** Recently I’ve learned quite a bit about the Machiavellian tactics corporations use against people and...I was horrified. "Doubt is our product" is just the tip of the iceberg.

Between the soft victim blaming, the lobbying against scientific research being transparent about their product, the rhetorical manipulation (“part of a balanced breakfast!”), the gaslighting, the corporation refusing anyone to actually pin down the nature of the product...doing literally anything to maximize profit under false pretenses of actually being pro-consumer when they’re being, simply, greedy fucks. They're disingenuous and manipulative, but somehow keep people on the hook.

It was the same exact manipulative shit I notice men use against women to maximize access to women and male supremacy and terrified me a bit. Yes, I expect corporations to act like that. Now, men...Pickmes...etc...that's different. Because, well, you don't expect people to act like manipulative and pressuring bullies, as if you're public property, but...here we are. And they basically encourage women to date any man, especially losers, even if she doesn't really like him, because to them, that is beneficial for a man. Anything that gets in the way is an error to be destroyed. It's kind of insane bc many men can't compute that it's bad and traumatizing for a woman to be in a bad relationship and seem to want to pimp off women to all the losers in the world, no matter how much she's abused or neglected.

So, I wrote a silly story about this. Yeah, it's not quite the same as real life, but pay attention nonetheless.

Imagine the corporation – let’s call it Cockcorp - is “male greed/patriarchy”.

The “product” is a analog for “boyfriend/husband”--we’ll call it Wonderscrote™.

Wonderscrote is marketed as necessary for women—or else, they won’t be complete...said to be a miracle “cure” to feminine loneliness, depression, anxiety, hysteria, and insecurity.

Cockcorp executives know from trials that some Wonderscrotes are safe (abet usually have a placebo effect instead of an actual positive effect), but others just...aren’t. The manufacturing methods lead to certain potentially dangerous differences in many of the final products that are highly costly to detect and fix, therefore, something buried.

Many levels of this corporation are aware of some signs a Wonderscrote is dangerous...but, they keep it a secret and don’t see the point in warning the consumer or educating them because it might decrease sales or make millions of the defective, toxic Wonderscrotes end up in landfills, argued by theorists to be something horrible for society/the environment--that women have a responsibility to care for one.

The corporation lobbies to deplatform women, websites, scientists, and other groups standardizing how to perceive Wonderscrotes or their issues—labeling them as “anti-progress” and against free will and the "Greater Good."

Cockcorp refuses to look at ways of improving the product, or what’s even causing these impurities, or wondering why some impurities seem to be comorbid, occuring together in weirdly specific patterns.

Their ads and sales from marketing pitches subtly neg women more and more, while the salespeople sow vulnerability and confusion in individual women. Women’s insecurity is ripe for the harvest.

And not just them--much of the public shares their religious fervor for the Wonderscrote. They basically do much of the dirty work for the corporation...they’re the friends, family coworkers of the targeted consumers.

“Well, the last Wonderscrote you got must have just been damaged in transit! That’s why it hurt you!” a friend tells a woman whose Wonderscrote made her deathly ill. “Wonderscrotes are amazing. Don’t let those shrill nonbelievers tell you different!” Alternatively, the people that swarm in when a woman talks about how her Wonderscrote damaged her health somehow.

“Not all Wonderscrotes! You just chose wrong or did something wrong! I bet you don’t know the first thing about taking care of your Wonderscrote.” “You CHOSE that one because you liked it! You knew EXACTLY what it’d do to you!”

Damning, nightmarish anecdotes of Wonderscrotes causing women harm pour in.

Death and Disability May Be A Side Effect Of This Product. Cockcorp chills and drinks tea.

They pay off scientists to blunt the 1000s of research papers coming out about the nature of the product; even when it’s negative, there’s always a perpetual “well, see us next time because nothing conclusive is here! Next!” Consumers are lead to believe that, well, nothing really was settled, why not just continue? They make up stories about the female victims of Wonderscrotes about them being degenerates living a risky life and basically "asking for it."

Whenever an honest debate springs up...no "conclusion" about what women should do is ever made.

Then...it goes on and on…until, the public is saying very creepy things—like, how defective Wonderscrotes have character and are actually MORE trustworthy. Or so that’s what Cockcorp is pushing—instead of the seemingly ok models being normalized, it’s now the questionable models being normalized...”they’re just more authentic and realistic.” The lines between a dangerous Scrote and an actual safe one is blurred while...subtly, women are encouraged to buy the more dangerous ones thinking they’re nicer.

The final evolution of the Wonderscrote is that of feminine empowerment.

It runs campaigns. To adopt progressiveness for material gain is “Recuperation.”

The women that really question the nature of the Wonderscrote are considered bitter, weak, and envious; they’re labeled as being too unattractive “poor” to afford one. They’re labeled as being against female equality, and actively shamed by the masses because, well. They make women look bad. In reality some have plenty of money, yet still find issues with the Scrotes. Without fail they are censored.

Cockcorp lowers the guillotine. “We’ve found evidence that it isn’t our product causing the issues. It’s something completely unrelated. We’re not accountable…you’re to blame. See our pamphlet of 10000 ways to not make your Wonderscrote hurt you! We made it because we deeply love our precious victims consumers and just want the best for you! T A K E I T"

You, woman, are but an unfeeling, soulless husk...if you don't adopt a Wonderscrote, and remake yourself to serve his image.

~~~

Now, let's step back. This is the summit of these issues—male consumption being optimized and, in any way possible, tearing down women feeling confident in having standards and boundaries of any kind until everything just kind of muddies together in a Stockholm-y puddle where...the barest bit of validation is enough.

The point isn’t “man iz object” (also thank god at least some of the worst things are in fact “standardized” as being issues), more that some creepy incel shit is being normalized in society or else women are unfairly framed as shallow, judgmental, and “asking” to be abused.

However, women ARE framed as an actual communistic resource by men--and it fuckin' shows.

See. A lot of people like fun, chemistry-full, adventurous (like, actually going places) relationships. But, instead of looking for signs that a relationship is this and can a valid in the long-run, it seems like a lot of people are just pushing women to...try making anything work with a guy, unless he doe something comically horrible.

The “Cockcorp” of real life functions by attacking the standardization of everyday markers of male goodness or badness--they're anti-action/effort. Anti-choice.

Case in point: it's usually the passive, insecure guy that isn’t actually actively kind that’s being sold as the "nice guy". Not, y'know, the confident, emotionally intelligent guy that experiences joy at making others happy and doesn't prioritize sex. Haven’t you noticed that a lot of guys bitching about women liking bad guys, also bitch and spew hatred about men that act like actual good men and putting in meaningful effort, and a woman apparently liking it? Victim blaming then...attacking others for...actually being good men and women loving it? Ok.

Is the niceness them wanting to fuck a hole and the gentle, tragic Shakespearean victimhood of their peepee not getting sum fuccs? Oh. Oh.

I mean, men don’t want a real discussion about how to help—they want to make themselves LOOK GOOD, in spite of their actual intentions, agenda, etc. This shit is AUTOPILOT. Yeah, many of the evilest men identify as "nice guys" almost religiously and...it's like they believe it. It's creepy as hell.

Men are often ruthlessly greedy about sex, status, ego, accessibility to others, and reward/dopamine--weaponizing whatever they can get their hands on for these ends, infringing on other people's lives, needs, and boundaries...while making sure everyone is brainwashed by their optics. "How about we start a witch hunt for each and every woman that finds it romantic to be paid for on a date?" Women are framed as the Villain, in thus, oppression breeds.

Hell. There's several layers to this including being "anti-individualism". You could say multiple times that you have a fatal allergy to peanuts and he would get you a peanut stir fry. There's always some asshole calling you entitled if you were to get frustrated. Men love calling women who REQUIRE to be treated like an individual entitled. Sure. Not all critics, though, that’s really enough to make women doubt themselves. Why, yes, you're not allowed to be high maintenance but then the masses suddenly get it when it's too late usually and it's getting exhausting.

Yes, bullying women for wanting to not be treated literally the same as hundreds of millions of other women by her supposed "love"...is being the proponent of true love now? Because love is enough? Even though there's little sign he actually loves her as an individual? Ok.

Tl;dr: doubt and ambiguity is horrible for women, and people love making sure that’s exactly what defines and rules women’s dating lives because to actually acknowledge the reality of men being riskier to date on average is to sabotage the institution of male greed...and, moreover, destroying any meaningful measures women actually have to judge if a guy is actually a good guy. A war on meaning...and meaningful relationships. Their pursuit of hedonism traumatizes yet entraps women.

I'm perpetually terrified of men's violent rhetoric and strategies. Think about recently that post of the man saying women not being easy to sleep with causes men to become genocidal. That's nuts. And while most agree, most seem incapable of understanding of how deep this creepiness runs and poisons people, so much so it's extremely common for people to shrug off red flags or...mistake them as vulnerability to be coddled.

People go with the flow. Of course they unknowingly go along with some very, very bad men that know how to weaponize their "victimhood" in order to make other people bend to their will. Men that literally just say ANYTHING to optimally achieve their ends--like most of their rhetoric about women actually making little sense and are literally meant to derail authentic discussions as much as humanly possible. Narcissists, for example, are noted to actually play the "victim" for a reason--it's because it works. That woman you cheated on and beat? She was crazy. Drove you crazy, made you depressed. She's to blame. You're a "nice guy", everyone thinks so...but, paradoxically, she likes bad boys. She wanted this.

I suspect that men, in fact, do know women are generally good for men but openly act like being with men means baggage and lowered value. This isn't random. They know what they're doing. The only goddamned thing most of these people are "vulnerable" about is their need to consume.

Cockcorp Does Not Care

** The other one was taken down because I think I accidentally edited in a word that is instant-removed by automod. On the upside, this is way more concise than the original. I also removed the outside link just in case. 🙌