Getting a woman to have sex with you as a man where she does not demand anything else from you is significantly harder than gifting her a relationship and aquiring sex that way; solely due to women only finding a extremely small percentage of men good looking.

A relationship entails a man having to compensate for his lack of physical attractiveness with other forms of payment for sex. In other words: Relationship are for losers; and this is easy to prove as the ltr-man has to provide far more to get sex without getting anything else in return.

​

This is what the genders have to provide within each given situation to get the other person to provide:

(FWB) Man: Sex

(FWB) Woman: Sex

​

(LTR) Man: Emotional comfort, safety, money, time, resources, meeting the womans friends and family, listening to the womans problems, buying her presents, etc.

(LTR) Woman: Sex

​

I genuinly do not understand how anyone can actually believe that having women give you casual sex is worse than having a relationship with one. Why would anyone downgrade from getting sex for free to going into a relationship and having to provide so much more? Good looking men know this and this is why they won't commit.

Besides that, when you are in a relationship with a woman that did not want casual sex with you know that her FWB were far more physically attractive to her than you will ever be. You know that they got the better deal. What you need to understand is that there are not "true hoes". There is only women that wanted are good looking man to commit to them and gave him casual sex in the hopes that he would stay around long enough for her to show her other qualities; even though she would never have been good enough in the first place, so he dumped her. So how can women claim that they "love" the man they are in a relationship with? This is nothing else than the woman lying her man into his face about having feelings for him even though they actually had feelings for their FWB; the man they actually wanted.