Horrible Anti-MRA article, says that MRAs just want to rape

Number357 · 2013-12-22T00:49:13+00:00

The fact that they say shit like this is probably a good thing in the long run. Why do people hate MRAs? Because we're a bunch of homophobic wife-beating rapists who whine about the friendzone and want to protect male privilege.

So when people find out none of that shit is true... they wonder why they opposed us to begin with, and they stop trusting the people who told them all of the above bullshit. I constantly read criticisms of MRAs. I don't think I have ever seen one that is actually true. Feminism is based on lies, and their hatred of MRAs is just an extension of that. People figured out the wage gap was a lie, and they'll figure out this is too.

Wordshark · 2013-12-22T04:37:36+00:00

But a large chunk of our most prominent leaders are women...

VortexCortex · 2013-12-22T00:33:39+00:00

The insane blitherings of an escaped lunatic with an IQ of 12.

giegerwasright · 2013-12-22T07:39:34+00:00

Interesting. I've never read a post on this board advocating for rape, punished or unpunished. The impression that I get from the people who post on this board is that they are quite against rape, of men or women by men or women. It seems, that they are even more against rape than feminists since they are against the rape of men and women by men and women, while feminists only admit that rape of women by men exists and only care about rape of women by men. It isn't that they don't acknowledge male on male prison rape... they just don't seem to quantify it the same way they do rape of women by men. And they don't give a single fuck about it for sure.

So. Lies.

chocoboat · 2013-12-22T02:58:24+00:00

Terrific comments on that article (not joking). They tore her to pieces.

typhonblue · 2013-12-22T00:08:22+00:00

But whites commit crimes too and many men (evidently) radically hate women – but are never collectively called criminals or crazy women-haters. And that’s the structural bias that is prejudice.

Yes they are. Men are collectively called criminals and crazy women-haters pretty much constantly.

It's called "patriarchy theory."

Even the author of this post does it indirectly with this:

It’s what makes denial acceptable when gender violence causes more death and disability in women, aged 15 to 44, than cancer, malaria, traffic injuries and war COMBINED (World Health Organisation).

Gender based violence? That's the patriarchy (aka. men) hurting women!

2013-12-22T02:49:23+00:00

"many men (evidently) radically hate women – but are never collectively called criminals or crazy women-haters."

Let's see:

"This mentality is what allowed Nazi Germany to happen, and Apartheid, and Rwanda, and every single religious battle ever fought."

and

"it has simply evolved into an online community of trolls whose genuine loathing of women is nothing short of intensely baffling."

Oops, you did both. Try again.

Dronelisk · 2013-12-22T03:55:14+00:00

Welp, I'm not white,straight, or tried to rape anyone!

femdelusion · 2013-12-22T00:04:17+00:00

Start of article:

If you’re unfamiliar with Men’s Rights Activists (MRA), here’s a quick overview: It’s group of very angry, heterosexual shit-stains who claim that men are actually the ones being oppressed in a world that is being torn apart by equal rights, matriarchy and serial killer feminists.

End of article:

My point is not that any group should be stigmatised, or their plights neglected.

And that's why... you always read things through.

Uncap · 2013-12-22T11:05:41+00:00

bunch of cherry picked, anonynmous, obvious troll comments

See how this represents all MRAs.

video evidence of hordes of feminists attacking people in violent 'protests'

NAFAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALT!

raptorrage · 2013-12-22T20:09:18+00:00

Which is unfair, because most mras don't like RoK

2013-12-22T14:39:17+00:00

We’ve seen it in Apartheid, in U.S slavery, and we’re still seeing it with Syria.

South Africa's as awful now as it ever was under apartheid, and the Syrian resistance is, as near as we can tell, no less deranged than Bashar Al-Assad himself. Lots of revolutionaries are as bad or worse than the system they oppose.

The resistance against patriarchy is no different.

You just compared slavery to ads with scantily clad women. That's incredibly racist and stupid.

Social psychology 101 – in order for group cohesion, there needs to be an existence of an “other”, a “them”. By representing your own group as uniquely virtuous, you can easily de-humanise another population. This mentality is what makes it okay for normal citizens to do atrocious things.

There's a large amount of irony here.

This othering is what makes it ok to send up red balloons, protesting a ‘genocide’ that does not exist.

If you're referring to abortion, you should know that people who oppose abortion do so because they think life begins at conception. They do not simply hate women. A smart person can understand this. A chimp cannot.

It’s what makes it OK to say that women don’t get pregnant from legitimate rape.

That's mere ignorance of biology.

It’s what makes denial acceptable when gender violence causes more death and disability in women, aged 15 to 44, than cancer, malaria, traffic injuries and war COMBINED (World Health Organisation).

That's a nice statistic, the problem is that it isn't true.

By pointing out one criminal who happened to be coloured,

I'll just assume you don't know that "colored" is considered a bit offensive in the US these days.

or one woman who happened to be a radical feminist

We don't think all women are evil. We simply disagree with feminists.

But whites commit crimes too and many men (evidently) radically hate women

Who cares? No one is denying that some guys hate women.

And there is nothing less horrifying about abuse and rape experienced by male victims. But attacking women has never been the answer to it.

We're not attacking women. We're attacking those particular women and men who are contributing to the problem.

And you, Malini Mohana, are one of them.

2013-12-22T02:48:29+00:00

The fact that everyone now seems to be talking about MRAs is a good thing. They would love to ignore us, but our influence is getting to big to ignore.

MockingDead · 2013-12-22T02:23:59+00:00

Not just rape...

I kid... I don't bother to take this seriously. I can't anymore. I've gone through too many monitors.

2013-12-22T16:32:02+00:00

The article doesn't say this at all. WTF? Pull your heads out of your asses.

darkgatherer · 2013-12-22T19:47:12+00:00

Ohh no they're on to us, we better shut down our roving rape vans...only temporarily of course. /s

HardKase · 2013-12-22T23:00:20+00:00

To be fair there are extremists in both mra a d feminism who give each a bad name

Pickle_WeasIe · 2013-12-22T14:35:26+00:00

TIL that people think you can make hostile claims about an entire group of people and then back said claims from 3 people. Also "Fuck your men's rights" NO fuck you bitch I want equality Middle east is fucked up with womens rights and that need to be fixed so Is Africa, America is fucked up with alimony being biased towards woman, NZ law basically states any males can't be raped and that a woman 36-37 old woman fucking a 13 year old boy is not a pedophile. Both genders are being royally screwed over and you'r trying to undermine one gender whilst promoting your own by using evidence from bloody misogynistic radicallists, mean while I refuse to not use radicall feminists in my arguments because GUESS WHAT RADICALLISTS ARE A MINORITY IN OUR TWO GROUPS.

Sincere regards disgruntled man who can apparently not be raped ever but you can if you take one drink and want to cover up the fact you just slepped with someone you don't like.

VaginalAssaultRifles · 2013-12-22T03:16:12+00:00

Oh it's an article. For a minute I thought you were talking about 99% of reddit.

HoneyPuffBear · 2013-12-22T12:32:33+00:00

Im afraid of being sarcastic here and that is a huge problem. You dont think so, it is. Not totally related to the article, but when something as 99% of girls are sluts is taken seriusly as an opinion of MRA, it becomes critical that we learn how to recognize sarcasm. I type out of experience when I say most of you dont, and neither do I. Sarcasm can even in its most disgusting and violent form really put a beam of light on todays hypocrazy. We must be able to sarcasticly respond to sometimes sarcastic articles without the very brethren and sisters of MRA thinking that it is 100% serius. If an MRA activist responds to a violent article against men by typing violent comment, that is not sexxism it is probebly rage, and its not constructive for a better future. But if someone sarcasticly implies that killing every women on earth would solve all wars, that is SARCASM and it highlights that some societies dont value mens life. But it is even more important that we in the future start merging with feministic and humanistic groups, I cant speak for ya'll but I want freedom and safety for men, women, children, grannies, trannies, groupies, bronies, niggas and racist cocksuckers and yes there were sarcastic elements in this comment cocksuckers. And yes alot of you actually are sexxist whom cant take a fuckin joke. Be ashamed ye offended of MRA cuz we can be equaly offensive.

Title	Horrible Anti-MRA article, says that MRAs just want to rape
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	61
Comments	43
Date	December 21, 2013 11:23 PM UTC (12 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1tfbb2/horrible_antimra_article_says_that_mras_just_want/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/horrible-anti-mra-article-says-that-mras-just-want.1155473 https://theredarchive.com/post/1155473

Comments