Sex-without-consent trial seems to long, only if we had a word for that.

SnooBeans9101 · 2024-08-11T13:40:50+00:00

'Sex without consent' oh fuck off.

And they wonder why men are much more hesitant with women now.

SomeSugondeseGuy · 2024-08-11T13:54:37+00:00

Male victims are never going to be taken seriously are they

ReadItProper · 2024-08-11T13:57:59+00:00

Dude.

I wanna see a single article in the whole of the internet that calls it sex without consent when a man does it to a woman.

Is it really so hard to acknowledge that some women also do bad things? It's not a fucking competition. There are enough shitty people in the world, some of them can be women while still having plenty more men do shitty things.

Fuck me, these people.

Poly_and_RA · 2024-08-11T15:38:33+00:00

Is this a story from the UK?

In the UK the problem isn't with how the media report it, but with the blatant sexism of the law itself. UK law defines "rape" in such a manner that only penetration with the perpetrators penis counts as rape.

So no matter what a woman does to a man, or to another woman, it's not going to count as rape.

Yes that's blatantly misandrist and a disgrace. It's pretty telling that even in spaces that are *very* concerned with sexual abuse and rape, most people aren't even aware of this fact, much less actually CARE about it.

intactUS_throwaway · 2024-08-11T15:47:20+00:00

They have to call it that because of the way the law is written, unfortunately.

In this case, it isn't a media problem for once.

Tevorino · 2024-08-11T20:06:05+00:00

This trial was two years ago and ended with the jury apparently buying the defence's infuriating argument of incapability (or perhaps they were smart enough to reject that and believed that she was capable of doing this, but decided to give her word at least as much weight as his). No mention was made of the prosecution trying to rebut the defence by calling witnesses to testify to her capability (e.g. past sex partners who consensually had sex with her on top) even though, as far as I can tell (I'm not a lawyer), the prosecution was legally allowed to do that after the defence opened the door by putting that particular personal trait at issue.

shonmao · 2024-08-11T21:31:25+00:00

Hm. 2022.

2024-08-12T16:36:51+00:00

It's as-if feminists were pushing for that bs of "women can't rape" in order to skew the rape statistics.

Oh wait, that's what they're actually doing ! 🤮

oldaccountblocked · 2024-08-12T03:49:06+00:00

Sex without consent? Did you mean rape? Women can rape too.

Title	Sex-without-consent trial seems to long, only if we had a word for that.
Author	DevelopmentSad3095
Upvotes	179
Comments	41
Date	August 11, 2024 1:22 PM UTC (1 year ago)
Subreddit	Posted in /r/EverydayMisandry
Original Link	https://old.reddit.com/r/everydaymisandry/comments/1epkojr/sexwithoutconsent_trial_seems_to_long_only_if_we/
Archive Link	https://theredarchive.com/r/EverydayMisandry/sex-without-consent-trial-seems-to-long-only-if-we.1526998 https://theredarchive.com/post/1526998

Comments