’t ask, you don’t tell. If your age does come up, you just acknowledge it matter of factly. Never apologize or try to justify. You’ll be able to buy booze, which you might be able to leverage. When buying booze for women, don’t act like it’s a big deal. That sets up the frame for women where they can tell themselves that they are only hanging with you for transactional reasons of the material thing you can provide. …
/r/askTRP08/11/18 03:44 PM
0

cmdrNacho makes four factual assertions: Money was raised for Ford only AFTER she had already come forward and only AFTER threats were made BY contrast, in the attempted Mueller smear, money was proactively offered to women in an effort to get them to make an accusation Trump was recorded on tape describing how he sexually assaults women Trump was accused of rape by his own wife, Ivana. These are four factual assertions. They are objectively verifiable. And in response, you've got...nothing. ​ ​
/r/TheRedPill05/11/18 02:11 AM
3

Which woman are you talking about that has little or no credibility? Your man Trump said that he found Ford very credible (until he didn't). Yes, I believe the FBI is not partisan, if by that you mean biased in favor of Democrats. The FBI is actually top-heavy with lifelong Republicans. The fact that the FBI does not always go along with all the Trump zaniness de jure does not make them Democractic partisans. There are no TRP principles discussed in the OP. It just a political rant, and on speci…
/r/TheRedPill05/11/18 01:58 AM
17

Good grief, you folks are gullible...or cynical. This is not an FBI report. This is a Republican authored document released days before the election. This post is purely political and has nothing to do with TRP. TRP should be apolitical.
/r/TheRedPill04/11/18 06:51 PM
4

Use it as fuel as you pursue your mission. See it as validation of how far you’ve come.
/r/askTRP04/11/18 04:21 AM
1

Improving is good. Self-improvement can be bad, if it becomes a fetish. If you find this is becoming the case for you, then as an exercise sometimes, blow it out on purpose. Fetishized self-improvement is a form of perfectionism. Deliberately fail. You will find that the sky doesn’t fall.
/r/askTRP01/11/18 07:17 PM
1

I don’t know how big your college is and whether everybody knows everybody. One problem-not the only one- could be that you now have the reputation as the guy who bangs chubby girls so hot girls are going to be unlikely to bang you because they would be lowering their social value, essentially equating themselves with the chubby girls. You may need to widen your circle to find girls who don’t already think of you as the guy that bangs fat chicks.
/r/askTRP24/10/18 08:10 PM
0

This sounds like outrage porn fan fiction.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/18 07:51 PM
64

185 cm is her way of saying “I don’t date Asian men” without being so gauche as to straight out say “I don’t date Asian men.”
/r/TheRedPill23/10/18 02:42 PM
23

Sometimes the perfect line will come to you in the moment. But if not, I find that "You're funny", said with a bored dismissiveness, has nearly universal applicability. Of course, you can't use that same line over and over again with the same girl.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/18 10:01 PM
3

Although he’s not mentioned by name, this kind of seems like a comment on the Kavanaugh hearings, at least in part. Which would be odd. Whether you believe her or not, Ford related her version of events in a calm, factual manner. When she couldn’t remember something, which is to be expected after that much time, she said so in a straightforward manner. Meanwhile Kavanaugh was like a bipolar chick on his period, screaming, threatening, crying. Clearly he was trying to use emotion and hysterics to…
/r/TheRedPill10/10/18 02:12 AM
4

Twenty 6 and 7 year olds had been gunned down in their classrooms. I think a few tears rolling down the cheek was acceptable. He wasn't a slobbering mess.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/18 05:37 PM
1

This is the purest expression of red pill that I have heard in a long time.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/18 03:46 AM
1

When in danger of being exposed, con men often accuse you of the very thing that they are doing.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/18 05:04 AM
1

Being drunk is your Dumbo's magic feather. You probably aren't as funny and interesting when you're drunk as you think you are. But you are fearless, or at least, less fearful. Conquer your fears by facing them. Overcome your fears by talking to X people a day. At first, make it people that you don't give a fuck what they think about you. Some old man on the bus, the ugly cashier at the grocery store, whatever. Make it your mission to crash and burn in these conversations so that you lose your f…
/r/askTRP06/08/18 07:40 PM
1

Read "Power: Why Some People Have it and Others Don't" by Jeffrey Pfeffer. "Never Eat Alone" by Keith Ferrazzi
/r/askTRP26/07/18 09:28 AM
4

Dude, we’re all on borrowed time. But you still have several good years left if you take care of business.
/r/askTRP25/07/18 07:09 AM
1

Yes. One of the key lessons I have learned is that the skill set needed to be successful is not static; it evolves through life. When you are young, most people have little money and experience so you have to make up for it with energy, sweat, grit. But if you are still grinding it out when you are older, you are not doing something right. For one thing, if hustle is your competitive advantage then your competitive advantage will erode as you age because inevitably there will always be a new cro…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/18 06:54 AM
2

I've heard guys say this with success: “Old enough to know better but too young to care.” Kind of cheesy but it worked. BTW never show them your ID when they ask. Just blow that off like you didn’t hear it.
/r/askTRP22/07/18 08:18 AM
1

My buddy was fucking this younger gal on her parents’ couch while they were gone. As soon as he goes into her, he knows right away he’s in trouble. He’s particularly embarrassed because as an older guy he feels like he has a certain persona of worldliness and sophistication he has to maintain. So what he does is brilliant. He stops and starts sweet talking her about “Oh, are you sure you are okay with this? I want it to be special for you. “ Etc. Meanwhile, he’s stuck his dick between the couch …
/r/askTRP22/07/18 07:58 AM
2

This is mental masturbation because this is not something you need to concern yourself with until you have so many throngs of women pining for you that you wouldn’t have time to deal with them all. In which case, you wouldn’t be here. You don’t have to worry about being too high value. Just focus on being better.
/r/askTRP22/07/18 07:30 AM
12

Women always say they slept with 3. That’s practically a punch line.
/r/askTRP22/07/18 07:21 AM
3

I suggest that in the near term you just focus on your own self-improvement and what you can control personally. You don't need to take on the burden of worrying about these society-wide problems.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/18 07:31 AM
9

To be manipulative requires intent which requires awareness. Otherwise, it is just cluelessness. The proof that nice guys are sincere is that they keep doing the same thing even though it is ineffective. Even if we assume for sake of argument that nice guys are amoral and will do whatever it takes to get the sex that they desire, they keep using "nice guy" tactics, showing that they sincerely believe that that is the way to behave. The whole nice guys are actually the worst line of argument real…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/18 07:47 PM
33

I think this trope about nice guys are actually secretly the worst is overstated. We all learn how to behave in life by trial and error. We learn that when we do certain things, we get certain results. When we are young, this works great. If we take our nap, we get a cookie after. If we study hard and behave, we get an A. This message gets etched into your brain and becomes second nature. It is completely rationale that a nice guy thinks that if he does "the right thing" then he is going to get …
/r/TheRedPill15/03/18 06:21 PM
1

Trump?! Wise? Rational? Emotional control? Picks his battles? Good grief. The man has emotional diarrhea.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/18 04:14 PM
1

I think you want a comma between "the one who's fucking you" and "and your mother". Just saying. Sometimes punctuation can change the meaning.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/17 12:52 AM
1

How's that lifting the spirits going with the lowest approval ratings in history? How's that "don't fuck with us" messaging going with Kim Jong Un continually firing off rockets and Trump just impotently flaps his yap? Has Iran capitulated? Is Russia out of Syria or Ukraine? Has China trembled in fear and made trade concessions? Trump is an impotent laughingstock-a transparent paper tiger. which gets us back to the OP's point. The more and louder he talks (and complains), the more impotent he lo…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 08:29 AM
1

First you demand proof, then you say you don't care what some bullshit article says. You're kind of confused, aren't you? P.S. That "beta" could buy everything Trump owns and then some, and pay cash on the barrelhead because Buffett "actively" made a fortune, for real. Trump has to shuck and jive (which you confuse for alpha behavior) because he is a phony.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/17 08:13 AM
2

I don’t assume Warren Buffett is a vile predator. Buffett actually made a fortune, not just pretending. He demonstrates that you can be civil and successful. His partner Charlie Munger is hard-nosed and Republican but still civil. The fallacy in your foregoing post is that Trump built a real estate empire and didn’t ride on his father’s coattails. The facts suggest otherwise on both counts. But let’s assume for sake of argument that you are correct. What does an astute businessman do? He maximiz…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 06:58 PM
4

Well, I haven’t filed for bankruptcy four times. I haven’t cheated retirees out of their savings with a bogus university. I haven’t run a public company in the casino business that lost money every single year I was in charge while my competitors in the casino business never had an unprofitable year during the same period, I haven’t colluded with the Russians. But if we are going to measure people’s value or the validity of their opinions by their net worth: if you calculate what I started with …
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 06:41 PM
2

His need for validation often overrides doing or saying the politically smart thing. That’s not astute or ballsy; that’s stupid. Contrast that with Putin who obviously gives zero fucks but has the emotional stability and self-control to reign it in when it suits his tactical purposes.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 06:31 PM
1

Dude, if you want footnotes formatted according to the Chicago Manual of Style, do your own research. This is literally everywhere. If you say this is news to you, then you are either being disingenuous or you have literally read nothing on the subject. Stick keywords from my post into a google search. Forbes and Fortune have written a lot about it, but many others as well. As far as making $400 million with small homes and apartments, when the Trumps got sued in 1973 for racial discrimination i…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 06:18 PM
0

His dad made a $400 million fortune building small houses. When Trump moved into the Manhattan real estate market, his dad was his silent partner-dad’s money, dad’s connections. Doing it in Donald’s name was a way for his dad to continue in the business while shielding his assets from creditors. Donald didn’t do it. Once he did it himself, he promptly crashed and burned. Since then he just rents out his name. It’s been decades since he actually built anything. For people who think he is actually…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/17 07:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter