TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Bob Dylan accused of “historical sexual abuse” by psychic who claims in a book that she’s hung out with angels and aliens

zhh2

August 27, 2021
128 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://www.zeusnewsnow.com/bob-dylan-breaking-news/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Bob Dylan accused of “historical sexual abuse” by psychic who claims in a book that she’s hung out with angels and aliens
Author

zhh2

Upvotes 128
Comments 30
Date August 27, 2021 12:31 AM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pcc9zo/bob_dylan_accused_of_historical_sexual_abuse_by/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/bob-dylan-accused-of-historical-sexual-abuse-by.1065532
https://theredarchive.com/post/1065532

Comments

[–]Playful-Reporter6577 65 points66 points67 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Remember, #BelieveAllWomen.

We're fucking doomed as a species and a society. The lunatics now run the asylum.

[–]MrProficient 23 points24 points25 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Believe all women unless it's Tara Reade. Then that bitch is lying. Amirite?

/s

[–]mikesteane 10 points11 points12 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

And Paula Jones

[–]TheLostTinkerer 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

No, you got it wrong. Unless the man involved is more woke than a woman

Tara reade was censored not because she was tara reade, but because the opposite guy was ........ [Redacted]

[–][deleted] 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is one of those titles where you never know what’s going to come next.

[–]tenchineuro 8 points9 points10 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

  • WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Bob Dylan will undeniably spare no expense to protect his legacy from sex abuse-accuser Joan Carra and two publicity-hungry lawyers, and he will do it with decency and common sense. We know who Dylan is. But who are the other characters? ZEUS NEWS is the first to bring you the identity and history of the accuser of legendary singer/songwriter/artist/Nobel Laureate Bob Dylan, and it’s Greenwich Connecticut based PSYCHIC MEDIUM JOAN CARRA

Interesting, they name his accuser.

  • The lawsuit, filed by Gleason and Isaacs about three hours before the expiry date that would prohibit raising the complaint, was to allow Dylan’s legal representatives to comply with their demand for compensation for Carra’s alleged continuing to suffer from “emotional and physical injury including […] severe mental distress, anguish, humiliation, and embarrassment, as well as economic losses”. Gleason and Isaacs appear to request monetary reimbursement for Carra’s medical care and and attention whilst engaged in the effort to “cure herself of her injuries”.

OK, she's after money.

  • Along with compensatory, punitive, and exemplary damages that would be awarded due to Dylan’s alleged “malicious, fraudulent, oppressive, and evil motives” the lawsuit appears to demand further compensation for a catalogue of alleged crimes including “grooming”, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional stress, unspecified “predatory, sexual, and unlawful” acts, sexual molestation, sexual abuse, battery, contact that was harmful and caused offence, and providing drugs and alcohol to a minor.

She wants a lot of money.

Wait, rape is a criminal matter, compensation is a civil matter. She must have filed a civil complaint or they could not have named her. I don't see how this could succeed, but this is 2021 and who knows.

[–]darkbluexanadu 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Im guessing its the burden of proof standard which is much lower.

[–]pappo4ever 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I don't see how this could succeed,

It's in all the news. It already succeeded. And Dylan already lost.

[–]IJustWokeUpInaRiver 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

uh was that anita brown case of that afro american dude that was accused of rape by her and then some time after joe biden hired her for being a "raped black woman"?

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 11 points12 points13 points 4 years ago (10 children) | Copy Link

She's a professional psychic. This is just a job. It doesn't mean she's crazy or a liar. But it also doesn't mean Dylan is guilty. That I will leave up to a judge and jury.

Bringing suite nearly 60 years later is crazy. There should be a lenient statuate of limitations like other crimes.

[–]mikesteane 27 points28 points29 points 4 years ago (6 children) | Copy Link

It doesn't mean she's crazy or a liar.

It means she is one or the other.

[–]dumwitxh 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I put my bet on both

[–]OldEgalitarianMRA 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

It's the people who pay her that are crazy. She's sharp as scissors.

[–]mikesteane 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Liar then.

[–]rustjelqing2 -4 points-3 points-2 points 4 years ago* (2 children) | Copy Link

Not that it applies here, but in certain cases it is possible to be untruthful without being crazy or a liar. You may simply be wrong and untruthful as a result.

For example if a woman says she was raped at a party and she is presented with "we know it had to have been one of these two, who were seen in the hall passing your room" (which it is not) and she feels that she recalls one, then she is simply wrong. Not lying. Not crazy. Happens all the time.

[–]HPUnicorn 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

What is that woman claims to be a psychic and KNOWS which one it was because she is psychic.

[–]rustjelqing2 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Well that additional piece of information suggests untruthful and crazy.

[–]Greg_W_Allan 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

She's a professional psychic. This is just a job. It doesn't mean she's crazy or a liar.

Crazy or a fraud artist? You be the judge. It's either one or the other.

[–]tenchineuro 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

There should be a lenient statuate of limitations like other crimes.

In CA the SOL for rape used to be 20 years. The SOL was removed just recently by, who was it, Grey Davis? This happened after some event, possibly the Bill Cosby rape trial.

[–]Waldhorn 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

believe all dead women

[–]MrProficient 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

I mean, first glance I think, okay this lady is crazy and making it up. Then again I said the same about Bill Cosby. The issue with historical argument is that, there is no proof. How can you claim something without a shred of evidence.

Something to consider. In science, the lowest form of evidence is 1st hand account I.e. I saw it, this is a thing. Yet in court, it can be one or the highest forms of evidence. You saw this crime or experienced it. If you take an objective perspective that you need more evidence than just someone's word, you are accused of not caring about xyz.

I wonder what happened to the mindset of innocent until proven guilty.

[–]tenchineuro 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

How can you claim something without a shred of evidence.

No evidence is needed to put a man in prison for rape. The woman's unsupported word is sufficient.

[–]biff64gc 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Jury of peers kind of ruins things. Yes, it's good to have our peers decide our fate instead of authority figures and can even give some leniency with crimes of passion or desperation, but it also means innocent people getting punished with insufficient evidence.

[–]czerdec 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then again I said the same about Bill Cosby.

Did he ever get a fair trial? Yes or no.

If you have certainty about his guilt or innocence, where did that come from?

[–]pappo4ever 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Then again I said the same about Bill Cosby.

And he is also innocent.

[–]kiaeej 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I spent time with cthulu and mr slave! I accuse you of (insert random bullshit), now believe me!

[–]CobraPL 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hmm, seems legit.

[+]EnvironmentalWar4627 -6 points-5 points-4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Don't really know the details. But surely someone that believes in aliens can't possibly have been sexually abused.

[–]mikesteane 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

If she does actually believe it; that could all be made up as well.

[–]Flamizardous 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

By someone who was not on the same continent during the alleged assaullt? No.

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter