TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

  • Subreddits

      Popular

    • /r/askTRP
    • /r/TheRedPill
    • /r/MarriedRedPill
    • /r/MensRights
    • /r/MGTOW
    • /r/PurplePillDebate
    • /r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
    • Other

    • /r/AllPillDebate
    • /r/AlreadyRed
    • /r/altTRP
    • /r/AntiFeminists
    • /r/askFDS
    • /r/askMRP
    • /r/askRPC
    • /r/becomeaman
    • /r/BlackPillScience
    • /r/Chadfish
    • /r/Divorce_Men
    • /r/EverydayMisandry
    • /r/ExRedPill
    • /r/FemaleDatingStrategy
    • /r/FeminismStopsWhen
    • /r/GEOTRP
    • /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates
    • /r/MalePsychology
    • /r/Male_Studies
    • /r/MenSupportMen
    • /r/MGTOW2
    • /r/MuslimRedPill
    • /r/newTRP
    • /r/PussyPass
    • /r/PussyPassDenied
    • /r/RedPillBooks
    • /r/RedPillParenting
    • /r/RedPillWives
    • /r/RedPillWomen
    • /r/RedPillWorkplace
    • /r/RPChristians
    • /r/seduction
    • /r/ThankTRP
    • /r/TheRedPillStories
    • /r/trpGAME
    • /r/TRPOffTopic
    • /r/TrueBlackPillMGTOW
    • /r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
  • Blogs

      Popular

    • Dalrock
    • Heartiste
    • Illimitable Men
    • Return of Kings
    • Rian Stone
    • The Rational Male
    • Woujo
    • Other

    • Artful Prudence
    • A Voice for Men
    • Alpha Game
    • Black Label Logic
    • Caleb Jones
    • Captain Capitalism
    • Corporate Machiavelli
    • Days of Game
    • Deep Strength
    • Dicipres
    • Donal Graeme
    • Female Misogynist
    • Free Northerner
    • Gaming My Wife
    • Good Looking Loser
    • Hawaiian Libertarian
    • In Mala Fide
    • KillToParty
    • Kill Your Inner Loser
    • Krauser PUA
    • LaidNYC
    • Married Man Sex Life
    • NO MA'AM
    • Omega Virgin Revolt
    • Pook's Mill
    • Random Xpat Rantings
    • Red Pill Theory
    • Red Pill Wifery
    • RedPillDad
    • RedPillDoctor
    • Seasons of Tumult and Discord
    • Sigma Frame
    • The Feminine Woman
    • The Futurist
    • The Masculine Principle
    • The Modern Man
    • The New Modern Man
    • The Obsidian Files
    • The Power Moves
    • The Private Man
    • The Red Pill Room
    • The Red Quest
    • The Rules Revisited
    • The Spearhead
    • Troy Francis
    • Wintery Knight
    • Young Man Red Pill
  • Books
  • Dictionary
  • @TRParchive
  • Please help TheRedArchive stay alive

A female misandrist's handbook on how to destroy a man's life via false acussations

Main-Camel2462

August 7, 2024
91 upvotes
/r/MensRights

The PDF for the book is readily availible:
https://archive.org/details/confidential-angela-how-to-destroy-a-man-now/mode/2up

Honestly... this is one of the sickest and most disturbing things I have ever seen in my entire life.

https://preview.redd.it/vxhsaoxua9hd1.jpg?width=693&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=999c9705e64d39037677298bef3612ecf7ac8349

https://preview.redd.it/6fchxixua9hd1.jpg?width=721&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3459135d6a6d4ebc5fd01b6013b357f0b4d6574d

https://preview.redd.it/7vbudmxua9hd1.jpg?width=727&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=bd128bc629519661d1e16157a82f5dbfdb06b3d4

https://preview.redd.it/enpkvkyua9hd1.jpg?width=719&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=3b18d4f7c62ddd60b282224a1bdca37f7cffc6f0

https://preview.redd.it/1regjixua9hd1.jpg?width=731&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=55909c39babd76fec895858a365fdb8e7a407bd7

Download the post

Want to save the post for offline use on your device? Choose one of the download options below:

PDF TXT EPUB
Share
Share Tweet Reddit Email
Post Information
Title A female misandrist's handbook on how to destroy a man's life via false acussations
Author

Main-Camel2462

Upvotes 91
Comments 27
Date August 7, 2024 2:54 PM UTC
(1 year ago)
Subreddit Posted in /r/MensRights
Original Link https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1emdvsm/a_female_misandrists_handbook_on_how_to_destroy_a/
Archive Link https://theredarchive.com/r/MensRights/a-female-misandrists-handbook-on-how-to-destroy-a.1526633
https://theredarchive.com/post/1526633

Comments

[–]unknown_graduate 31 points32 points33 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

World is not safe anymore for men

[–]Surv1ver 23 points24 points25 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

WTF 🀯

[–]jessi387 16 points17 points18 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This should be shown to legal professionals so that they can anticipate how women abuse the system. Unfortunately I doubt anyone will care

[–]Reversegiraffe1 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Save that as a download. There should be a download option on the bottom right to save as PDF. Yoink! will be saving this and reading their strategies to defend myself against.

[–]randomthoughts1050 12 points13 points14 points 1 year ago (10 children) | Copy Link

Published 2018....

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (9 children) | Copy Link

So?

[–]randomthoughts1050 10 points11 points12 points 1 year ago (8 children) | Copy Link

What do you mean?

Aren't you astonished and appalled?

This information was published 6+ years ago. Probably been out much much longer, just compiled 6+ years ago.

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 7 points8 points9 points 1 year ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Never mind, I get it now. You mean this has been around for 6 years, and there still has been no backlash against it.

[–]randomthoughts1050 5 points6 points7 points 1 year ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Yep. Replied with more detail to your other reply.

Depending upon how widely distributed this is, it's downright frightening.

A) even if someone received it and didn't use the information, they kept the secret of fraudulent & illegal activities to manipulate the legal system.

B) if it was used, how often? This could distorts so much data, which is used to fund abuse shelters, pass legal laws, etc. Hell, even simple public opinion due to a distortion of data points.

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

Yeah. By the way, in case you were wondering, the reason I said "so?", is because there are certain people here who seem to think any news older than 5 or 10 years is "old news", therefore uninteresting. I've had people say we should ignore a 15-year-old study because "maybe it's not true anymore". Like the human race completely changes every 10 years or something. LMAO Anyway, getting late here, so I have to leave for the night now.

[–]DecrepitAbacus 4 points5 points6 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I've just retired after a lifetime's work as a data analyst and a lifetime interest in gender politics. Where matters of gender are concerned research from the eighties is often more reliable than much of what is published today.

[–]schtean 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

The first example they give of how these methods were used is the "victimization" of Harvey Weinstein.

[–]Vegetable_Ad1732 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

I don't see the pub date as all that significant here. Who cares if it was published 6 years ago? What difference does that make?

[–]Nidd1075 6 points7 points8 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I think the vilest thing about it is that the author (from what I've read) literally talks about which problems men face inside the system, in order to exploit said problems to enact this process.

Awful read, -∞ /10

[–]Current_Finding_4066 3 points4 points5 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Problem are men supporting such psychopaths.

[–]Emrys_Merlin 2 points3 points4 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

In case anyone doubts this is real: 1. Library of Congress: https://catalog.loc.gov/vwebv/search?searchCode=LCCN&searchArg=2018900514&searchType=1&permalink=y

2.Delaware Department of State: Divisions of Corporations listing for the publisher: https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx Search Lemons to Lemonade Publishing

[–]Fuzzy_Department2799 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago* (0 children) | Copy Link

I have had so many feminist deny that this book even exits. Even when i show it to them they deny it says what it obviously says. Its sad that so many women have been brainwashed by this cult.

[–]mahone007649 1 point2 points3 points 1 year ago (1 child) | Copy Link

This is going to be a shitshow dumpster fire for a lot of guys if this book becomes a best seller. I had a psycho woman scorned that threatened to do this to me and she came through big time because all they have to do is associate you with some nefarious deed and make a big enough stink about it that your reputation is ruined and depending upon your vocation they just don't want to be around anybody who would know a woman this crazy or disgusting that she would come up with these accusations and you are just as fucked as if the accusations were true. I had my whole life burned down all my clients chased away

[–]walterwallcarpet 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

This strategy for destroying an opponent is simply what women do, and have ALWAYS done. They marshal the resources of society against their chosen victim, a low-risk strategy for them personally. https://naturallawinstitute.com/2019/02/definition-gsrm-or-gsrrm/

When they invaded the workplace, they brought it with them. And, it's why so much female 'violence' is invisible. But, losing your job and reputation is no laughing matter.

Great Gaelic user name, by the way!!

[–]ArticleHelpful1173 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

when people evocates "free speech" as an argument, you know there is something wrong.

[–]schtean 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (5 children) | Copy Link

Not so sure this was written by a female misandrist. The first example the book gives of a victim is Harvey Weinstein. More likely it was written by someone posing as a misandrist.

[–]Main-Camel2462[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (4 children) | Copy Link

Well... the author presents themselves as "Angela" but you're right. It could be someone who is not female, though I do not doubt that the person is a misandrist, because if you don't want to harm men then you wouldn't provide a resource for people to do so. Even if you wanted to make certain people look bad, you still probably wouldn't do something that would help their cause so to speak. That wouldn't really add up. Though it could be possible, I suppose.

[–]schtean 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (2 children) | Copy Link

I (and I guess you also) see the book as ridiculous. Nobody should take it seriously, I take it as satire. Maybe it was paid for by Weinstein himself. IMO it is more likely written by a critic of feminism than by a misandrist.

That being said there are people who do use the system to their advantage and use the system to smear others.

[–]Main-Camel2462[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

Could be. It just seems too crazy for me to think that it is nothing more than satire. If the book truly is satire, then I don't see what is supposedly so funny or socially critical about a semi-functional handbook on how to create false allegations. Though I do agree that the book is ridiculous. None the less, it is still disturbing.

[–]schtean 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

I said I take it as satire but maybe that's the wrong way to think of it. I don't think it was intended as satire. I think it is written to try to make people who report harassment and assault look bad. Maybe in particular with respect to Weinstein.

[–][deleted] 1 year ago* (1 child) | Copy Link

[permanently deleted]

[–]Main-Camel2462[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 year ago (0 children) | Copy Link

Oh, thanks for the information

Browse all authors
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

Β© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter