TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

tyranus89 Archive

View 7 posts and 319 comments by tyranus89 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

Actually, it is about slaying pussy. Directly from the sidebar: The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men. Coincidentally, slaying life is the most efficient way to slay pussy. And yeah, the natural progression of things is that you end up caring more about the progress of your own life more than nailing chicks. Which subsequently leads to nailing more chicks.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/17 08:06 PM
68

The most important thing is just getting in the gym. At first, don't even worry about what you're doing. Just get a membership, get in, and start fucking around. The reason being -- if you don't, you'll suffer from analysis paralysis. You'll worry about the effects that 3 sets of 5 reps of deadlifts rather than 4 sets of 8 -- even though you've never touched a barbell. This and other bullshit that at the end of the day doesn't matter until you're already an intermediate-to-advanced lifter. The f…
/r/TheRedPill15/11/16 03:21 PM
1

For those who are improving by learning sales: this is a fantastic ad, too. Perfect for digital. Engaging, strikes emotion, soft sale at the end. Added to my swipe file.
/r/MarriedRedPill26/04/16 11:24 AM
12

Haven't seen too many classic films, I see. Hope it's worth it man.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/16 08:04 AM
2

Your post title includes "how I handled it." When I clicked the link, I thought "if you didn't break it off with her, or at least downgrade her status to plate, you didn't handle it well."
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 05:39 AM
3

She's indebted to you Not at all. He blew up on her, let her stick around and then had sex afterwards. Proving that it's all ok.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/16 05:37 AM
2

Man, I thought it was brilliant! Who would've known that by starting a successful energy company, you could sell it for millions?!
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 06:52 AM
2

There are 290 comments at the time I'm posting this. I'm not going to read them all, so in case it hasn't been asked: Have you made a million dollars? No? Then don't give ANY advice on the subject.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 06:51 AM
1

Actually a great idea, way to think outside the box.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/16 06:40 AM
-48

Well, now we know why she divorced this beta. Seriously, I understand that these women are retarded for complaining about this, but we at TRP know that alimony is bullshit. What a fucking beta thing to do -- you're a professional tennis player and you publicly ask for support from your ex-wife? I'm baffled if he ever gets laid again, especially considering that women hold resources in such high regard and he's proven he'll take them from you instead of provide them. Although hypocritical, the or…
/r/TheRedPill23/10/15 05:52 AM
1

I disagree. You need only know that they do respond positively to men like Chad -- thus, you emulate them and succeed. Trying to figure out why often leads to inaction, not to mention poor emulation of success. Constantly reading signals and trying to "figure out" best responses, instead of just learning to be the best response. Nobody needs to know why a certain baseball pitcher's technique allows him to throw a harder fastball; you need only emulate his technique in order to improve your pitch…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 03:09 AM
5

He's certainly jealous, but being that he's clearly BP, it sounds like he has a case of the feelz for Chad's girlfriend. He's frustrated that she's unavailable meanwhile Chad's running game on other broads. "I could treat you right baby!"
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 01:09 PM
8

Trying to answer this question is part of the problem. I'm not sure if "not seeing the forest for the trees" is the best phrase here, but the only thing that matters is that they do respond positively to guys like this. Why is almost irrelevant.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 01:06 PM
1

Through affiliate sales, mostly.
/r/seduction04/10/15 11:11 PM
6

I'm guessing it's pretty easy to get girls with a big instagram following For sure. One problem: becoming IG famous isn't as easy as it sounds. Not at all. Tons of guys (tens of thousands?) are trying to do this because of how lucrative it can be -- and not just for pussy. You can make a lot of money on IG. That being said, it's not like you shouldn't try. Just don't expect it to work -- at all.
/r/seduction04/10/15 01:36 AM
2

I know that it depends on the type of face you have Yes. but No. Someone could suggest a 'cool' haircut that could make you a laughing stock. There's a subreddit where men can get advice for their hair. Check that out. Post pics under a throwaway.
/r/seduction04/10/15 01:31 AM
4

This is awesome. You sound like a badass, well-rounded dude. The guys that "go creative" after enjoying stereotypically masculine activities for so long are usually VERY good at their newfound craft -- simply because so many other creative types lack these backgrounds, and can't compete with the level of honesty that's brought to the table. Bravo.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 05:31 AM
3

No. You cannot simultaneously believe that women are only capable of acting in accordance to one rationale, and then get angry when their actions align as such. Entirely anti-stoic. Might as well hate a tree for being green.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 07:20 PM
1

I don't think what he's saying should be encouraged at all. All the upvotes and gilded posts are just showing that the only people agreeing with him are newcomers. It's not a good thing that this sub is growing as fast as it is, given that each user's upvote is worth as much as anyone else's. "This sub is not a democracy, never has been, never will be," say the mods.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 07:17 PM
38

Bunch of upvotes. Gilded post. This sub is dead. If you are angry when you see/hear/read the way women act, you have not internalized what's going on here. Emotional reactions are BP. You are losing frame and allowing a woman to change your state through a fucking post on the internet. You've admitted it yourself, you don't believe that women are naturally like this. That is a BP thought process.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/15 06:01 PM
2

comfortable read: submissive Think about if you saw a scrawny, 5'2" 16-year old "making piercing, unflinching, emotionless eye contact". If you didn't "want to deal with it", would you be looking down or away? I'll agree that sometimes there's more to it, but this post is going deeper than that. Of course there are obvious exceptions.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 03:34 AM
1

Disagree. His stuff on mindset is incredible, and most importantly actionable. Highly recommended.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/15 01:02 AM
1

My other question is, should I even care? This answers all your other questions, because the answer to this is "no".
/r/askTRP16/04/15 07:54 PM
1

I clicked the link happily expecting the first line to be what it was. Eliminate "easy" from your vocabulary, and replace it with "real". You get to use that word again once you're at the top, and things actually are easy.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/15 04:50 PM
1

Of course it's possible... I just think it doesn't apply here. Again, it's not necessarily the case, but if she is soft nexting, then there was no "undying worship".
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 04:43 PM
12

I'm not saying this is necessarily the case, but I don't think you should dismiss the fact that she's soft nexting you. She could be realizing that you won't be there for, say, two weeks out of any given month, and could be finding someone to fill that gap. No doubt about it, a doctor is a high value position. By being a medical student, though, she could be looking to secure you in a BB sense. Yes, she'll be excited by the distance... but at the same time, she'll only tolerate so much of it. Ou…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/15 08:50 AM
1

That's not how the Brad Pitt example works. Brad Pitt doesn't need to demonstrate high value because women all know how high value he is already. The whole point of that example is to test if a girl is flaking or not. When she gives you an excuse for why she can't/won't meet up, think to yourself if she would re-prioritize her day to meet with Brad Pitt. If you think she would, then she's not into you. If you don't think she would, then she legitimately can't meet with you and isn't flaking. If …
/r/seduction29/03/15 07:04 AM
5

The tumblr idea sounds like a ridiculous amount of work, for what's probably a very low chance of scoring. It's not an avenue that women pursue for dating, so the chances they'll actually give you any personal information seems low. You're also not giving them any indication of who you are or why they should be attracted to you. If you want to be exposed to hundreds of women at once, join a band. As you already noted, there's no avoiding the fact that you have to approach. If you can find a fulf…
/r/seduction29/03/15 06:39 AM
1

Porn can cause you to develop unreal expectations, and fantasies that won't -- or even sometimes can't -- be fulfilled. Clearly doesn't happen with everyone, but it is well-documented.
/r/seduction24/03/15 05:52 AM
1

No idea why this was downvoted. As the man, you set the tone for the sex, and the better you are at it, the better the sex will be. During sex, she's looking for you for guidance and if you don't fuck her right, it'll suck. Daniel Rose's 'Sex God Method' goes over everything you need to know.
/r/seduction23/03/15 05:27 AM
1

Blame porn.
/r/seduction23/03/15 05:25 AM
5

Agreed. Places / organizations / events that promote the values that TRP encourages men to pursue will lead to men of like minds. They won't necessarily be familiar with TRP per se, but they will hold the values that TRP stresses are important, and thus you'll become a better person. "You are the company you keep", yes. But, by an even better metric, "you are the average of the 5 people you spend the most time with". If you start hanging out the most with 5 people who are lightyears ahead of you…
/r/askTRP23/03/15 04:07 AM
1

Yeah, reading his frame is also very important. Very good point. Seemed like this guy was trying to out-AMOG OP. But, this "joking" frame leaves an option of no fight while you maintain control frame-wise. If you adopt the anger frame, you're heading towards a fight and at best (as happened in this scenario) it gets de-escalated by someone other than yourself, who is therefore dictating the frame of the confrontation. Again... He ended up alright in this situation.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 11:05 PM
5

Agreed. If you're not going to hit him, don't escalate the situation with anger or strong language as that's shifting the frame to somewhere you don't want to go. Play up the joking frame, like his actions are water on a duck's back. You'll make him look foolish amongst everyone else. In the end though, you obviously did ok.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/15 11:57 AM
3

Listen, I understand that rape suits are a huge deal for your social reputation regardless of whether or not you win or lose it, but the fact that he won means this post should be celebrating a victory against the system, not opposing it. Some crazy bitch tried to fuck him over, and the system took his side... Not just saying he was not guilty, but awarding reparations as well. This is unnecessarily negative.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 04:23 AM
2

On another thread earlier this week, we discussed Marcus Aurelius' views on death; that because death is an inevitable natural process, it is foolish to be afraid of it. This is the essence of stoicism and The Red Pill: that there are certain truths in life which are seemingly hard to swallow, but you have no say in the matter; they are true, whether or not you want them to be. Given this, it is better to use these truths to your advantage than to complain about them or live in willful ignorance…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 09:09 AM
7

Fat acceptance tries to get everyone to accept fat people for being fat. It has little-to-nothing to do with fat people accepting themselves for being fat. Therein lies the problem, and it's closely tied to the root of this post: feminists and SJWs would rather change and control the mindset of society -- in order for fat people to finally *feed on validation -- instead of promoting the "nobody cares" mindset outlined here.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/15 08:44 AM
2

What you fail to understand is that these all are crimes; my point is that whether or not they are enforced is something different entirely. Guys scrap, they hardly ever get charged with assault. But by taking the first swing, I could have been charged. It's naive to think someone is "scared of women" because they would rather avoid the potential of jail time and all the social problems associated with a rape charge (not even a conviction), just to nut in a mouth. It's not about being scared of …
/r/askTRP09/03/15 04:07 PM
2

lol not literally. I just mean in court for rape. And just because you have done it doesn't mean you won't be charged if you did it again. I've punched a guy but haven't been charged for assault.
/r/askTRP08/03/15 08:47 PM
10

It's not about fighting death, it's about being afraid of it. What you shouldn't be fighting is the truth that it will eventually happen.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 08:46 PM
6

Bad idea. You'll be in rape court a week later.
/r/askTRP08/03/15 05:50 PM
25

Not exactly. He's saying that when you contemplate death, you realize that's it's just a natural occurrence, (or as he puts it, "operation of nature"). Given that, it is silly to be afraid of death. Indeed, this is the essence of TRP; that truths exist independently of your desire for them to be true or untrue. This is why stoicism is so important and respected among us. Learning to live with and even embrace life's "hard truths" is much better than trying to fight against them, as it is a losin…
/r/TheRedPill08/03/15 02:16 PM
10

Absolutely no to most of the stuff at Express... Way too flashy and guido-esque, and covered in outrageous designs and logos.
/r/TheRedPill04/03/15 11:25 PM
6

When you're just looking for a hookup in a club and facing this level of deception, why should you be honest about anything? To be clear, I agree with your point. You don't have to be. Moreover, I don't think you should be... necessarily. Most guys here have not killed their ego, despite good advice urging them to do so. Therefore, they want to bang a girl because she likes them for "who they are"... instead of who they're merely perceived to be. They don't just bang 9's so they can get their di…
/r/TheRedPill26/02/15 05:36 AM
1

Sample size = poor; bias is present. Next
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 05:00 AM
2

Costly mistake. People wonder why the divorce rate is so high -- this is such a common scenario.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:58 AM
1

That's why we preach Stoicism -- if you're tied to a cart and it's driving in a direction you don't want to go, you can either be dragged in the dirt kicking and screaming, or calmly walk along behind it and enjoy the view on the way.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:51 AM
62

Agreed, most of the stuff highlighted, when in context, was okay. Mentioning that anal sex exists to 12-year olds (7th-graders) is NOTHING new to them. Explaining to them that anal sex is not risk-free is just smart, because they know what it is, but don't know much else besides what they see in porn. "Derp, porn stars do it and you can't get pregnant so that's what we should do!" Kids are dumb, and that's why sex ed exists. However, as my other post explains, the brainwashing shit can stay the …
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:38 AM
30

It seems like all of the quotes under the "Student:" sections are what the students are "supposed" to say. And people say that schools don't try to brainwash kids. I just read an introductory to reactionism that claims our society is Orwellian; I'd never considered that until then, and reading this has now confirmed it.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/15 04:23 AM
4

This is fantastic, but also remember to be a couple steps ahead. Most girls (as in >95%) will just return the eye contact and then look away. Cool. But, some of them will respond. Make sure you're ready for this. When I was practicing eye contact, one girl responded with a smile and "hi!". Totally wasn't expecting it, since I was just so focused on "maintain eye contact; don't look away" that when she actually reacted, I was caught off guard. Some girls might be creeped out. Don't be phased by i…
/r/seduction20/02/15 03:20 AM
2

There's no coming back from understanding the world from a BP lens, but there is the possibility of slipping back to beta practices. My mistake about how that could be confusing from my previous post, but the slip has been well-documented on this sub.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 11:46 PM
6

I think there's a difference between "natural alphas" and some guys who read TRP. Someone once made an analogy between some TRP men and cancer/addiction -- always "recovering betas" or "in remission"... reading TRP staves the beta away, and without returning to this forum, they would slip back to a BP mindset beta behaviour.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 04:35 AM
3

I don't agree entirely with Tim Ferriss, but his idea of the "low-information diet", implemented once a month or every other month, is great. Quick Google search didn't turn up anything written by him, but you might be able to get that chapter or segment from The 4-Hour Workweek from Google Books.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/15 04:32 AM
8

Necessarily, if you're at the point of walking out, you don't care what she's thinking or hamstering.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/15 02:38 AM
1

Yeah, but even then she's judging your response. Clearly she lacks the social engineering to understand that asking that is inappropriate.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/15 07:47 PM
5

It seems that these days, it's trendy to be weak and liberal; to celebrate your victim-hood in hopes of mass approval. You're on to something, but it's less of a trend and more of an overarching characteristic for these types of people. They love to be pitied. Nietzsche pointed out that by pitying someone, you merely suffer with them. Their suffering is eased by your pity, but only at the cost of your strength. This is the lifeblood of these worms -- leeching strength from those with an excess t…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/15 05:51 AM
2

For something like this, it's probably true, unless she's out-of-her-skull crazy.
/r/askTRP28/01/15 10:29 PM
1

Whether or not such behaviour is virtuous is a moot point.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 04:30 AM
1

they whine and complain about having to do it I've never once seen anyone complain about sleeping with women or going to the gym.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 04:23 AM
1

Like /u/cxj said, there is whining about women, but not about sleeping with them or exercise.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/15 04:20 AM
5

Not sure where you're seeing that.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 07:04 PM
7

No sarcasm -- do you think everyone on TRP is lying when they talk about going to the gym and sleeping around?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/15 05:53 PM
3

TRP endorses a separation from conventionality. Where you take your date depends on a multitude of variables -- you and your interests, your style of game, her interests and what she responds to, your geographic location and culture, etc. "Dinner and a movie" is rejected by TRP because it's conventional. We can't really outright tell you where to go on a date.
/r/TheRedPill22/01/15 06:52 PM
2

The root problem of your response was that you focused not only on getting off, but still getting off with her. A display of abundance mentality would show that you either a) don't care enough about getting off, and b) that if you did, you don't need her to do it. /u/redpillexplainsit shows both points in his example.
/r/askTRP22/01/15 06:20 AM
1

Otherwise they wouldn't be emasculate beta's in the first place. Except that this isn't true, since many RP guys were admittedly blue pill / beta at one point... Hence the purpose of this post.
/r/AlreadyRed22/01/15 06:16 AM
1

Seems like it... these are his only posts on Reddit ever.
/r/askTRP21/01/15 01:13 AM
1

This is just a really drawn-out way to say "I'm still blue pill"
/r/askTRP21/01/15 01:11 AM
2

Me: That's OK then, I'll just smash one out over your face Ugh. That's ridiculously creepy and BP... jacking off on a girl's face while she's sleeping? You're so desperate to get off that it comes down to that? No abundance mindset here.
/r/askTRP21/01/15 01:08 AM
1

I don't think he realized the depth of her intentions -- the possibility that she may have been nervous and his "no" was a roadblock. He made a good call by going with his gut, saying what he wanted to say and waiting to see if she'd still be down.
/r/askTRP21/01/15 01:04 AM
1

One of my favourite negs is "Do you want a piece of gum?" Especially if you aren't chewing some.
/r/askTRP21/01/15 12:59 AM
1

I was surprised at how little mentions there were of one-night stands (ONS), but now it makes more sense.
/r/askTRP21/01/15 12:35 AM
9

I'm glad you have such an adequate sample size that clearly applies to men of every age group, social status and geographic location.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 02:14 PM
0

Lately, TRP has turned into this ... sex focused sub about spinning plates Look at the sidebar. Directly under "Welcome to The Red Pill": The Red Pill: Discussion of sexual strategy in a culture increasingly lacking a positive identity for men.
/r/TheRedPill12/01/15 02:56 AM
1

•as a man or woman, It's important to understand that language like this doesn't provide authority to those who respond. Nobody can reply and say "as a man, this doesn't bother me", and have the authority to be speaking on behalf of all men. Just the same as it'd be wrong to say "all women don't care if men sleep around but come home at the end of the night".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/01/15 09:47 PM
1

Committing heinous acts like murder can be objectively beneficial By "objectively beneficial", do you mean that they do more good than harm? If so, you're thinking along the lines of utilitarianism, specifically 'act utilitarianism' which evaluates the morality of individual acts. Rule utilitarianism establishes general principles according to utilitarianist thought and then examines how individual acts affect utility. However, under deontology these heinous acts would always be wrong. Deontolog…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 05:34 PM
1

Debate still continues because no current theory provides clear guidance all of the time. mmmm, not so sure about clear guidance being the problem more than interpretation. Most moral philosophies are quite clear, but interpretation of intangibles like utility and duty can muddy it all up, which in my opinion lends more to subjectivity than objectivity. It can still be objective. Yes, it definitely still can be objective. But is it? Again, objective ethics means that every act/intention is eithe…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/14 05:21 PM
1

We may be running into some definitional problems here. When I see "sexual strategy is amoral", what that means to me is that morality is optional when pursuing a sexual strategy. Ok, that makes this more understandable. What we're saying when we say "sexual strategy is amoral", is that it's not prescriptive, it's descriptive. For example, math is amoral. 2+2=4 is a mathematical fact, not a moral fact. By expressing this truth, math is not attempting to consider its morality or immorality. TRP i…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 09:19 PM
1

Sure, ignore everything I wrote.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 09:13 PM
3

Bullshit. Religion is a way for the 1% to control the masses. It's a plague that's better eradicated, and thankfully we're heading down that road. Modern Christians don't take any of the core morals from the bible to heart and instead corrupt them to justify their own prejudices and further their own causes. As OP noted, morals have always been part of humanity, that's how we got as far as we did.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 09:13 PM
12

really it's amoral because existential nihilism and science! Society's emphasis of science without the backing of philosophy has led to this insanely ignorant mindset, which is a huge part of the "decline" that we all lament, yet most of TRP is a part of. Kudos to /u/illimitableman for pointing this out. Blame whomever you want, but not too long ago basic philosophy and moral systems were a major part of high school and even elementary school education. This has been lost on us, and now we're pa…
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 06:48 AM
5

You have every right right? Where do you derive this from?
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 06:43 AM
0

One can subscribe to subjective morality and still criticize the moral behaviour of others. Subjective morality need not mean that "people can choose what they think is good or bad", it's just the opposite of objective morality, which is the argument that morals exist outside of agents/persons/humans. I'm not sure why so many people here believe that there is no rationality involved with ethics/morality. Deontology is entirely based on a lack of emotion, and builds a moral philosophy purely out …
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 06:42 AM
3

If this statement bothers you, you're not redpilled. Untrue. Again, sexual strategy is amoral, not immoral. You can be red pill and feel that all of these things (murder, rape and genocide) matter. TRP, being amoral, does not convene in the realm of morality, and thus one can be for or against anything morally, and be RP.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 06:36 AM
1

I'm not a biologist, but I don't think genetics take social consequence into account.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 06:34 AM
13

The point of this thread that there are no morals No, it's that there is no morality outside of agency. In other, less accurate words, there's no objective morality of the universe that binds to creatures. There is morality; it exists, and we follow it. It can even be argued that we haven't created it per se (see deontology and utilitarianism).
/r/TheRedPill29/12/14 06:32 AM
10

No. This sub is dedicated to the debate of those topics, and so banning the jargon makes no sense. Use google.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/14 08:10 PM
1

Right. This is the other side of my internal debate -- that if TRP used to be mainstream, it can be once again. It was destroyed by feminism -- in other words, it was unlearned, and therefore can be relearned.
/r/AlreadyRed12/12/14 02:10 AM
1

Great points. Thanks for the contributive response.
/r/AlreadyRed09/12/14 06:01 AM
1

What makes it implicit for me is that you have approahing zero influence over whether people do or don't I'm genuinely unsure what you mean by "do or don't"; I think you mean "do or don't [make these mistakes]". If that's the case, well that's what the point of this post is -- to fix that; to increase the influence on whether people do or don't receive and accept the red pill. your purpose is to offer sympathy for others trapped in losing mentalities because they represent your younger self. No.…
/r/AlreadyRed09/12/14 05:57 AM
1

So really youre expressing your personal desire that you wish you knew sooner Yeah. But that's not implicit, nor the purpose. Why do others need to suffer through the same mistakes we've already made? The other day, my co-worker was struggling with a program. I told him, "actually, if you close it and re-boot it, it'll work fine." Why let him flounder? Wondering how your life would have turned out differently and that you'd be in a better position now If you had figured it out on your own No. No…
/r/AlreadyRed08/12/14 06:12 AM
9

hiding your flaws is a way of looking good to receive acceptance I personally believe this, but I don't care. Everyone does this. Everyone has flaws, and it takes a while to figure them out -- that's social strategy. It's also anti-awkward. Alcoholics rarely introduce themselves as such, and when they do, it's either because they're at an AA event or because they're crazy. Even if you do believe it though, you don't have to say anything to your mom. In the book, he's talking about hiding your fl…
/r/askTRP08/12/14 05:24 AM
4

Not society. Individuals. Simply preventing the instances of "I wish I knew sooner". As individuals we're happier post-RP, and I'd like to offer that to others before they're hurt from a BP lifestyle. I understand that going through BP shittiness makes you stronger and more accepting of RP philosophy once it's presented to you, but I don't think it's necessary to be experienced. manipulative strategies That allow them to get what they want from women Not really even this. Understanding RP philos…
/r/AlreadyRed07/12/14 08:12 PM
1

Why do you care? In short, morality.
/r/AlreadyRed06/12/14 04:19 PM
3

I dunno. I'm torn. Part of me says that the reason boys aren't internalizing the RP messages flashed to them in the media is because they're subtle, implicit and they're so quick that they are lost in the sea of BP propaganda. Part of me thinks that you can raise men to be more RP. However, we all agree with the 80/20 ratio of betas/alphas. Alphas by definition are elite and outnumbered by betas. This is the other part of me -- that in showing 100 men RP philosophy, only 20 of them will swallow …
/r/AlreadyRed06/12/14 01:49 AM
1

Definitely. Either that or your self-esteem isn't well-founded; that you think highly of yourself but you also need validation from others and are scared of rejection/failure (in other words, you have a scarcity mindset, not an abundance mindset).
/r/seduction05/12/14 02:19 AM
1

I definitely think there is such a thing as too many questions. Acting in a blabbering manner and asking mindless questions in order to prevent awkward silences because you want to make sure she's stimulated ... That's all supplicating and unattractive. What you're describing is facilitating discussion and that's ok. Asking where she's from and building a discussion from there is different. Silences aren't a bad thing. Keep in mind that you are the catch. She should be just as willing to fill aw…
/r/seduction05/12/14 02:17 AM
1

Hard to say when we don't know your game -- can't see your strengths or your weaknesses. I have to agree with the other comment recommending you internalize "Models" by Mark Manson. Work on yourself and you'll naturally be more attractive. Have an abundance mindset, not a scarcity mindset.
/r/seduction05/12/14 01:55 AM
1

Buy and use a tongue scraper. Floss. Your toothbrush can't get in those crevices. It really doesn't matter if you floss before or after you brush, but you should mouthwash right after you floss (get the crap loose, then wash it away). There are many sides to the "floss before or after brushing" debate and the experts can't agree. Basically some say brushing after gets rid of the loose crap, some say it puts it back in the spaces. Either way, using mouthwash right after works well. Drink lots of …
/r/seduction05/12/14 01:52 AM
1

The perfect pickup is when she doesn't know it's happening. When she does, she realizes "aw, how cute. He's trying to pick me up." If she had the tingles for you even before you open your mouth, then at the right time this will drive her over the edge for you. Otherwise, you'd be driving her away. Pickup works because you're acting in a way that's attractive. All there is to it. Being outright cheesy isn't attractive.
/r/seduction05/12/14 01:38 AM
1

so the girl ends up thinking that you just want to be friends with them Another key point: she doesn't find you sexually attractive. If she did, she wouldn't friend zone you.
/r/seduction05/12/14 01:32 AM
2

Couldn't find your post in AskSeddit. She probably found you attractive, and wanted to see if you'd react confidently to someone staring at you -- which you didn't. You should've looked right back at her, cracked a confident, IDGAF smirk and said "hey." She's the one who's staring RIGHT at you repeatedly... Why would it be "presumptuous" for you to talk to her? (Well, because Western society rails on men for their sexuality and approaching women, that it somehow disrespects them... and then they…
/r/seduction05/12/14 12:51 AM
2

Agreed. We're no longer cavemen. There's nothing inherently wrong with raising another man's child.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 09:31 PM
2

There's more to TRP than just game. TRP is very anti-cuckolding; that is, it's wrong to raise a child that your wife has with another man since you're spending resources prolonging genetics that aren't yours. It seems like OP is extrapolating this idea to adoption -- where the child is not the offspring of you, nor your partner.
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 09:28 PM
2

Agreed on all fronts -- looking for a happy medium here. I definitely don't think he should only spend on her, nor should he spend lavishly.
/r/askTRP03/12/14 01:50 AM
2

This is the insight/clarification I was looking for. Seemed like OP was being negative about everything he did. What you're saying is appropriate.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 04:23 AM
2

We disagree there, I suppose. Success is not an end in itself, for me.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 11:18 PM
7

It's so easy to settle when you're comfortable so I never allow myself such luxury. What's the point of success if you don't enjoy it?
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 09:14 PM
0

You can go ahead and do the latter, since I still have no idea what you're getting at with this.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 01:07 AM
2

Use the google operator "site:". For example, the search "site:reddit.com/r/theredpill alpha compare group situation" will search for the pages with the terms alpha, compare, group and situation but only under the site reddit.com/r/theredpill
/r/askTRP01/12/14 01:02 AM
1

Mazlow's hierarchy of needs. You can't help your parents unless you help yourself and get yourself on solid ground. Otherwise you'll fail at both.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:52 AM
1

Way better. Was in an LTR while blue pill, still in the same one. I'm sexed constantly, we're both much happier. Definitely.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:49 AM
1

Let's play the feminist game for a second (the dictionary definition; gender equality, not the femnazi stuff we're used to). What would you do if you extended these privileges to a guy friend/acquaintance, and he started to act like that? You'd kick him the fuck out. Shouldn't treat this bitch any differently just because she has a pussy. Yay feminism!
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:48 AM
1

Man, number one is to spend way more time on this sub. You're still very blue pill. Much to learn, grasshopper. Among those: Don't be spilling your guts to girls. Ever. Stop asking for consent so much -- learn how to read it. Clearly, even doing "the right thing" (asking for consent) isn't working for you. I don't know how I would handle 2 false rumours I know this might fall on deaf ears, because we've all been there, but high school bullshit is just that -- bullshit. It's over before you know …
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:39 AM
1

It really does depend if you're acting mopey and shit, or if she's just gauging this or prodding you towards it. Maybe she's deliberately denying what you want to do in order to see how you deal with it. If you're storming off and deliberately quiet around her after, then she's trying to see if she's getting under your skin. The best solution is to not care if she does or doesn't want to do what you want to do. Then you'll be able to deal with it. Let's take your example of movies vs. TV. If you…
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:28 AM
4

"Hey man, I don't know how to take this, but I saw that your girlfriend has a profile on Tinder. Not sure if you know about it, or if someone hacked her photos, but I thought I'd let you know." If the unlikely circumstance arises where he says "yeah, I know" and is cool with it (as in, they have an open relationship), then, with utmost nonchalance, say "ok cool. Let's spar" or whatever.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:22 AM
2

You've redefined terms and asked us to compare and contrast them according to your new definitions. Not sure how to do that or what the point is.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:20 AM
2

but I try to avoid binary terms of thinking Right, because a ternary mode of thought is lightyears better, especially when trying to classify the types of males.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:18 AM
2

lol get a hooker, wear a condom and you'll be fine. You don't really need to worry about STDs if you protect yourself. Crabs is fucking nothing but a mild inconvenience.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:14 AM
1

Then start a sub... I don't know what to tell you. TRP is definitely a negative, "hard truth" kind of space.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:12 AM
2

Dude, I understand you want to be frugal, but you sound fucking obsessed. "I'm not totally against spending so long as it is a learning experience or something potentially profitable." Don't look at everything as an investment. Money is meant to be spent. What's the point of investing every dollar you have? Why turn $100 into $150 if you're not going to spend the extra $50? You just like seeing the numbers get bigger? How about this: look at your spending on dates as an investment in your marria…
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:11 AM
1

lol I'm confused. You cut her off, and now you're wondering what to do because she "wants nothing to do with me"? Doesn't seem like there's a problem at all. This girl lost her beta orbiter provider because he decided to grow up and pursue girls who'd actually put out. She's pretty much admitting to using you, and then acting like a child when she can't use you anymore. How does that make you feel?
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:07 AM
1

I've never understood this quote. Everybody can turn into a complete prick/bitch in certain situations, but nobody deserves to have to deal with it. I really like when girls post things like this, it's like pre-selection of sorts.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:03 AM
3

Seconded. I actually only read those 4 words then looked at the comments. Tons of material on these boards about how bad it is to touch base with exes. Next.
/r/askTRP01/12/14 12:01 AM
6

Wouldn't being thrown into a lion's den be a good test of strength? Sure, but there are other ways to go about it.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:59 PM
2

Yes. There is no other answer.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:57 PM
3

TRP's views on gaming is the same as its view on women -- if they're controlling your life, GTFO. Otherwise, cool.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:56 PM
2

I would agree with /u/vandaalen that if anything, it would be for the benefit of the offspring. However, I think there's too much emphasis placed on evolution these days. People look at human behaviour and think it must be the result of evolution/natural selection, however that's simply not the case -- we're also behavioural beings, and this could be learned. A popular anti-creationist/anti-intelligent-design argument is the fact that we stuff food in the same pathway we use to breathe, which le…
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:52 PM
2

lol the possibility that the gruelling process of evolution has favoured oneitis because every woman is that annoying is ridiculously implausible, although it's a funny thought
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:47 PM
1

so whats the point of getting one? I mean I want a girlfriend or a plate sure You still have a little bit of yourself plugged in. You've said it yourself -- what's the point? Why do you say you "want a girlfriend or a plate sure"... just because you haven't had one? Just because society tells you it's the thing to do? Fuck that man, unplug and do what you want to do. You need to let go of wanting a girlfriend. Ironically, that's the only way you'll get one and maintain a good relationship.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:46 PM
2

Of course in these subs there will be more failure stories than success stories, but that's just selection bias. Sure, there are no unicorns, but there are loyal girls and you can have a good relationship if you follow solid RP LTR game.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:44 PM
2

The best advice for people who are depressed about where they are in life is to not look at where they are in relation to people who are way above where they are, as that causes them to become demoralized. I suppose the opposite would apply to this (which is the opposite situation); look at people who have way more than you do and think about all the hard work they achieved to get there. Keep the "get-it-done-now", disciplined attitude at the forefront of your consciousness. Basically, your prob…
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:40 PM
3

Cut off all contact. Block from all social media, block from email, delete her number and block her number from your service provider (if possible). Don't use transit that goes past her house, work or other major reminders of her. Start working on something. Something bigger than yourself. It'll consume your mind, body and soul. Have sex with 10 girls. Not nine; ten. COROLLARY: engage with lots of different women. And I mean those separately: engage with lots of women and with different women, n…
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:31 PM
5

Danger & Play is an excellent RP resource for introverts, definitely a pioneer in the area of how to live as a RP introvert in our world, for anyone interested. That being said, yeah games can be just as harmless as other hobbies, you just need to make sure they aren't dominating your life (as you've noted).
/r/askTRP30/11/14 11:24 PM
2

The fuck 10 women hasn't worked (admittedly it hasn't been 10, but a few). It does work. You haven't done it. It's 10 for a reason. As others have said, she's not into you. Sorry (truly). Cut off all contact. Block from all social media. Delete her number and block her number from calling/texting your phone (if possible). Work on yourself, or something in your life. Start building something bigger than yourself. It'll consume your mind, body and soul. Talk to lots of different women. I mean that…
/r/askTRP30/11/14 09:13 AM
2

I'm pretty argumentative by nature, and used to be like this. I've found that taking the "amused mastery" approach works well (look on the subs for what this is if you're not sure). The key is to be consciously thinking that you want a mindset shift. This post/podcast on Danger & Play should be helpful -- think "I want to have a frame of amused mastery", and you should see results.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 09:05 AM
1

So... what's your question
/r/askTRP30/11/14 08:58 AM
2

Upvote. Please, if you're reading this and know the answer, don't feed the bear.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 08:57 AM
2

It depends on your relationship with them, but it would seem kind of weird to me to show them these subs at all. Just do your best raising them RP, without explicitly telling them "this is all Red Pill philosophy".
/r/askTRP30/11/14 08:53 AM
2

if you want to sell records and not be a dudes-only band, women want to think you're the sensitive type Nope. Numerous bands have avoided the sensitive, woe-is-me image with massive success. it's pretty fuckin' hard to change something that's fundamentally who you are and has been since birth Welcome to the red pill, my friend. A mighty bitter one to swallow.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 08:47 AM
2

Hard to say.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 02:58 AM
1

First and foremost, lurk. Ask questions here if you'd like, but lurk the main page (including the comments) and consume the main page's sidebar material like it's manna. balance the sensitivity and vulnerability needed for my career I'm also an original-music musician, and I have to call you out on this. You don't need to be sensitive and vulnerable to be a good musician. If you undergo a serious mindset shift, your art will reflect that, as it should. Don't worry about that. Think about how swa…
/r/askTRP30/11/14 02:56 AM
2

•I tease for a long time, she finally says, "I know what you're trying to do and it's working. I give you permission to just do it." •Obviously, consent is necessary, but she was demanding and I didn't want to give her what she wants after that. I continue teasing and then go to sleep shortly afterwards She gave you the green light and you stopped. She wanted your dick and you denied it. This took the teasing too far. You should've stuck it in her. Girls hate getting blue-balled as much as guys …
/r/askTRP30/11/14 02:47 AM
1

Definitely. There is no easy way to overcome approach anxiety. The only way to get over it is to get rejected. It's like jumping in a cold pool -- the only way to get used to the temperature of the water is to experience the displeasure of it for a while.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 02:30 AM
1

Number 1 is working on yourself. Building something important in and with your life, something bigger than yourself, will occupy your mind, body and soul. Number 2, of course, is slaying sluts. Pro tip: echoing /u/fnordsnord's advice. Zero contact -- block from all social media, delete her number, get her number blocked from your phone service (if possible). Avoid transit routes that go by her residence/work, etc.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 02:21 AM
1

Concerning number 1: start reading Dappered and working through the archives. Also good is Real Men Real Style. They stick with classic, unmistakeably masculine looks. Learn the difference between fashion and style.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 02:18 AM
1

There are certain scenarios -- for example, dealing with police -- where sugar coating is necessitated.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/14 02:12 AM
3

You can only go up from here. Don't look at how low you are in comparison to others. Think only about how every bit you move forward is an exponential leap from where you were before. Good luck.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/14 02:04 AM
1

1.) Yes. Of course. The percentage of women who will stay faithful is another question... 2.) Yes, but stick with the "trust but verify" idiom. It's possible to trust, but that trust needs to be earned. If a vagina tingles when no bf, SO or husband is around does it always get fucked? Always? No. You're never going to be able to entirely prevent tingles when you're not around. Even if a girl is with the most alpha man in history, she can still be turned on by other men. Does this mean she will c…
/r/askTRP30/11/14 01:56 AM
1

the word "next" is a bit too soon for me Drop that mentality now. It's never too soon to invest in a girl; if anything, it can be "too late" because you're invested too long (although this is a poor mentality as well). All of your red flags are serious. Listen, you don't have to next her entirely -- just demote her to plate status. Work your own life, talk to other girls, hang out with/fuck her whenever you want but don't get invested. Make her prove to you that she's serious before you make it …
/r/askTRP30/11/14 01:50 AM
2

I want to make it an enjoyable 40-hour/week experience by working hard and not being harassed Then you definitely need to apply the 48 laws in order to prevent people from walking all over you. Plenty of people see new guys as "fresh meat" and will try to take advantage of you. Be wary of this and take steps to prevent it.
/r/askTRP30/11/14 12:32 AM
2

What impression are you trying to set? I'm curious as to why you chose r/askTRP to pose this question. One thing: you shouldn't care about trying to impress the women who work there, because you should never get into any sort of sexual or romantic relationship with a co-worker, especially in today's sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace and false-rape-accusation society. That done with, the other reason to pose that question here would be to appear dominant and alpha. Read The 48 Laws of Power. Gen…
/r/askTRP29/11/14 11:58 PM
1

She's just another tinder girl. Totally. OP doesn't seem to share this mindset. Not staying to the "she's the pursuer, you're the pursuee" idea.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 11:36 PM
6

Should I just say something like "whatever you say ;)" NO. God no. Horribly submissive, telling her you'll accept whatever frame she sets. The wink face does nothing to offset this. or agree and amplify with "duh you think i'm attracted to you??" Something along this lines is nice, but seems a bit brash. Instead, just say "obviously" I need to text this girl back quickly Nope. She's on your clock; you aren't on hers. You text her back whenever you feel like it. She is chasing you, not the other …
/r/askTRP29/11/14 10:29 PM
1

No, it's just not as extensive a process as it once was. There are still courtship rituals/dances, but they're less time consuming. I suppose courtship used to be so long that you could consider two people to be in a "courtship phase"; post-acquaintance and pre-relationship, which seems to be gone in most cases.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 10:24 PM
5

The answer that really is most correct is /u/eat-sleep-jre-train's: "when you want and feel like crying". But, that doesn't adequately express how a man cries. /u/harkrank is more on point. If you're truly an adult male, you'll cry only when it's acceptable, necessarily -- when you experience deep loss. So really, the answer is -- when you're a grown man, you'll always only cry when it's ok to. Weird answer, but it's the truth.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 10:19 PM
1

Have to echo the prevailing thought here. 7s are a dime a dozen no matter where you are -- forget about the bitchy ones, and find someone who's more pleasant.
/r/askTRP29/11/14 10:14 PM
1

Great line, great scene. We need a "Don Draper Red Pill Wisdom Supercut" video.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 07:57 AM
1

You can still live a red pill life and be in love. Being in love does not equate to blue pill.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 07:55 AM
1

I don't think the analogy can extend that far, since a magician relishes being an entertainer, and the audience enjoys being entertained. It's a different dynamic in that sense, although /u/crimsoncapsule's extent of the analogy is sound.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 07:54 AM
4

So what is romantic love a man that is in love with a woman and a woman that is in love with the thought of being with you You're thinking of romantic love in the sense that both people need to "love the person for who they really are"... this is the non-existent, fairy tale type. I don't subscribe to the idea that all women only like the thought of a boyfriend/husband or whatever, they're capable of further love, it's just different than that of a man's love. I don't think a man's love for a wo…
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 07:46 AM
9

The idea of love as it is presented to children is non-existent. Based on that definition, the answer to your question is "no". There is such a thing as romantic love, though. It's just not the Disney-movie type. Based on this definition, the answer is "yes".
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 07:13 AM
2

TRP's views on drugs are the same as its views on women: if your life is all about them, then GTFO.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 08:30 PM
1

MFA isn't needed. Learn how clothes should fit; don't wear stuff with logos or writing; pick items that you're comfortable wearing. Done.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/14 08:26 PM
0

Interesting, where did you hear this from? I'm trying to find things on Google but with the recent news, it must be lost in the mess.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 04:11 PM
2

I always thought he was great. He always got his subjects to be extremely comfortable with them, brought new perspectives to interviews, asked fresh questions, etc.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 04:08 PM
-1

BRO HOW CAN YOU VICTIM BLAME LIEK THAT OMG ... in reality, this is great advice. That's what I never understood about victim blaming... nobody's saying it's his fault this bitch is a psycho, but there were some things he could've done to prevent it. It's just a "learn from his mistakes" kind of deal.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 04:05 PM
3

Upgrading your style is very undervalued (probably because it's not well understood) on these boards. It's an almost-instant way to increase your SMV significantly. I would also like to reinforce "style" over "fashion".
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 01:26 AM
1

Dappered is awesome.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 01:24 AM
7

"Fashion" is expensive and fleeting. It is flamboyant and effeminate. "Style" is affordable and timeless. It is subtle and masculine. Dappered is the best place to understand the difference between style and fashion.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 01:23 AM
3

Yes and no. You have to understand the comparisons where they are appropriate. It can get very deeply philosophical, but at the end of the day we have less free will than most think. We're all apes with egos -- our minds are composed entirely of matter, the movement of which is pre-disposed by by DNA. Yes, we have some form of agency and that changes things a bit, but looking at how animals mate (assuming the animals are operating with no or very little agency) shows us baseline, natural behavio…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 01:34 PM
3

Finger nails grow 3 times faster than toe nails. For me, my nails are fine up until 5 days after my last trim. Every third time you trim your fingers, trim your toes.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 10:54 PM
7

Considering that with the smaller city likely having a much lower cost of living and the other province probably having better tax rates, that difference in salary shrinks quickly, making it even more of a good decision.
/r/TheRedPill03/10/14 12:28 AM
11

Montreal is the exception. It's an international city -- it has its own culture and attitudes. The best place in Canada.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 05:44 PM
13

I'm a recent grad living in Ontario, and all job options are pointing towards Toronto. People in my social circle are usually pretty stoked to be moving to "the city", but I couldn't care less. It has so much less to offer than other cities that are a fifth of Toronto's size. Montreal is the greatest Canadian city. Vancouver a close second.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 05:43 PM
1

i still feel like an impostor, like i'm not really an alpha but i play one on tv Fake it til you make it. Best way to be an alpha is to act like one. It'll settle in soon.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/14 04:29 PM
1

Netflix as well (in Canada at least)
/r/TheRedPill24/09/14 07:35 PM
1

Don't know why people keep downvoting this. The fact of the matter remains that it applies to every scenario you comment on. Just because it's literally the same message every time doesn't change the fact that it's true.
/r/askTRP24/09/14 02:35 PM
1

In these types of situations, I usually give advice along the lines of 'sure, if your ex is willing to keep up a non-exclusive sexual relationship, go for it until she gets crazy and then next her'. One problem: you have oneitis. She sounds like bad news, and you need to get over her. Cut off all contact now and start getting with these Tinder girls. You can call/text/tell your girlfriend something along the lines of "I've decided that I don't want to be with you anymore." She will rant and rage…
/r/askTRP22/09/14 06:22 PM
1

It's a poor test subject, because the conditions aren't the same. You have history together, and so you won't be able to conclude that any methods used on her will work with other women. Stop wasting her time and yours.
/r/askTRP22/09/14 05:43 PM
1

Yes, there definitely is a careful balance to maintain; as Aristotle might put it, the virtuous middle ground between two extremes. You want to strike the balance between can't go anywhere else, and are going somewhere else for sex -- merely that you could go somewhere else, but aren't because she's satisfying you.
/r/askTRP21/09/14 12:21 PM
1

On top of all these physical qualities you despise, would you also like to walk with a limp? Because you're shooting yourself in the foot by going back to the blue pill. TRP is only going to help you -- why give that up, especially when you have, in your words, nothing to lose?
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 04:44 PM
1

But that's not always the right response. Yes, there are certain people that we should do certain things for -- ex., work to provide for your family. But, that doesn't mean you need to labour at a specific job if it makes you absolutely miserable.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 04:08 PM
1

There's a difference between seeing the grass on the other side as greener, and genuinely wanting everything that lifestyle brings. I forget where I read this (maybe Danger & Play): you have to want the pleasure and the pain of a certain lifestyle. If you want to be a bartender to talk to chicks and sleep during the day, do you also want to not have a lot of money? Never be able to go out on the weekend? Maybe you'll be unfulfilled by your job. You may want these things, but it's an important as…
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 04:07 PM
1

I didn't write that, so I'm not sure what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 11:52 PM
5

TRP will change the way you look at life, period. The personal improvement side of things -- which deal with starting to consider yourself first and foremost -- will allow you to see non-sexual aspects of life in a different light, too.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 11:49 PM
61

This isn't just a gender-specific issue. Tons of blue pill guys go into miserable jobs to impress the other people in their lives, and hate themselves for it.
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 09:36 PM
2

You're a moron. This has nothing to do with love. It's the English language.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 05:35 PM
1

It turns out that she kills babies for fun? Doesn't matter Ummm... no. If it is "unconditional love"? Meaning you'll love them no matter what, with no conditions? Then ummm... yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 05:13 PM
5

I don't think you can define "unconditional love" as anything other than "loving someone with no conditions; i.e. no matter what they do, you'll love them". You don't have to live for another person to unconditionally love them.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/14 05:11 PM
1

it completely neglects the point of how and why the women lucky enough to be in your life should be appreciated and celebrated The Captain/First Mate dynamic is an extremely helpful product of TRP, and seems to be what you're looking for here. There are a few sexual dynamics built here, but the ones most heavily focused on are for plates and ONS', which are very different. I can see where you'd think TRP "completely" misses the mark, but it can still cover all ground.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 08:29 AM
1

Even earlier, potentially. It could be a day. The fact is that women spend a lot of time thinking in between dates, and if they compartmentalize meetings as being discrete, then in their mind they are separate "dates".
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 08:16 AM
2

Yeah, you're better off catering to the girls who are into that then lying (since its an easy test for them to judge).
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 08:14 AM
3

You're assuming that these guys are all digging for gold.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 08:13 AM
10

Proof of AWALT. What's the issue?
/r/TheRedPill13/09/14 08:12 AM
1

It would've been smarter for him to not react. If she's assaulting him in a casino -- where there are cameras everywhere -- and he doesn't react, he can get her with assault.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 05:02 PM
0

There's an interesting conspiracy going around. NFL had no policy on domestic abuse prior to the earlier, outside-the-elevator video. So they release the "aftermath" video, suspend for 2 games, initiate a policy. They keep the elevator video under wraps, and wait until after their policy is implemented to leak it. Once they leak that elevator video and it goes public, they can release him under the new policy.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 04:57 PM
44

Think about how many guys she probably fucked while on your "break"... Got her AF and is ready to snuggle back with some BB. Still wanna be with her?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 04:49 AM
9

Because theoretically "I didn't know what I was doing; I was drunk" can apply to both, but nobody accepts that argument for driving... So it's silly to accept it for cheating.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 04:32 AM
1

Didn't know that -- thanks for clarifying. Only saw the video. From what I saw, he could've easily built a self-defense case...
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 04:22 AM
1

The charges are going to come, I'd like to be ready for it and not build a case against myself by going to anger management/public apology, etc. Admitting guilt.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 10:08 PM
1

I'm sure it wasn't entirely his decision, but -- what a moron.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 10:02 PM
2

Seems like hitting them (especially in the strength context of being a star NFL running back) is adopting their frame.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 05:48 AM
2

This will no doubt be the prosecution's main angle.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/14 05:47 AM
3

If we hated women then we wouldn't be posting on a sub that is largely geared towards giving them what they want. I think it's worth pointing out that giving them what they want is a mere side effect of our behaviour. The main goal is for us to get what we want; coincidentally this is what they want as well. This is not immoral, however; it's merely human nature, and in fact, I don't believe people ever act outside of self-interest. Literally, never.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 04:19 AM
1

Yeah, just be yourself. Where have I heard that before? In all honesty, see my comment above -- it doesn't determine who you are, but it's effect is not nil.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 03:56 AM
1

It's not going to change your lifestyle on it's own, but just as constantly hanging around BP people will have an effect on your life, so will being around BP media. Of course there is an ability to disconnect to an extent, but to dismiss it entirely is wrong.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/14 03:55 AM
4

... which is ignorant and foolish. You don't need to rely on these things, but you should acknowledge the unconscious effect they have on you.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 11:44 AM
6

I have to give it up to The Black Keys. Even if it is a joke.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 11:42 AM
1

Good Looking Loser sounds like it'd be great for you. Easy things to implement: fitness and style. Fitness advice abounds on the internet; Dappered, /r/malefashionadvice and /r/frugalmalefashion are good for style. Cruise around GLL. I haven't really gotten into the site myself, but it looks like he has awesome programs for guys who are really just starting out. As for thinking you being undiagnosed with a certain disorder; if you're not going to go to a doctor and find out, then you're just usi…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:19 AM
0

lmao
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:04 AM
1

TRP can be unclear at first, and this isn't going to be an answer you'll like, but it takes time. You need to internalize the principles, and they will make sense. Reading, studying, analyzing, questioning -- and like you suggest, experimenting. TRP is about using these principles in your frame. Find out what works, and roll with it, tweaking it at times when you need to. To focus on your specific issue, it sounds like the girls aren't too interested. You're clear to run experiments on them now,…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 05:00 AM
1

Eventually one night, I got really drunk and asked her a burning question "Am I wasting my time?" I know you were drunk, but there's nothing to expect from this. "Yeah, move on" Or, "No, I'll fuck you next time we see each other." Given her response and her revelation of Tinder matches, like /u/Misteralcala said, she's not ready to get off the CC. Doesn't sound like you have too much invested, so stop investing now (since she's given you no reason to) and see where that takes you.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:50 AM
1

She's definitely thinking about it. Good responses have been given, but an agree & amplify works well too: "So glad you said that! I didn't want to be pressured to give up my virginity" Then, while escalating, your words playfully denying that any escalation is happening, but tone and attitude clearly on the prowl: "Did you just touch my ass?" "My hand slipped... Don't get any ideas" Hard to convey proper tone through text but maybe if you delivered that last line with a wink and a little laugh.…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:42 AM
1

A note to everyone who says "I don't want to break up with her for reasons undisclosed": this puts us in a shitty situation. You're asking us if your relationship is saveable, but not giving us the option of telling you "no". You're also not giving us the full picture, and so we can't make a fair judgment, because you may be leaving out key details that could be relevant, and you just don't think they are. Often times on askTRP, guys will pose a question thinking the only answers are "yellow" or…
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:32 AM
3

This is the ideal reply. No need to next if she says anything. Only when you see red flags that she's crazy. If you hold your frame of just wanting a physical relationship, she'll either fit to it or leave. Either way, nexting is just prematurely ending future engagements.
/r/askTRP04/09/14 04:12 AM
4

I think the new LTR flair is sufficient.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/14 03:43 AM
0

How many devout people do you meet today? Depends where you live. The non-urban centers of America are flooded with zealous fools who blindly follow their religious leaders and dogmas without question. With a subjective and ambiguous moral code Atheism has no morality. It is purely disbelief in the existence of deities; no more. A result of atheism can be the reversion to nihilism, but this is not a necessary result. Many atheists follow ethical systems grounded in logic. the system encourages a…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 05:39 AM
1

so that all members of a tribe could be successfully pair-bonded This is what I was getting at when I said "enforcing monogamy". You're right in that it creates a productive society. The flip side is that if they don't, all the betas would get pissed at the AFBB and ultimately revolt against the alphas, causing the society to crumble -- again, what you were saying, just another side of the coin. I'm forever agnostic So am I. Agnosticism/Gnosticism describes knowledge of a god. Atheism/theism des…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/14 05:32 AM
12

Atheism. This is one that you have to come to on your own, but once you do you'll realize that religion is merely a cooked up tale by the upper classes to control the masses (Marx famously claimed that religion was the "opiate of the masses"). The role of religion controlling betas has been explored here before, but there's more to it then enforcing monogamy to keep otherwise sexless men happy. It will truly free you, if you're ready to go down that road.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/14 12:52 AM
0

Gentleman, first post here so please go easy. Stop caring, man. You're not doing this for encouragement, right? Give your opinion. If it's well-received, so be it -- and thanks for sharing. If not, take the criticism with a grain of salt and try to learn from it. In the end, we're all just serving history.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 05:09 PM
1

It has nothing to do with attraction. If they captured me, I'd kill myself too, instead of living my numbered days in endless torture and slavery. Even worse for women, who get all of this and are raped repeatedly. You're painting the world with too broad of a brush.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 04:57 PM
1

But if the world isn't objective (as in exists as-is, independently of your perception), how would you have any knowledge of it? The universe need not be entirely objective or subjective. It can have both objective and subjective truths that are different from one another. This is the age old "is the colour that I see as 'green' the same colour you see? What if what you call 'blue' is what I call 'green'?" idea at work. We don't disagree that we both see a colour, and we both call it "green", bu…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 08:42 PM
1

You have a really weird username for such an ignorant comment.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 08:39 PM
1

You can laugh about betas with girls, but once you try to explain to them that you're part of an online brotherhood that criticizes beta behavior, teaches and studies sexual strategy, shares stories about how women have scorned them, etc., you'll turn her off. Nobody gets TRP from the outside, it sounds weird until you're in it. Like /u/brianjamesxx said, it's like Fight Club. The reason they never talked about it is because they wanted to keep it under wraps, since they knew it'd be troublesome…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 03:38 PM
1

Not by the way she was (supposedly) acting. That being said, she could definitely have wanted to fuck but has a personal philosophy of never giving it up on the first date, no matter how bad she wants it.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/14 03:22 PM
10

It is entirely possible that she needed to catch the last train, if you're talking about rail cars and not subways. They're a pain in the ass to get refunded/rescheduled.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 10:58 PM
1

Yep. It's investment. If they can get a guy that's a lower SMV (in an LTR sense) and being passed on for LTRs by other girls, and "fix" him, then they got a great deal, and will (in their minds) be dating above their SMV.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 09:13 PM
1

though we might percieve the world differently, it doesn't change what actually is A lack of consistency actually would indicate a difference. However, for its sake, I personally do believe in objective truth. Just pointing out that it isn't quite as solid a belief at first look.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 08:57 PM
1

You can never remove yourself from the lens of subjectivity. We are all experiencing the world as subjects. This is what I'm getting at.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 05:25 PM
1

metaphysics, epistemology, ethics or aesthetics These do not comprise the entirety of philosophy. Philosophy is much, much broader than these categories. TRP describes a facet of reality, and is thus a philosophy, if not a traditional one. Besides the point, I'm saying that the essence of TRP is questioning and explanation, which is also the essence of philosophy as a whole. Questioning cultural norms, the explanation of human behaviour, and re-appropriation of behaviours for male exploitation. …
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 05:24 PM
2

... that's what I was pointing out.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/14 05:14 PM
2

Specifically, weakness to be exploited.
/r/TheRedPill26/08/14 02:30 AM
4

If you're in an LTR, it'd be like any other tragedy. The Captain/First Mate dynamic dictates that you have to help her through it. You have to be her rock, and over time the wound will heal. It wouldn't be easy, but tragedy rarely is. If she's someone you don't have a sexual relationship with but care for, then you should help her, the primary reason being that you care for them and it's the right thing to do, but also you're not in a position for sex anyways. If it's a plate, then the harsh rea…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:39 AM
69

TRP's view on drugs is similar to its view of women -- if they're controlling your life, GTFO.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:21 AM
2

The response of others to a certain group of claims does not determine whether or not it is philosophy or dogma.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:10 AM
1

Right, which would make it easier for a philosopher to accept it than other types of people. This is because philosophers are "lovers of wisdom" and as such are ultimately interested in knowing the truth. Therefore, they are less likely to hold onto beliefs for emotional reasons, and would rather accept the dark truths of life simply because they are true.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:09 AM
1

Having a philosophy degree is not the same thing with being a philosopher. True, but the line is more muddy than having a biology degree and being a scientist. Being a professional philosopher has hard boundaries (i.e., being a professor or professional philosophy writer). 'Being a philosopher' in its simplest isn't that hard, but as such doesn't carry much weight.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:06 AM
1

Philosophical questioning and explanation is what TRP is.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:03 AM
1

It's not that you are wrong, it's just that nobody should consider your claim to be true. If what you say was true (that unexplained claims are automatically wrong), then you could build deductions in the following manner: A) Most cows are able to produce milk. B) I have no evidence for this claim. C) Ergo, most cows are unable to produce milk. Really, the only conclusion someone could draw is that "We have no reason as of now to believe that most cows are able to produce milk."
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 06:02 AM
2

objective truth subjective to human consciousness So you're saying objective truth is subjective ... (to human consciousness). Therefore, truth is subjective.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 05:56 AM
2

Disagree, I a have an honours degree in Philosophy and didn't have much trouble turning red. Same goes for a few guys in my program. In fact, I think philosophical education would help people accept TRP because its logic and argumentation is solid.
/r/TheRedPill25/08/14 05:49 AM
9

Generally, shit tests are more for women to use, since men derive a woman's SMV from their appearance. Women dig deeper than that, so they shit test.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 07:50 PM
5

Nothing wrong with nofap, but from what I've read on this sub, it sounds like seddit is pretty BP. Might be best to focus on /r/trpgame
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 06:03 PM
2

Had an extremely similar #1. Fucking clueless.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 06:01 PM
6

We don't want to commit logical fallacies, do we?
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 05:53 PM
6

Existentialism is a great way to deal with huge shocks to personal philosophy. Nietzsche specifically is good to read after swallowing TRP.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:44 PM
2

I think there's a difference between selfishness and self-interest. Everyone acts out of self-interest, always. Selfishness is thinking only about yourself. There's a story about Thomas Jefferson being on a train, explaining this premise to someone. Then, he sees baby pigs drowning in a lake, demands that the train be stopped, and saves them. When he returns, his companion questions: "How was that acting in self-interest?" He replies, "If I didn't do something, they would have weighed on my cons…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:40 PM
3

You're right and you're wrong, but mostly you're right. This is because it's an issue of semantics. Kay uses alpha/beta differently then we generally do. So you're right in that those tasks are alpha when you frame them a certain way. How he uses the terms, though, they can't be re-framed. Again, it's semantics -- not saying that the tasks themselves can't be reframed, rather his language serves another purpose (to highlight a dichotomy of lifestyle acts, which can then be analyzed and used to b…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:33 PM
1

I've often thought that part of TRP is bringing an alpha mindset to those who otherwise wouldn't have had one. Surely, some are naturally inclined to a beta lifestyle, whereas others are raised as such (nature and nurture). Thus, we should have a system/plan for overcoming the beta mindset. I don't want this to sound like a concern troll, I just don't have a solution right now. I'd like to encourage others to think about this, and let's hear some suggestions. Danger and Play is a great resource,…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 03:50 PM
9

And trying to settle into a LTR with a 31yo? Hopefully, if you're in the position to be settling into an LTR, the number won't be that high.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 06:54 AM
3

LTR - Long Term Relationship AFBB - Alpha Fucks Beta Bucks
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 12:23 AM
11

Yeah, it's about having the beta qualities in the right context. Shit tests are never one of them. Money is one of them (financial stability). Et cetera.
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 04:49 PM
75

One of the major differences between LTRs and pickups/plates is the introduction of what Athol Kay calls "beta qualities". I know MMSL has taken a lot of flak from TRP community lately, but we can all agree that the book was great. AFBB is a huge part of TRP, and we see it in action all the time. However, remember that there are two sides of that coin. If you are too AF, then she'll go somewhere else to find her BB. Your alpha qualities must be tempered with "beta qualities" in order to make her…
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 03:55 PM
2

I see where you're going, but I have to agree with /u/SgtTRP -- you're in the wrong frame of reference here. I'm assuming you come from an engineering/physics background and are applying that to TRP (nothing wrong with that), but this is a philosophy, and should be treated as that, not as a model. I don't want to get down to semantics (because I think they're really over-discussed and overemphasized), but this categorization is useful when considering the meta of TRP: what TRP is, what it's goal…
/r/TheRedPill18/08/14 07:10 AM
7

Sorry to hear about your story. But as you'll see, it led you here and that's a good thing. In fact, it might be one of the best things to happen to you. Gorge on the sidebar material. Lurk for a while. Read other RP blogs. Don't just focus on game; get into self-improvement. When the bitterness subsides, you'll realize that truly is what we're about. Welcome.
/r/TheRedPill17/08/14 03:26 PM
7

You won the battle, she won the war.
/r/TheRedPill16/08/14 03:53 AM
1

Oneitis as a beta means you don't know better. Oneitis as an alpha means you deserve the divorcerape coming your way. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 08:30 PM
2

I'm very fine that she's aware I'm with someone else - that's sort of the point. That's what I was getting at. the only reason im NOT with them is cause of distance. This doesn't sound like too good of an idea to convey. Doesn't show off an abundance mentality. At the end of the day, straight up texting a girl "how're you doing?" just gives off the impression that you were laying in your bed daydreaming about her, and built up the courage to find out how she is and what she's up to. The example …
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 08:27 PM
7

Can't endorse this. There are ways of achieving this same message through subtext. For example, say you went out for a bite with her at a certain restaurant: "lol i just had lunch at X and had that bitch of a server again" This will be a jumping point to a conversation, and she might wonder about why you were there again, but without her... especially if you took her there for lunch (she'll think you took another girl there). Clearly if you texted her this, you were thinking about her. It's just…
/r/TheRedPill15/08/14 05:57 AM
1

I am talking about physical desensitization though -- DGS. There's no way to tell for sure if my case has to do with circumcision. I guess the only people who will know for sure are those who have had circumcisions later in life (which would be very rare). All I know is that I had issues reaching climax during sex, changed the way I masturbated and how frequently I did, and now feel like I have "normal" sex.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 06:43 PM
2

Yes, and it may have had something to do with that, but very little, considering I'm back to normal now.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 09:06 PM
3

Ask yourself, when I do this, who benefits? I think there's a complementary question that goes along with this: Will I be hindered/disadvantaged by this? A big BP trait is being the "Yes Man", putting people ahead of yourself, even at your own cost. For example, say a good friend of yours needs a lift to the airport: A: Hey man, I'm really stuck for a ride to the airport tomorrow. Could you help me out? B: Sure man, I'm supposed to work, but I'll call in sick. A: Thanks! With a more assertive mi…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:32 PM
2

It's relative to the individual, but I don't think 0 is ideal. There's a time for masturbation; it can be quite therapeutic at times.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:16 PM
2

He didn't like blowjobs Me neither, because they wouldn't even "come close" (har har). They were stimulating, definitely, but for the most part it was awkward because the girl would get so into them and I would have to act like I loved it. Meanwhile, they'd never be able to finish me off. Would've made some nights a lot more satisfying and less frustrating if I'd be able to finish from a quickie.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:10 PM
1

You can still be DGS-free and fuck a girl long and hard.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:07 PM
1

The first time I did, I went "Ohh.... That's what life is about...." Whoever thought you could reinvent the orgasm? So true. I've never met a woman who didnt appreciate my DGS though. If you don't care, then I guess that's one thing. I'm more concerned with myself in bed, and sex is even more satisfying now that I can truly appreciate pussy.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:07 PM
2

I don't think he's advocating jerking off constantly, just not pedestalizing it.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:09 AM
2

Surely there are significant discoveries that could have been made earlier, and yet science has progressed in spite of it. Also, there are millions of future significant discoveries yet to be made, until which we will always be approaching them. Your understanding of science is like a video game where there are checkpoints to be crossed in order to move forward. This is not the case with truth/knowledge/"science". Scientific truths (or any truths for that matter) can be discovered without knowin…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 04:04 AM
3

Her supposed lack of contribution towards the benefits of humanity is due to her field, not her gender. Thought you'd understand, but sorry for assuming. I also assumed you'd agree that Nobel laureates can be said to have done "[something] of note with [their] abilities", yet nobody would say that Physics or Literature laureates have "done anything to benefit the common human being", at least in the narrow, objective view that you understand "benefits" to be.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 03:56 AM
41

I'm not going to advocate nofap or any shit like that because 0 is just as bad as 100. Even worse is dipping into the spank bank. I used to jack off to my old conquests and it kept me stuck in the past. I was so satisfied with what I had done that I stopped focusing on what I wanted to do. If anyone needs more convincing, the porn novelty treadmill eventually causes erectile dysfunction in a lot of young guys who can still jerk off but not get hard when they're with a girl - /u/2comment How you …
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 03:48 AM
6

Can you tell me how anyone who wins the Nobel Prize in Physics accomplishes anything that will significantly benefit humanity as a whole? Same goes for the NP in Literature. Her supposed lack of contribution towards the benefits of humanity (which I'm not arguing is the case, since the advancement of knowledge will always benefit humanity, and the greater the advancement the greater the achievement) is due to her field, not her gender.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 02:57 AM
0

Collectively it's in my best interest This is conflicting: it's either in the collective interest, OR your interest. Sometimes they coincide, but (as the word begs) that's coincidental. So the fragment needs to either be "It's in my best interest" or "Collectively it's in humanity's best interest". why should I give a shit when i'm dead? Nobody is saying you are. When you die, you're no longer a moral agent. If you mean to say "why should I give a shit [about the well-being of the human race] wh…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 04:40 PM
2

That's just a moral philosophy. This doesn't mean that "morality is universal". Morality is relative. Without humans (or any being with agency) actions cannot be considered in a moral stance, therefore morality is not universal (since it's not absolute). Morality differs with perspective -- culture, time, place, etc.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 04:33 PM
0

Moral philosophy is based on logic. You're logical, right?
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 05:08 AM
6

Actually, your objections are more in line with deontology, which examines intent rather than consequence. According to utilitarianism (and other forms of the broader philosophy of consequentialism), an act is considered moral if it maximizes utility, regardless of any reasons of why it was committed. If /u/n0c0ntr0l is only interested in making life better for him, but consequently makes life better for everyone on earth, then under utilitarianism he is considered a supremely moral being. Howev…
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 05:03 AM
2

Your definition of morality being what?
/r/TheRedPill06/08/14 04:51 AM
1

100% agreed. If there's one thing people waste the most of in life, it's time. (Compound to that the ignorant fantasy-belief of life after death, and it's even worse). It's just that I don't care too much if I don't get my dick wet for four months. I have a ton of other things I enjoy doing, even enjoy doing more. I don't want to raze what I've built with my partner/first mate for that. If my bandmate were to go on a four month vacation, and I abstained from playing music with anyone else, that …
/r/askTRP01/08/14 09:37 PM
2

That would be the case if it wasn't just four months. I want to be in this relationship. It's going very well so far. To break it off because of what could happen over the next four months isn't the best solution. I'd rather wait and see what happens. Worst case scenario, she cheats on me, I break it off, and lost four months of chasing tail... No big deal.
/r/askTRP01/08/14 08:31 PM
1

Thanks for the advice. Soft dread is going all the time -- usually unintentionally. As others have noted in this thread, bringing in hard dread now probably isn't a good move -- and as you're saying, everything's amplified. Other dread posts have focused on it as a "tool" and not a constant; something to be used when needed, and that overuse will ruin an LTR entirely. So I'll hold off on that; besides, I don't use it too often and don't want to come off as butthurt. The Golden Ratio is also some…
/r/askTRP01/08/14 03:04 PM
2

What is the method of this conversation? Facebook? Tinder? That's key here. Also, the text you skipped should've been made available... Don't tl;dr us, usually those responses/banterings reveal a lot of key subtext.
/r/askTRP01/08/14 04:28 AM
1

Definitely -- that's why I'm starting this thread, as preventative maintenance. No idea how she'll react, since this is completely new territory for the relationship, so I'm trying to set frame before she moves up. There is no doubt in my mind she'll receive boatloads of attention and this is all about how to deal with it from afar. I feel like a nerd because I'm excited to see how this localized experiment in red pill philosophy goes. Everything since reading TRP has been small, minute changes …
/r/askTRP01/08/14 02:46 AM
2

So funny how being on the inside can cloud things up, eh? Thanks for the help. Edit: what I mean when I say it's deceptive is that by saying "you can talk to me about anything", the subtext is that I wouldn't break up with her -- when I would. But in a literal sense, it's all honest.
/r/askTRP01/08/14 02:12 AM
2

Yeah, the possibility is definitely there and that's why I started this thread. Like I said, it's about preventative maintenance. I think that the strategy /u/AlphaAsFAQ suggested is good: realize the possibility of cheating is there, and get her to be open about it.
/r/askTRP01/08/14 01:41 AM
2

Good point. I think the "enabling" is a moot point --- either I say that it's ok to be around these guys and it happens, or I angrily condemn it and it happens... better to establish a "don't give a fuck" frame. To be honest, we haven't had the "cheating" talk, other than times when she's said "if you cheated on me, I don't think I'd leave you". At which point I've always laughed and jokingly said something along the lines of "good to know". But, I think she feels if I found out she cheated, I'd…
/r/askTRP01/08/14 01:38 AM
2

Yes. Thanks for pointing that out.
/r/askTRP31/07/14 11:35 PM
2

A lot of the comments here have gotten away from what you actually asked in your post, and focused on your title. To answer the question in your post: yes. There has been that person, and we were influenced to not be like him. Then, we realized that sometimes what people say and what people do/react to are not congruent, and we began acting in a way that got positive results.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/14 12:30 AM
1

The party line is that it's a difference in resources. Men want sex; women want resources. A fair trade of these results in a balanced relationship -- both parties get what they want, but nobody's being sold short or undercut. Relating it to the business world: there are two companies who sell similar products. The quality of product A is 25% greater than product B. Producer A expects to charge 25% more than Producer B, but understandably so. In a fair balance, Producer B will have more gross co…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 05:54 AM
1

Unfortunately, you can't look to fictional characters for examples of sexuality and the sexual marketplace... because it's fiction. Nobody's developing physics theories off of Star Wars.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/14 05:29 AM
3

Manipulation is not inherently immoral, but can be in extremes and when combined with other immoral acts. Don't take this as getting too far into semantics, as it's just helpful for understanding the difference between moral and immoral 'manipulation': Let's take the Aristotelian route and call 'manipulate' the extreme vice of 'convince'. Let's say that 'convincing' is the application of rhetoric, logic and argumentation to make a case, while 'manipulation' is a form of convincing that appeals t…
/r/AlreadyRed13/05/14 03:34 AM
-1

We've talked about it before: religion was created to maintain civility, and keep betas from lashing against alphas. But, because of this, religion was created by alphas for betas. Religiosity is a beta quality. When I cast off my religious beliefs, it was like taking a red pill of sorts, and was one of the best things that ever happened to me.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 06:49 PM
2

It's hard to debate that religion is used as a tool to stabilize early civilizations/societies. However, getting them to a point of organization predates organized religion. The conclusion is that there had to be some mode of rational unity amongst men.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:10 PM
11

Along these lines... if a girlfriend expresses interest in going abroad without you, should you next her? Intent is there anyway.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 03:45 PM
1

Totally misunderstood you, then.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:15 PM
1

In comparison to the rest of the population? Of course it is. If only street wear accepts graphic tees, and the rest of the world doesn't, why would you limit yourself?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:13 PM
1

Nobody's arguing that. We're saying that given two men with identical skill and effort in game, the better-dressed, taller man with a more symmetrical face will outperform. Game on its own is not everything, not even close.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:11 PM
1

A personal style icon for me as well. Others: Clooney, Bond, Bruce Wayne.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:09 PM
1

"Just be yourself!" We all know that's shitty advice, and if it worked, none of us would be here. What you do, what you wear, how you act, are all factors of attraction. Don't use the idea of 'peacocking' too generally. If you stroll into a bar wearing a shirt that says "FUCK <insert racial minority here>", you're technically 'peacocking', but it's going to have disastrous results. What you're peacocking with is still a huge factor. Side note: a Bellini is akin to a Cosmo. Do you feel the same w…
/r/seduction08/04/14 05:08 PM
2

Are you now actually arguing that having a symmetrical face or being tall makes no difference?
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 03:43 AM
1

Lots of guys who realize what style is and start to embrace it sort of backlash and go crazy, pushing the boundaries of their own style. The best thing to do is to think about some style icons of yours -- guys you want to look like -- and think to yourself "would ____ wear this?"
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 03:42 AM
-2

Who cares? What a small niche. Wear something with no logos... nobody will think less of you.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 03:38 AM
5

Part of it is, it's hard to wear clothes that fit when you are an amorphous mass of lard. Nope. Lame excuse.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 03:36 AM
4

lol, specifically that part of the post was funny. Were you really that offended / annoyed that I decided to recognize that? By the same line of reasoning: if you don't like it, downvote it.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 02:25 AM
3

"Did you want me to hold your purse so you can enjoy your drink?"
/r/seduction08/04/14 12:22 AM
51

As a bartender, I would laugh at any guy ordering a Bellini in order to "look classy". Very few things are girlier than champagne and peach purée, and champagne flutes are anything but classy in the hands of a man. If you want to start appreciating the tastes of hard liquors, start ordering them with club soda or plain water, then slowly decrease the amount of dilution. Then, order on the rocks, and eventually you'll be able to drink them neat (no ice). "I'll take a rye, neat" is A LOT better th…
/r/seduction07/04/14 04:40 PM
20

Do you have a fluffy, feel-good, self-help motivational piece? 'Be the man you want to be' and other platitudes? /r/seduction hahahahahaha
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:33 PM
1

In other words, crazies. Yeah, there's definitely a fine line between a "girl with options" and one who has OCD oneitis for you.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 06:34 PM
4

There's a Captain/First-Mate theme going on, but also a "strong, confident, independent woman" thing in there. I like the woman who will dedicate herself to your cause... a "woman with options" isn't attractive, while it is from the other side.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 06:27 PM
1

Only watched the first 2 minutes, but she gave off a really strong Louis C.K. vibe. Ripping it off. Central to Louis C.K.'s humour is how he identifies with being male, and the goings-on of a male life, which explains why this was so unfunny.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 05:46 PM
4

Minor behavioural changes in response to changes in environment and cultural attitudes weren't considered either. And you're right, it's a platitude... not a scientific reflection of the truth. Relax.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 02:49 AM
1

As it does. Like he says in the post, he belongs to the Masons, and that's his 'honor group'. Reading the whole series, while lengthy, will explain the decline of honor in the Western world, why it needs to be revived, and how.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 02:47 AM
8

Men of the West, we are Rome. And we're every civilization that's risen and fallen before us, and are the precedent for future societies that will rise and fall. Societal collapse is the norm more than the exception. The world will not stay dominated by liberal capitalism forever. But, the cyclical nature of history can also be reassuring, because the good times happen again, too. You just have to be lucky enough to be born in that generation.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 06:11 PM
3

He's talking about human behaviour. Of course things change. The quote is just carries a lot less weight if he phrased it "Nothing. Ever. Changes in the realm of human behaviour."
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 06:02 PM
7

Nihil novi sub sole.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 06:00 PM
1

Yeah, this seems like the lesser of two evils. Get rid of the demanding hoe, and save some money (although you'll lose half of what you own).
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:37 AM
5

Of course we're fallible. Not disagreeing with that. I just don't think you have to be in an "extreme outlier group" to behave unpredictably / against the norm.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:31 AM
1

Actually, lots of comedy is. The best stand-up comedy turns the mirror of reality towards us. "HAHAHAHA so true!" responses to comedians are the case in point.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:24 AM
2

Had a lot of good points, and I respected her. Then I watched her anti-statist video.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 01:18 AM
5

Those were absolutely hilarious, but would you do something like that? The people here should have their head square on their shoulders. If someone asked me if I knew who this chump was, I'd be glad to say "I have no idea." Sheep wanna be in the know, and are embarrassed when they aren't. One of the benefits of "unplugging" is that we're better than that. THUS, I disagree with your use of the second-person narrative.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 12:14 AM
3

Importantly, though, is this damned-if-you-do, damned-if-you-don't dilemma regarding frame. If he gives in and agrees to children, that's a massive frame to let fall. However, he's looking at divorce if he maintains his frame. What to do here?
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 03:58 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter