TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • Other

      • /r/AllPillDebate
      • /r/AlreadyRed
      • /r/altTRP
      • /r/AntiFeminists
      • /r/askFDS
      • /r/askMRP
      • /r/askRPC
      • /r/becomeaman
      • /r/BlackPillScience
      • /r/Chadfish
      • /r/Divorce_Men
      • /r/EverydayMisandry
      • /r/ExRedPill
      • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
      • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
      • /r/GEOTRP
      • /r/MalePsychology
      • /r/Male_Studies
      • /r/MenSupportMen
      • /r/MGTOW2
      • /r/MuslimRedPill
      • /r/newTRP
      • /r/PussyPass
      • /r/PussyPassDenied
      • /r/RedPillBooks
      • /r/RedPillParenting
      • /r/RedPillWives
      • /r/RedPillWomen
      • /r/RedPillWorkplace
      • /r/RPChristians
      • /r/ThankTRP
      • /r/TheRedPillStories
      • /r/trpGAME
      • /r/TRPOffTopic
      • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
      • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • A Voice for Men
    • Dalrock
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Heartiste
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • Return of Kings
    • The Power Moves
    • The Rational Male
    • The Spearhead
    • Other

      • Alpha Game
      • Archwinger
      • Artful Prudence
      • Black Label Logic
      • Caleb Jones
      • Captain Capitalism
      • Corporate Machiavelli
      • Days of Game
      • Deep Strength
      • Dicipres
      • Donal Graeme
      • Female Misogynist
      • Free Northerner
      • Gaming My Wife
      • Hawaiian Libertarian
      • Illimitable Men
      • In Mala Fide
      • Kill Your Inner Loser
      • KillToParty
      • Krauser PUA
      • LaidNYC
      • NO MA'AM
      • Omega Virgin Revolt
      • Pook's Mill
      • Random Xpat Rantings
      • Red Pill Theory
      • Red Pill Wifery
      • RedPillDad
      • RedPillDoctor
      • Rian Stone
      • RooshV
      • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
      • Sigma Frame
      • The Feminine Woman
      • The Futurist
      • The Masculine Principle
      • The Modern Man
      • The New Modern Man
      • The Obsidian Files
      • The Private Man
      • The Red Pill Room
      • The Red Quest
      • The Rules Revisited
      • Troy Francis
      • Wintery Knight
      • Woujo
      • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Support

having breasts does not affect the effectiveness of seatbelts.

ZS_1171

January 21, 2022
83 upvotes
/r/MensRights

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2022/01/new-cars-have-lost-their-steering-feel-heres-why-that-matters/?utm_source=pocket-newtab

Seriously! first sentence in, and its already loaded with (Radical) Feminist stupidity!

​

https://preview.redd.it/u95i63qsx3d81.png?width=767&format=png&auto=webp&s=d7c09cfea37f325261aad8879fc5ba44dad52971

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title having breasts does not affect the effectiveness of seatbelts.
Author

ZS_1171

Upvotes 83
Comments 32
Date January 21, 2022 9:17 PM UTC
(4 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/s9l7ih/having_breasts_does_not_affect_the_effectiveness/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/having-breasts-does-not-affect-the-effectiveness.1098324
https://theredarchive.com/post/1098324
Red Pill terms in post
feminist
Top posts by ZS_1171

Can women just stop kicking between the legs?

260 upvotes
October 19, 2021
/r/MensRights

When are they gonna say *HE*rshey's to celebrate masculinity?

226 upvotes
June 11, 2022
/r/AntiFeminists

"Dating for men is a chore."

75 upvotes
August 6, 2021
/r/MensRights

I wish there were more women like her...

13 upvotes
November 20, 2021
/r/MensRights

Post in r/lonely about a man being molested in their childhood. Not a single comment commenting on that fact.

12 upvotes
May 13, 2023
/r/MensRights

that's how it be... (meme)

1 upvotes
October 11, 2022
/r/MensRights

Hating men is okay now. I think this is Twitch, but i’m not sure.

1 upvotes
April 9, 2023
/r/MensRights

Free masks for Minorities, $10 for white people.

1 upvotes
November 7, 2021
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]63daddy 54 points55 points56 points 4 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

Funny how facts get twisted. Follow the link. What it shows is men have always died in auto accidents more than women, but as cars become safer and fatality rates decline, the gap therefore gets smaller. Only feminists could look at data showing men suffer more from something and twist it to insinuate discrimination against women.

Here’s the link

https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality-statistics/detail/males-and-females

[–]SodyPops17 16 points17 points18 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Next they'll be saying women die more in combat even though they make up like 15% of the collective soldiers in the entire world and like 2% of that 15% are actually in combat roles, and 0.1% of that 2% died from actual combat directly.

[–]63daddy 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yep. They made a similar argument when fewer men started dying prematurely, decreasing the death age gap slightly. Women were still outliving men, but they screamed discrimination.

[–]SodyPops17 12 points13 points14 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

... so living longer than them is discrimination now? Why does anybody take these humans seriously?

[–]63daddy 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Unfortunately they have a voice and influence.

[–]ZS_1171[S] 3 points4 points5 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

if some men don't follow road laws, thats their problem.

[–]63daddy 14 points15 points16 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Some men don’t follow laws, some women don’t follow laws. Men drive more than women, so get in more accidents. The point however: the gap between men and women dying is decreasing not because women are more at risk, the gap is lowering because increased vehicle and highway safety measures are lowering overall fatalities. Both men and women are less likely to die, it’s just numerically less significant for women because women have always represented a lower percentage of motor vehicle fatalities.

[–]Greg_W_Allan 9 points10 points11 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Men drive three times the distances of women in much larger and more complex vehicles and regularly have to drive in very harsh environments. Your thought processes are as shallow as an oil slick.

[–]SodyPops17 6 points7 points8 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

They want to be victimized by everything in the world at this point. If that was a real concern why would women be having big fake silicone bazungas put on their chests then?

Next they'll be saying cars are sexist.

[–]Embarrassed-Lemon-69 5 points6 points7 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They actually have said that before

[–]ZS_1171[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Mazda RX-8 looks quite feminine.

[–]erik-the-first 4 points5 points6 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't know what study this picture is referring to but it's feminist hogwash. Feminists come up with all kinds of studies that prove this or that but they are all bull shit.

[–]ZS_1171[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

i posted a link to the article. i can't read anything online without fems playing the victim!

[–]usku 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Ars Technica has been crap since gamer gate.

[–]c4ptnh00k 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I'm not seeing this article saying anything of the sort... it doesn't actually mention seatbelts are less effective for da boobies anywhere and the linked statistic is just that, a statistic. I'm anti-feminist anti-woke but just don't see it here. Article was poorly written imo

[–]ZS_1171[S] -1 points0 points1 point 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

They're safer than they used to be--though that is less true for women. I believe this is referencing how the seatbelts are "unfit for females"

[–]c4ptnh00k 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I take this as, being a link to a statistic that over the years it has been measured that women have more unsafe outcomes than men. This could very well be true and seems to be void of opinion. But that's just my take.

[–]TBFProgrammer 2 points3 points4 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Actual root article (PDF, from citation 2 in the iihs link)

Of particular note:

The first purpose of the analyses is to flag any safety technologies or vehicle components that have little benefit or possibly even increase harm to older occupants or women.

A second purpose is to build a narrative of how fatality and injury risk of older occupants and women, relative to young adult males, has changed over the past 50 model years. Of course, it is important to note that in absolute terms, vehicles have become much safer for everybody.

The third purpose is to identify specific injuries and injury sources that are especially prevalent among older occupants and/or females. ... those injury mechanisms might be priority candidates for additional study of potential safety improvements.

The analyses was created specifically to push for re-focusing efforts away from young men, despite young men making up the bulk of crash fatalities. It is also deliberately looking for any statistics pointing toward a preordained conclusion, known as torturing the data, which renders its findings invalid for any purpose other than constructing a hypothesis.

[–]reddituniqueuser19 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

Didn’t a man write this?

[–]ZS_1171[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Men can be feminists

[–]reddituniqueuser19 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

For sure, but by the sound of the rest of the post it doesn’t seem many people are blaming a man for the writing. Granted I don’t think this is what the author was trying to get at. I think, based on the study, he was just referring to the fact that women have biologically different (weaker in a sense) bodies and so in accidents with the same level risk, women tended to die more than men but that as the tech advanced the rate is more or less becoming the same. I don’t mean you offense, I get mens rights and support it, but I think this is specifically just looking too much into it.

[–]ZS_1171[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Hi! I agree with you, but i am still unsure what the writer originally intended. But thanks for the polite comment! Maybe i am looking into it too deeply.

Thank you!

[–]ZS_1171[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Perhaps i should've chosen a different title.

[–]TheDailyExperiencer 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

What the fuck is this buffoon of a post

[–]ZS_1171[S] 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Feminists don't belong in these here parts, mate

[–]TheDailyExperiencer 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I have a cock excuse u.

[–]ImplodedPotatoSalad 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

We dont need 5th column either

[–]Melodic-Treacle7300 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Well, men drive a lot more and generally faster than women, it makes sense that they’d die more in accidents, there are no female truck drivers or race car drivers really

[–]ZS_1171[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

there's not many, but they're out here. Danica Patrick is a former NASCAR driver.
And i've seen a few female truckers before.

[–]Melodic-Treacle7300 1 point2 points3 points 4 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I forgot about Danica 😂 but yeah. Seatbelts are less safe for shorter people (hence why kids sit in car seats) so they can be dangerous for little tiny women, but also if you’re a dude who’s 5’2 you have the same issue. I guess there are a lot more tiny women. So small people, get a seatbelt adjuster!

[–]ZS_1171[S] 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

that's a fair point. many women tend to be shorter, thankfully i'm taller than 5'2"!

[–]ThatOneCrusader1 0 points1 point2 points 4 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Me who's 6'4

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter