Because only men have sick desires...

jackpot18uk · 2013-07-23T14:55:36+00:00

Says the paper with topless models on page 3 everyday. Owned by Murdoch who owns satellite tv networks in europe that broadcast hardcore pornography channels in Germany & Italy & softcore in UK. Wonder if he's been advising UK Prime Minister.

notnotnotfred · 2013-07-23T14:36:05+00:00

Coming from 'The Sun', I just feel glad that they put in "a tiny minority". That paper is always trying to stir shit up.

2013-07-23T15:40:58+00:00

I desire to not pay for women's DV shelters when men get none.

5th_Law_of_Robotics · 2013-07-23T14:54:06+00:00

This is the cultural narrative perpetuated by the feminist zeitgeist.

Only male sexuality is deviant.

Only men are violent and abusive.

Dictating the behavior of men is necessary to smash the Patriarchy, but dictating the behavior of women is anti-feminist and/or misogyny.

2013-07-23T15:03:23+00:00

Newsflash: More than a tiny minority of dudes dig porn.

modix · 2013-07-23T16:34:24+00:00

But safe search IS the default setting...

fia_bui · 2013-07-23T22:01:13+00:00

It's the Sun. I don't expect proper english, let alone journalism.

BalllsackTBaghard · 2013-07-23T18:29:16+00:00

I feel for the anglo bros. America is fucked, Britain is fucked, Australia has always been fucked. Canada has too many liberals and feminists aka it is fucked. I'll be enjoying my depraved porno here in Finlandia.

Trenchyjj · 2013-07-23T17:26:18+00:00

As my grandmother would say, fuck the English.

giegerwasright · 2013-07-23T19:39:18+00:00

Consider this; Whatever their desires, however healthy or depraved, legal or illegal, men actually have less opportunity to fulfill them. That's why they turn to the vicarious stimulation of pornography. Women, on the other hand can get most of their desires fulfilled just by expressing them. A man with a rape fantasy (either as the aggressor or the victim) will have a much harder time finding a female partner to participate then a woman with the same desire. So, it stands to reason, that women would watch less pornography. But that is because women are out IRL pursuing and acting on those desires. Some healthy. Some not. Some legal. Some not. The difference is that our society is trained to only think of men as sexual deviants, so women get the pass to do whatever without any response.

So, which is more problematic? Men going home to watch kink.com videos or women carelessly acting on their easily fulfilled whim without any concern for repercussion?

For clarification, I have no problem with adults pursuing consensual activities with one another but I think that our society gives women a lot more leeway with the "consent" part and the "adult" part then it should. And that is far more problematic than watching videos on the internet made by fully informed and consenting participants.

HalfysReddit · 2013-07-23T18:03:52+00:00

Women can be pedophiles to, and ignoring that only puts children at risk.
I have never seen any data to suggest that the availability of internet child pornography increases the likelihood of children being victimized, and part of me imagines that having access to the material may discourage pedophiles from actually engaging live children to act out their sexual desires.

I know this is a sensitive topic, and trust me you'll rarely find a man less prone to anger when it comes to the victimization of children. But I'm more interested in actually helping children instead of feeding my desire for vengeance, so if there's a chance that allowing these people digital access to their fetishes results in less victims than prohibiting them, I'm willing to entertain the idea that maybe an outright ban is not the smartest move.

That being said, I am not comfortable with images and videos of actual children being used, as this is in itself a crime against them (too young to consent to pornography). I do imagine there's a chance that access to say, digitally rendered children may result in less real-life victims.

I want to see data on this. I cannot stomach actually sifting through said data myself, but I don't feel comfortable just making assumptions about what affects this will have on children.

ILoveHate · 2013-07-23T20:14:24+00:00

Someone should show them all those articles about the red rose stories and similar incidents.

Either way, censorship is stupid shit. Oh and I'm guessing this is Britain's idiotic response to increasing marriage rates and pregnancy rates.

2013-07-23T20:23:27+00:00

Fuck The ~~Sun~~ Scum

PRIDEVIKING · 2013-07-24T00:49:15+00:00

What case are they refering too?

JakeDDrake · 2013-07-24T02:26:09+00:00

All civilized people agree [that] these pictures are evil, as well as illegal.

Illegal (in the UK) I could see, but evil? Like, pointy-pitchfork, red-complexion'd evil?

This person needs to consider taking on a new definition of what "evil" is, if consensual pornographic imagery is on par with murder.

Also, the notion that it's only a small minority of sick men who have sick desires is laughable.

I think we should introduce the editorial writer to Blowfly Girl.

YetAnotherCommenter · 2013-07-24T02:53:25+00:00

Ahh yes, Britain.

Where looking at Page 3 Girls is shameful but every second person has a caning fetish.

The English are truly the arbiters of what constitutes a "sick" desire. (please note the sarcasm)

Absinthe99 · 2013-07-24T03:41:55+00:00

Depends entirely on who's definition of "sick" you use.

typhonblue · 2013-07-24T04:15:57+00:00

Someone has never browsed y!gallery I see.

MyloDu · 2013-07-24T10:35:24+00:00

Ironically, they perfectly illustrate the pointlessness of their campaign with the line...

"As the Mark Bridger case revealed, even innocent family photos can inflame a diseased mind."

So what now? we censor innocent family photos? Does this not prove the point that a sick mind is a sick mind regardless of influence?

And don't get me started on the gender issue. Read about the Magdalene Laundries in Ireland for an insight into the potential of females for cruelty and perversion.

Everything_Is_Rape · 2013-07-23T20:51:09+00:00

sick desires are rape

sunset261 · 2013-07-23T17:15:05+00:00

it is absurd to claim purging the web of child abuse images is a slippery slope to censorship

funnily enough http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2013/jul/22/david-cameron-crackdown-internet-pornography

JaminSousaphone · 2013-07-23T17:18:40+00:00

And what exactly does this have to do with men's rights? At what point are men here being discriminated against?

Title	Because only men have sick desires...
Author	[deleted]
Upvotes	174
Comments	35
Date	July 23, 2013 2:26 PM UTC (13 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1ivvw1/because_only_men_have_sick_desires/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/because-only-men-have-sick-desires.1168123 https://theredarchive.com/post/1168123

Comments