Wife demands $100M in divorce trial - she doesn't want to live on the $38 million her estranged husband has offered her, she has no income but expenses of more than $53,000 a week.

rmosler · 2009-04-01T18:32:20+00:00

More than that... the 38 million is what she agreed to in a prenup. So she already agreed to it but now it is not enough.

2009-04-02T02:12:32+00:00

Even better, SHE had an affair! ANd now she's saying that she can't live on fifty fucking three thousand fucking dollars a WEEK?!

FUCK this greedy bitch.

justpickaname · 2009-04-01T19:26:58+00:00

Even with 53k a week, that's 19 years of high living. If you marry a rich guy, then leave, do you deserve to live like him your whole life, or isn't 19 years enough?

I understand somewhat if they'd married each other poor, and she put him through school, etc, but that's not the case.

pemboa · 2009-04-01T22:50:55+00:00

I always think to myself, that if this ever happens to me and the judge rules that I have to give her that much money, I think I would rather donate all the money i have to some charity and go homeless.

zoomzoom83 · 2009-04-02T00:27:27+00:00

Explain to me why the male is supposed to support the female after a divorce?

coldsteelrail · 2009-04-01T19:14:58+00:00

I hope the judge says you madam are a gold digger and to set an example for all you diggers out there you shall get nothing!

dskoziol · 2009-04-01T19:11:36+00:00

So she wants the judge to throw out the postnup and give her more than what was on it? I wonder if the judge can agree to throwing it out and then give her nothing.

b34nz · 2009-04-02T01:30:22+00:00

Apparently she needs a job. The world always needs ditch diggers.

Purnell · 2009-04-02T17:40:45+00:00

Does she realize that a hitman can be hired for under 10K?

Kuonji · 2009-04-01T17:54:49+00:00

Woah. $100 million plus $130k a month in alimony? Nice.

2009-04-02T02:48:10+00:00

All the people who voted yes on California Proposition 8 should now go to Connecticut and protest to prevent these two from being allowed a divorce.

georedd · 2009-04-01T19:07:51+00:00

ok so don't hate me but..

It occurred to me that it is ridiculous that she wants that much becuase she (or the law) believes her contribution to his earnings through support or whatever could be worth that much.

However I then realized it is just as rediculous that anything he could contribute to his businesses is worth that much either. So her argument is just as good as his perhaps.

The only exceptions are unless he is an inventor who personally invented things he licenses or a celebrity who personally entertains and draw that much box office.

How can "his management style" be worht that much? or his inheritance claim? or really anything.

SO if you believe in his right to over earn that much then you almost have to believe in her claim too.

Like I said I am not sure I like my conclusion but it is a valid comment.

Comments