~ archived since 2018 ~

r/amiugly is brutal

Cautious_Vast5955 · 2023-07-22T02:11:25+00:00

Its full of good-looking women and ugly men, and the women often get karma and replies and awards while the men are just ignored. Brutal....

Cautious_Vast5955

July 22, 2023

22 upvotes

/r/AllPillDebate

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB

Support the archive

Everything here was supposed to disappear. Banned subreddits, deleted communities, cancelled blogs — much of what is archived here survives nowhere else.

It stays free — no paywall, no account — for the next man who comes looking, the way it was free for you.

I pay for the servers, the storage and the bandwidth myself. If you want this record still standing in ten years, become one of the people who keeps it online.

Support the archive

Post Information

Title	r/amiugly is brutal
Author	Cautious_Vast5955
Upvotes	22
Comments	28
Date	July 22, 2023 2:11 AM UTC (3 years ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/AllPillDebate
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/AllPillDebate/comments/1567b36/ramiugly_is_brutal/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/AllPillDebate/ramiugly-is-brutal.1226026 https://theredarchive.com/post/1226026

Comments

[–]Chad_Thundercock717 6 points7 points8 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]BigZaddyZ3 -14 points-13 points-12 points 3 years ago (13 children) | Copy Link

[–]Diligent_Divide_4978SciencePill 15 points16 points17 points 3 years ago* (12 children) | Copy Link

[+]BigZaddyZ3 -7 points-6 points-5 points 3 years ago* (11 children) | Copy Link

Nah. Studies consistently show that both men And women rate women as more visually appealing than men on a average.

You can’t just cherry pick certain aspects of men while ignoring other less flattering aspects of men. Men skin might age a bit better but men are also way more prone to acne, male pattern baldness, and facial failos (as you even admitted yourself). You guys also talk about how hypergamous women are with things like height. The majority of men aren’t 6ft. So if women really are as hypergamous as stated here, that alone should tell you that the majority don’t possess the physical traits required to be considered good looking by the opposing sex.

And even if women weren’t hypergamous, we know for a fact that male fetus are more prone to mutations than female ones. And since most mutations are likely to negative, we know that men are more likely to have physical defects as well.

Lastly bro, just use the eye test for fuck’s sake. How often do you come across good looking women versus good looking men? Doesn’t this sub always talk about how low the percentage of good looking guys is and how difficult it is for a guy to be considered attractive? Now all of a sudden none of that is true? If you believe that guys are anywhere near as good looking as women on average, you’re probably just a closet bisexual or gay and you don’t even realize it yet.

[–]Diligent_Divide_4978SciencePill 7 points8 points9 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[+]BigZaddyZ3 -6 points-5 points-4 points 3 years ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

Men’s looks are more prone to failos tho. Even if it’s just because men have less good features that offset the bad ones. That’s actually more proof that women are more sexually attractive. You’re proving it with your own talking point. Women are so much more sexually appealing than men that they can even get away with failos that men can’t.

Also if the gay comment makes you chuckle, I’m assuming it’s cause you find it ridiculous right? Well, if that’s the case then wouldn’t you yourself be in agreement that women are more attractive? Why are you fighting so hard against something you are supposed to agree with as a heterosexual man anyways? Is it because you falsely believe that the genders have to be equally sexually appealing for some odd reason? Because that’s almost as silly as someone saying that men and women are supposed to be equal in physical strength. We aren’t. Just like the two genders aren’t equal in beauty or sex appeal as well. Men and women have different traits that they excel at compared to the opposite gender. That’s just reality buddy.

[–]Southern_Fall983 2 points3 points4 points 3 years ago (8 children) | Copy Link

It doesn’t matter if “women are better looking on average” than men, the point is a female “5” is celebrated for her “beauty” way more than a male “5” would ever be. I would argue a male “5” could go his whole life never being complimented on ANYTHING about his physical looks. Women only celebrate 8+ men for their looks, the bar is extremely high whereas a female 6 is adulated and simped for by even men slightly above her in terms of looks.

Also, if it’s true that the average woman is “better looking” than the average man, well that’s just too bad isn’t it. What are we supposed to do, not criticize the possibility that only 20% of men are deemed worthy to procreate with the rest of the female population? Do you realize how STUPID that is? That’s like saying a star athlete is way better at their sport than an average one on his team. It’s unfortunate that one is better than the other but they both have a skill set of value and they both have to overcome each others pitfalls and work together to “win”

[–]BigZaddyZ3 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (7 children) | Copy Link

It doesn’t matter if “women are better looking on average” than men, the point is a female “5” is celebrated for her “beauty” way more than a male “5” would ever be. I would argue a male “5” could go his whole life never being complimented on ANYTHING about his physical looks. Women only celebrate 8+ men for their looks, the bar is extremely high whereas a female 6 is adulated and simped for by even men slightly above her in terms of looks.

Perhaps because a female “5” is just more sexual attractive and valuable to society than a male “5”… Thanks for proving my point actually.

Also, if it’s true that the average woman is “better looking” than the average man, well that’s just too bad isn’t it. What are we supposed to do, not criticize the possibility that only 20% of men are deemed worthy to procreate with the rest of the female population? Do you realize how STUPID that is? That’s like saying a star athlete is way better at their sport than an average one on his team. It’s unfortunate that one is better than the other but they both have a skill set of value and they both have to overcome each others pitfalls and work together to “win”

That’s actually a really stupid analogy tbh. For one, the “star athlete” in this case doesn’t have to work with the mediocre teammates. They can simply go to a better team. That’s why incels seethe in the first place. Because women don’t actually need them at all and can just bypass them for better options. Secondly, in the case of incels, the mediocre teammates do not actually have a skill set of value. The incel has no looks, no money, no clout/status, and not even charisma or social competence. They have nothing of value to offer women. That’s why they are incel. But instead of accepting this and working on themselves, they just expect the “star athlete” to tolerate their pathetic mediocrity. But then get butthurt when they realize that’ll never happen. Like I said, your analogy is dumb and doesn’t even really work when applied to dating. At the end of the day, you can keep getting butthurt over reality, but that won’t change it.

[–]Southern_Fall983 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[–]Southern_Fall983 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago* (5 children) | Copy Link

“Perhaps because a female “5” is just more sexual attractive and valuable to society than a male “5”… Thanks for proving my point actually.”

So you think “value” measured in society is “sexual attractiveness”, and not other qualities such as intelligence, productivity, kindness etc.? So Megan Fox contributed more “value” to the world than Mahatma Gandhi, for example? That has to be one of the most vapid, stupidest takes I’ve ever come across. People in relationships contribute different things to even each other that fall outside the scope of sex appeal. I can’t believe I have to even say that.

“That’s actually a really stupid analogy tbh. For one, the “star athlete” in this case doesn’t have to work with the mediocre teammates.”

You clearly lack the ability to understand the analogy. If we were to look at American football (for example) - quarterbacks are typically the most “valued” position on offense, they are ranked higher simply because of their function. But that’s not to say other players, such as offensive lineman or kickers don’t serve an important role for the offense either because they do - they just have different skill sets.

The same can be said about male and female attractiveness..if more women are physically attractive than men then so what - men serve another purpose and have only in recent times within the scope of human history have been looked at for their physical appearance.

That was my point but you were too triggered to understand it, “tbh”

“They can simply go to a better team” JFLOL if you think that’s how professional sports works

[–]BigZaddyZ3 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Southern_Fall983 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

“No where in anything I posted did I imply that Megan Fox contributed more to society than Gandhi.”

Gee I wonder what the impetus was to make a statement like that..maybe it was this garbage: “Perhaps because a female “5” is just more sexual attractive and valuable to society than a male “5”…

The implication here is that you equate “sexual(ly) attractiveness” to “value to society”, which is one of the stupidest takes I’ve ever heard.

Sexual attractiveness is only valued of any worth by the person having sex with that person. Just because someone is sexually attractive it does not make them “valuable to society”. This and your other takes prove you are an unbelievably low IQ/shallow and most likely bitter person who can’t differentiate the right and the left. You think you are way smarter than you actually are, everyone you call “dumb” or “Low iq” is complete projection. You are of no authority to imply any of this with anyone, look at your commentary it’s laughable

[–]BigZaddyZ3 -1 points0 points1 point 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]Southern_Fall983 0 points1 point2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]BigZaddyZ31 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]Southern_Fall9831 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]BigZaddyZ31 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

You’re just babbling pointless bullshit at this point. I respect you more if you were man enough to simply admit that you were trying to be difficult and unnecessary pedantic out of spite. Purposely being obtuse in order to try and paint what I said as stupid in some way. But in the process, you simply made yourself look stupid instead.

No matter what bullshit cope you try to spin, the facts are :

-Men are a part of society

-Women also highly value women’s looks as well

-Even children value and decent looking woman over the average male.

-Therefore, men, women, and even children highly value female beauty. Another terms for “men, women, and children” would be “society”. Therefore, I was totally correct in how I phrased it and you’re just grasping at straws trying to argue meaningless semantics at his point. All because you’re too butthurt and immature to admit that you were wrong about something. Yet you seem to delude yourself into thinking you’re this surpreme intellectual lol 😂. Yeah right pal. Get a life.

And yes, I’m fullying expecting you to reply with more meaningless semantic nonsense and pointless cope. Too bad I’m done taking you seriously at this point. Have fun👍

[–]Southern_Fall9831 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[–]BigZaddyZ31 point 3 years ago [recovered] | Copy Link

[+]ROBYoutube -10 points-9 points-8 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[–]ItoshiSae10 9 points10 points11 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]ROBYoutube -4 points-3 points-2 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]ItoshiSae10 8 points9 points10 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link

[+]operation-spot -13 points-12 points-11 points 3 years ago (4 children) | Copy Link

[–]Cautious_Vast5955[S] 16 points17 points18 points 3 years ago (3 children) | Copy Link

[+]operation-spot -11 points-10 points-9 points 3 years ago (2 children) | Copy Link

[–]SeaworthinessAdept98BlackPill 3 points4 points5 points 3 years ago (1 child) | Copy Link

[–]iPatrickDev 4 points5 points6 points 3 years ago (0 children) | Copy Link