TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

Critics Tell Young Men that Their Penises are NOT Golden (But They Are!)

rbrockway

September 15, 2022
119 upvotes
/r/MensRights
https://avoiceformen.com/featured/critics-tell-young-men-that-their-penises-are-not-golden-but-they-are/
Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title Critics Tell Young Men that Their Penises are NOT Golden (But They Are!)
Author

rbrockway

Upvotes 119
Comments 19
Date September 15, 2022 10:30 AM UTC
(3 years ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/xetan6/critics_tell_young_men_that_their_penises_are_not/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/critics-tell-young-men-that-their-penises-are-not.1132933
https://theredarchive.com/post/1132933
Top posts by rbrockway

Unprovoked 'one punch' attacks are now subject to harsh penalties in Australia unless the perpetrator is a woman in which case she gets off with a small fine as usual.

3441 upvotes
February 3, 2019
/r/MensRights

Women treat each other worse at work then men treat women or women treat men.

3035 upvotes
February 24, 2018
/r/MensRights

Woman burned 13-year-old boy's genitals with hot tongs for refusing sex

2919 upvotes
November 29, 2018
/r/MensRights

Woman committing sexual assault at “Women’s March” identified and arrested

2765 upvotes
February 4, 2019
/r/MensRights

Boys left to fail at school because attempts to help them earn wrath of feminists, says ex-Ucas chief

2614 upvotes
January 28, 2019
/r/MensRights

School proposes punishing boys by taking away part of their recess on International Women's Day

2488 upvotes
May 17, 2019
/r/MensRights

United Nations research finally admits that 94% of children held in bondage around the world are boys.

2424 upvotes
November 23, 2019
/r/MensRights

Women-only STEM college programs under attack for male discrimination

2130 upvotes
August 22, 2019
/r/MensRights

Comments

[–]heeroena 65 points66 points67 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

More women going to college than men, women most affected.

[–]Idiodyssey87 94 points95 points96 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Women: "We need more women in college."

Also women: "There aren't enough educated men for all the educated women."

Considering how shocked women are about this development, I guess it's true what they say about women and math. What they call "Golden Penis Syndrome," I call men correctly recognizing they're in a buyer's market.

[–]fwoomer 41 points42 points43 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think it’s more than just that men are recognizing they’re in a buyer’s market.

My experiences are anecdotal, and I could be experiencing confirmation bias, but I’m surprised at how many are starting to recognize that there is nothing in it for them if they date/marry. This is even more true when they’re successful and single.

Why in the living hell would any man who has assets and a career even consider the possibility of getting married and having children? They stand to lose it all due to horrifying divorce law, sexism, child support law, etc.

Taking it a step further, though:

If I were young, single, successful, there would be one demographic of women I would even consider getting involved with if (and that’s a HUGE “if”) I’d get involved at all: those more successful than I, wealthier than I, greater earning potential than I, etc.

And that’s because it’d be theoretically harder for her to rake me over the coals in a divorce. You want alimony, Mrs. fwoomer? You make $100,000 more per year than he does. It is he who should receive alimony. You want a child support golden parachute? Sorry, your income is significantly greater than his. We are not taking 66% of his earnings and redirecting it to you.

So, I think this, too, is contributing to the dynamic.

Men don’t want to be successful if they want to marry. Why would they? Where’s the incentive if it’s all just going to be taken away in a divorce? Why the hell should any man work hard, contribute to society, acquire wealth when odds are he’ll end up divorced and living in his mother’s basement, despite making six figures/year?

Screw that. She can take care of me, if there’s going to be a “she” at all. I’m not risking everything in a losing game. I’ll put the risk on her. I think men are beginning to recognize this.

[+]TheRingger0 -18 points-17 points-16 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

It's like some women have different opinions than other women. Like they aren't one hive mind that all share a consciousness.

Some women have one opinion. And other women hold a different opinion.

It's so hypocritical.

[–]CawlinAlcarz 11 points12 points13 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

One would think that women with different opinions would voice them en masse, no?

Of course, they also benefit from the deference and tilted playing field their misandrist sisters are shouting from every roof top and podium that drive the legislation. So why would they buck the tide?

[–]Cute_Needleworker916 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

OK, I’m waiting for the non-hivemind women to speak to the other women any day now.

[–]Laytheblameonluck 38 points39 points40 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Since the 1960s, men who went to college have less sex partners than men who didn't.

There's some studies showing that for women this has been reverse - women who go to college have more sex partners.

This "golden penis syndrome" is total crap, if anything it's come about by men trying to emulate female behaviour on campus.

[–]spelczech 22 points23 points24 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Amazing article. Gynocentric and feminist policies have been pushing men out of higher education for decades, and women still find something to complain about. I mean, of course it's only an issue when it affects you, right, ladies? Perhaps you shouldn't let people who don't give a shit about men make policy.

Make the bed, sleep in the bed.

[–]psuedoscientist500 17 points18 points19 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I know more women are going to college now more than ever. However, aren't more men now going into the trades because many four year degrees are pretty useless? Food for thought.

[–]TraehNoil 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Degrees are mostly a waste. I was making over $100,000/year before I was even 30. No degree, just hard work and the will to succeed and grow.

[–]mechajutaro 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. What todays MRAs usually leave out when they're caterwauling over this particular disparity:

​

-It's nothing new https://reason.com/1994/07/01/man-troubles/ Men have statistically ALWAYS opted for military service, trade school, or work after K-12 more than they have a four year university

-76% of all Americans, male AND female alike, have little to no secondary education. And a large percentage of these folks have no desire to attend a four year university, and would prefer some sort of vocational training

Yeah, there's a strong case for abolishing campus star chambers and every major that ends with the word "studies". These reforms aren't just better for men, but better for America. These changes in and of themselves won't=more men in university

[–]ActPsychological8189 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Funny title but a good read.

[–]CawlinAlcarz 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago* (3 children) | Copy Link

The issues that college women are bitching about (or that we are led to believe that they are) with regard to their deserved "satisfying dating experience" are 100% created by those women and the feminist policies and practices:

Scarcity of men in general - this is the result of

  1. hugely preferential admissions favoring women over men - women outnumber boys on campus 3 to 2, and graduation rates are nearly 2 females getting a bachelors for every 1 male getting one - speaks to dropouts and admission rates both impacting males more than females.
  2. decades of public schools driven by feminist agendas giving up on actually educating boys and not only deprioritizing boys and their needs, but actively forcing them down in the heirarchy through ADMITTED slanted grading practices even if/when they do excel

Men without social skills - this is the result of:

  1. decades of public schools driven by feminist agendas browbeating and tearing down boys and masculinity in general to the point that any who do make it to college are those who "bent the knee" and either outwardly adopted the "shut up and do what we say" posture that public schools expect, or totally inwardly adopted it, complete with guilt laden self images to the point that they feel they have to apologize for being male.
  2. continually redefining what "masculinity" means from "something to be reviled and avoided" to "docile provider, protector, without any right to individual opinions or self determination" to "a real man" when women find out that they actually do NOT like pussified little bitches as dating partners.

"Casanova" behavior - males being unfaithful or unwilling to settle down into monogamous relationships - this is the result of:

  1. Pretty much everything above: HELLLLOOOOOO college girls are finding out that masculine men who are assertive and outgoing and confident are the ones that actually trip their triggers. Meanwhile, despite the efforts of public schools for the past several decades to weed these boys out, and the efforts of colleges to weed these young men out, and the feminist agenda attempting to stomp these sorts of males out of existence in general everywhere else, a few of them do wind up making it to college where they find that they are the new unicorn on campus. I mean, talk about a target rich environment for these guys - 3 females to 2 males, 90% of the male competition that this guy faces is socially inept and scared of their own shadow and women in general, and 90% of the women this guy meets actually want to date a man, not a pussy whipped little bitch who worships their feet. What could be more natural for a guy in such an environment, where women are LITERALLY throwing pussy at him, to tag as many as he feels inclined to? Of course, women don't like that though, each one of them believes it is her inalienable right to claim whatever "high value" male she sees, regardless of her own "value". Of course, therein lies the problem, because all women think this way, and if today, Susie gets to fuck the stud, you can bet that Angela is going to be gunning for him tomorrow. Women's own hypergamous nature creates these conflicts amongst themselves.

Unfortunately for these "Casanovas", due to the intentional and agenda driven bastardization of Title IX and college kangaroo courts, the women STILL have the last laugh on these guys. As soon as one of these guys pisses off Susie whom he slept with on Saturday night, by sleeping with Angela on Sunday afternoon, all Susie has to do is start leveling sexual harrassment or assault or rape charges and this guy is gone - tuition room and board money stolen by the college as the kangaroo court just immediately dismisses him, no real investigation, no consideration of the man's side of the story because: feminism.

Meanwhile, the dearth of datable men continues to worsen for those girls on college campus and for decades they've been told that any grievance, discomfort, or suboptimal circumstance they encounter at all MUST be the fault of men and the patriarchy. It is UTTERLY UNPOSSIBLE that such issues could be of the women's own creation so they never even consider that this could be a problem that they created themselves. Feminist solipsism right there.

And so it goes.

[–]mechajutaro 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Men without social skills - this is the result of:

Let's not forget the advent of social media and, along with it, The Manosphere and The Church Of The Red Pill. For all of it's good intentions, entirely too many of us are retreating into fantasy worlds online, then acting surprised that our external environments aren't changing in the way we'd like them to

[–]UnconventionalXY 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

Retreat into fantasy is all that is left when reality is so shite: it's likely part of our natural psychological defense mechanisms. People retreat into inner worlds and fragmented psyches in response to an outside world they can't competently handle.

Why would you continue to beat your head against a real brick wall till you have brain damage?

Porn and gaming in parents basements are the results of womens unreasoning emotional impulses driving policy without any cognition of the consequences they are creating.

If women had their way, they would be cloning themselves and then dying off like Dolly the sheep or creating long term side effects that we don't understand. Humans thought mapping the genome would solve everything and then we discovered epigenetic factors. There are probably still many levels of the complexity of life to understand before we could begin to play god.

[–]mechajutaro -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Retreat into fantasy is all that is left when reality is so shite: it's likely part of our natural psychological defense mechanisms.

Let's not forget to treat a binary thought like "Life is so shite" as a hypothesis, that must be tested for falsifiability. Let's provide specific examples of what makes life here in '22 the living hell that so many activists today(MRAs included)claim it is, and then ask "Is that a 100% true?" If it turns out that the world is a deeply flawed place, which is nonetheless amenable to practical improvements, then we're not helping ourselves by retreating into fantasy worlds on social media

​

People retreat into inner worlds and fragmented psyches in response to an outside world they can't competently handle.

All the more reason to read some books, watch videos, and perhaps even attend some seminars on strengthening one's social acuity, rather than pumping our brains with even more Manosphere content

​

Why would you continue to beat your head against a real brick wall till you have brain damage?

Butting our heads against the wall is exactly what we've been doing since '15, when The MRM decided to forego all pretenses to taking on the ground action, in favor of endlessly caterwauling over all the ways life isn't going the way we want it to. This has been the equivalent of a shrink who lets his client ramble endlessly about his woes, without every providing said client with behavioral interventions, then feigning surprise when the client just gets even more ill

​

Porn and gaming in parents basements are the results of womens unreasoning emotional impulses driving policy without any cognition of the consequences they are creating.

There's always the more obvious explanation: Like all other addictions, they're ways of ducking around one's difficulties, rather than facing them and taking action. Saying "It's all women's fault" is The Red Pill equivalent of The Woke Left's assertion that drug addiction among non-whites in our ghettoes,barrios, and Indian Reservations is mostly the result of racism at the hands of white people

​

If women had their way, they would be cloning themselves and then dying off like Dolly the sheep or creating long term side effects that we don't understand.

That's another hypothesis that must be tested for falsifiability. What's your basis for making such an assertion?

[–]NoCommunication5976 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

It’s kinda funny how the first time men aren’t expendable, women immediately throw a bunch of shit at men.

[–]jmcsquared 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This is the most confusing thing I've read all week. I hope this phrase does not catch on.

[–]mechajutaro 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Quote the article: "But now it turns out that some women themselves are not entirely happy with the deal feminists engineered for them, which sees them outnumbering men at close to 3-2 at most English-speaking universities, and thousands of words have already been devoted to the idea that college women deserve a more satisfactory dating experience."

​

Let's note that whenever someone has encouraged the folks running flagship MRA organizations like AVFM and HBR to modify our line of attack("Let's start selling the public on all the ways that legal and policy reform doesn't just benefit men. It benefits women and America also"), they're response has been something like this:

"Universities are part of Blue Pill Norm-ie society. We're Red Pill, and have grasped Truths that the other 99% of humanity is too dumb to grasp, despite the fact that nothing we're saying is especially original https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d28usWdvmSg We don't want to be part of the larger civilization, even though we have a hard-on for endlessly grousing about how fucked up we think that civilization is. Our strategy, insofar as we have one, is to retreat onto social media and into our own minds, and reflect on how much more enlightened we are compared to everyone else"

It's not surprising that The MRM has achieved so little since it came into being in the mid-10s, despite having expended an immense amount of effort into posting crap online. The movement's leadership hasn't really provided a large cross-section of the public with ample incentives to invest in our cause

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter