A way for the unwanted male 80% to live in dignity - become homesteaders

TLDR: As men receive less from society for what they contribute, they should cut off those contributions. An actionable plan for doing this is outlined below.

There is a male mating crisis on hand. 30% of men under 30 haven't had sex in the last year. 63% of male young adults are single. Women don't find more than 80% of men attractive. The sources for these statistics are easy to find if you bother to do a brief search.

This was not a problem before, because the two genders needed each other. A woman needed a man to survive, and a man needed a woman for love and reproduction. There were gender roles that were assigned by who was biologically better suited for what. The more primitive the living conditions are, the more apparent the gender differences become. Men are physically stronger and resilient to the environment. A man is better equipped than a woman to survive alone in the wild. He can go to a piece of raw land, clear it, farm it, and build a house on it with his own hands. As recently as 100 years ago men did exactly that. But what he cannot do is birth and rear children. That has been women's primary contribution to civilization. But to achieve the conditions suitable for child birthing and rearing, a woman had to get protection and provision by a man, by giving him love.

But recently women don't seem to think that they need men. Actually, they do depend on men, but the government has come in between, and make men contribute essential services to the country. The military draft is an example. Men are forced to protect the country, when the women who receive that protection don't have to give anything in return. The same goes for other critical services that men provide. Feminists try to maximize these benefits women receive for free by wanting more 'rights' (the right to protection, freedom, shelter etc.), but not caring about the conditions of those who provides those rights. If not for the protection provided by men, feminism wouldn't even exist. Also there is this biological effect called the gender empathy gap, where people do not have any empathy for men, but have empathy for women and children. So the men in the modern society have become slaves of sorts, slaving their lives away in the hopes of getting love and a family, but not succeeding.

So when the social contract has been breached, and when the men don't receive what they are looking for in return for what they provide, it is time or men to stop contributing.

There are several ways that governments make men obsolete.

1. The innate male characteristics a man brought to a relationship has been replaced with jobs, such as military, police, sanitation, construction etc. that provide essential services such as protection and provision. Before, when a man provided these services to a woman he was given mating opportunities directly. Now he gets a salary when he provides it to society, which may or may not be his ultimate goal. Furthermore, the men providing some of these essential services (sanitation for example) are seen by women as lower breeding stock (because they are not doctors, lawyers etc.).
2. Using tax revenue to provide essential services that men would have otherwise provided, such as protection from threats (military, police), housing (section 8), transport etc. The men are replaced by the taxes they pay. If not for the government that provides these benefits using tax revenue, a woman would have had to find and keep a man to get the same benefits.
3. Alimony and uncapped (beyond what is needed to raise a child) child support, that forces the man to keep providing financially even after divorce/separation.
4. Giving women undeserved special treatment in the form of female only scholarships, job quotas, affirmative action, paid maternity/menstrual leave etc. Females in physical jobs such as military, police, firefighting etc. have reduced physical standards they have to meet (therefore are less effective), but get the same amount of pay (how is this equal pay for equal work?).

​

I suggest men do the following to counter these, respectively.

1. Do not work in the aforementioned critical services, especially if you're a male who is unsuccessful at mating. If a female wants those services, she can mate with you. If you are providing those services to a female who is not mating with you, you are simping. As less men engage in these jobs, the importance of men will go up, because they are needed. For example, if a woman can't find security because there is only female police, who have less physical strength than male police, she will have to find a man who will provide her that protection.
2. Find ways to pay less taxes, especially if you're a male unsuccessful at mating. There are ways to legally pay less taxes, such as becoming more self sufficient, growing your own food, fixing your own house and equipment, bartering instead of buying, being self employed, working under the table, using tax breaks as a farmer, moving to Puerto Rico and using act 20/22/60, working as a digital nomad, working in or emigrating to a country that has a lower tax rate, etc. Working a high wage salaried job causes you to pay to most taxes, and the money you yourself make will go towards replacing you.
3. Do not sign a marriage contract, and if you are in the US, only have children in default-equal-custody states such as KY and WV. Otherwise you will lose your children, and pay child support for children you cannot see. Having children by buying an egg and paying a surrogate mother also minimizes the risk of losing them.
4. Do not work in a job that give women undeserved special treatment. You are not being paid fairly for how much you work. Someone has to make up for the work that the freeloaders are skipping, and it's you. Leave these jobs, and the freeloaders will have no option but to work to prevent to the whole company from going down. Someone has to do the work. For example, take the military. Females in the military have lower physical standards, but get paid the same. Now let's suppose that, realizing this, all the males quit. Who is going to carry the 120lb rucks, move heavy equipment, move to contact with the enemy, etc.? Who is going to do the actual work? The military will have no option but to pay the men higher for what they are worth. The same applies for a corporate job where the women get paid maternity or menstrual leave, but the males do not.

​

Basically, as women become more selfish and self-centered, men should also become more selfish and more self-centered. Otherwise you end up being exploited.

How do I recommend men make a living in order to prevent the government from exploiting them in the above 4 ways? Become a homesteader/farmer and move away from the cities. You do not have to do this immediately. Rather, it's a process that you can do slowly over a long time.

Modern cities rely on male labor to a high extent. Sanitation workers, police, construction, mechanics etc. A female crew of construction workers just can't put out the same amount of work a male crew can. But these workers are paid less and have lower status in society. So it's getting harder and harder for them to find a partner and have a family. So living in a city is not working out for them anyway.

Since city life is not working out for them anyway, they should move out and start homesteading. Not all at once. Let's take a male who works in a city. First of all, he can save rent by living with his parents. He saves some money and buys some land 3 hours away. Cheaper because in the middle of the boonies. If there is a broken down house it's better. He can park a camper there to live in. During the weekends he goes there and starts converting it to his homestead. Builds a cabin, or puts a mobile home there, or repairs the broken down house that is already there. Makes a little farm, and starts selling produce at the farmer's market. Buys used batteries and solar panels. Digs a well. Little by little he builds his little kingdom that he can go away to. In the city he is at the bottom of society. But in his land he is king. He learns and gathers equipment to live off the land more and more, and eventually leaves the city and moves to the countryside full time, taking a job in the countryside. He has gone from a high taxed city existence to a more self-reliant existence in the countryside. The city has lost a worker. If he keeps increasing the profit he makes from his farm, he can quit his job and become a self reliant farmer.

I'm halfway through this process now. I have a property and a broken down house, which I bought for very cheap, 3 hours away from a major city. I'm still working at the city, but experimenting with growing produce and locally selling, and also fixing the house when I can. When I start making enough profit from my farm, I will quit my job in the city and find a low demand, low pay job near my farm (or do something like Uber, Doordash or Instacart) and concentrate more on the farm, until I'm living completely off the farm. Later, as I make more profit, I can go to Puerto Rico and use Act 20/22/60 to pay zero taxes. If I meet a suitable woman I will go to Kentucky before I have children. Paying to have a child through a surrogate is not entirely out of the question, if I manage to make enough money.

I started out being depressed with city life and the self-entitled women that were available there as mating opportunities. As I started working more in the homestead, I became less stressed, less depressed and started enjoying life. It is great to wake up with the sun, be outside, experience the sunlight and the wind, smell the grass and the soil, and watch my produce grow. I am also learning to hunt and fish, and got my first deer recently, which took care of my meat needs for quite a while. This is not the easiest life, but it is a cause to fight for. Men enjoy doing hard things, and it is a great feeling to know that I'm minimizing the ways my enemies can exploit me.

All the lower status male physical workers in cities should do this. They are not getting much sex or a family in the city anyway, and they are moving to an environment where they are in their element, being self reliant against nature. If the city wants to keep them, they'll have to pay more.

Actually, all men should do this if they can. Because this is where the average male is in his element. Communal city living is for feminists, where, because of so called 'equity', a weaker female construction worker get's paid the same as a strong male construction worker who does twice the work.

When looking for mates, follow the red-pill truths (refer Rollo Tomassi etc). Realize that there are no soulmates. Increase the pool of candidates, by using social media and also by looking in other countries. Do not put maximum effort on one woman. Instead put minimum effort on maximum number of women, and choose based on how they reciprocate. Keep multiple options, just the way women do it. Do not commit to a woman until she shows that she is willing to put effort in to the relationship. This is the most efficient way. Otherwise, from my experience, you will end up just simping and having nothing to show for it. As women reach the end of their biological clock, they will try to find someone to settle with. The woman you get will most probably have a high body count and be less able to pair-bond. That is even more reason to earn less money, and collect non-transferrable wealth, in terms of talent, experience etc., so the family courts can't take it away from you. Since marriage contracts always favor the lower earner, only sign a marriage contract if the woman makes more money than you, and file for immediate divorce if she stops earning. Since the feminists dislike gender roes, you can be a great house-husband who can fix things around the house. As the tradesmen become rarer and more expensive as the males quit, being handy around the house will be more attractive to women. Since her income is more that yours, if she cheats you can file for divorce and take the money that she earned.

When society refuses to listen to the problems of men and continue to exploit men, this is a non-violent method of advocating for yourself. There is no reason to openly talk about this. Keep it silent, to the degree that you are comfortable with. The aim is not to be a loser, but to be a winner who doesn't let anyone take advantage of your work, and reciprocate ONLY to those who help you. You are not entitled to love and sex, but at the same time, society is not entitled to your labor, or the protection that you provide.