TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

You're not helping, Obama – just reinforcing myths about men v women

InitiatePenguin

December 21, 2019
26 upvotes
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/dec/21/barack-obama-women-better-than-men-myths-leaders
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title You're not helping, Obama – just reinforcing myths about men v women
Author

InitiatePenguin

Upvotes 26
Comments 21
Date December 21, 2019 10:27 PM UTC
(6 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/comments/edwc87/youre_not_helping_obama_just_reinforcing_myths/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/youre-not-helping-obama-just-reinforcing-myths.1064267
https://theredarchive.com/post/1064267
Top posts by InitiatePenguin

Menslib Charity Drive for Ukraine

52 upvotes
March 15, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

No, Elizabeth Warren – taking Super Pac money is not girl power

26 upvotes
March 1, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

New Evidence Supports Credibility of Tara Reade’s Allegation Against Biden

24 upvotes
April 24, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Menslib Charity Drive for Ukraine

23 upvotes
March 15, 2022
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Gender Bias in Job Referrals: An Experimental Test

17 upvotes
October 4, 2019
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

The Depressing Future of the #MeToo Movement

10 upvotes
May 9, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Liz Plank AMA in MensLib is up.

5 upvotes
September 18, 2019
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

A former neighbor of Joe Biden's accuser Tara Reade has come forward to corroborate her sexual-assault account, saying Reade discussed the allegations in detail in the mid-1990s

4 upvotes
April 27, 2020
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates

Comments

[–]ohheyhi99 8 points9 points10 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

A good position, but it’s disappointing that the author conveniently ignores how many mainstream feminists happily push the “women are inherently better” narrative just as hard as the gender traditionalists.

[–]ParanoidAgnostic 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She still pushes the idea that women are better people. It's just that she asserts women are socialised to be better people rather than innately being better people.

[–]ElderApe 6 points7 points8 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

While I don't really disagree with article, it was a stupid thing to say, I can't take anybody who says there isn't innate difference between men and women seriously.

[–][deleted] 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

At least she is consistent with this one. Even though, knowing this journalist, I think she enjoys shitting on Obama for doing feminism wrong.

[–]azazelcrowley 5 points6 points7 points 6 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Women aren't socialized into being sociable and so on, that's the usual nonsense feminist lens that assumes the world revolves around women and them being oppressed. The studies show the opposite; that boys are socialized *out of* these behaviors.

​

Parents enforce gender roles on boys while largely leaving girls be.

https://www.psypost.org/2019/04/parents-more-uncomfortable-with-gender-nonconforming-behaviors-in-boys-study-finds-53540

This is especially true in terms of socialization and emotional upbringing.

This is an important distinction, because if we take the feminist conception of the issue then we end up perpetuating the problem of assuming focusing on womens wellbeing and so on is going to fix things.

​

It's like you have two population sets; One is beaten when they try and read and the other isn't. The one that can read convinces themselves that the reason for the differrence is a conspiracy to make them do all the reading and they are somehow the victims. So they focus on trying to normalize the idea that they shouldn't *have* to read if they don't want to. Some take up this opportunity, but not all because reading is obviously desirable. Hence the difference closes, but not entirely. So they just repeat it again but more targetted; We should no longer have to use our reading skills or knowledge gained by it to help the other group. This again doesn't close the gap. So another solution is adopted; and on and on it goes. Because of the refusal to accept the situation doesn't revolve around them and how they are treated unfairly, the situation is unfixable.

​

So while the writer calls out Obama for peddling unhelpful bullshit, she engages in it herself.

[–]HeForeverBleeds 4 points5 points6 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It seems to basically be saying "women aren't better than men because of biology. They're better than men because they're raised to serve others and they're held to higher standards.". I think yes to the first sentence, and no to the second. Women are not better than men because of biology. Women are also not better than men because they're held to higher standards

Women are not better than men, period. When women do have power, they also sometimes abuse it like men sometimes do (e.g. mothers abusing their children, female teachers raping their students, women abusing their partners then playing the victim to avoid being prosecuted, etc.)

Women are also not held to higher standards in general. If anything men are, hence why they're judged / punished more harshly for bad behavior. The idea that women are indisputably better doesn't come from either biological fact nor how women are socialized. It comes from a complete ignorance or denial of the fact that women are already just as bad as men are, even with the amount of power they currently have

[–]insane_gravy 7 points8 points9 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Obama just wants to keep attention away from the fact that he lost a thousand congressional seats to a party full of Charles Dickens villains and gave them the keys to a surveillance state.

[–]LacklustreFriend 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

One has to ask, if women are better leaders than men, than historically more leaders were men than women? And why is it still the case today?

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Sounds like a galaxy brain way of trying to assert that men are better leaders because historically more leaders were men than women and still is the case today.

[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

To be fair, it's a logical hole that actual female supremacists fall into.

In some ways the patriarchy was invented as a way to explain men historically doing more than women. But they've looked over an equally valid explanation in coming up with this: that before the advent of modern medicine, women essentially had to be "baby making machines" for a solid 20 years of their lives. If all you're doing is nursing and having children, you can't really run a country, or discover or invent something important.

Sure this necessitated certain gender roles that at one point might have approximated something similar to a patriarchy. But the idea that men were on purpose oppressing women, or that there is even anything similar to a patriarchy in existence today, is frankly laughable, and shouldn't be taken seriously.

The idea that women let men oppress them though, that women somehow "lost" this "war" between men and women, would logically lead to the conclusion that men are superior to women. And it's actually feminist logic that leads us to this conclusion.

The role of modern medicine in liberating both women and men from historical gender roles is hugely unappreciated, and leads to these kinds of logical inconsistencies.

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I'm not here to discuss patriarchy.

Your comment also slides from talking about "actual female supremicists" to "feminist logic"

To be fair, it's a logical hole that actual female supremacists fall into.

..

would logically lead to the conclusion that men are superior to women. And it's actually feminist logic that leads us to this conclusion.

And you insistence to raise that point only mirrors what I was saying in the next comment;

your saying "checkmate female supremicists, logic indicates men are superior".

And indicates it is an absolutely fair way to interpret his comment.

[–]LacklustreFriend 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's a genuine question. If we assume men and women are equally capable, then we can still explain the prevalence of male leaders by socialization. If you're asserting that women are inherently better leaders like Obama is, then you have to ask why a sex or gender that is inherently better at a certain role would not naturally fulfill the majority of that role.

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

If you're asserting that women are inherently better leaders like Obama is

I'm not.

But your comment without mentioning your belief that socialization plays a key role - not innate characteristics - makes it read as "if you look at history, men have been leaders, not women, and still is the case, ergo, men are better".

I understand you're trying to indicate faulty logic, but it'd be far better just to say what you mean, because there are men who say exactly what you have said, and believe it. Which I am describing as Galaxy logic, the sort of comment that has a guy tapping his forehead in a check-mate of "rationality".

One does not have to ask the question you pose. And the suggestion that one should indicates that the only logical conclusion (that men have been historical leaders because they superior) is the right one.

TLDR; your saying "checkmate female supremicists, logic indicates men are superior".

[–]LacklustreFriend 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

You're reading way too much into it

If you're asserting that women are inherently better leaders like Obama is

I'm not.

I didn't mean you specifically, I was using a general "you", probably could have phrased it better.

TLDR; your saying "checkmate female supremacists, logic indicates men are superior".

I'm not saying that. You're saying I'm saying that.

All I'm saying if you (general) are going to assert that women are inherently better leaders, then you need an explanation why a group of people who were inherently better at a role did not occupy that role, which Obama has not provided. That's literally all I'm saying. You accuse me of trying to get a "checkmate", by you're trying to do a "gotcha" of sexism.

[–]InitiatePenguin[S] 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

All I'm saying if you (general) are going to assert that women are inherently better leaders, then you need an explanation why a group of people who were inherently better at a role did not occupy that role, which Obama has not provided.

I understand you're trying to indicate faulty logic, but it'd be far better just to say what you mean, because there are men who say exactly what you have said, and believe it

[–]LacklustreFriend 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

K

[–]J-Unleashed 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Obama got a lot of passes when he was in office. Nice to see people finally calling him out as yet another full of shit politician. To be fair, though, he was an incredible public speaker. However, he has shown to be yet another corrupt shill who is as traditional as the cuckservatives he criticized.

Easily one of the worst Presidents, in my opinion. Campaigned on change, hope, and progress and failed to deliver jackshit in his promises.

[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate 3 points4 points5 points 6 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

He was just another Bush, if a tad bit more liberal. Same thing would have been true for Hillary. Hillary I actually pegged as being right of middle. Still better than Trump but definitely part of the establishment.

[–]J-Unleashed 0 points1 point2 points 6 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Obama is better than Trump? I disagree. Obama was a terrible President, and in my opinion, the worst we've ever had.

[–]Oncefa2left-wing male advocate 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Technically I said Hillary would have been better than Trump. Although when talking about Trump, the bar is pretty low regardless of who you're comparing him against.

[–]J-Unleashed 1 point2 points3 points 6 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hillary would have been better than Trump? I disagree. She was a terrible Secretary of State, so I have a tough time believing she would have been better than Trump as President.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter