Okay so, in the Agent Orange thread, one feminist named sheeperdr informed me that what we are objecting to is not genocidal hate speech at all; it's simply female sovereignty, which we - being men - naturally interpret as genocidal hate speech because we men are so keen on genocide.

Let's put this theory of hers to the test, shall we? The following is a sample of the material in question. I include only the quotes. All this can be found in the Agent Orange files.

When reading through, think to yourself: is this indicative of female sovereignty? Or of genocidal levels of hate?

"I'll take any revolution I can get. Any revolution that removes most of the males will do just fine."

"Actually, they [men] should be put on a leash, put in a cage, or put to sleep, just like they do to any animal which causes them any problem."

"Actually, now that I think about it, a better source of animal glue (and leather, for that matter) would be from the bodies of men ... They should be put to death, skinned, and then their carcasses can be boiled for glue."

"....kill off all the alpha-males, all the aggressive males, and retrain the remaining more compliant males."

That is only a small sample of what can be found in the files.

Now, according to the feminist sheeperdr, this is nothing more harmful than female sovereignty; women seeking their liberation and autonomy from patriarchal rule!

Buuuut ... if that is true ... then wouldn't men have every reason to oppose feminism, since their very lives, seemingly, would depend on its failure?

Thanks for endorsing our opposition to feminism, sheeperdr!

But, on a serious note: I do not believe 'all feminists are like that.'

Still, it's rather shocking how those who are supposedly 'not like that' can take a look at those quotes, look at our objections, and then tell us that the only reason we object to them is because WE hate women!